Morbidity and mortality in hip surgery patients due to fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 epidemic generated major changes in general surgical management protocols. The literature has reported high mortality rates for hip fracture surgery in patients with COVID-19. This study describes the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery due to hip fractures in 12 Colombian institutions between March and September 2020. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective observational descriptive study. Medical records of 12 hospitals were reviewed. Consecutive patients who underwent hip fracture surgery from March 6 to September 6, 2020, were included. Data collected were sociodemographic profile, type of fracture, surgical treatment, complications, and early (1 month) or mid-term (1-6 months) mortality associated or not with COVID-19. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty patients with hip fractures requiring surgery in the 12 institutions were included. 364 (70%) were women; mean age was 77.7 years (SD: 13.8), mean BMI was 25.1, 91.73% of patients had at least one comorbidity, 60.38% were classified as ASA II and 25.77% as ASA III. There were 267 (51.34%) pertrochanteric fractures, 227 (43.65%) femoral neck fractures, and 26 (5.0%) subtrochanteric fractures. 274 (52.69%) patients were treated with osteosynthesis, 244 (46.92%) with arthroplasty, and 2 (0.38%) with girdlestone. Surgery was performed less than 24 h after the fracture for 115 (22.11%) patients, between 24 and 72 h for 208 (40.0%) patients, and more than 72 h for 197 (37.88%) patients. One hundred six patients in total suffered a medical or surgical complication throughout the different follow-up stages, amongst the most frequent were respiratory failure, coronary events, surgical site infection, cutting-out and peri­implant fracture. 25 (4.8%) patients required attention in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). 13 patients had COVID-19 throughout the follow-up period. 27 patients died due to any cause, and 3 of them had reported a positive COVID-19 test any time during follow-up period, of which one died during the first month, and two died between 1 and 6 months. Statistically significant associations were found between age older than 75 years old, ASA classification, ICU requirement, and death. CONCLUSION: 520 patients received surgical treatment for hip fracture during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 12 medical centers in Colombia. 21.10% suffered a complication during the early stage (30 days) and 4.77% during the midterm stage (1-6 months). 4.8% were admitted in the ICU during the early stage. All-cause death was 27 patients, early death was 11 (40.74%) and midterm death was 16 (59.25%). 13 patients were positive for COVID-19, 3 died, one (1/5=20%) on the first 30 days and the other two (2/8=25%) from month 1 to 6.

Copas de doble movilidad cementadas: sobrevida, indicaciones y medición de la calidad de vida / Cemented double mobility cups: Survival, indications and measurement of quality of life

Introducción Las copas de doble movilidad son implantes en que se introduce una cabeza protésica en un núcleo de polietileno, el cual posteriormente se articula con una copa metálica implantada en el acetábulo. Este tipo de diseño desarrollado en Francia desde la década de 1970ha demostrado disminuir el riesgo de luxación en un remplazo total de cadera. Estas copas han sido utilizadas históricamente de forma no cementada. No obstante, actualmente se pueden utilizar copas cementadas. Los objetivos de este estudio son determinar la sobrevida de las copas de doble movilidad cementadas y medir la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Materiales y métodos Se realiza un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, cuya indicación para la cirugía sea fracturas (61,5%), artrosis (34,6%) o tumores (3,8%). El análisis se realizó con los pacientes operados entre los años 2011-2013 y se encontraron 82 caderas operadas con copas de doble movilidad cementadas con un promedio de edad de 76 años. Resultados Se revisó una copa de doble movilidad por infección; por tanto, se obtuvo una sobrevida del 97,6% con un promedio de tiempo de seguimiento de 33,7 (29,7-37,7) meses con un IC 95%, y un promedio en la escala de Oxford de 38,2 (34,8-41,7) con un IC 95%. Discusión Se pudo concluir que la tasa de sobrevida es óptima para el tiempo de seguimiento y el puntaje promedio en la escala de Oxford es bueno si se tienen en cuenta las comorbilidades y la media de edad de los pacientes. Nivel de evidencia clínica. Nivel IV.

Background The dual mobility cups are implants where a prosthetic head is introduced into a polyethylene core, which is subsequently articulated with a metal cup to be implanted in the acetabulum. This type of design developed in France since the seventies has shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in total hip replacement. These cups have been used historically cementless, however now can be use cemented. The objectives are to determine the survival of double cemented mobility cups and to measure the quality of life of patients. Materials and methods A retrospective multicenter study was made. Patients who underwent primary surgery and whose indication for surgery is fractures (61.5%), osteoarthritis (34.6%) or tumors (3.8%) were included. The analysis was performed with patients operated between 2011 and 2013. Results The study was based in 82 hips operated with dual mobility cemented cups with a patient's average age of 76 (13.4) years old. A dual mobility cup was checked for infection therefore obtaining a survival rate of 97.6% and an average follow up of 33.7 months with 95% CI (29,7-37,7) and an average in the Oxford scale of 38.2 with 95% CI (34,8-41,7) Discussion It was concluded that the survival rate is optimal taking into account the follow up time and the average score on Oxford scale were good considering comorbidities and the average age of patients. Evidence level. IV.

Injertos oseos estructurales para la reconstrucción acetabular en artoplastia total de cadera primaria y de revisión con severa deficiencia osea / Solid acetabular bone grafts in reconstruction of severe bone stock deficiency

Los injertos óseos estructurales para la reconstrucción acetabular son tema de gran controversia hoy en día. En la literatura encontramos reportes que muestran que los resultados a largo plazo son malos y que son sólo una solución temporal. Con base a esta premisa nosotros revisamos un grupo de 24 pacientes con injertos estructurales con un seguimiento promedio de 12.5 años, rango entre 10 y 18 años y obtuvimos buenos resultados en un 87.5 por ciento. Concluímos que el éxito del resultado esta directamente relacionado con la técnica quirúrgica y que en casos en que no se tenga una opción diferente, los injertos acetabulares estructurales son una solución definitiva siempre y cuando la técnica quirúrgica sea adecuada