Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 46(12): 2214-2219, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30391087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After orbital exenteration a facial prosthesis is a viable option for rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate implant loss and peri-implantitis of solitary orbital implants with regard to risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Implant loss (primary outcome) and periimplantitis (secondary outcome) were reviewed retrospectively in patients who received orbital implants between 2006 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months. Potential risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: 94 patients were included with 371 inserted implants and 326 implants remaining for final analysis. At the time of last follow-up 18.1% (59/326) of the implants were lost and 3.4% showed signs of periimplantitis but were still stable in situ. Daily smoking (p = 0.016, OR = 2.1), irradiation (p < 0.001, OR = 2.8) and daily alcohol abuse (p = 0.028, OR = 3.1) had a significant effect on periimplantitis and implant loss. Combining smoking and irradiation, implant failure was 46.9% versus 15.0% in patients without these risk factors (p < 0.001, OR = 5.0). Age, tumor entity, ASA Score, anticoagulation, chemotherapy, diabetes and implant position did not show a significant correlation for implant loss or - except for age - periimplantitis. Younger patients showed a higher risk of developing periimplantitis (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Orbital prostheses retained by solitary implants provide a solid option to reconstruct facial defects. Whereas in general high implant survival can be expected, they should be carefully considered in patients with the risk factors irradiation, smoking and alcohol abuse.


Subject(s)
Orbital Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/etiology , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(2): 405e-413e, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26818331

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumors are the most frequent reason for acquired defects of the nose. Bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses represent a secure, uncomplicated, and cosmetically acceptable rehabilitative alternative to surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine a potential benefit of the Titanium Epiplating System (Fa. Medicon, Tuttlingen, Germany) as a grouped implant system in the anatomically difficult nasal region with limited bone supply. METHODS: Patients with complete nasal defects who received a transfacial Titanium Epiplating System between January of 2009 and December of 2013 for nasal prostheses were included. The Epiplating titanium plates are specially adapted to the nasal region and were modified individually. Implant survival, periimplantitis, clinical course, and risk factors for implant survival were assessed retrospectively, including univariate statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in this study. At the time of last follow-up, 51 of 53 Epiplating systems (96.2 percent) were stable in situ. One titanium plate had to be renewed because of a traumatic accident and one plate had to be removed because of disease recurrence. Periimplantitis occurred in 7.5 percent and could be treated successfully by either local or systemic antibiotic therapy without any loss of stability in bone anchorage. Only smoking significantly increased the risk of periimplantitis (p = 0.013), whereas age, irradiation, chemotherapy, and immunosuppression did not influence the outcome of therapy. The median healing time with use of the Titanium Epiplating System was 3.6 ± 2.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Titanium Epiplating System is a safe and uncomplicated system for bone-anchored retention of nasal prostheses. Good aesthetic results can be achieved. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Nose/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Titanium , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Face , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Suture Anchors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 42(5): 525-30, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24041608

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) can be caused by a variety of disorders. The most common cause of VPI is the association with cleft palate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different surgical techniques for cleft palate patients with VPI: (1) velopharyngoplasty with an inferiorly based posterior pharyngeal flap (VPP posterior, Schönborn-Rosenthal), and (2) combination of VPP posterior and push-back operation (Dorrance). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 41 subjects (26 females, 15 males) with VPI were analysed. Hypernasality was judged subjectively and nasalance data were assessed objectively using the NasalView system preoperative and 6 months postoperative. RESULTS: Subjective analysis showed improved speech results regarding hypernasality for all OP-techniques with good results for VPP posterior and VPP posterior combined with push-back with success rates of 94.4% and 87.7%, respectively. Objective analysis showed a statistically significant reduction of nasalance for both VPP posterior and VPP posterior combined with push-back (p < 0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences concerning measured nasalance values postoperatively between the VPP posterior and VPP posterior combined with push-back. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, both VPP posterior and VPP posterior combined with push-back showed good results in correction of hypernasality in cleft patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.


Subject(s)
Cleft Palate/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Speech/physiology , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Velopharyngeal Insufficiency/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Palate, Soft/physiopathology , Palate, Soft/surgery , Pharyngeal Muscles/physiopathology , Pharyngeal Muscles/surgery , Speech Disorders/diagnosis , Speech Disorders/therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cancer ; 116(21): 5075-81, 2010 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atypical teratoid/rhaboid tumors (AT/RTs) and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors are highly malignant neoplasms with a dismal prognosis. These tumors predominantly affect infants and targeted, adjuvant treatment approaches would be highly desirable. METHODS: In the current study, the authors investigated the expression and functional role of tyrosine kinases in 2 malignant rhabdoid tumor cell lines (A204 and G401) and in a series of 5 AT/RTs and 18 malignant rhabdoid tumors (13 rhabdoid tumors of the kidney and 5 extrarenal rhabdoid tumors). RESULTS: Both cell lines consistently expressed the tyrosine kinase c-Abl, which promoted proliferation as assessed by small interfering RNA knockdown. Blockage of c-Abl using the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib resulted in reduced cellular growth in both cell lines. Furthermore, c-Abl was expressed in all rhabdoid tumors, whereas expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor subtypes alpha and beta was infrequent and c-Kit expression was absent. CONCLUSIONS: The current data pointed toward a role for c-Abl in the biology of malignant rhabdoid tumors and provided a rationale for the investigation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target c-Abl for the treatment of these aggressive tumors.


Subject(s)
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-abl/metabolism , Rhabdoid Tumor/enzymology , Benzamides , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/enzymology , Piperazines/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Rhabdoid Tumor/drug therapy
5.
Anticancer Drugs ; 21(5): 514-22, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20147838

ABSTRACT

Rhabdoid tumors are highly aggressive pediatric malignancies. Although the prognosis of children with rhabdoid tumors has improved, it still remains dismal and long-term survivors suffer from severe side effects of current therapeutic approaches. The objective of our study was to explore the toxicity of standard and novel anticancer drugs against rhabdoid tumors in vitro and to prioritize them for future preclinical and clinical studies. Antitumor activity of 10 standard anticancer drugs (doxorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone, actinomycin D, temozolomide, carmustine, oxaliplatin, vinorelbine, methotrexate, thiotepa), five target-specific drugs (sorafenib, imatinib, roscovitine, rapamycin, ciglitazone) and two herbal compounds (curcumin and apigenin) was assessed by a modified 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation assay on three rhabdoid tumor cell lines, A204, G401, and BT16, derived from different anatomical sites. Comparable with their high clinical activity, anthracyclines inhibited tumor cell proliferation by 50% (GI50) in the nanomolar range. Actinomycin D exhibited the lowest GI50 values overall ranging from 2.8x10(-6) nmol/l for G401 to 3.8 nmol/l for A204 cells while thiotepa was the only alkylating drug that inhibited tumor cell growth in clinically relevant concentrations. Target-specific drugs, such as sorafenib, roscovitine, and rapamycin, showed promising results as well. In this report, we show for the first time that apigenin and curcumin effectively inhibit rhabdoid tumor cell growth. Supporting earlier reports we conclude that cyclin D1 seems to be an excellent target in the treatment of rhabdoid tumors. Idarubicin or mitoxantrone represent potent alternatives to doxorubicin, and vinorelbine may substitute vincristine in future clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Rhabdoid Tumor/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Apigenin/therapeutic use , Apigenin/toxicity , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Curcumin/toxicity , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...