Contemporary outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe: the ERCTO registry.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) have reached high procedural success rates thanks to dedicated equipment, evolving techniques, and worldwide adoption of state-of-the-art crossing algorithms. AIMS: We report the contemporary results of CTO PCIs performed by a large European community of experienced interventionalists. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of different risk factors for procedural major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and trends of employment of specific devices like dual lumen microcatheters, guiding catheter extensions, intravascular ultrasound and calcium-modifying tools. METHODS: We evaluated data from 8,673 CTO PCIs included in the European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion (ERCTO) between January 2021 and October 2022. RESULTS: The overall technical success rate was 89.1% and was higher in antegrade as compared with retrograde cases (92.8% vs 79.3%; p<0.001). Compared with antegrade procedures, retrograde procedures had a higher complexity of attempted lesions (Japanese CTO [J-CTO] score: 3.0±1.0 vs 1.9±1.2; p<0.001), a higher procedural and in-hospital MACCE rate (3.1% vs 1.2%; p<0.018) and a higher perforation rate with and without tamponade (1.5% vs 0.4% and 8.3% vs 2.1%, respectively; p<0.001). As compared with mid-volume operators, high-volume operators had a higher technical success rate in antegrade and retrograde procedures (93.4% vs 91.2% and 81.5% vs 69.0%, respectively; p<0.001), and had a lower MACCE rate (1.47% vs 2.41%; p<0.001) despite a higher mean complexity of the attempted lesions (J-CTO score: 2.42±1.28 vs 2.15±1.27; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of different recanalisation techniques, operator experience and the use of specific devices have contributed to a high procedural success rate despite the high complexity of the lesions documented in the ERCTO.

Wire-based antegrade dissection re-entry technique for coronary chronic total occlusions percutaneous revascularization: Experience from the ERCTO Registry.

BACKGROUND: The recent development and widespread adoption of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) techniques have been underlined as one of the antegrade strategies in all worldwide CTO consensus documents. However, historical wire-based ADR experience has suffered from disappointing long-term outcomes. AIMS: Compare technical success, procedural success, and long-term outcome of patients who underwent wire-based ADR technique versus antegrade wiring (AW). METHODS: One thousand seven hundred and ten patients, from the prospective European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions (ERCTO), underwent 1806 CTO procedures between January 2018 and December 2021, at 13 high-volume ADR centers. Among all 1806 lesions attempted by the antegrade approach, 72% were approached with AW techniques and 28% with wire-based ADR techniques. RESULTS: Technical and procedural success rates were lower in wire-based ADR than in AW (90.3% vs. 96.4%, p < 0.001; 87.7% vs. 95.4%, p < 0.001, respectively); however, wire-based ADR was used successfully more often in complex lesions as compared to AW (p = 0.017). Wire-based ADR was used in most cases (85%) after failure of AW or retrograde procedures. At a mean clinical follow-up of 21 ± 15 months, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) did not differ between AW and wire-based ADR (12% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.106); both AW and wire-based ADR procedures were associated with significant symptom improvements. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to AW, wire-based ADR is a reliable and effective strategy successfully used in more complex lesions and often after the failure of other techniques. At long-term follow-up, patient's MACCEs and symptoms improvement were similar in both antegrade techniques.

Effect of preoperative coronary CT for planning of percutaneous coronary intervention for complex chronic total occlusion (CTS-C-CTOPCI): study protocol for an open-label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with the difficulty of guidewire manipulation through the occluded segment, particularly when there is hard tissue due to calcification. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to determine whether improved planning of CTO-PCI using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) (versus conventional angiography) increases success rates of wire crossing in ≤ 60 min in difficult cases. METHODS: This is a randomised controlled open-label multi-centre trial in a superiority framework with 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (n = 130) will be randomised into two groups: the study group who will receive standard of care with the addition of preoperative coronary computed tomographic angiography (CT group), and the control group that will receive standard of care (angiography group). The primary endpoint will be the rate of successful wire crossing in ≤ 60 min in complex CTO (J-CTO ≥ 2). Wire crossing will be considered successful if TIMI flow 3 is restored and residual stenosis is < 30%. The safety endpoint will be mortality due to the intervention or major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary endpoints are success rates at any time; total time of PCI; time of wire crossing; rate of PCI complications; radiation levels during PCI; volume of iodine contrast medium administered; and cost of the PCI. DISCUSSION: This randomised trial will provide insight into whether pre-procedural CCTA as opposed to conventional angiography for planning of CTO-PCI yield higher success rates of wire crossing in ≤ 60 min. Potential benefits of CCTA include shorter successful procedure times of CTO-PCI leading to less irradiation and contrast medium with lower complication rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT04549896. Registered on December 21, 2021.

[Angioplasty in the elderly]. / L'angioplastica nell'anziano.

Due to increasing age in the general population, patients > 75 years are more and more often submitted to cardiac catheterization. These patients have, in general, more severe and diffuse coronary disease, more severe comorbidities, and a higher risk for periprocedural complications. Elderly patients have traditionally been excluded from most clinical trials of coronary interventions, and most often receive medical undertreatment in clinical practice. The basis of evidence for an early invasive strategy, as compared to optimal medical management, is therefore limited in these patients and the risk/benefit ratio is poorly known, both in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and of more stable coronary heart disease. A broad review of the literature is summarized in this paper, to help make therapeutic decisions in these patients.

Half-dose thrombolysis to begin with, when immediate coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction is not possible.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose lytic drugs are sometimes administered to patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as a bridge to coronary angioplasty (facilitated PTCA). Reports are scarce. The characteristics and outcomes of a recent series of consecutive patients treated in our Center are presented. METHODS: In August 2000 facilitated PTCA with half-dose reteplase was started in our Center in all cases when the cath lab was not immediately (< 30 min) available, or the patient had to be transferred to us. Since August 2000, 153 patients were admitted to our cath lab to undergo facilitated (n = 80) or primary (n = 73) PTCA. The data of all patients were prospectively collected, and were analyzed on an "intention-to-treat" basis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between facilitated and primary PTCA patients with regard to: gender, diabetes, hypertension, previous PTCA/bypass surgery, heart rate at admission, systolic blood pressure, anterior AMI, number of leads with ST-segment elevation, total ST-segment deviation, collateral flow to the infarct-related artery, and three-vessel disease. In our series, facilitated vs primary PTCA patients had a better risk profile: they were younger (61 +/- 13 vs 66 +/- 11 years, p = 0.016), less frequently had a previous AMI (7 vs 24%, p = 0.01), had a shorter time from pain onset to first emergency room admission (122 +/- 104 vs 168 +/- 162 min, p = 0.045), and a trend to a shorter total time to the cath lab (209 +/- 121 vs 255 +/- 183 min, p = 0.073) despite a similar emergency room-to-cath lab component (89 +/- 50 vs 98 +/- 92 min, median 74 vs 65 min, p = NS). Moreover, they presented with a lower Killip class on admission (1.1 +/- 0.4 vs 1.5 +/- 0.98, p = 0.01), with more patients in Killip class 1 (95 vs 74%, p = 0.001). One vs 8% of patients were in shock. Facilitated vs primary PTCA patients had an initial TIMI 2-3 flow in 42 vs 25% of cases (p = 0.031), a final TIMI 3 flow in 82 vs 71% (p = NS), > or = 50% ST-segment resolution in 73 vs 58% (p = NS), and both of the latter in 62 vs 45% (p = 0.099); distal coronary embolization occurred in 9 vs 14% of cases (p = NS); intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was used in 5 vs 12% and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in 10% of the whole population. The overall in-hospital mortality was 3.7 vs 9.6% (p = NS), and 2.5 vs 4.5% (p = NS) when patients in shock at admission were not considered. Reinfarction occurred in 2 patients submitted to facilitated PTCA (who had had no immediate PTCA, due to full reperfusion) and in none of the patients submitted to primary PTCA; no patient presented with stroke or major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment with thrombolysis often provides a patent vessel before PTCA, appears to be safe, and may improve reperfusion after PTCA. In this setting, the additional use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors before PTCA only in non-reperfused patients may be significantly risk- and cost-effective.

[Selection of contrast media for hemodynamic studies and limitation of the associated risk]. / Scelta del mezzo di contrasto per l'emodinamica e limitazione dei rischi connessi.

Both the choice of contrast media for use in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and the practice for limiting patient damage, are relevant to the quality of health care. As part of our quality assurance program, and as a preliminary step to a critical reappraisal of our current protocols, an updated review has been made of existing evidence about contrast media for this use, and about measures to prevent adverse events. Consideration was also given to evidence-based measures or drug treatment in patients at risk for anaphylactoid reactions or with renal failure, as well as to the recommended course of action in diabetic patients receiving oral biguanide agents.

Management and outcomes of patients transferred for rescue coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Rescue coronary angioplasty (PTCA), though recommended by the guidelines, is not regularly performed after failed lysis in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and data from large contemporary studies are not available. The outcomes of a recent series of consecutive patients in our Center are presented. METHODS: Between August 2000 and November 2003, 270 patients with AMI < 12 hours were referred to our cath lab for emergency PTCA: 117 (43%) for rescue PTCA after failed lysis, and 153 for primary or facilitated PTCA. The baseline, procedural and outcome data of all patients were prospectively collected, analyzed on an "intention-to-treat" basis and compared. Cineangiographic data were reviewed by three angiographers who were unaware of the clinical data. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between rescue PTCA and primary/facilitated PTCA patients as to: age, female gender, diabetes, hypertension, previous AMI, time from pain onset to the first emergency room admission, heart rate at admission, systolic blood pressure, number of leads with ST-segment elevation, total ST-segment deviation, collateral flow to the infarct-related artery, initial TIMI 2-3 flow, and three-vessel disease. Patients with rescue PTCA, as compared to primary/facilitated PTCA, had a longer time from pain onset to the cath lab (336 +/- 196 vs 229 +/- 155 min, p = 0.0001) and more frequently had an anterior AMI (52 vs 38%, p = 0.027), a higher Killip class (1.5 +/- 0.98 vs 1.26 +/- 0.7, p = 0.02), shock (11 vs 5%, p = 0.073), and intra-aortic balloon pump use (17 vs 8%, p = 0.048); fewer patients were in Killip class 1 (74 vs 85%, p = 0.043). PTCA was performed immediately in 78 vs 95% of patients (p = 0.0001); 8 vs 3 patients had PTCA of the infarct-related artery and 8 vs 1 had bypass surgery later during hospitalization. Patients with rescue PTCA, as compared to primary/facilitated PTCA, had a final TIMI 3 flow in 62 vs 76% of cases (p = 0.017), > or = 70% ST-segment resolution in 36 vs 50% (p = 0.086), and both of the latter in 24 vs 45% (p = 0.006); the overall hospital mortality was 12 vs 6.5%, and 5.8 vs 3.4% when patients in shock on admission were not considered; reinfarction and stroke occurred in 0.9 vs 1.3% and in 2.6 vs 0% of the patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to referral, rescue PTCA patients were admitted to the cath lab later after the onset of infarction, and had a higher risk profile, as compared to primary/facilitated PTCA patients; both recanalization and reperfusion were less satisfactory, as were the outcomes. Thrombolysis is often ineffective but, as long as it remains a widespread treatment, efforts should be made to improve reperfusion and survival in these patients, possibly by an earlier referral for rescue PTCA.

[Should we use clopidogrel instead of ticlopidine in elective coronary angioplasty?]. / Dobbiamo sostituire la ticlopidina con il clopidogrel nelle angioplastiche coronariche elettive?

The use of ticlopidine in association with aspirin has reduced the incidence of subacute stent thrombosis to currently < 1% after coronary stent implantation. Clopidogrel, a more recently marketed thienopyridine derivative, has a lower incidence of side effects than ticlopidine. The use of clopidogrel in association with aspirin as compared to aspirin alone from the second through the sixth month after coronary angioplasty has been shown to reduce the 6-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events by 20-30%. Comparative studies about the use of ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing stent implantation are scarce: these data are briefly reviewed. The conclusion is reached that, except for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, there is at present no evidence that ticlopidine should be replaced with clopidogrel in all patients undergoing stent implantation; clopidogrel might be reserved for those patients who have shown side effects due to ticlopidine.

[Coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients]. / L'angioplastica coronarica nei diabetici.

Increased thrombogenicity, endothelial dysfunction, proliferation of both the cells and the matrix in the vessel walls, dislipidemia and insulin-resistance are the main metabolic alterations in the diabetic scenario, with possible implications in terms of vessel restenosis after coronary angioplasty. The outcome of balloon coronary angioplasty in diabetics is poor. This is due to both increased restenosis and a high incidence of medium/long-term cardiac events; the use of stents in these patients has substantially improved the results, but the recurrence rate has not been abated to the level observed in the general population. Abciximab may be a helpful adjunct to coronary angioplasty in these patients, while coronary artery bypass grafting may still be preferable--as at present--in case of multivessel coronary artery disease. This viewpoint is likely to be substantially modified in the near future, if the promise of "zero restenosis" devices is kept.