Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 138(14)2018 09 18.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: All Norwegian hospitals must submit data to the Norwegian Surveillance System for Antibiotic Consumption and Healthcare-Associated Infections (NOIS) regarding surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft, caesarean section, hip arthroplasty, cholecystectomy and colonic surgery. The purpose of our study was to identify the proportion of patients undergoing surgery in 2016 who developed a surgical site infection, and the consequences in the form of prolonged postoperative hospitalisation, readmission or revision surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients who underwent one of the five surgical procedures registered in NOIS in 2016 were included and followed up for 30 days after the surgery. The criteria set out by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control were used to define infections. RESULTS: From among the 31 401 patients included, a total of 1 225 surgical site infections were recorded. The incidence was highest following colonic surgery (10.9 %) and lowest following total hip arthroplasty (1.8 %). Median postoperative length of hospitalisation was three days for those with no infection, and six days for the 544 patients with a deep infection or an infection in an organ or cavity. The infections resulted in the need for revision surgery in 308 patients and readmission for 323 patients. INTERPRETATION: A total of 3.9 % of patients registered with a surgical procedure included in NOIS developed a surgical site infection. Consequences such as increased hospitalisation time, and more readmissions as well as revision procedures serve to highlight the importance of preventing such infections.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy/adverse effects , Colon/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Cross Infection/complications , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Mandatory Reporting , Norway/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/complications , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
2.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 75: 58-64, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28735246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is indicated that healthcare personnel's perceptions of the work environment may reflect the clinical outcomes for the patients they care for. However, the body of evidence is inconsistent when it comes to the association between work environment and surgical site infection. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine the associations between nurse-reported characteristics of the work environment and incidence of surgical site infections after total hip arthroplasty. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: This is a cross-sectional multicentre study conducted in 16 Norwegian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical outcomes for 2885 patients >18years that underwent total hip arthroplasty are combined with work environment descriptions from 320 nurses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combine data about surgical site infections from The Norwegian Surveillance System for Antibiotic Consumption and Healthcare-Associated Infections and hospital characteristics such as overall survival probability (from administrative patient data) and nurses' reports of characteristics of the work environment (from a multicentre survey among nurses in Norwegian hospitals). Stepwise mixed-effects logistic regression model was performed to examine the associations between characteristics of the work environment and surgical site infections. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical site infection among 2885 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty in 16 Norwegian hospitals was 2.6%. Older age, elective procedures and high scores for staffing adequacy were associated with risk for surgical site infection. The association between high scores for adequate staffing and low risk for surgical site infections was present for patients that were admitted for an elective procedure, but not for patients admitted for a non-elective procedure. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the risk of surgical site infections after elective total hip arthroplasty was lower in hospitals where nurses assessed staffing as adequate. Our findings add to the existing literature that examines the linkage between work environment and clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Patient Safety , Physician-Nurse Relations , Quality of Health Care , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Survival Analysis , Workplace
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 15: 549, 2015 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26619949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High quality of surveillance systems for surgical site infections (SSIs) is the key to their usefulness. The Norwegian Surveillance System for Antibiotic Consumption and Healthcare-Associated Infections (NOIS) was introduced by regulation in 2005, and is based largely on automated extraction of data from underlying systems in the hospitals. METHODS: This study investigates the quality of NOIS-SSI's denominator data by evaluating completeness, representativeness and accuracy compared with de-identified administrative data for 2005-2010. Comparisons were made by region, hospital type and size, age and sex for 4 surgical procedures. RESULTS: The completeness of NOIS improved from 29.2 % in 2005 to 79.8 % in 2010. NOIS-SSI became representative over time for most procedures by hospital size and type, but not by region. It was representative by age and sex for all years and procedures. Accuracy was good for all years and procedures by all explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible and incremental implementation strategy has encouraged the development of computer-based surveillance systems in the hospitals which gives good accuracy, but the same strategy has adversely affected the completeness and representativeness of the denominator data. For the purpose of evaluating risk factors and implementing prevention and precautionary measures in the individual hospitals, representativeness seems sufficient, but for benchmarking and/or public reporting it is not good enough.


Subject(s)
Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Benchmarking , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Norway/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(4): 323-8, 2015 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25672951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most surgical site infections (SSIs) after hip arthroplasty are detected after a patient is discharged from hospital, making postdischarge surveillance (PDS) an important component in surveillance systems. We investigated how long it was necessary to monitor hip arthroplasty patients for SSIs after hospital discharge and if passive PDS through readmissions could replace active PDS by patient questionnaire in detecting SSIs. METHODS: We used data from the Norwegian surveillance system from 2005-2011, which has active 1-year PDS, to investigate proportions of SSIs found at different time intervals after surgery and whether these SSIs could have been detected through passive PDS by investigating the proportion of patients with SSIs that were readmitted. RESULTS: We found that 79% of all SSIs and 82% of deep SSIs were detected after hospital discharge. 95% of deep SSIs were detected within 90 days after surgery. 14% of the deep SSIs were detected beyond 30 days after surgery, and all of these patients were readmitted because of their SSI and thus could have been detected by passive PDS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that most deep SSIs are detected within 90 days and that passive PDS beyond 30 days after surgery may replace active PDS without reducing sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Patient Discharge , Population Surveillance , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay , Norway/epidemiology , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(7): 591-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23318091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surveillance is a primary component of systems for the prevention of health care-associated infections (HCAI). Feedback to surgeons from these surveillance systems may reduce rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) by approximately 20%. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the Norwegian Surveillance System for Healthcare-Associated Infections' (NOIS) module for SSI (NOIS-SSI) and to evaluate the completeness of hospital participation, the effectiveness of automated data collection, and the added value of follow-up after hospital discharge during 2005 to 2009. METHODS: NOIS was introduced by regulation in 2005. Hospital participation is described through adherence to the mandatory requirements and participation in the voluntary aspects of the system. Automated data collection is evaluated through the completeness of reporting of explanatory and administrative variables. The impact of active postdischarge surveillance is assessed through the completeness of follow-up and the proportion of infections detected after hospital discharge. RESULTS: The system has achieved 95% (52/55) hospital participation, with 65% (34/52) of the hospitals submitting more data than the required minimum. The completeness of patient and procedure-related background data is satisfactory, with 23.3% (5,079/21,772) of the records having at least 1 missing value. The completeness of 30-day follow-up of patients is 90.7% (19,747/21,772), and 81% (765/948) of the infections were detected after discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a new surveillance system for SSI has been successful evaluated through hospital participation, the completeness of reporting of explanatory and administrative variables, and the completeness of postdischarge follow-up. Important success factors are a mandatory system, automated data-harvesting systems in hospitals, and active postdischarge surveillance.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Data Collection/methods , Health Care Surveys/methods , Mandatory Programs/organization & administration , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Electronic Health Records , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Norway , Program Evaluation , Research Design
7.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 40(6): 1291-7, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21450472

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A mandatory national surveillance system for surgical site infections (SSIs) following certain surgical procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), was introduced in Norway in 2005. The objectives of this study were to measure national baseline incidence rates of SSIs after CABG, describe the characteristics of the patients and procedures, and identify possible risk factors for infection. METHODS: In 2005-2009, all hospitals that performed CABG were invited to assess all patients undergoing CABG surgery in 3-month periods for SSIs. The hospitals evaluated infection status at discharge and 30 days after surgery by sending post-discharge questionnaires to all patients. We calculated incidence proportions and risk ratios for different risk factors. We applied the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index to the data. RESULTS: In total, 2440 patients were included. Altogether, 124 sternal and 217 harvest site infections were registered, giving incidence proportions of 5.1% and 8.9%, respectively. Over 95% of infections occurred post-discharge from the hospital. No risk factors were identified. Incidence did not significantly increase with higher NNIS risk index; however, 93% of the patients fell into the same risk category. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided a baseline rate for SSIs after CABG procedures in Norway. The results show the importance of post-hospital discharge follow-up. The NNIS risk index did not adequately stratify CABG patients. We recommend that more potential risk variables should be included in the surveillance, such as the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), height, weight, and diabetes.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Sternotomy/adverse effects , Sternum/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/adverse effects
8.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 129(7): 618-22, 2009 Mar 26.
Article in Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19337329

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: All hospitals in Norway are required to participate in the Norwegian Surveillance System for Hospital-Acquired Infections (NOIS). Hospitals can choose to have from one to five given surgical procedures under surveillance, caesarean section being one of them. This article describes the incidence of surgical site infections after caesarean sections and identifies causes for such infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A national protocol, was developed in accordance with the European protocol (HELICS). Patients undergoing a caesarean section (1 September - 30 November in 2005, 2006 or 2007) in the participating hospitals were included and followed-up for 30 days. Cases were identified in accordance to standardised case definitions. Potential risk factors as well as demographic and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: 3900 women were included. 290 infections were diagnosed (incidence 8.3 %) among the 3491 women who were followed up after discharge. Only 14 % of the infections were diagnosed during the hospital stay. Age higher than 29 years and contaminated wound class 3 were significantly associated with infection. Among the 54 women with an organ/space or deep infection, 20 were readmitted to the hospital and 11 were reoperated. INTERPRETATION: One of 12 women who undergo a caesarean section develops a surgical site infection. The incidence of infections in Norway is lower than in many other European countries. We recommend hospitals to evaluate the preventive measures implemented at their institution.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control , Norway/epidemiology , Patient Readmission , Pregnancy , Registries , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...