Utilization of anonymization techniques to create an external control arm for clinical trial data.

BACKGROUND: Subject-level real-world data (RWD) collected during daily healthcare practices are increasingly used in medical research to assess questions that cannot be addressed in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). A novel application of RWD arises from the need to create external control arms (ECAs) for single-arm RCTs. In the analysis of ECAs against RCT data, there is an evident need to manage and analyze RCT data and RWD in the same technical environment. In the Nordic countries, legal requirements may require that the original subject-level data be anonymized, i.e., modified so that the risk to identify any individual is minimal. The aim of this study was to conduct initial exploration on how well pseudonymized and anonymized RWD perform in the creation of an ECA for an RCT. METHODS: This was a hybrid observational cohort study using clinical data from the control arm of the completed randomized phase II clinical trial (PACIFIC-AF) and RWD cohort from Finnish healthcare data sources. The initial pseudonymized RWD were anonymized within the (k, ε)-anonymity framework (a model for protecting individuals against identification). Propensity score matching and weighting methods were applied to the anonymized and pseudonymized RWD, to balance potential confounders against the RCT data. Descriptive statistics for the potential confounders and overall survival analyses were conducted prior to and after matching and weighting, using both the pseudonymized and anonymized RWD sets. RESULTS: Anonymization affected the baseline characteristics of potential confounders only marginally. The greatest difference was in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.6% vs. 5.4% in the pseudonymized compared to the anonymized data, respectively). Moreover, the overall survival changed in anonymization by only 8% (95% CI 4-22%). Both the pseudonymized and anonymized RWD were able to produce matched ECAs for the RCT data. Anonymization after matching impacted overall survival analysis by 22% (95% CI -21-87%). CONCLUSIONS: Anonymization may be a viable technique for cases where flexible data transfer and sharing are required. As anonymization necessarily affects some aspects of the original data, further research and careful consideration of anonymization strategies are needed.

Efficacy and safety of vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: data from the ASTEROID 3 randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Vilaprisan is a highly potent selective progesterone receptor modulator shown to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding, induce amenorrhea, and diminish uterine fibroid volume in phase 2 studies. The objective of ASTEROID 3 was to demonstrate the superiority of vilaprisan compared with placebo in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study. SETTING: Hospitals and medical centers. PATIENT(S): Women with ≥1 uterine fibroid of ≥3 cm and heavy menstrual bleeding of >80 mL/cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms, which were planned to comprise 2 treatment periods of 12 weeks, each with vilaprisan (2 mg/d) or placebo that were continuous or separated by a break of one bleed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amenorrhea (primary end point; <2 mL in the last 28 days of treatment) and heavy menstrual bleeding response (key secondary end point; <80 mL/cycle and >50% reduction in bleeding from baseline) were measured with the alkaline hematin method. Change in volume of the 3 largest fibroids from baseline to end of treatment was assessed by ultrasound. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULT(S): Overall, 75 women completed the first 12 weeks of treatment. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences were observed between the vilaprisan- and placebo-treated groups in both the full analysis and per-protocol sets. In the per-protocol set (n = 36 and n = 12 for the vilaprisan and placebo groups, respectively), amenorrhea was observed more frequently in women treated with vilaprisan than in those who received placebo (83.3% vs. 0%, P<.0001), with a median time to onset of 3 days in the vilaprisan group. Similarly, more vilaprisan- than placebo-treated women achieved a response in heavy menstrual bleeding (91.7% vs. 25.0%, P<.0001). Serious adverse events were reported for 22 (27.8%) of 79 women and were evenly distributed among the 4 groups receiving vilaprisan and/or placebo. None of these events led to study discontinuation or were related to the liver, and no new safety findings were identified compared with the earlier phase 2 ASTEROID studies. CONCLUSION(S): Vilaprisan is efficacious and well tolerated over 12 weeks in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Further investigations of the long-term efficacy and safety of vilaprisan are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03400943 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (RISE-SSc): open-label, long-term extension of a phase 2b, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The phase 2b Riociguat Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (RISE-SSc) trial investigated riociguat versus placebo in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. The long-term extension evaluated safety and exploratory treatment effects for an additional year. METHODS: Patients were enrolled to RISE-SSc between Jan 15, 2015, and Dec 8, 2016. Those who completed the 52-week, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase were eligible for the long-term extension. Patients originally assigned to riociguat continued therapy (riociguat-riociguat group). Those originally assigned to placebo were switched to riociguat (placebo-riociguat group), adjusted up to 2·5 mg three times daily in a 10-week, double-blind dose-adjustment phase, followed by an open-label phase. Statistical analyses were descriptive. Safety including adverse events and serious adverse events was assessed in the long-term safety analysis set (all patients randomly assigned and treated with study medication in the double-blind phase who continued study medication in the long-term extension). The RISE-SSc trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02283762. FINDINGS: In total, 87 (72%) of 121 patients in the main RISE-SSc study entered the long-term extension (riociguat-riociguat, n=42; placebo-riociguat, n=45). 65 (75%) of 87 patients were women, 22 (25%) were men, and 62 (71%) were White. Overall, 82 (94%) of 87 patients in the long-term extension had an adverse event; most (66 [76%] of 87) were of mild to moderate severity, with no increase in pulmonary-related serious adverse events in patients with interstitial lung disease. INTERPRETATION: No new safety signals were observed with long-term riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Study limitations include the absence of a comparator group in this open-label extension study. FUNDING: Bayer and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (RISE-SSc): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: Riociguat is approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension and has antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in animal models of tissue fibrosis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) at high risk of skin fibrosis progression. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial, adults with dcSSc of <18 months' duration and a modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) 10-22 units received riociguat 0.5 mg to 2.5 mg orally three times daily (n=60) or placebo (n=61). The primary endpoint was change in mRSS from baseline to week 52. RESULTS: At week 52, change from baseline in mRSS units was -2.09±5.66 (n=57) with riociguat and -0.77±8.24 (n=52) with placebo (difference of least squares means -2.34 (95% CI -4.99 to 0.30; p=0.08)). In patients with interstitial lung disease, forced vital capacity declined by 2.7% with riociguat and 7.6% with placebo. At week 14, average Raynaud's condition score had improved ≥50% in 19 (41.3%)/46 patients with riociguat and 13 (26.0%)/50 patients with placebo. Safety assessments showed no new signals with riociguat and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Riociguat did not significantly benefit mRSS versus placebo at the predefined p<0.05. Secondary and exploratory analyses showed potential efficacy signals that should be tested in further trials. Riociguat was well tolerated.