Assessment of disseminated pancreatic cancer: a comparison of traditional exploratory laparotomy and radioimmunoguided surgery.

BACKGROUND: After curative resection for pancreatic cancer, only 10% of patients survive disease for 5 years. These dismal results suggest the presence of occult tumor at the time of initial operation. This phase I/II study was conducted to compare traditional exploratory laparotomy with radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) in the assessment of disseminated pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Ten patients with the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were injected intravenously with 1 mg CC49 monoclonal antibody radiolabeled with 2 mCi iodine 125. All patients were evaluated by a standard abdominal exploration followed by RIGS. Tumor identified by each technique was documented and categorized as neoplasm disseminated to viscera or lymphatics. RESULTS: There were 25 visceral sites of disease that were traditionally discovered at the time of exploration including pancreas, omentum, small bowel, pelvis, liver, and other. All 25 sites of disease were positive by RIGS plus an additional four sites of visceral tumor for a total of 29 RIGS positive sites of disease. Six lymphatic sites of disease were discovered by traditional examination; however, 44 sites of lymphatic sites were documented by RIGS (p < 0.001). In addition, nine traditionally and pathologically negative/RIGS positive nodes were subjected to cytokeratin and MOC 31 immunohistochemistry. Six of nine nodes were positive by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry, and five of the six cytokeratin positive nodes were MOC 31 positive. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the RIGS technique detected significantly more foci of visceral spread of tumor than traditional exploratory laparotomy and significantly more sites of lymphatic dissemination were identified by RIGS than by standard exploration.

Role of carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting resectability of recurrent colorectal cancer.

The reported low resectability rate for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer who have carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels > 11 has led us to perform this study. One hundred twenty-four patients who underwent Radioimmunoguided Surgery (RIGS) procedures for recurrent colorectal cancer from 1986 to the present were studied. In surgery, all patients underwent a traditional exploration followed by survey with a hand-held, gamma-detecting probe to detect preinjected radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies attached to cancer cells. Sites of metastases included: 72 liver (58.1 percent), 23 pelvis (18.5 percent), 15 distant lymph nodes (12.1 percent), 2 anastomotic (1.6 percent), and 12 other sites (9.7 percent). The resectability rate was 43.5 percent (54 patients). The mean preoperative CEA level for patients with resectable disease was significantly lower than for patients with unresectable disease (P = 0.017): unresectable--mean, 87.1; SD, 141.0; minimum, 0.3; maximum, 501; resectable--mean, 36.6; SD, 59.3; minimum, 0.3; maximum, 329. The CEA level for patients with liver metastasis did not vary significantly from those patients without metastasis: 70 vs. 58.2 (P = 0.58). Those patients with resectable liver tumors had lower mean CEA levels than those with unresectable liver, approaching significance: 41.6 vs. 91.9 (P = 0.065). Other metastatic sites had a mean CEA level of: pelvic, 72.6; distant lymph nodes, 47.8; anastomotic, 2.7; and other sites, 53.8. These data suggest that there is a significant difference between the preoperative CEA level of the resectable and unresectable recurrent colorectal cancer patients, but the large standard deviation does not justify abandonment of exploration for any CEA level.