Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(4): 724-731, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27976439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, there is still a debate how to deal with patients receiving antithrombotic agents prior to surgical procedures on the skin. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess complications after dermatosurgical interventions, especially bleeding, depending on anticoagulation therapy. METHODS: Patients underwent surgery consecutively as scheduled, without randomization, whether or not they were currently taking anticoagulants. Nine institutions of the DESSI (DErmatoSurgical Study Initiative) working group documented patient data prospectively on a standardized study sheet prior to and after 9154 dermatosurgical interventions. RESULTS: Bleeding complications were observed in 7.14% of cases (654/9154 surgeries). A severe bleed requiring intervention by a physician occurred in 83 surgeries (0.91%). In multivariate analysis, INR, length of the defect, perioperative antibiotic treatment, current treatment with anticoagulation therapy, age and surgery on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) were significant parameters independently influencing the risk of bleeding. Discontinuation of phenprocoumon therapy and subsequent switching to low molecular weight heparin was associated with the highest risk of bleeding (9.26%). CONCLUSION: Bleeding complications in skin surgery are generally rare. Even if slightly increased complication rates are found in patients taking anticoagulants during skin surgery, platelet inhibitors should not be stopped prior to surgery. If a surgical procedure in patients on a combination therapy of 2 or more antiplatelet cannot be postponed, it should be conducted with the patient remaining on combination therapy. Discontinuation of DOACs is recommended 24 h prior to surgery. Bridging of phenprocoumon should be terminated. In patients with a bleeding history, the INR value should be within the therapeutic range.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Skin Diseases/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Heparin/adverse effects , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Middle Aged , Phenprocoumon/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/therapy , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound/complications
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(2): 144-9, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24094682

ABSTRACT

The nasal region represents an important three-dimensional esthetic unit where minimal distortion will be obvious and disturbing. In this regard the reconstruction of the nasal ala in dermatologic tumor surgery may be challenging. We propose the reconstructive option of a caudal-lateral inserted transposition flap for this indication. The principle of this surgical alternative and the long-term outcome is demonstrated in representative cases. The various indications and modifications of this reconstructive principle are discussed and compared to other remodeling alternatives.


Subject(s)
Nose Neoplasms/surgery , Nose/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Humans
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 22(5): 555-60, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18070025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pruritus, burning, epiphora and insufficient occlusion of the mouth have been less extensively studied than cosmetic changes in irradiated fields. OBJECTIVES: How frequent are these late adverse effects? Do they usually occur permanently? Are they influenced by treatment and tumour parameters, sex and age of the patients? METHODS: Patients were interviewed at least once later than 90 days after soft X-ray therapy. RESULTS: Pruritus has been reported in 18.5% of the interviews, burning in 7.7%, epiphora in 36.2% and insufficient occlusion of the mouth in 11.5%. Patients were usually not permanently troubled and irritated by these symptoms: pruritus more than once per week was reported in every interview for 0.6% of the fields, burning for 0.2%, epiphora for 6.4% and insufficient occlusion for 0%. Irritation by these symptoms has been stated in every interview for 5.1% of fields around the eye and for 1.4% of fields at other sites. Late pruritus, burning and epiphora were less frequently reported after irradiation with lower total doses, lower time-dose-fractionation factor (TDF) and by men. Patients older than 70 years of age experienced pruritus and burning less frequently. The largest diameter of the irradiated field influenced pruritus and the half value depth of the X-rays influenced burning and epiphora. CONCLUSIONS: Late pruritus, burning, epiphora and insufficient occlusion of the mouth do not considerably reduce the value of soft X-ray therapy because these adverse effects usually are not experienced permanently. Total dose and TDF should not be chosen higher than necessary.


Subject(s)
Radiation Injuries/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , X-Ray Therapy/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases/etiology , Male , Malocclusion/etiology , Pain/etiology , Pruritus/etiology , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
Dig Dis Sci ; 31(8): 822-8, 1986 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3731976

ABSTRACT

In order to delineate the clinical value of a dual-isotope fat absorption test system (FATS) using glycerol [75Se]triether as lipid-phase marker and glycerol [125I]trioleate as the test lipid, fecal isotope ratios from single stools (and a 72-hr stool homogenate) were compared to quantitative fecal fat excretion. The study included 11 patients without and 24 patients with steatorrhea. With a figure of 0.8% as the upper limit of normal, the test was a reliable indicator of steatorrhea with 87.5% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity; efficiency was 85.7%. Related to a prevalence of steatorrhea of 45.9% as the mean value of 1269 consecutive 72-hr specimens investigated for steatorrhea during 1978-1982, the positive (negative) predictive value of the FATS is 80.3% (87.2%). With 2% as the upper limit of normal, no false positive results ensued. It is concluded that a two-step interpretation of the FATS (0.8% limit and 2% limit) may be regarded a valid qualitative index for steatorrhea. The FATS isotope ratio using single stools correlated well with FATS ratios in the 72-hr stool homogenates (r = 0.97). FATS therefore allows a convenient estimate of steatorrhea from measuring single stools. As a quantitative measure of fecal fat excretion, the FATS is unreliable.


Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Fats/metabolism , Feces/analysis , Intestinal Absorption , Adult , Aged , Female , Glycerol/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes , Male , Middle Aged , Selenium , Time Factors , Triolein
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...