Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 22(4): 899-909, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18325729

ABSTRACT

Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and play an important role in the treatment of osteoporosis, metastatic bone disease, and Paget disease. However, nephrotoxicity has been reported with some bisphosphonates. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates directly inhibit farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) synthase activity (mevalonate pathway) and reduce protein prenylation leading to osteoclast cell death. The aim here was to elucidate if this inhibition also occurs in kidney cells and may directly account for nephrotoxicity. In an exploratory study in rats receiving zoledronate or ibandronate an approximate 2-fold increase in FPP synthase mRNA levels was observed in the kidney. The involvement of the mevalonate pathway was confirmed in subsequent in vitro studies with zoledronate, ibandronate, and pamidronate, using the non-nitrogen containing bisphosphonate clodronate as a comparator. In vitro changes in FPP synthase mRNA expression, enzyme activity, and levels of prenylated proteins were assessed. Using two cell lines (a rat normal kidney cell line, NRK-52E, and a human kidney proximal tubule cell line, HK-2), ibandronate and zoledronate were identified as most cytotoxic (EC50: 23/>1000 microM and 16/82 microM, respectively) and as the most potent inhibitors of FPP synthase (IC50; 1.6/7.4 microM and 0.5/0.7 microM, respectively). In both cell lines, inhibition of FPP synthase activity occurred prior to a decrease in levels of prenylated proteins followed by cytotoxicity. This further supports that the mechanism responsible for osteoclast inhibition (therapeutic effect) might also underlie the mechanism of nephrotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Diphosphonates/toxicity , Geranyltranstransferase/antagonists & inhibitors , Imidazoles/toxicity , Kidney/drug effects , Animals , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/toxicity , Cell Line , Clodronic Acid/toxicity , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Geranyltranstransferase/metabolism , Humans , Ibandronic Acid , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Kidney/cytology , Kidney/enzymology , Male , Pamidronate , RNA, Messenger/drug effects , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Zoledronic Acid
2.
Mutat Res ; 575(1-2): 102-15, 2005 Aug 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15924886

ABSTRACT

Almost 10 years ago, microarray technology was established as a new powerful tool for large-scale analysis of gene expression. Soon thereafter the new technology was discovered by toxicologists for the purpose of deciphering the molecular events underlying toxicity, and the term "Toxicogenomics" appeared in scientific literature. Ever since, the toxicology community was fascinated by the multiplicity of sophisticated possibilities toxicogenomics seems to offer: genome-wide analysis of toxicant-induced expression profiles may provide a means for prediction of toxicity prior to classical toxicological endpoints such as histopathology or clinical chemistry. Some researchers even speculated of the classical methods being superfluous before long. It was assumed that by using toxicogenomics it would be possible to classify compounds early in drug development and consequently save animals, time, and money in pre-clinical toxicity studies. Moreover, it seemed within reach to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying toxicity. The feasibility of bridging data derived from in vitro and in vivo systems, identifying new biomarkers, and comparing toxicological responses "across-species" was also excessively praised. After several years of intensive application of microarray technology in the field of toxicology, not only by the pharmaceutical industry, it is now time to survey its achievements and to question how many of these wishes and promises have really come true.


Subject(s)
Drug Design , Drug Industry/trends , Toxicogenetics/trends , Animals , Biomarkers , Databases, Factual , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Interactions , Gene Expression Profiling , Genomics , Humans , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Species Specificity , Toxicogenetics/economics
3.
Toxicol Sci ; 73(2): 315-28, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12700408

ABSTRACT

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin often found in cereals as a contaminant, and it is known to cause severe nephrotoxicity in animals and humans. There have been several investigations studying the mode of action of this toxicant, suggesting inhibition of protein synthesis, formation of DNA adducts, and provocation of DNA single-strand breaks as a result of oxidative stress, but little is known about the transcriptional alterations underlying OTA-derived nephrotoxicity so far. We carried out DNA microarray analyses to assess OTA-specific expression profiles in vivo and in vitro. Cultures of primary rat proximal tubular cells and male Wistar rats were treated with a low dose (5 microM and 1 mg/kg, respectively) or a high dose (12.5 microM and 10 mg/kg, respectively) of OTA for 24 or 72 h. Microarray experiments were carried out after dual fluorescent labeling of sample cDNA, and data analysis was performed utilizing different statistical methods. Validity of selected microarray data was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. We were able to demonstrate that microarray data derived from our proximal tubule cell (PTC) culture model were highly comparable to the in vivo situation. Marked treatment-specific transcriptional changes were detected for genes involved in DNA damage response and apoptosis (upregulation of GADD 153, GADD 45, annexin V), response to oxidative stress (differential expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and catalase), and inflammatory reactions (upregulation of alpha 2 macroglobulin, ceruloplasmin, and cathepsin S). We conclude that our results provide a molecular basis for interpretation of OTA-induced nephrotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , Gene Expression Profiling , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Mycotoxins/toxicity , Ochratoxins/toxicity , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Acute-Phase Reaction/genetics , Acute-Phase Reaction/metabolism , Administration, Oral , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/genetics , Carcinogens/administration & dosage , Cell Culture Techniques , DNA/analysis , DNA Damage/drug effects , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Primers/chemistry , DNA Repair/drug effects , DNA Repair/genetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Kidney Diseases/metabolism , Kidney Diseases/pathology , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/drug effects , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/metabolism , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/pathology , Male , Mycotoxins/administration & dosage , Ochratoxins/administration & dosage , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/genetics , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...