Randomized clinical trial on the clinical effects of a toothpaste containing extra virgin olive oil, xylitol, and betaine in gingivitis.

To determine the effects on gingival bleeding, dental biofilm, and salivary flow and pH in patients with gingivitis of using toothpaste with extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), xylitol, and betaine in comparison to a placebo or commercial toothpaste. This controlled, double blinded, and multicenter randomized clinical trial included patients with gingivitis randomly assigned to one of three groups: test group (EVOO, xylitol, and betaine toothpaste), control group 1 (placebo toothpaste), or control group 2 (commercial toothpaste). Percentage supragingival biofilm and gingival bleeding were evaluated at baseline (T0), 2 months (T2), and 4 months (T4), measuring non-stimulated salivary flow and salivary pH. Comparisons were performed between and within groups. The final study sample comprised 20 in the test group, 21 in control group 1, and 20 in control group 2. In comparison to control group 1, the test group showed significantly greater decreases in gingival bleeding between T4 and T0 (p = 0.02) and in biofilm between T2 and T0 (p = 0.02) and between T4 and T0 (p = 0.01). In the test group, salivary flow significantly increased between T2 and T0 (p = 0.01), while pH alkalization was significantly greater between T4 and T0 versus control group 2 (p = 0.01) and close-to-significantly greater versus control group 1 (p = 0.06). The toothpaste with EVOO, xylitol, and betaine obtained the best outcomes in patients with gingivitis, who showed reductions in gingival bleeding and supragingival biofilm and an increase in pH at 4 months in comparison to a commercial toothpaste.

Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate in vivo the color agreement between natural teeth and dental shade guides by means of visual and instrumental coverage error ([Formula: see text]) index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The color of the middle third of 735 incisors was visually determined by two evaluators using the Vita Classical (VC) and Vita 3D Master (V3DM) shade guides. The color match between the natural tooth and the shade tab was rated as poor (P), good (G), or optimum (O) by each observer. CIE color coordinates of the target teeth and shade tabs of VC and V3DM were instrumentally measured using a clinical spectrophotometer. Visual ([Formula: see text]) and instrumental ([Formula: see text]) coverage error indexes were computed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 metrics for both shade guides. For [Formula: see text] calculation, only the concordant inter-observer determination on tooth shade rated as O-O or O-G was used. The results were evaluated using perceptibility (PT, [Formula: see text]= 1.2, [Formula: see text]= 0.8) and acceptability (AT, [Formula: see text]= 2.7, [Formula: see text]= 1.8) color thresholds for dentistry. RESULTS: VC and V3DM exhibited [Formula: see text] (2.5, 3.2, and 3.2, 2.7 CIELAB units; 1.9, 2.3, and 2.8, 2.4 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O-O and O-G match) and [Formula: see text] (4.7, 4.8, and 4.1, 4.6 CIELAB units; 3.3, 3.4, and 3.4, 3.6 CIEDE2000 units, respectively, for O-O and O-G match) values greater than 50:50% AT for both color difference formulas. [Formula: see text] contributes more than 50% (53.2-82.4% range) to the [Formula: see text] value. This contribution depends on the shade guide used and the quality of the visual rating. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated shade guides exhibited visual coverage errors above acceptability thresholds, largely due to the contribution of the instrumental coverage error to the visual coverage error. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It necessary to further improve commercially available dental shade guides to facilitate achievement of satisfactory esthetics results in clinical practice.