[Interoperability Working Group: core dataset and information systems for data integration and data exchange in the Medical Informatics Initiative]. / Arbeitsgruppe Interoperabilität: Kerndatensatz und Informationssysteme für Integration und Austausch von Daten in der Medizininformatik-Initiative.

The interoperability Working Group of the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) is the platform for the coordination of overarching procedures, data structures, and interfaces between the data integration centers (DIC) of the university hospitals and national and international interoperability committees. The goal is the joint content-related and technical design of a distributed infrastructure for the secondary use of healthcare data that can be used via the Research Data Portal for Health. Important general conditions are data privacy and IT security for the use of health data in biomedical research. To this end, suitable methods are used in dedicated task forces to enable procedural, syntactic, and semantic interoperability for data use projects. The MII core dataset was developed as several modules with corresponding information models and implemented using the HL7® FHIR® standard to enable content-related and technical specifications for the interoperable provision of healthcare data through the DIC. International terminologies and consented metadata are used to describe these data in more detail. The overall architecture, including overarching interfaces, implements the methodological and legal requirements for a distributed data use infrastructure, for example, by providing pseudonymized data or by federated analyses. With these results of the Interoperability Working Group, the MII is presenting a future-oriented solution for the exchange and use of healthcare data, the applicability of which goes beyond the purpose of research and can play an essential role in the digital transformation of the healthcare system.

Bringing Communities Together: Mapping the Investigation-Study-Assay-Model (ISA) to Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR).

Adhering to FAIR principles (findability, accessibility, interoperability, reusability) ensures sustainability and reliable exchange of data and metadata. Research communities need common infrastructures and information models to collect, store, manage and work with data and metadata. The German initiative NFDI4Health created a metadata schema and an infrastructure integrating existing platforms based on different information models and standards. To ensure system compatibility and enhance data integration possibilities, we mapped the Investigation-Study-Assay (ISA) model to Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). We present the mapping in FHIR logical models, a resulting FHIR resources' network and challenges that we encountered. Challenges mainly related to ISA's genericness, and to different structures and datatypes used in ISA and FHIR. Mapping ISA to FHIR is feasible but requires further analyses of example data and adaptations to better specify target FHIR elements, and enable possible automatized conversions from ISA to FHIR.

Assessing the use of HL7 FHIR for implementing the FAIR guiding principles: a case study of the MIMIC-IV Emergency Department module.

Objectives: To provide a real-world example on how and to what extent Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) implements the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles for scientific data. Additionally, presents a list of FAIR implementation choices for supporting future FAIR implementations that use FHIR. Materials and methods: A case study was conducted on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Emergency Department (MIMIC-ED) dataset, a deidentified clinical dataset converted into FHIR. The FAIRness of this dataset was assessed using a set of common FAIR assessment indicators. Results: The FHIR distribution of MIMIC-ED, comprising an implementation guide and demo data, was more FAIR compared to the non-FHIR distribution. The FAIRness score increased from 60 to 82 out of 95 points, a relative improvement of 37%. The most notable improvements were observed in interoperability, with a score increase from 5 to 19 out of 19 points, and reusability, with a score increase from 8 to 14 out of 24 points. A total of 14 FAIR implementation choices were identified. Discussion: Our work examined how and to what extent the FHIR standard contributes to FAIR data. Challenges arose from interpreting the FAIR assessment indicators. This study stands out for providing a real-world example of a dataset that was made more FAIR using FHIR. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that formally assessed the conformance of a FHIR dataset to the FAIR principles. FHIR improved the accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of MIMIC-ED. Future research should focus on implementing FHIR in research data infrastructures.

Modeling the Application of IHE QRPH Profiles in Data Integration Centers: A Practical Approach with 3LGM2.

The Data Integration Centers (DICs), all part of the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII), prepare routine care data captured in university hospitals to enable its reuse in clinical research. Tackling this challenging task requires them to maintain multiple data stores, implement the necessary transformation processes, and provide the required terminology services, all while also addressing the use case specific needs researchers might have. An MII wide application of the standardized profiles defined in the IHE QRPH domain might therefore be able to drastically reduce the overhead at any one DIC. The MII DIC reference model built in 3LGM2, a method to describe complex information system architectures, serves as a starting point to evaluate whether such an application is possible. We first extend the IHE modeling capabilities of 3LGM2 to also support the five profiles from the QRPH domain that our experts evaluated as relevant in the MII DIC context. We then expand the DIC reference model by some IHE QRPH actors and transactions, showing that their application could be beneficial in the MII DIC context, provided they surpass their trial status.

A Tool for Specifying Data Quality Checks for Clinical Data Management Systems - A Technical Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Prospective data collection in clinical trials is considered the gold standard of clinical research. Validating data entered in input fields in case report forms is unavoidable to maintain good data quality. Data quality checks include both the conformance of individual inputs to the specification of the data element, the detection of missing values, and the plausibility of the values entered. STATE-OF-THE-ART: Besides Libre-/OpenClinica there are many applications for capturing clinical data. While most of them have a commercial approach, free and open-source solutions lack intuitive operation. CONCEPT: Our ocRuleTool is made for the specific use case to write validation rules for Open-/LibreClinica, a clinical study management software for designing case report forms and managing medical data in clinical trials. It addresses parts of all three categories of data quality checks mentioned above. IMPLEMENTATION: The required rules and error messages are entered in the normative Excel specification and then converted to an XML document which can be uploaded to Open-/LibreClinica. The advantage of this intermediate step is a better readability as the complex XML elements are broken down into easy to fill out columns in Excel. The tool then generates the ready to use XML file by itself. LESSONS LEARNED: This approach saves time, is less error-prone and allows collaboration with clinicians on improving data quality. CONCLUSION: Our ocRuleTool has proven useful in over a dozen studies. We hope to increase the user base by releasing it to open source on GitHub.

Pitfalls in Analyzing FHIR Data from Different University Hospitals.

The German Medical Informatics Initiative has agreed on a HL7 FHIR-based core data set as the common data model that all 37 university hospitals use for their patient's data. These data are stored locally at the site but are centrally queryable for researchers and accessible upon request. This infrastructure is currently under construction, and its functionality is being tested by so-called Projectathons. In the 6th Projectathon, a clinical hypothesis was formulated, executed in a multicenter scenario, and its results were analyzed. A number of oddities emerged in the analysis of data from different sites. Biometricians, who had previously performed analyses in prospective data collection settings such as clinical trials or cohorts, were not consistently aware of these idiosyncrasies. This field report describes data quality problems that have occurred, although not all are genuine errors. The aim is to point out such circumstances of data generation that may affect statistical analysis.

Concept for a Basic ISO 14721 Archive Information Package for Clinical Studies.

Secondary use of medical data for research is desirable for intrinsic, ethical and financial reasons. In this context, the question becomes relevant as to how such datasets are to be made accessible to a larger target group in the long term. Typically, datasets are not extracted ad hoc from the primary systems, because they are processed qualitatively (FAIR data). Special data repositories are currently being built for this purpose. This paper examines the requirements for the reuse of clinical trial data in a data repository utilizing the Open Archiving Information System (OAIS) reference model. In particular, a concept for an Archive Information Package (AIP) is developed with the central focus on a cost-effective trade-off between the effort of creation for the data producer and the comprehensibility of the data for the data consumer.

Identifying Relevant FHIR Elements for Data Quality Assessment in the German Core Data Set.

The German Medical Informatics Initiative makes clinical routine data available for biomedical research. In total, 37 university hospitals have set up so-called data integration centers to facilitate this data reuse. A standardized set of HL7 FHIR profiles ("MII Core Data Set") defines the common data model across all centers. Regular Projectathons ensure continuous evaluation of the implemented data sharing processes on artificial and real-world clinical use cases. In this context, FHIR continues to rise in popularity for exchanging patient care data. As reusing data from patient care in clinical research requires high trust in the data, data quality assessments are a key point of concern in the data sharing process. To support the setup of data quality assessments within data integration centers, we suggest a process for finding elements of interest from FHIR profiles. We focus on the specific data quality measures defined by Kahn et al.

A Data Transformation Methodology to Create Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Health Data: Software Design, Development, and Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: Sharing health data is challenging because of several technical, ethical, and regulatory issues. The Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles have been conceptualized to enable data interoperability. Many studies provide implementation guidelines, assessment metrics, and software to achieve FAIR-compliant data, especially for health data sets. Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is a health data content modeling and exchange standard. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to devise a new methodology to extract, transform, and load existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR repositories in line with FAIR principles, develop a Data Curation Tool to implement the methodology, and evaluate it on health data sets from 2 different but complementary institutions. We aimed to increase the level of compliance with FAIR principles of existing health data sets through standardization and facilitate health data sharing by eliminating the associated technical barriers. METHODS: Our approach automatically processes the capabilities of a given FHIR end point and directs the user while configuring mappings according to the rules enforced by FHIR profile definitions. Code system mappings can be configured for terminology translations through automatic use of FHIR resources. The validity of the created FHIR resources can be automatically checked, and the software does not allow invalid resources to be persisted. At each stage of our data transformation methodology, we used particular FHIR-based techniques so that the resulting data set could be evaluated as FAIR. We performed a data-centric evaluation of our methodology on health data sets from 2 different institutions. RESULTS: Through an intuitive graphical user interface, users are prompted to configure the mappings into FHIR resource types with respect to the restrictions of selected profiles. Once the mappings are developed, our approach can syntactically and semantically transform existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR without loss of data utility according to our privacy-concerned criteria. In addition to the mapped resource types, behind the scenes, we create additional FHIR resources to satisfy several FAIR criteria. According to the data maturity indicators and evaluation methods of the FAIR Data Maturity Model, we achieved the maximum level (level 5) for being Findable, Accessible, and Interoperable and level 3 for being Reusable. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and extensively evaluated our data transformation approach to unlock the value of existing health data residing in disparate data silos to make them available for sharing according to the FAIR principles. We showed that our method can successfully transform existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR without loss of data utility, and the result is FAIR in terms of the FAIR Data Maturity Model. We support institutional migration to HL7 FHIR, which not only leads to FAIR data sharing but also eases the integration with different research networks.

The Leipzig Health Atlas-An Open Platform to Present, Archive, and Share Biomedical Data, Analyses, and Models Online.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials, epidemiological studies, clinical registries, and other prospective research projects, together with patient care services, are main sources of data in the medical research domain. They serve often as a basis for secondary research in evidence-based medicine, prediction models for disease, and its progression. This data are often neither sufficiently described nor accessible. Related models are often not accessible as a functional program tool for interested users from the health care and biomedical domains. OBJECTIVE: The interdisciplinary project Leipzig Health Atlas (LHA) was developed to close this gap. LHA is an online platform that serves as a sustainable archive providing medical data, metadata, models, and novel phenotypes from clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and other medical research projects. METHODS: Data, models, and phenotypes are described by semantically rich metadata. The platform prefers to share data and models presented in original publications but is also open for nonpublished data. LHA provides and associates unique permanent identifiers for each dataset and model. Hence, the platform can be used to share prepared, quality-assured datasets and models while they are referenced in publications. All managed data, models, and phenotypes in LHA follow the FAIR principles, with public availability or restricted access for specific user groups. RESULTS: The LHA platform is in productive mode (https://www.health-atlas.de/). It is already used by a variety of clinical trial and research groups and is becoming increasingly popular also in the biomedical community. LHA is an integral part of the forthcoming initiative building a national research data infrastructure for health in Germany.

A Formal Model for the FAIR4Health Information Architecture.

In the EU project FAIR4Health, a ETL pipeline for the FAIRification of structured health data as well as an agent-based, distributed query platform for the analysis of research hypotheses and the training of machine learning models were developed. The system has been successfully tested in two clinical use cases with patient data from five university hospitals. Currently, the solution is also being considered for use in other hospitals. However, configuring the system and deploying it in the local IT architecture is non-trivial and meets with understandable concerns about security. This paper presents a model for describing the information architecture based on a formal approach, the 3LGM metamodel. The model was evaluated by the developers. As a result, the clear separation of tasks and the software components that implement them as well as the rich description of interactions via interfaces were positively emphasized.

FAIRness for FHIR: Towards Making Health Datasets FAIR Using HL7 FHIR.

Medical data science aims to facilitate knowledge discovery assisting in data, algorithms, and results analysis. The FAIR principles aim to guide scientific data management and stewardship, and are relevant to all digital health ecosystem stakeholders. The FAIR4Health project aims to facilitate and encourage the health research community to reuse datasets derived from publicly funded research initiatives using the FAIR principles. The 'FAIRness for FHIR' project aims to provide guidance on how HL7 FHIR could be utilized as a common data model to support the health datasets FAIRification process. This first expected result is an HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide (IG) called FHIR4FAIR, covering how FHIR can be used to cover FAIRification in different scenarios. This IG aims to provide practical underpinnings for the FAIR4Health FAIRification workflow as a domain-specific extension of the GoFAIR process, while simplifying curation, advancing interoperability, and providing insights into a roadmap for health datasets FAIR certification.

Improving Findability of Digital Assets in Research Data Repositories Using the W3C DCAT Vocabulary.

Research data management requires stable, trustworthy repositories to safeguard scientific research results. In this context, rich markup with metadata is crucial for the discoverability and interpretability of the relevant resources. SEEK is a web-based software to manage all important artifacts of a research project, including project structures, involved actors, documents and datasets. SEEK is organized along the ISA model (Investigation - Study - Assay). It offers several machine-readable serializations, including JSON and RDF. In this paper, we extend the power of RDF serialization by leveraging the W3C Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT). DCAT was specifically designed to improve interoperability between digital assets on the Web and enables cross-domain markup. By using community-consented gold standard vocabularies and a formal knowledge description language, findability and interoperability according to the FAIR principles are significantly improved.

Implementation of a Clinical Trial Recruitment Support System Based on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) in a Cardiology Department.

Clinical Trial Recruitment Support Systems can booster patient inclusion of clinical trials by automatically analyzing eligibility criteria based on electronic health records. However, missing interoperability has hindered introduction of those systems on a broader scale. Therefore, our aim was to develop a recruitment support system based on FHIR R4 and evaluate its usage and features in a cardiology department. Clinical conditions, anamnesis, examinations, allergies, medication, laboratory data and echocardiography results were imported as FHIR resources. Clinical trial information, eligibility criteria and recruitment status were recorded using the appropriate FHIR resources without extensions. Eligibility criteria linked by the logical operation "OR" were represented by using multiple FHIR Group resources for enrollment. The system was able to identify 52 of 55 patients included in four clinical trials. In conclusion, use of FHIR for defining eligibility criteria of clinical trials may facilitate interoperability and allow automatic screening for eligible patients at multiple sites of different healthcare providers in the future. Upcoming changes in FHIR should allow easier description of "OR"-linked eligibility criteria.

ToolPool Gesundheitsforschung - A Repository for Software and Services Focused on Supporting Clinical and Epidemiological Research.

The academic research environment is characterized by self-developed, innovative, customized solutions, which are often free to use for third parties with open-source code and open licenses. On the other hand, they are maintained only to a very limited extent after the end of project funding. The ToolPool Gesundheitsforschung addresses the problem of finding ready to use solutions by building a registry of proven and supported tools, services, concepts and consulting offers. The goal is to provide an up-to-date selection of "relevant" solutions for a given domain that are immediately usable and that are actually used by third parties, rather than aiming at a complete list of all solutions which belong to that domain. Proof of relevance and usage must be provided, for example, by concrete application scenarios, experience reports by uninvolved third parties, references in publications or workshops held. Quality assurance is carried out for new entries by an agreed list of admission criteria, for existing entries at least once a year by a special task force. Currently, 79 solutions are represented, this number is to be significantly expanded by involving of new editors from current national funding initiatives in Germany.

Towards Harmonized Data Quality in the Medical Informatics Initiative - Current State and Future Directions.

Health data from hospital information systems are valuable sources for medical research but have known issues in terms of data quality. In a nationwide data integration project in Germany, health care data from all participating university hospitals are being pooled and refined in local centers. As there is currently no overarching agreement on how to deal with errors and implausibilities, meetings were held to discuss the current status and the need to develop consensual measures at the organizational and technical levels. This paper analyzes the discovered similarities and differences. The result shows that although data quality checks are carried out at all sites, there is a lack of both centrally coordinated data quality indicators and a formalization of plausibility rules as well as a repository for automatic querying of the rules, for example in ETL processes.

FAIR4Health: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable data to foster Health Research.

Due to the nature of health data, its sharing and reuse for research are limited by ethical, legal and technical barriers. The FAIR4Health project facilitated and promoted the application of FAIR principles in health research data, derived from the publicly funded health research initiatives to make them Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). To confirm the feasibility of the FAIR4Health solution, we performed two pathfinder case studies to carry out federated machine learning algorithms on FAIRified datasets from five health research organizations. The case studies demonstrated the potential impact of the developed FAIR4Health solution on health outcomes and social care research. Finally, we promoted the FAIRified data to share and reuse in the European Union Health Research community, defining an effective EU-wide strategy for the use of FAIR principles in health research and preparing the ground for a roadmap for health research institutions. This scientific report presents a general overview of the FAIR4Health solution: from the FAIRification workflow design to translate raw data/metadata to FAIR data/metadata in the health research domain to the FAIR4Health demonstrators' performance.

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) in a FAIR Metadata Registry for COVID-19 Research.

Adopting international standards within health research communities can elevate data FAIRness and widen analysis possibilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mapping feasibility against HL7® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR)® of a generic metadata schema (MDS) created for a central search hub gathering COVID-19 health research (studies, questionnaires, documents = MDS resource types). Mapping results were rated by calculating the percentage of FHIR coverage. Among 86 items to map, total mapping coverage was 94%: 50 (58%) of the items were available as standard resources in FHIR and 31 (36%) could be mapped using extensions. Five items (6%) could not be mapped to FHIR. Analyzing each MDS resource type, there was a total mapping coverage of 93% for studies and 95% for questionnaires and documents, with 61% of the MDS items available as standard resources in FHIR for studies, 57% for questionnaires and 52% for documents. Extensions in studies, questionnaires and documents were used in 32%, 38% and 43% of items, respectively. This work shows that FHIR can be used as a standardized format in registries for clinical, epidemiological and public health research. However, further adjustments to the initial MDS are recommended - and two additional items even needed when implementing FHIR. Developing a MDS based on the FHIR standard could be a future approach to reduce data ambiguity and foster interoperability.

What Metadata? Defining Different Types of Digital Assets as Application Targets of Metadata in Clinical Research Informatics.

The term 'metadata' is mentioned in every one of the FAIR principles. Metadata is without question important for findability, accessibility, and reusability, but essential for interoperability. Standardized schemas have been developed by various stakeholders for decades, but too rarely come to practical use. The reason for this is that the application domain is not clearly understood. In many bio-medical research projects, the need for metadata is recognized at some point, but there is not only a lack of overview of existing standards, but also a lack of correct assessment of what individual metadata schemas were actually made for. This paper differentiates different application scenarios for metadata in clinical research.

[Making COVID-19 research data more accessible-building a nationwide information infrastructure]. / COVID-19-Forschungsdaten leichter zugänglich machen ­ Aufbau einer bundesweiten Informationsinfrastruktur.

Public health research and epidemiological and clinical studies are necessary to understand the COVID-19 pandemic and to take appropriate action. Therefore, since early 2020, numerous research projects have also been initiated in Germany. However, due to the large amount of information, it is currently difficult to get an overview of the diverse research activities and their results. Based on the "Federated research data infrastructure for personal health data" (NFDI4Health) initiative, the "COVID-19 task force" is able to create easier access to SARS-CoV-2- and COVID-19-related clinical, epidemiological, and public health research data. Therefore, the so-called FAIR data principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) are taken into account and should allow an expedited communication of results. The most essential work of the task force includes the generation of a study portal with metadata, selected instruments, other study documents, and study results as well as a search engine for preprint publications. Additional contents include a concept for the linkage between research and routine data, a service for an enhanced practice of image data, and the application of a standardized analysis routine for harmonized quality assessment. This infrastructure, currently being established, will facilitate the findability and handling of German COVID-19 research. The developments initiated in the context of the NFDI4Health COVID-19 task force are reusable for further research topics, as the challenges addressed are generic for the findability of and the handling with research data.