ABSTRACT
Some health concerns are often not identified until late into clinical development of drugs, which can place participants and patients at significant risk. For example, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeled the xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat with a"boxed" warning regarding an increased risk of cardiovascular death, and this safety risk was only identified during Phase 3b clinical trials after its approval. Thus, better preclinical assessment of drug efficacy and safety are needed to accurately evaluate candidate drug risk earlier in discovery and development. This study explored whether an in vitro vascular model incorporating human vascular cells and hemodynamics could be used to differentiate the potential cardiovascular risk associated with molecules that have similar on-target mechanisms of action. We compared the transcriptomic responses induced by febuxostat and other xanthine oxidase inhibitors to a database of 111 different compounds profiled in the human vascular model. Of the 111 compounds in the database, 107 are clinical-stage and 33 are FDA-labelled for increased cardiovascular risk. Febuxostat induces pathway-level regulation that has high similarity to the set of drugs FDA-labelled for increased cardiovascular risk. These results were replicated with a febuxostat analog, but not another structurally distinct xanthine oxidase inhibitor that does not confer cardiovascular risk. Together, these data suggest that the FDA warning for febuxostat stems from the chemical structure of the medication itself, rather than the target, xanthine oxidase. Importantly, these data indicate that cardiovascular risk can be evaluated in this in vitro human vascular model, which may facilitate understanding the drug candidate safety profile earlier in discovery and development.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , United States , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Xanthine Oxidase , Febuxostat/pharmacology , Risk Factors , Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Heart Disease Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The causal relationship between gout and renal transplant outcomes is difficult to assess due to multiple interacting covariates. This study sought to estimate the independent effect of new-onset gout on renal transplant outcomes using a methodology that accounted for these interactions. METHODS: This study analyzed data on patients in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) who received a primary kidney transplant between 2008 and 2015. The exposure was new-onset gout, and the primary endpoint was returning to dialysis >12 months postindex date (transplant date). A marginal structural model (MSM) was fitted to determine the relative risk of new-onset gout on return to dialysis. RESULTS: 18 525 kidney transplant recipients in the USRDS met study eligibility. One thousand three hundred ninety-nine (7.6%) patients developed new-onset gout, and 1420 (7.7%) returned to dialysis >12 months postindex. Adjusting for baseline and time-varying confounders via the MSM showed new-onset gout was associated with a 51% increased risk of return to (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: This finding suggests that new onset gout after kidney transplantation could be a harbinger for poor renal outcomes, and to our knowledge is the first study of kidney transplant outcomes using a technique that accounted for the dynamic relationship between renal dysfunction and gout.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an inflammatory arthritis of unknown etiology, which lasts for greater than 6 weeks with onset before 16 years of age. JIA is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. NSAIDs have been the mainstay of initial management with naproxen (NAP) being commonly used, but they may cause serious side effects such as gastric ulcers which can be reduced by concomitant administration of proton pump inhibitors, such as esomeprazole (ESO). METHODS: Primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 3 fixed doses of NAP/ESO in JIA patients aged 12 to 16 years. Forty-six children and adolescents with JIA by International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, mean age of 13.6 years, from 18 US sites were prospectively enrolled over 2 years and followed for up to 6 months. Doses of the NAP/ESO fixed combination were based on baseline weight. The exploratory efficacy outcome was assessed with the ACR Pediatric-30, - 50, - 70, - 90 Response and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) discomfort and functional scores at months 1, 3, and 6 as change from baseline. Occurrence and causality were assessed for treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) and discontinuations were monitored monthly. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received at least 1 dose of naproxen/esomeprazole and 36 completed the trial. Thirty-seven (80.4%) had at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) and, with the exception of 2 events in one patient, all of the TEAEs were mild or moderate. Frequent TEAEs (≥5% of patients) were upper respiratory tract and gastrointestinal related. Eleven (23.9%) had at least 1 TEAE considered to be related to study drug. Four patients (8.7%) discontinued due to a TEAE with one of these being the only serious AE reported, acute hepatitis. Mean number of active joints at baseline was 3.1. Improvement in JIA signs and symptoms occurred at most assessments and by month 6, the percentage of patients with an ACR Pediatric-30, - 50, - 70, and - 90 Response was 47.1, 38.2, 32.4, and 17.6%, respectively. The percent of patients achieving ACR Pediatric response increased over time. CHAQ discomfort improved at each assessment and functional scores improved at all assessments for 'Arising, Walking, and Activities' with several improved for 'Dressing and Grooming, Eating, Hygiene, and Grip'. There was no indication of a dose-related efficacy effect. CONCLUSION: NAP/ESO was well tolerated in JIA patients aged 12 to 16 years with high levels of response to ACR criteria. No new safety signals were identified for the well-characterized components of this fixed dosed JIA treatment, which was developed to reduce the risk of gastric ulcers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01544114 . Registered February 21, 2012.
