ABSTRACT
The dosimetric data on tissue maximum ratios (TMR), output factors, off axis ratios and beam profiles are presented for small circular fields of diameters ranging from 12.5 to 40 mm for 6 MV radiosurgery beam. It is noticed that dmax increases as the collimator field size increases. Comparison of our data with the published TMR and output factors of similar small circular fields shows that our values are higher than those data. Similarities in trend are noticed with the published isodose volumes for 1-5 and 10 arcs. Not much variation is seen beyond two arcs for 80% isodose volumes for all the field sizes. The variation is small in 20% isodose volumes beyond three arcs. Variations are noticed in 5% isodose volumes for 12.5 mm diameter collimated beam. Our experience has been exclusively with malignant neoplasms. An ideal target volume is covered by 80% isodose volume with 3-4 arcs and a single isocenter. Sixteen patients have been treated to date at our institution, including one patient with brain metastases, two patients with meningiomas, one patient with lymphoma and 12 patients with astrocytomas. The majority of tumors have been treated with single isocenter but some as large as 7 cm have been treated safely with two isocenters.
Subject(s)
Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
Actual teaching at the bedside during attending rounds, with emphasis on history taking and physical diagnosis, has declined from an incidence of 75% in the 1960s to an incidence of less than 16% today. Profound advances in technology, in imaging, and in laboratory testing and our fascination for these aspects of patient care, account for part of this decline, but faculty must also assume responsibility for the present lack of bedside teaching. If we are to reverse this trend, we will need to realize the barriers to bedside teaching, both real and imagined, and overcome them. And if we are to become effective bedside teachers, as were our mentors, we will need to sharpen our own physical diagnostic skills. We will need to learn how to be gentle with students and housestaff, how to better communicate with patients, and how to teach ethics and professionalism with the patient at hand.
Subject(s)
Clinical Medicine/education , Education, Medical/methods , Teaching/methods , Communication , Education, Medical/trends , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , United StatesABSTRACT
Recognizing that skilled history-taking is in danger of becoming a lost art, the American Board of Internal Medicine calls attention to the urgent need for internal medicine residency programs to ensure that these skills are taught and assessed. Although the Board's certification examination contains standardized items that test the physician's ability to use information from a patient's medical history, the written examination cannot assess the physician's ability to elicit that history. The Board believes that history-taking skills will become even more crucial as health care delivery changes, requiring more cost efficiency without sacrificing quality. By highlighting the skills of effective history-taking and strategies for assessment, the Board offers specific recommendations for its promotion as a key element of quality patient care.
Subject(s)
Clinical Medicine , Internal Medicine/education , Medical History Taking , Health Care Reform , Humans , Internship and Residency , United StatesABSTRACT
Early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with radiotherapy alone or combined modality therapy were retrospectively analyzed for survival, patterns of failure, salvage, and toxicity. Of 75 evaluable patients, 47 were given radiotherapy alone and 28 were given combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Of the patients studied, 26 were clinical stage I and 49 were clinical stage II, with nine patients upstaged at laparotomy. Minimum follow-up was 2 years, with a median of 81 months. Complete response rate was 95%. Relapse-free survival and overall survival were 89% and 96%, respectively, at 2 years; 78% and 86% at 5 years; and 76% and 82% at 10 years. Of 16 patients who relapsed (21%), 13/47 patients were treated with radiotherapy and 3/28 were treated with combined modality therapy. Salvage rates were higher in those treated with radiotherapy alone. There were 13 deaths: six from disease, two from treatment-related complications, and five from second primary malignancies. There was a higher incidence of second malignancies and deaths due to complication in patients treated with combined modality therapy. Radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy is an effective modality in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Treatment should be selected properly to optimize results and decrease complications.