EPDR1 up-regulation in human colorectal cancer is related to staging and favours cell proliferation and invasiveness.

The finding of novel molecular markers for prediction or prognosis of invasiveness in colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes an appealing challenge. Here we show the up-regulation of EPDR1 in a prospective cohort of 101 CRC patients, in a cDNA array of 43 patients and in in silico analyses. EPDR1 encodes a protein related to ependymins, a family of glycoproteins involved in intercellular contacts. A thorough statistical model allowed us to conclude that the gene is significantly up-regulated in tumour tissues when compared with normal mucosa. These results agree with those obtained by the analysis of three publicly available databases. EPDR1 up-regulation correlates with the TNM staging parameters, especially T and M. Studies with CRC cell lines revealed that the methylation of a CpG island controls EPDR1 expression. siRNA knocking-down and overexpression of the gene following transient plasmid transfection, showed that EPDR1 favours cell proliferation, migration, invasiveness and adhesion to type I collagen fibres, suggesting a role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Both statistical and functional analysis correlated EPDR1 overexpression with invasiveness and dissemination of tumour cells, supporting the inclusion of EPDR1 in panels of genes used to improve molecular subtyping of CRC. Eventually, EPDR1 may be an actionable target.

Ordered transcriptional factor recruitment and epigenetic regulation of tnf-alpha in necrotizing acute pancreatitis.

Tauhe expression of the critical initiator cytokine TNF-alpha was strongly upregulated in vivo in acute necrotic pancreatitis (AP) in rodents and in vitro in TNF-alpha activated acinar AR42J cells. Upregulation of tnf-alpha, inos, icam-1 and il-6 occurred both in TNF-alpha receptor 1 and 2 knock-out mice, but not in TNF-alpha knock-out mice, in cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that transcriptional factors (ELK-1, SP1, NF-kappaB and EGR-1) and chromatin modification complexes (HDAC1, HDAC2, GCN5, PCAF and CBP) were recruited and/or released from the promoter in a strictly ordered mechanism. Activation of tnf-alpha gene was also accompanied by an ordered increased level of histone H3K9, H3K14 and H3K18-acetylation and H3K4 methylation, as well as H4K5 acetylation. A better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that control tnf-alpha gene regulation will provide deeper understanding of the initiation and development of the inflammatory processes occurring in acute pancreatitis triggered by TNF-alpha cytokine.

PAP1 signaling involves MAPK signal transduction.

Pancreatitis-associated protein 1 (PAP1) belongs to the Reg family of secretory proteins. Several important biological roles have been attributed to PAP1 but the signaling pathways activated by this protein remain only partially understood. Here, we describe the intracellular pathways triggered by PAP1 in a pancreatic acinar cell line. Taking advantage of the fact that PAP1 induces its own transcription, we performed ChIP assays to analyze the recruitment of transcriptional factors on its promoter. Our results show that PAP1 increased the transactivation activity of pap1 and the binding on its promoter of the nuclear factors C/EBPbeta, P-CREB, P-ELK1, EGR1, STAT3, and ETS2, which are downstream targets of MAPK signaling. p44/42, p38, and JNK MAPKs activity increased after PAP1 treatment. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of these kinases markedly inhibited the induction of pap1 mRNA. Taken together, these results indicated that the mechanism of PAP1 action involves the activation of the MAPK superfamily.

Distinct site specificity of two pea histone deacetylase complexes.

We report on the site specificity of two intact pea histone deacetylase complexes. HD1 deacetylates lysines 5 and 16 of H4 in the order K16 > K5, while in the case of H3 the preferred order is K4 >> K18 approximately K9. The specificity of the HD2 complex is markedly different. The preferred residues in H4 are K8 approximately K5 > K16, while in H3 deacetylation, the complex HD2 prefers sites 4 and 18. To obtain these results, we have used a novel procedure based on the SPOT technique, a method to synthesize peptides on membrane supports. Different sets of membranes with sequentially overlapping histone peptides containing acetylated lysines in the sites corresponding to all in vivo acetylatable residues were incubated with the complexes. The acetyl groups removed by the deacetylase activity were then replaced by radioactive acetate by treating the membranes with labeled acetic anhydride. The subsequent counting of the membranes allows the quantification of the acetate removal in the histone deacetylase reaction in a way that circumvents some of the inconveniences of other available procedures.

DNA methylation and histone acetylation of rat methionine adenosyltransferase 1A and 2A genes is tissue-specific.

Methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) catalyzes the biosynthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet). In mammals MAT activity derives from two separate genes which display a tissue-specific pattern of expression. While MAT1A is expressed only in the adult liver, MAT2A is expressed in non-hepatic tissues. The mechanisms behind the selective expression of these two genes are not fully understood. In the present report we have evaluated MAT1A and MAT2A methylation in liver and in other tissues, such as kidney, by methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion of genomic DNA. Our data indicate that MAT1A is hypomethylated in liver and hypermethylated in non-expressing tissues. The opposite situation is found for MAT2A. Additionally, histones associated to MAT1A and MAT2A genes showed enhanced levels of acetylation in expressing tissues (two-fold for MAT1A and 3.5-fold for MAT2A liver and kidney respectively). These observations support a role for chromatin structure and its modification in the tissue-specific expression of both MAT genes.

Liver-specific methionine adenosyltransferase MAT1A gene expression is associated with a specific pattern of promoter methylation and histone acetylation: implications for MAT1A silencing during transformation.

Methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) is the enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet), the main donor of methyl groups in the cell. In mammals MAT is the product of two genes, MAT1A and MAT2A. MAT1A is expressed only in the mature liver whereas fetal hepatocytes, extrahepatic tissues and liver cancer cells express MAT2A. The mechanisms behind the tissue and differentiation state specific MAT1A expression are not known. In the present work we examined MAT1A promoter methylation status by means of methylation sensitive restriction enzyme analysis. Our data indicate that MAT1A promoter is hypomethylated in liver and hypermethylated in kidney and fetal rat hepatocytes, indicating that this modification is tissue specific and developmentally regulated. Immunoprecipitation of mononucleosomes from liver and kidney tissues with antibodies mainly specific to acetylated histone H4 and subsequent Southern blot analysis with a MAT1A promoter probe demonstrated that MAT1A expression is linked to elevated levels of chromatin acetylation. Early changes in MAT1A methylation are already observed in the precancerous cirrhotic livers from rats, which show reduced MAT1A expression. Human hepatoma cell lines in which MAT1A is not expressed were also hypermethylated at this locus. Finally we demonstrate that MAT1A expression is reactivated in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 treated with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine or the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin, suggesting a role for DNA hypermethylation and histone deacetylation in MAT1A silencing.

Interaction between N-terminal domain of H4 and DNA is regulated by the acetylation degree.

To study whether the acetylation of one or more of the four acetylatable lysines of histone H4 affects its binding to DNA, we have designed a protection experiment with a model system consisting in phage lambda DNA as substrate, StuI as restriction endonuclease and histone H4 with different degrees of acetylation as the protective agent. It can be deduced from the experimental data that the protection afforded by the histone is not dependent on the number of positive charges lost by acetylation. Thus, non-acetylated H4 and mono-acetylated H4 cause similar protection, while di-acetylation of the histone seems to be the crucial step in significantly weakening the interaction between H4 and DNA. This is confirmed by the results obtained in protection experiments carried out using H4 peptide (1-24) with different degrees of acetylation as the protecting agent. As restriction enzyme can imitate any trans-acting factor with sequence recognition, the di-acetylated isoform of histone H4 can be the starting point, through acetylation, to unmask DNA sequences, allowing the accessibility of regulatory factors to DNA in the chromatin.

Histone acetyltransferases during the cell cycle and differentiation of Physarum polycephalum.

The dynamic state of histone acetylation is maintained by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and deacetylases. Cellular fractionation of plasmodia of Physarum polycephalum and partial purification of subcellular fractions by chromatography revealed the existence of a cytoplasmic B-type and four nuclear A-type HATs. The cytoplasmic B-enzyme was highly specific for histone H4, causing di-acetylation of H4 in vitro. The nuclear enzymes (HAT-A1 to HAT-A4) accepted all core histones as substrates, but differed by the preference for certain histone species. Enzymes were analyzed during the naturally synchronous cell cycle of macroplasmodia. Each of the enzymes had its individual cell cycle activity pattern, indicating diverse functions in nuclear metabolism. When growing plasmodia were induced to undergo differentiation into dormant sclerotia, an additional enzyme (HAT-AS) appeared at a late stage of sclerotization which correlated with differentiation-specific histone synthesis and acetylation in the absence of DNA replication. When dormant sclerotia were induced to reenter the cell cycle, a further enzyme form (HAT-AG) appeared during a short time period prior to the first post-germination mitosis. This enzyme had a strong preference for H2B, correlating with the overproportional in vivo acetate incorporation in H2B. Both differentiation-associated HATs were undetectable in growing plasmodia. The results demonstrate that different functions of core histone acetylation are based on multiple enzyme forms that are independently regulated during the cell cycle. Transitions from one developmental stage into another are accompanied by specific enzyme forms. With respect to recent data in the literature it may be assumed that these HAT-forms are subunits of a HAT-complex whose composition changes during the cell cycle and differentiation.

Subcellular location of enzymes involved in core histone acetylation.

Multiple enzyme forms of histone deacetylase and histone acetyltransferase exist in germinating maize embryos. We analyzed the association of the different enzymes to chromatin by ion exchange chromatography of subcellular fractions from different time points of embryo germination. The vast majority of histone deacetylase HD-1A was not bound to chromatin, since it was solubilized during chromatin isolation, regardless of its phosphorylation state and the phase of embryo germination. In contrast, HD-2 was chromatin bound during the entire germination pathway. Histone deacetylase HD-1B was present in a chromatin-bound and a soluble form; the ratio between these two forms changed during germination. Both nuclear histone acetyltransferases, HAT-A1 and HAT-A2, were tightly chromatin-bound and could only be released from chromatin by salt extraction. To test whether histone acetyltransferases or deacetylases are associated with the nuclear matrix, we analyzed nuclear matrix preparations from yeast, Physarum, and maize step by step for both enzyme activities. This analysis confirmed that part of the activity is chromatin bound, but no significant enzyme activity could be found in the final nuclear matrix, regardless of the preparation protocol. This result was further substantiated by detailed analysis of histone deacetylases and acetyltransferases during cellular fractionation and nuclear matrix preparation of chicken erythrocytes. Altogether our results suggest that the participation of these enzymes in different nuclear processes may partly be regulated by a distinct location to intranuclear components.

Properties of the yeast nuclear histone deacetylase.

A nuclear histone deacetylase from yeast was partially purified and some of its characteristics were studied. Histone deacetylase activity was stimulated in vitro by high-mobility-group nonhistone chromatin proteins 1 and 2 and ubiquitin and inhibited by spermine and spermidine, whereas n-butyrate had no significant inhibitory effect. Like the mammalian enzyme, partially purified histone deacetylase from yeast was strongly inhibited by trichostatin A. However, in crude extract preparations the yeast enzyme was not inhibited and treatment with trichostatin in vivo did not show any effect, either on the histone acetylation level or on cell viability. At low ionic strength, the enzyme can be isolated as a complex of high molecular mass that is much less inhibited by trichostatin A than is partially purified histone deacetylase activity. Furthermore, radiolabelled oligonucleosomes were more efficiently deacetylated by the complex than by the low-molecular-mass form of the enzyme. The histone deacetylase activity was separated from a polyamine deacetylase activity and its specificity studied. Using h.p.l.c.-purified core histone species as substrate, histone deacetylase from yeast is able to deacetylate all core histones with a slight preference for H3. Our results support the idea that the yeast histone deacetylase may act as a high-molecular-mass complex in vivo.

Histone deacetylase. A key enzyme for the binding of regulatory proteins to chromatin.

Core histones can be modified by reversible, posttranslational acetylation of specific lysine residues within the N-terminal protein domains. The dynamic equilibrium of acetylation is maintained by two enzyme activities, histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase. Recent data on histone deacetylases and on anionic motifs in chromatin- or DNA-binding regulatory proteins (e.g. transcription factors, nuclear proto-oncogenes) are summarized and united into a hypothesis which attributes a key function to histone deacetylation for the binding of regulatory proteins to chromatin by a transient, specific local increase of the positive charge in the N-terminal domains of nucleosomal core histones. According to our model, the rapid deacetylation of distinct lysines in especially H2A and H2B would facilitate the association of anionic protein domains of regulatory proteins to specific nucleosomes. Therefore histone deacetylation (histone deacetylases) may represent a unique regulatory mechanism in the early steps of gene activation, in contrast to the more structural role of histone acetylation (histone acetyltransferases) for nucleosomal transitions during the actual transcription process.

Specificity of Zea mays histone deacetylase is regulated by phosphorylation.

Mono Q ion exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) reveals that the main histone deacetylase activity (HD1) of germinating Zea mays embryos consists of multiple enzyme forms. Chromatography of HD1 after treatment with alkaline phosphatase yields two distinct histone deacetylase forms (HD1-A, HD1-B). The same is true for chromatography after phosphatase treatment of a total cell extract. One of these enzyme forms (HD1-A) is subject to phosphorylation, which causes a change in the substrate specificity of the enzyme, as shown with HPLC-purified individual core histone species; the substrate specificity for H2A increases more than 2-fold after phosphorylation, whereas the specificity for H3 decreases to about 60%. The total histone deacetylase activity is quantitatively released from isolated nuclei after extraction with moderate ionic strength buffers; no significant residual enzyme activity could be detected in the nuclear matrix.

Enzymes involved in the dynamic equilibrium of core histone acetylation of Physarum polycephalum.

DEAE-Sepharose chromatography of extracts from plasmodia of the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum revealed the presence of multiple histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. A cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase B, specific for histone H4, and two nuclear acetyltransferases A1 and A2 were identified; A1 acetylates all core histones with a preference for H3 and H2A, whereas A2 is specific for H3 and also slightly for H2B. Two histone deacetylases, HD1 and HD2, could be discriminated. They differ with respect to substrate specificity and pH dependence. For the first time the substrate specificity of histone deacetylases was determined using HPLC-purified individual core histone species. The order of acetylated substrate preference is H2A much greater than H3 greater than or equal to H4 greater than H2B for HD1 and H3 greater than H2A greater than H4 for HD2, respectively; HD2 is inactive with H2B as substrate. Moreover histone deacetylases are very sensitive to butyrate, since 2 mM butyrate leads to more than 50% inhibition of enzyme activity.

Histone acetylation in Zea mays.I. Activities of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases.

DEAE-Sepharose chromatography of extracts from Zea mays meristematic cells revealed multiple histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase enzyme forms. An improved method for nuclear isolation allowed us to discriminate nuclear and cytoplasmic enzymes. Two nuclear histone acetyltransferases, A1 and A2, a cytoplasmic B-enzyme and two nuclear histone deacetylases, HD1 and HD2, have been identified. The histone specificity of the different enzyme forms has been studied in an in vitro system, using chicken erythrocyte histones as substrate. The cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase B is the predominant enzyme, which acetylates mainly histone H4 and to a lesser extent H2A. The nuclear histone acetyltransferase A1 preferentially acetylates H3 and also H4, whereas enzyme A2 is specific for H3. This substrate specificity was confirmed with homologous Z. mays histones. The two histone deacetylases differ from each other with respect to ionic strength dependence, inhibition by acetate and butyrate, and substrate specificity. The strong inhibitory effect of acetate on histone deacetylases was exploited to distinguish different histone acetyltransferase forms.

Histone acetylation in Zea mays. II. Biological significance of post-translational histone acetylation during embryo germination.

Multiple forms of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases, which have been separated and characterized in the accompanying manuscript (López-Rodas, G., Georgieva, E. I., Sendra, R., and Loidl, P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18745-18750), together with in vivo acetate incorporation, were studied during the germination of Zea mays embryos. Total histone acetyltransferase activity increases during germination with two maxima at 40 and 72 h after start of germination. This fluctuation is mainly due to the cytoplasmic B-enzyme which predominantly acetylates histone H4 up to the diacetylated form. The nuclear histone acetyltransferase A2, specific for H3, is low throughout germination, except at 24 h, when it transiently becomes the main activity. Both enzymes are also present in the dry embryo, whereas the second nuclear enzyme A1, specific for H3 and H4, is absent in the initial stage of differentiation. The two histone deacetylases, HD1 and HD2, exhibit entirely different patterns. Whereas HD1 activity is low in the dry embryo and increases during germination, HD2 is the predominant enzyme at the start of differentiation, but almost disappears at later stages. Analysis of the in vivo acetate incorporation reveals that H4 is present in up to tetraacetylated subspecies. The pattern of acetate incorporation into core histones closely resembles the fluctuations of histone acetyltransferase B. Based on the analysis of thymidine kinase activity a close correlation was established between histone acetyltransferase B and DNA replication, whereas the A2 enzyme is associated with transcriptional activity. Histone deacetylase HD1 obviously serves a specific function in the dry embryo and could be a prerequisite for DNA repair processes. The study confirms the idea of DNA repair processes. The study confirms the idea of multiple functions of histone acetylation and assigns distinct enzymes, involved in this modification, to certain nuclear processes.

Subcellular localization and nucleosome specificity of yeast histone acetyltransferases.

We have previously reported [López-Rodas et al. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19028-19033] that the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains four histone acetyltransferases, which can be resolved by ion-exchange chromatography, and their specificity toward yeast free histones was studied. In the present contribution we show that three of the enzymes are nuclear, type A histone acetyltransferases and they are able to acetylate nucleosome-bound histones. They differ in their histone specificity. Enzyme A1 acetylates H2A in chicken nucleosomes, although it is specific for yeast free H2B; histone acetyltransferase A2 is highly specific for H3, and histone acetyltransferase A3 preparations acetylate both H3 and H4 in nucleosomes. The fourth enzyme, which is located in the cytoplasm, does not accept nucleosomes as substrate, and it represents a canonical type B, H4-specific histone acetyltransferase. Finally, histone deacetylase activity is preferentially found in the nucleus.

Yeast contains multiple forms of histone acetyltransferase.

We have assayed several methods to quantitatively recover yeast histone acetyltransferases in an attempt to study the multiplicity of enzymatic activities. Two methods, namely (NH4)2SO4 precipitation and salt dissociation of chromatin in 0.5 M NaCl, yielded convenient preparations of total histone acetyltransferases. DEAE-Sepharose chromatography of the crude extracts resulted in the separation of three peaks of activity when total yeast histones were used as substrate. However, the scanning of the enzymatic activity toward individual histones along the chromatography, achieved by determining the specific activity of the individual histones after incubating whole histones and [14C]acetyl-CoA with the chromatographic fractions, yielded four peaks. The first two peaks showed specificity toward H2B and H3, respectively. Although they partially overlapped, rechromatography on cation exchangers allowed us to resolve the two activities, and several criteria were used to prove that they correspond to different enzyme molecules. The last two peaks were H4-specific, but the present data suggest that one of the activities is chromatin-bound, whereas the other surely corresponds to the cytoplasmic B-form of the enzyme. The enzyme specific for yeast H2B acetylates chicken erythrocyte H2A, rather than H2B. The detected multiplicity of yeast histone acetyltransferases may correspond to the multiplicity of roles proposed for histone acetylation.

Partial purification and properties of two histone acetyltransferases from the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Two histone acetyltransferases, A and B, have been extracted and partially purified from yeast cells. The purification scheme included ammonium sulfate precipitation, and chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose and Sephadex G-200. The basic properties of both enzymes closely correspond to those of acetyltransferase A and B found in higher eucaryotes. Yeast enzyme A elutes from DEAE-Sepharose prior to acetyltransferase B, and it is activated by low concentrations of DNA and strongly inhibited by p-chloromercuribenzoate (PCMB). Enzyme B is inhibited by DNA over the entire range of concentrations tested and it is less sensitive to PCMB than enzyme A. When assayed with yeast whole histones, enzyme B shows a marked specificity toward histone H4, although H3 and H2B are also accepted as substrates. Enzyme A preferentially catalyzes the acetylation of yeast H2B and H3, with the other two core histones being acetylated to a much lesser extent.