Patient engagement to counter catheter-associated urinary tract infections with an app (PECCA): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time-series and before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is increased by unnecessary placement and prolonged use of urinary catheters. AIM: To assess whether inappropriate use of catheters and catheter-associated UTI were reduced through patient participation. METHODS: In this multicentre, interrupted time-series and before-and-after study, we implemented a patient-centred app which provides catheter advice for patients, together with clinical lessons, feedback via e-mails and support rounds for staff members. Data on catheter use and infections were collected during a six-month baseline and a six-month intervention period on 13 wards in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Dutch Trial Register: NL7178. FINDINGS: Between June 25th, 2018 and August 1st, 2019, 6556 patients were included in 24 point-prevalence surveys, 3285 (50%) at baseline and 3271 (50%) during the intervention. During the intervention 249 app users and a median of seven new app users per week were registered (interquartile range: 5.5-13.0). At baseline, inappropriate catheter use was registered for 175 (21.9%) out of 798 catheters, compared to 55 (7.0%) out of 786 during the intervention. Time-series analysis showed a non-significant decrease of inappropriate use of 5.8% (95% confidence interval: -3.76 to 15.45; P = 0.219), with an odds ratio of 0.27 (0.19-0.37; P < 0.001). Catheter-associated UTI decreased by 3.0% (1.3-4.6; P = 0.001), with odds ratio 0.541 (0.408-0.716; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although UTI significantly decreased after the implementation, patient participation did not significantly reduce the prevalence of inappropriate urinary catheter use. However, the inappropriate catheter reduction of 5.8% and an odds ratio of 0.27 suggest a positive trend. Patient participation appears to reduce CAUTI and could reduce other healthcare-associated infections.

Implementation of 'Choosing Wisely Netherlands' for internal medicine.

BACKGROUND: The Choosing Wisely campaign aims to reduce low-value care to improve quality and lower healthcare costs. Our objective was to determine the current implementation of the Choosing Wisely Netherlands campaign and the 10 recommendations (released in 2014) for internal medicine. METHODS: We actively surveyed physicians and residents in the departments of internal medicine in 13 hospitals in the Netherlands. The survey was performed during a presentation about Choosing Wisely and we asked whether they thought that the recommendations were implemented. RESULTS: Between May and November 2018, we surveyed 281 physicians and residents, of which we received 2625 answers (response rate 85%). We found that 178 (68.5%) of 260 physicians were unaware of the Choosing Wisely campaign. For the implementation of recommendations, 1506 (75.2%) of 2003 answers stated that physicians applied the recommendations in clinical practice. We found no differences in implementation of physicians who were aware or unaware of the campaign, respectively 529 (76.1%) of 695 versus 854 (74.2%) of 1151 of the recommendations were implemented; p = 0.357. The recommendation that was implemented least was 'Do not routinely order coagulation tests before invasive procedures', in which 28% stated that they applied this in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Four years after the introduction, only one-third of physicians and residents of internal medicine were aware of the Choosing Wisely Netherlands campaign. Nevertheless, most Choosing Wisely recommendations were implemented sufficiently in clinical practice. There is room for improvement, mainly in recommendations that need a multidisciplinary approach.

Prevalence and risk factors of inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters in surgical and medical patients.

BACKGROUND: Previously, the RICAT (Reduction of Inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary CATheters) study had been conducted by ourselves to reduce inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters in medical wards to prevent healthcare-associated infections. AIM: To compare surgical and medical wards, and to determine risk factors for inappropriate catheter use. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed from October, 2017, to May, 2018, in surgical wards of two university hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were prospectively observed every other week for seven months. Inappropriate use was compared with non-surgical wards in the RICAT study. FINDINGS: In all, 409 surgical patients were included, and they were compared with 1781 medical patients. Inappropriate use occurred in 36 (8.5%) out of 425 peripheral intravenous catheters in 373 surgical patients, compared to 400 (22.9%) out of 1747 peripheral intravenous catheters in 1665 medical patients, a difference of 14.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-17.8; P < 0.001). Inappropriate use of urinary catheters occurred in 14 (10.4%) out of 134 surgical patients, compared to 105 (32.4%) out of 324 medical patients, a difference of 22.0% (95% CI: 14.7-29.2; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis in the two university hospitals confirmed these differences. The main risk factor for inappropriate use of peripheral intravenous catheters was admission in medical wards (odds ratio (OR): 3.50; 95% CI: 2.15-5.69), which was also one of the main risk factors for urinary catheters (OR: 2.75; 95% CI: 1.36-5.55). CONCLUSION: Inappropriate use of catheters is more common in medical wards compared to surgical wards. Prevention strategies to reduce healthcare-associated infections should primarily focus on sites with high prevalence of inappropriate use.

[Ascites, pleural effusion and a benign ovarian tumour; the triad of Meigs' syndrome]. / Ascites, pleuravocht en een benigne ovariumtumor.

BACKGROUND: Classical Meigs' syndrome consists of the triad of an ovarian fibroma, ascites and pleural effusion. A characteristic of the syndrome is that the excess fluid is resorbed after surgical resection of the tumour. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 49-year-old woman was admitted to accident and emergency department in a neglected, cachectic and hypothermic condition. A CT scan revealed an ovarian tumour, ascites and a right-sided pleural effusion. The level of the tumour marker CA-125 was also greatly elevated. Our initial working diagnosis was, therefore, 'high-grade ovarian carcinoma', but on repeated testing no malignant cells were found in the aspirated fluid. We suspected Meigs' syndrome. We first ensured that her general and nutritional condition improved; then she underwent a bilateral adnexectomy. A fibrothecoma was found in each ovary. The ascites and pleural effusion resolved following surgery and the patient recovered well. CONCLUSION: The clinical picture of Meigs' syndrome can resemble that of high-grade ovarian carcinoma. This syndrome should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients with an ovarian tumour, ascites and, possibly, pleural effusion.