Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
J Oral Implantol ; 49(4): 414-427, 2023 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796068

ABSTRACT

This article seeks to provide the most relevant aspects of the etiology, prevention, and management of bleeding in routine implant surgery. A comprehensive and systematic electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases until June 2021. Further references of interest were retrieved from bibliographic lists of the selected articles and the "Related Articles" feature of PubMed. Eligibility criteria were papers about bleeding, hemorrhage, or hematoma associated with routine implant surgery on human subjects. Twenty reviews and 41 case reports fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in the scoping review. Involved implants were mandibular in 37 and maxillary in 4 cases. The major number of bleeding complications was in the mandibular canine region. The most injured vessels were sublingual and submental arteries, due mainly to perforation of the lingual cortical plate. Time to bleeding occurred intraoperatively, at suturing, or postoperatively. The most reported clinical manifestations were swelling and elevation of the mouth floor and the tongue with partial or complete airway obstructions. First aid to manage airway obstruction was intubation and tracheostomy. For active bleeding control, gauze tamponade, manual or digital compression, hemostatic agents, and cauterization were applied. When conservative procedures failed, hemorrhage was controlled by intra- or extraoral surgical approaches to ligate injured vessels or by angiographic embolization. The present scoping review provides knowledge and evidence on the most relevant aspects of the etiology, prevention, and management of implant surgery bleeding complications.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Hematoma/complications , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Blood Loss, Surgical
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(2): 827-835, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35802191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ex vivo the efficacy of an amino acid buffered hypochlorite solution supplemented to surface debridement with air-powder abrasion in removing bacterial biofilm following open-flap decontamination of implants failed due to peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an ex vivo, single-blind, randomized, intra-subject investigation. Study population consisted of 20 subjects with at least three implants failed for peri-implantitis (in function for > 12 months and progressive bone loss exceeding 50%) to be explanted. For each patient, implants were randomly assigned to surface decontamination with sodium bicarbonate air-powder abrasion (test-group 1) or sodium bicarbonate air-powder abrasion supplemented by amino acid buffered hypochlorite solution (test-group 2) or untreated control group. Following open-flap surgery, untreated implants (control group) were explanted. Afterwards, test implants were decontaminated according to allocation and explanted. Microbiological analysis was expressed in colony-forming units (CFU/ml). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in the concentrations of CFU/ml was found between implants of test-group 1 (63,018.18 ± 228,599.36) (p = 0.007) and implants of test-group 2 (260.00 ± 375.80) (p < 0.001) compared to untreated implants (control group) (86,846.15 ± 266,689.44). The concentration of CFU/ml on implant surfaces was lower in test-group 2 than in test-group 1, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The additional application of amino acid buffered hypochlorite solution seemed to improve the effectiveness of implant surface decontamination with air-powder abrasion following open-flap surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lacking evidence on the most effective method for biofilm removal from contaminated implant surfaces, the present experimental study provides further information for clinicians and researchers.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Dental Implants/microbiology , Powders , Hypochlorous Acid , Amino Acids , Decontamination/methods , Single-Blind Method , Sodium Bicarbonate , Surface Properties
3.
J Oral Implantol ; 49(6): 567-572, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279654

ABSTRACT

This clinical report describes the oral rehabilitation of a 25-year-old male patient who lost the lower incisors, right canine, and a significant amount of anterior mandibular bony and soft tissue following severe dentoalveolar trauma due to a car accident. The patient's young age, anterior esthetic zone in the lower jaw, previous mandibular fracture, and extended bony and soft-tissue defect hindering ideal 3-dimensional implant placement oriented the therapeutic plan toward a staged approach, with several reconstructive surgical procedures before implant rehabilitation. The treatment involved deepening the labiobuccal vestibule and lingual sulcus to correct cicatricial shrinkage due to previous surgical fixation of the mandibular fracture, vertical guided bony augmentation to regenerate adequate volumes of bone, free gingival graft to achieve sufficient height and thickness of peri-implant soft tissues, and a prosthetic-driven surgical procedure to place the implants in a good functional and esthetic position. This therapeutic approach restored function and esthetics and achieved outcome stability at 3-year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Mandibular Fractures , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Male , Humans , Adult , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Esthetics, Dental , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 24(6): 831-844, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36197040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to retrospectively evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate, flapless full-arch prostheses, supported by 4/6 implants according to prosthetic-driven planning and guided surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 28 edentulous patients (20 female/8 males; average age 67.75 ± 8.627 years), 32 prostheses (17 all-on-4/15 all-on-6) and 164 implants. The Implants survival, prostheses success/survival, peri-implant marginal bone loss, incidence of biological and prosthetic complications were evaluated. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the influence of implant and patient characteristics on marginal bone loss. RESULTS: Cumulative implant survival rate was 89.7% for all-on-four (seven failures) and 99.0% for all-on-six (one failure) after a mean follow-up of 6.46 ± 2.236 years (range 1-10 years). Cumulative prosthesis success rate was 51.5% (58.8% for all-on-four/ 43.8% for all-on-six). Prosthesis survival rate was 88.2% for all-on-four. No failure was registered in all-on-six. Mean value of marginal bone loss was 1.38 ± 0.1.28 mm at 5-year and 2.09 ± 0.56 mm at 10-year follow-up. No difference was found in the mean value of marginal bone resorption between all-on-four (1.56 ± 1.61 mm) and all-on-six (1.20 ± 0.85 mm) (p = 0.104) and between tilted (1.22 ± 1.29 mm) and axial implants (1.44 ± 1.27 mm) (p = 0.385) after 5-year follow-up. The incidence of biological complications was 1.0% in all-on-six (one mucositis) and 10.3% in all-on-four (two peri-implantitis). Prosthetic complications affected teeth of final rehabilitations with 3 detachments, 10 chippings or fractures, and 3 severe occlusal wears. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results and within the limitations of the present study, the implant-supported hybrid prosthesis according to prosthetic-driven planning and guided surgery showed to be an efficient, safe, and effective approach to rehabilitate edentulous jaws.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Immediate Dental Implant Loading , Jaw, Edentulous , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Prosthesis Design , Jaw, Edentulous/surgery , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Immediate Dental Implant Loading/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Oral Dis ; 28(3): 796-804, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486855

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect of ibuprofen 400 mg given 30 min before or immediately after third molars surgery under local anaesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-centre, randomized, split-mouth, triple-blind, clinical trial involved 38 outpatients, for a total of 76 bilateral symmetrical fully bone impacted mandibular third molars. Each patient was undergone to separate surgical sessions for the right and left side, and ibuprofen was randomly administered 30 min before or immediately after the intervention. Study participants recorded pain intensity using Numerical Rating Scale-11, the timing of rescue therapy intake and overall tablets consumption over 3 days. RESULTS: The overall pain intensity score was lower in the group receiving ibuprofen immediately after (3.13 ± 2.46) than before (3.58 ± 2.40) surgery, with statistically significant differences only on the second and third days. The mean time to the first using rescue therapy was longer in the postoperative (598.33 ± 422.62 min) than in the preoperative (406.25 ± 149.79 min) analgesic treatment group (p = .123). The number of supplemented ibuprofen tablets did not differ (p = .530) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, ibuprofen administration immediately after surgery seemed to be more effective than preoperative administration.


Subject(s)
Ibuprofen , Tooth Extraction , Administration, Oral , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
6.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 21(4): 101611, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34922726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and rapid onset of postsurgical oral pain relief are critical to improve clinical outcomes and reduce the risk of excessive dosing with analgesic drugs. PURPOSE: To compare analgesic effects of preoperative administration of paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg in single-tablet and effervescent formulation to ibuprofen 400 mg, and placebo in the management of moderate to severe postoperative pain after mandibular third molar surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty healthy outpatients aged 15-29 years undergoing surgical removal of 1 bony impacted mandibular third molar were enrolled in this, single-center, prospective, randomized, triple-blind parallel-group, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Study participants were randomly assigned to three treatment arms. According to the concealed allocation, each patient 30 minutes before surgery received paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg (group APAP/COD), ibuprofen 400 mg (group IBU) or placebo (group PLA). Rescue therapy allowed in the postoperative period was paracetamol 500 mg plus codeine 30 mg in groups APAP/COD and PLA and ibuprofen 400 mg in group IBU. Patients recorded on Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) the pain intensity, total number of postoperative-supplement medications and time of the first intake, until 12-hours after surgery and over extra 2 days, RESULTS: Over postoperative 3 days, patients in the APAP/COD group (2.33 ± 1.99) displayed significantly (P< .001) less pain intensity than IBU (3.43 ± 2.47) and placebo (3.57 ± 2.62) groups. The first-day postoperative pain was significantly (P < .001) higher in group PLA than in groups APAP/COD and IBU, but not between the latter 2 groups. However, at 2 hours postdose, the IBU group displayed average pain intensity lower than APAP/COD group (P> .05). On the next 2 days, pain intensity was significantly (P< .001) lower in group APAP/COD than in groups IBU and PLA but failed to reach statistical significance between groups IBU and PLA. Although the time to the first using rescue therapy was longer (445.88 ± 159.96 minute) in group IBU, compared to groups APAP/COD (392.67 ± 138.90 minutes) and PLA (323.00 ± 143.95 minutes), the number of supplemented tablets was significantly higher in group IBU (2.89 ± 2.13) than in groups APAP/COD (1.24 ± 1.79) (P= .001) and PLA (1.53 ± 1.67) (P = .008). No adverse events were registered for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, over postoperative 3 days, a statistically significant intensity pain reduction and decreased rescue therapy consumption were recorded in the paracetamol-codeine group than to ibuprofen group. Nevertheless, lower pain intensity at 2 hours postdose and longer time using rescue therapy was found in the ibuprofen group without statistical significance. No adverse events occurred over the studied period.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen , Ibuprofen , Analgesics , Codeine , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Tooth Extraction
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34948898

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous facial emphysema related to dental treatments is a well-known clinical complication due to incidental or iatrogenic air or gas penetration into the subcutaneous tissues and fascial planes, leading to distension of the overlying skin. To the best of our knowledge, from 1960 to the current date, only six cases have been reported arising from peri-implant cleaning or non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment. Therefore, the present case of subcutaneous facial emphysema following open-flap air-powder abrasive debridement was the first report during surgical peri-implantitis therapy. Swelling on the left cheek and periorbital space suddenly arose in a 65-year-old woman during open-flap debridement with sodium bicarbonate air-powder abrasion (PROPHYflex™ 3 with periotip, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) of the infected implant surface. The etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, potential complications, and management of subcutaneous emphysema are also briefly reviewed. The present case report draws the attention of dental practitioners, periodontists, oral surgeons, and dental hygienists to the potential iatrogenic risk of subcutaneous emphysema in using air-powder devices in implant surface debridement.


Subject(s)
Peri-Implantitis , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Aged , Debridement , Dentists , Female , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/therapy , Powders , Professional Role , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/therapy
8.
Methods Protoc ; 4(3)2021 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449664

ABSTRACT

Canine disimpaction is always a challenging orthodontic treatment overall, even when the impacted permanent canine is in a high position, especially when in tight relation with the upper incisors' roots. Conventional treatment methods are usually not capable of performing the correct force direction, consisting of the contemporary movement in the distal and vestibular directions of the canine crown, often provoking, as side effects, the presence of decubitus on the mucous of the lips and cheeks or a poor final appearance of the periodontal support of the disimpacted canine. Among the different approaches, the vertical incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique shows good performance with regard to the direction of the forces and the canine's periodontal conditions when erupted; it is usually realized through an elastic chain connected to a temporary anchorage device (TAD) in the posterior area. In this paper, a different protocol for the VISTA method is also presented, to be resorted to in cases of difficult miniscrew positioning due to the anatomic conditions or stage of dentitions. The new protocol also considers the use of nickel-titanium coil springs in order to avoid the need of frequent reactivation of the device and consequent patient discomfort, highlighting its advantages and indications with respect to the traditional approach.

9.
J Prosthodont Res ; 65(1): 1-10, 2021 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938874

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This systematic review was performed to compare tooth, implant and prosthesis failures and biological and technical complications in toothimplant vs freestanding implant supported fixed partial prostheses, in order to evaluate the effectiveness and predictability in combining teeth and implants in the same fixed partial prosthesis. STUDY SELECTION: A comprehensive and systematic literature research was conducted, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, to identify human trials, with a minimum sample size of 10 patients, comparing tooth-implant to freestanding implant supported fixed partial prostheses. Four groups of meta-analyses were performed based on the patients treated with toothimplant vs freestanding implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: abutment failures, biological and mechanical complications, prosthesis failures, and prosthetic (technical) complications. RESULTS: The search yielded 749 records, after removal of duplicates. Based on the title assessment, the abstracts reading and the full-texts evaluation, 8 articles, published between 1999 and 2013, fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The studies included were: 4 controlled clinical trials, 2 prospective and 2 retrospective cohort studies. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between tooth-implant and implant-implant supported fixed in the number of abutment (implant or tooth) failures, biological complications, prosthesis lost, and prosthetic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present systematic review, although the freestanding implant supported fixed partial prosthesis remains the first choice, joining teeth and implants to support fixed prosthesis in partially edentulous patients becomes a valid alternative with an acceptable success rate.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/adverse effects , Dental Restoration Failure , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
10.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(5): 2667-2676, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975703

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare, using an ex vivo model, the biofilm removal of three surface decontamination methods following surgical exposure of implants failed for severe peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design was a single-blind, randomized, controlled, ex vivo investigation with intra-subject control. Study participants were 20 consecutive patients with at least 4 hopeless implants, in function for >12 months and with progressive bone loss exceeding 50%, which had to be explanted. Implants of each patient were randomly assigned to the untreated control group or one of the three decontamination procedures: mechanical debridement with air-powder abrasion, chemical decontamination with hydrogen peroxide and chlorhexidine gluconate, or combined mechanical-chemical decontamination. Following surgical exposure, implants selected as control were retrieved, and afterwards, test implants were decontaminated according to allocation and carefully explanted with a removal kit. Microbiological analysis was expressed in colony-forming-units (CFU/ml). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the concentrations of CFU/ml was found between implants treated with mechanical debridement (531.58 ± 372.07) or combined mechanical-chemical decontamination (954.05 ± 2219.31) and implants untreated (37,800.00 ± 46,837.05) or treated with chemical decontamination alone (29,650.00 ± 42,596.20). No statistically significant difference (p = 1.000) was found between mechanical debridement used alone or supplemented with chemical decontamination. Microbiological analyses identified 21 microbial species, without significant differences between control and treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial biofilm removal from infected implant surfaces was significantly superior for mechanical debridement than chemical decontamination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present is the only ex vivo study based on decontamination methods for removing actual and mature biofilm from infected implant surfaces in patients with peri-implantitis.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Decontamination , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Powders , Single-Blind Method
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32121336

ABSTRACT

Dental implants are one of the most commonly used ways to replace missing teeth. Nevertheless, the close contact with hard and soft oral tissues expose these devices to infectious peri-implant diseases. To prevent such infection, several surface treatments have been developed in the last few years to improve the antimicrobial properties of titanium dental implants. In this in-vitro pilot study, the antimicrobial activity of titanium surfaces coated with different types of graphene nanoplatelets are investigated. Six different colloidal suspensions of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were produced from graphite intercalated compounds, setting the temperature and duration of the thermal shock and varying the number of the exfoliation cycles. Titanium disks with sand-blasted and acid-etched surfaces were sprayed with 2 mL of colloidal GNPs suspensions. The size of the GNPs and the percentage of titanium disk surfaces coated by GNPs were evaluated through a field emission-scanning electron microscope. The antibacterial activity of the specimens against Staphylococcus aureus was estimated using a crystal violet assay. The dimension of GNPs decreased progressively after each sonication cycle. The two best mean percentages of titanium disk surfaces coated by GNPs were GNPs1050°/2 and GNPs1150°/2. The reduction of biofilm development was 14.4% in GNPs1150°/2, 20.1% in GNPs1150°/3, 30.3% in GNPs1050°/3, and 39.2% in GNPs1050°/2. The results of the study suggested that the surface treatment of titanium disks with GNPs represents a promising solution to improve the antibacterial activity of titanium implants.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Graphite , Nanoparticles , Peri-Implantitis , Titanium , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Peri-Implantitis/microbiology , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus , Surface Properties
13.
Case Rep Dent ; 2019: 6725351, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31827940

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the supracrestal bone regeneration of approximately 10 mm using solvent-dehydrated mineralized cancellous bone allograft and nonresorbable membrane in rehabilitation of unsuccessful implants in the anterior maxilla and stability of the regenerated bone at the 14th-year follow-up. CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old female patient with a history of anterior dentoalveolar trauma resulting in the loss of upper left incisors and canine underwent rehabilitation several years ago with three implant-supported fixed prostheses. The prosthesis was both functionally and aesthetically inadequate, and the patient complained of gingival swelling, bleeding, and food impaction at the site of the implants. A staged approach for retreatment was planned, wherein the first surgical stage aimed at removing the existing implants and preparing the bone ridge and soft tissues for the augmentation procedure. The second stage was vertical ridge augmentation and simultaneous prosthetic-driven placement of two new implants at the sites of the left central incisor and canine. After nine months of uneventful healing, complete regeneration of the bony defect was achieved, and the new prosthetic rehabilitation satisfied both functional and aesthetic requirements. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic approach followed in the present case proved effective in achieving satisfactory functional and aesthetic results and in maintaining the stability of the regenerated bone at 14 years of follow-up.

14.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 156(3): 355-364, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31474265

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to analyze data of patients with failed or delayed eruption of first and second permanent molars, to assess the effectiveness of the treatment methods used. METHODS: Epidemiologic and clinical data of 125 patients (mean age 14.08 ± 4.04 years) with 197 affected molars (30 first and 167 second molars) were retrospectively analyzed. The treatment outcome was known in 161 molars after patient drop-out (20 patients with 36 molars). The cases were categorized into 8 groups according to the choice of treatment: orthodontic uprighting, surgical-orthodontic uprighting, surgical uprighting, surgical repositioning, surgical exposure, first or second molar extraction, third molar extraction, or removal of pathologic conditions. RESULTS: The overall treatment outcome was positive in 141 molars (87.6%). It was positive in all cases treated with orthodontic uprighting (7 molars), surgical exposure (10 molars), surgical uprighting (38 molars), and surgical repositioning (8 molars), but it was significantly lower for surgical-orthodontic uprighting (34/48 molars, 70.8%). The positive outcome was significantly lower for inclusion (52/68 molars, 76.5%) than for early-diagnosed condition (11/11 molars, 100%) and retention (78/82 molars, 95.1%), and for total bone crown coverage (21/28 molars, 75.0%) than for osteomucosal or mucosal crown coverage (120/133 molars, 90.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an early diagnosis results in a better outcome regardless of the treatment used, with the number of cases with a positive outcome being higher in younger patients.


Subject(s)
Molar/pathology , Tooth Abnormalities , Tooth Eruption , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Tooth, Impacted/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Italy , Logistic Models , Male , Molar/surgery , Molar, Third/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tooth, Impacted/diagnosis , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Case Rep Dent ; 2019: 3787696, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30838139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) is a relatively uncommon benign neoplasm of odontogenic epithelial origin, accounting for less than 5% of odontogenic tumors. CASE REPORT: The reported case describes morphological characteristics, clinical course, radiographic and histopathological features, and surgical therapy of an extrafollicular variant of AOT in the maxillary posterior region. An asymptomatic swelling on the left side in the posterior region of the maxilla, gradually increased since approximately 12 months, developed in a 16-year-old Caucasian female patient. Radiographic images revealed a well-defined, unilocular radiolucency, with some small foci of radiopacity inside, and root resorption of the first and second molars. On the base of the histological examination of the specimen retrieved by incisional biopsy, the diagnosis of AOT was made, and the conservative surgical enucleation of the lesion was performed. DISCUSSION: The present case was reported in agreement with an extensive review, in which it was recommended to discontinue reporting classic follicular cases because their clinicopathological profile was well-known, but to continue reporting well-documented cases of the extrafollicular variant, with indication of the exact position. CONCLUSION: The present case was reported in order to expand the knowledge about the clinical behavior and surgical treatment of the extrafollicular variant of AOT.

16.
Minerva Stomatol ; 68(6): 332-340, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052622

ABSTRACT

Traumatic injuries to the primary dentition are critical events in dentistry not only due to the need for urgent care, but also since they have potential sequelae in the permanent dentition, with a prevalence ranging from 12% to 74%. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the prevalence, etiology, and clinical and radiographic characteristics as well as the management of permanent teeth sequelae resulting from traumatic injuries to their deciduous predecessors. An extensive literature review was performed to reveal the current evidence on enamel discoloration with or without hypomineralization/hypoplasia, crown dilaceration, odontoma-like malformation, root anomalies, partial or complete arrest of root formation, sequestration of the permanent tooth germ, and eruption disturbances.


Subject(s)
Dental Enamel Hypoplasia , Dentition, Permanent , Humans , Tooth Crown , Tooth Eruption , Tooth, Deciduous
17.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 29(10): 1025-1037, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical and radiographic outcomes following reconstructive therapy of peri-implantitis lesions using mineralized dehydrated bone allograft and resorbable membrane in the nonsubmerged mode of wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis were treated by mechanical debridement; chemical decontamination using hydrogen peroxide (3%), chlorhexidine (0.2%), and a tetracycline hydrochloride solution; and bone defect filling with mineralized dehydrated bone allograft and resorbable membrane. Clinical and radiographic assessments were obtained during 5-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the absence of additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥1.0 mm after surgery, and the composite outcome included the additional marginal peri-implant bone loss, absence of probing depth (PD) ≥5 mm, and absence of bleeding on probing (BoP)/suppuration. RESULTS: According to the primary and composite outcomes, the success rate of 34 implants included in the study was 100% and 91% (N = 31), at 1 year after surgery, and decreased progressively to 77% (N = 26) and to 59% (N = 20) at 5-year follow-up, respectively. Five years following treatment, only the BoP reduction was statistically significant compared to baseline (p < 0.001), and no difference was found in PD (p = 0.318) and in marginal peri-implant bone level (p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: At 1-year follow-up, the surgical reconstructive therapy showed clinical improvement and radiographic defect filling. However, the results appeared to be unpredictable over time, due to a progressive decrease in the bone filling of the peri-implant defects and an increase in the mean PD.


Subject(s)
Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Adult , Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Dental , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
18.
Biomed Res Int ; 2018: 9430989, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30050947

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performances of six different bone substitute materials used as graft in maxillary sinus augmentation by means of histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies retrieved from human subjects after a 6-month healing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six consecutive patients (3 males, 3 females, aged 50-72 years), healthy, nonsmokers, and with good oral hygiene, presenting edentulous posterior maxilla with a residual bone crest measuring ≤ 4 mm in vertical height and 3 to 5 mm in horizontal thickness at radiographic examination, were selected to receive sinus augmentation and delayed implant placement. Under randomized conditions, sinus augmentation procedures were carried out using mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft (MCBA), freeze-dried mineralized bone allograft (FDBA), anorganic bovine bone (ABB), equine-derived bone (EB), synthetic micro-macroporous biphasic calcium-phosphate block consisting of 70% beta-tricalcium phosphate and 30% hydroxyapatite (HA-ß-TCP 30/70), or bioapatite-collagen (BC). After 6 months, bone core biopsies were retrieved and 13 implants were placed. Bone samples were processed for histological and histomorphometric analysis. CT scans were taken before and after surgery. After 4 months of healing, patients were restored with a provisional fixed acrylic resin prosthesis, as well as after further 2-4 months with a definitive cemented zirconia or porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. RESULTS: There were no postoperative complications or implant failures. The histological examination showed that all biomaterials were in close contact with newly formed bone, surrounding the graft granules with a bridge-like network. No signs of acute inflammation were observed. The histomorphometry revealed 20.1% newly formed bone for MCBA, 32.1% for FDBA, 16.1% for ABB, 22.8% for EB, 20.3% for HA-ß-TCP 30/70, and 21.4% for BC. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present investigation, all the six tested biomaterials showed good biocompatibility and osteoconductive properties when used in sinus augmentation procedures, although the FDBA seemed to have a better histomorphometric result in terms of newly formed bone and residual graft material. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (Registration Number): NCT03496688.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials , Bone Transplantation , Maxillary Sinus , Sinus Floor Augmentation , Aged , Animals , Bone Substitutes , Cattle , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Female , Horses , Humans , Lactation , Male , Maxilla , Middle Aged
19.
Pain Res Manag ; 2017: 9246352, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28325960

ABSTRACT

Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of preoperative administration of single-dose of paracetamol-codeine, in the relieving of acute postoperative pain after the surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar. Materials and Methods. The study cohort consisted of 32 Caucasian outpatients, giving a total of 64 bilateral symmetrical impacted mandibles. Patients were randomized in two experimental groups to receive a preoperative oral dose of paracetamol-codeine (analgesic group) or a placebo (placebo group) at the first and second surgeries. Study participants were asked to record pain intensity scores during the operation and the next 2 days, the time of the first request for rescue analgesic, and the total number of postoperative-supplement paracetamol-codeine tablets. Results. The pain intensity score on the first day was significantly lower in the analgesic group than in the placebo group (p < 0.001). The time to using rescue therapy was significantly longer in the analgesic group than in the placebo group (p = 0.004). The number of paracetamol-codeine tablets used postoperatively did not differ between the analgesic and placebo groups (p = 0.104). Conclusions. Preoperative paracetamol-codeine is effective in providing immediate postoperative pain control after third molar surgery and in delaying the initial onset of pain. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (Registration Number): NCT03049878.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Codeine/administration & dosage , Mandibular Osteotomy/adverse effects , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Adult , Cohort Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Routes , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Nerve Block/methods , Pain Measurement , Young Adult
20.
Ann Stomatol (Roma) ; 8(3): 131-138, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682226

ABSTRACT

In the case reports, two different approaches have been described to treat the developmental disturbances in the maxillary central incisors due to trauma to its predecessor. The treatment plan was chosen according to the type and severity of the malformations, the exact location and the morphology of the involved teeth. In the first case, the disimpaction of the maxillary right central incisor was achieved with the combined of surgical and orthodontic therapy, that was planned in two consecutive stages. In the second case the severe root angulation and the failure of the previous orthodontic traction made impossible the repositioning of the upper right central incisor, which was surgical removed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...