Mitigating the accumulation of arsenic and cadmium in rice grain: A quantitative review of the role of water management.

Arsenic exposure through rice consumption is a growing concern. Compared to Continuous Flooding (CF), irrigation practices that dry the soil at least once during the growing season [referred to here as Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD)] can decrease As accumulation in grain; however, this can simultaneously increase grain Cd to potentially unsafe levels. We modelled grain As and Cd from field studies comparing AWD and CF to identify optimal AWD practices to minimize the accumulation of As and Cd in grain. The severity of soil drying during AWD drying event(s), quantified as soil water potential (SWP), was the main factor leading to a reduction in grain total As and inorganic As, compared to CF. However, lower SWP levels were necessary to decrease grain inorganic As, compared to total As. Therefore, if the goal is to decrease grain inorganic As, the soil needs to be dried further than it would for decreasing total As alone. The main factor driving grain Cd accumulation was when AWD was practiced during the season. Higher grain Cd levels were observed when AWD occurred during the early reproductive stage. Further, higher Cd levels were observed when AWD spanned multiple rice growth stages, compared to one stage. If Cd levels are concerning, the minimum trade-off between total As and Cd accumulation in rice grain occurred when AWD was implemented at a SWP of -47 kPa during one stage other than the early reproductive. While these results are not meant to be comprehensive of all the interactions affecting the As and Cd dynamics in rice systems, they can be used as a first guide for implementing AWD practices with the goal of minimizing the accumulation of As and Cd in rice grain.

Residual Effects of Fertilization History Increase Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Zero-N Controls: Implications for Estimating Fertilizer-Induced Emission Factors.

Agricultural N fertilization is the dominant driver of increasing atmospheric nitrous oxide (NO) concentrations over the past half-century, yet there is considerable uncertainty in estimates of NO emissions from agriculture. Such estimates are typically based on the amount of N applied and a fertilizer-induced emission factor (EF), which is calculated as the difference in emissions between a fertilized plot and a zero-N control plot divided by the amount of N applied. A fertilizer-induced EF of 1% is currently recognized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) based on several studies analyzing published field measurements of NO emissions. Although many zero-N control plots used in these measurements received historical N applications, the potential for a residual impact of these inputs on NO emissions has been largely ignored and remains poorly understood. To address this issue, we compared NO emissions under laboratory conditions from soils sampled within zero-N control plots that had historically received N inputs versus soils from plots that had no N inputs for 20 yr. Historical N fertilization of zero-N control plots increased initial NO emissions by roughly one order of magnitude on average relative to historically unfertilized control plots. Higher NO emissions were positively correlated with extractable N and potentially mineralizable N. This finding suggests that accounting for fertilization history may help reduce the uncertainty associated with the IPCC fertilizer-induced EF and more accurately estimate the contribution of fertilizer N to agricultural NO emissions, although further research to demonstrate this relationship in the field is needed.