The Metamorphosis of Patient Priorities Throughout the Breast Reconstruction Process.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is a lengthy, multi-stage process guided by patients. It is vital to understand how their goals vary over time in order to achieve optimal outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate how breast reconstruction patients' priorities changed throughout the reconstructive process. METHODS: Fifty women who underwent immediate breast reconstruction completed a quality of life survey at their preoperative appointment, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and then again 10 years later. Scores on the survey's subsections corresponded to different patient priorities: survival, restitution, symmetry, and enhancement. The relationship between time and survey-measured patient priorities was analyzed with mixed-effects regression models and Tukey's HSD tests were used to make pairwise comparisons between time points. RESULTS: Survival scores decreased between 3 and 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001) before returning to baseline at long-term follow-up. Restitution scores were lowered only at 12 months PO (T4 vs. T1, T2, and T3, p < 0.001; T4 vs. T5, p = 0.003). Symmetry scores increased from preop to 6 months post-operation (p < 0.001), and then fell back to baseline by month 12 (p < 0.001) and remained at that level at long-term follow-up. Enhancement scores increased from pre-op to 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001), before returning to baseline at 10 year follow-up (T1 vs. T5, p > 0.99; T4 vs T5, p < 0.001). Time had an overall significant effect on each subsection score (p < 0.001), but this relationship was restricted to certain time points. CONCLUSIONS: In the year following immediate breast reconstruction, patients' concern over their physical health decreases while they become increasingly focused on enhancing the appearance of their reconstructed breasts. However, by ten years after surgery, patients' priorities were virtually unchanged from their preoperative desires.

Ten-Year experience with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of abdominoperineal resection defects.

PURPOSE: We evaluate outcomes of our single center using vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps for reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Our goal was to analyze factors that may affect perineal wound healing, a problematic complication with APR reconstructions due to location and high frequency of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed all VRAM flap perineal reconstruction patients after APR defect over a 10-year period (from July 2008 to June 2018). Outcome measures focused on factors that may affect perineal wound healing complication rates: cancer stage (I/II vs III/IV), neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgeon's years in practice (<5 years vs >5 years), and pelvic closed suction drain use. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall major perineal wound complication rate was 14.3% (4 patients). Lack of perioperative closed suction pelvic drain use was associated with a significantly higher rate of major perineal wound complications (28.6% vs 0% and p = 0.031). All four major wound complications occurred in patients who did not have a pelvic drain. The major perineal wound complication rate for patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 22% vs 0% with no neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.107). CONCLUSION: While our cohort represents a relatively small single-center study, our 14.3% rate of major perineal wound complications is consistent with previous studies in the literature. Our findings show that perioperative pelvic closed suction drain use is associated with a lower rate of perineal wound complications. While neoadjuvant chemoradiation trended toward a higher incidence of perineal wound complications, it did not reach statistical significance.

The Price of Medical Tourism: The Legal Implications of Surgery Abroad.

Medical tourism, or traveling abroad to obtain medical services, has evolved into a global health care phenomenon, with over 15 million U.S. patients each year seeking medical care internationally, representing a $50 billion dollar industry in 2017. Speculation and media fascination about the growing industry, diverse destinations, and rationale behind the medical tourists is rampant; however, the legal implications of tourism medicine, particularly when it goes wrong, are often unclear. On the international stage, accreditation agencies are limited in scope and practice, legal jurisdiction is difficult to establish, and the enforcement of rulings is nearly impossible. Patients seeking tourism medicine have little legal recourse and shoulder all the legal burden.

Compliance of Perioperative Antibiotic Dosing and Surgical Site Infection Rate in Office-Based Elective Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A best practice goal to reduce surgical site infection includes administration of antibiotics in the ideal preoperative window. This article evaluates an office surgical suite antibiotic administration rate and compares it with the timing of a local hospital treating a similar patient population. The hypothesis was that similar or better compliance and surgical site infection rates can be achieved in the office-based suite. METHODS: A total of 277 office-based surgeries were analyzed for antibiotic administration time before incision and their corresponding surgical site infection rate. RESULTS: Our facility administered timely prophylactic antibiotics in 96% of cases with a surgical site infection rate of 0.36%. This rate was significantly lower than a reported rate of 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Low infection rates with high antibiotic administration rate suggest that compliance with best possible practice protocols is possible in the outpatient setting.

Cost Analysis of an Office-based Surgical Suite.

INTRODUCTION: Operating costs are a significant part of delivering surgical care. Having a system to analyze these costs is imperative for decision making and efficiency. We present an analysis of surgical supply, labor and administrative costs, and remuneration of procedures as a means for a practice to analyze their cost effectiveness; this affects the quality of care based on the ability to provide services. The costs of surgical care cannot be estimated blindly as reconstructive and cosmetic procedures have different percentages of overhead. METHODS: A detailed financial analysis of office-based surgical suite costs for surgical procedures was determined based on company contract prices and average use of supplies. The average time spent on scheduling, prepping, and doing the surgery was factored using employee rates. RESULTS: The most expensive, minor procedure supplies are suture needles. The 4 most common procedures from the most expensive to the least are abdominoplasty, breast augmentation, facelift, and lipectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructive procedures require a greater portion of collection to cover costs. Without the adjustment of both patient and insurance remuneration in the practice, the ability to provide quality care will be increasingly difficult.