Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
New Microbiol ; 47(1): 111-115, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700892

ABSTRACT

Lamivudine (3TC)/dolutegravir (DTG) single tablet regimen (STR) has shown long-term efficacy and tolerability in people living with HIV (PLWH). Dolutegravir has been approved for use in children, while data on the efficacy of 3TC plus DTG in maintaining virological suppression in this population are still under evaluation. In this case series, we describe three children with perinatally acquired HIV who maintained virological suppression after switching antiretroviral therapy to DTG/3TC. We present three case reports of three children enrolled in the Italian Register for HIV Infection in Children: a 9-year-old boy, a 10-year-old girl, and a 2-year-old girl with perinatally acquired HIV who immediately started antiretroviral therapy with a three-drug regimen upon diagnosis, which occurred at delivery, after 6 months of life, and after 2 years of life, respectively. They achieved and maintain virological suppression after 1, 6, and 7 months of therapy, respectively; then a switch strategy was performed with a two-drug regimen with DTG/3TC STR at the age of 7 years for the first child and at the age of 9 years for the second, while the third was switched to a DTG plus 3TC not STR, owing to weight requirements, at the age of 2 years and 10 months. All children maintained virological suppression at last follow-up visit (January 2024), showing an excellent growth curve and maintaining good adherence and tolerability to DTG plus 3TC. A two-drug regimen with DTG/3TC demonstrated efficacy in maintaining virological suppression in a switch strategy in these children, with important advantages such as better tolerability and comfort of taking a single tablet once daily.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring , Lamivudine , Oxazines , Piperazines , Pyridones , Humans , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Lamivudine/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/administration & dosage , Male , Child , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/virology , Child, Preschool , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV-1/drug effects
2.
New Microbiol ; 46(3): 246-251, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747468

ABSTRACT

To achieve the World Health Organization goal of hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication, barriers to treatment should be investigated and overcome. The aim of this study was to identify those barriers and describe the strategies adopted to achieve HCV micro-elimination in a cohort of coinfected people living with HIV (PLWH-HCV). Adult PLWH-HCV followed at our hospital with detectable serum HCV-RNA in 2018 were enrolled. After a three-year follow-up, barriers to HCV treatment were investigated and strategies to overcome them were described. Of 492 PLWH-HCV seen in 2018, 29 (5.9%) had detectable serum HCV-RNA. Eight out of 29 (27.6%) were excluded because they were already under treatment, while 2 others were excluded because they moved to other outpatient clinics. Among the remaining 19 study participants, the most common barriers to treatment were poor adherence to therapies and follow-up visits (n=9, 47%), recent HCV diagnosis awaiting proper staging (n=3, 16%) and treatment hesitancy (n=2, 10%). During the following three years, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) treatment was completed in 11/19 (58%) cases, with achievement of sustained virological response in 100% of cases. For the remaining cases, 2/19 (10.5%) were lost to follow-up, 2/19 (10.5%) died before treatment initiation and 4/19 (21.0%) are still awaiting treatment. Despite 3 years of effort, HCV micro-elimination has not been achieved at our center. We observed that poor adherence and treatment hesitancy were the main barriers to treatment. Strategies addressing these issues need to be implemented.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Adult , Humans , Hepacivirus , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , RNA
3.
J Chemother ; 35(8): 730-736, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608747

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines reduce COVID-19-related mortality and morbidity. We describe the effect of vaccination on COVID-19-patients admitted at our hospital. Retrospective, single-center study conducted in Genoa, Italy, including patients ≥18years hospitalized for COVID-19 from May to December 2021. Demographical and clinical data were collected, vaccinated (group-A) and not-vaccinated (group-B) patients were compared. Impact of vaccination on mortality, ICU admission, and oxygen need was studied using Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models after adjusting for propensity scores. Overall, 395 patients SARS-CoV-2 infected were included, of which 150 (38%) were vaccinated and 245 (62%) were not vaccinated. Patients in group-A were older, more disable, and with higher morbidity. Overall, 64 patients (16%) died within 30 days from admission, 34 in Group A (23%), and 30 in group B (12%). However, no statistically significant differences were observed (group-A versus group-B: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.40, p = 0.483). On the other hand, vaccination was protective in terms of ICU admission (OR = 0.23, p = 0.046) and oxygen need (OR = 0.33, p = 0.008). Our study confirms that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduces morbidity among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The still high mortality in our cohort of vaccinated individuals could be partially due to vulnerable conditions of our patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals , Vaccination , Italy/epidemiology , Oxygen
4.
HIV Med ; 24(11): 1150-1157, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37439411

ABSTRACT

The rise of HIV-1 drug resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) threatens the long-term success of NNRTI-based therapies. Our study aims to describe the circulation of major resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) for NNRTIs in people living with HIV (PLWH) in Italy from 2000 to 2020. We included 5982 naïves and 28 505 genotypes from 9387 treatment-experienced PLWH from the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis (ARCA) cohort. Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) was found in 12.5% and declined from 17.3% in 2000-2003 to 10.9% in 2016-2020 (p = 0.003). Predictors of TDR were viral subtype B [vs. non-B, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.94, p < 0.001], zenith viral load (VL) (per 1 log10 higher, aOR = 0.86, p = 0.013), nadir CD4 cell count (per 100 cells/µL increase aOR = 0.95, p = 0.013). At least one RAM for NNRTIs among treatment experienced PLWH was detected in 33.2% and pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) declined from 43.4% in 2000-2003 to 20.9% in 2016-2020 (p < 0.001). Predictors of PDR were sexual transmission route (vs. others, aOR = 0.78, p < 0.001), time since HIV diagnosis (per 1 month longer, aOR = 1.002, p < 0.001), viral subtype B (vs. non B, aOR = 1.37, p < 0.001), VL (per 1 log10 higher, aOR = 1.12, p < 0.001), nadir CD4 count (per 100 cells/µL increase, aOR = 0.91, p < 0.001), previous exposure to any NNRTI (aOR = 2.31, p < 0.001) and a more recent calendar year sequence (any time span > 2008 vs. 2000-2003, any aOR <1, p < 0.001). Circulation of RAMs to NNRTIs declined during the last 20 years in Italy. NNRTIs remain pivotal drugs for the management of HIV-1 due to safety concerns and long-acting options.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Humans , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV-1/genetics , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy
5.
New Microbiol ; 46(2): 226-230, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37247247

ABSTRACT

Management of heavily treatment experienced (HTE) people with HIV remains a challenge. Tailored antiretroviral therapy (ART) is needed in this fragile population who almost invariably harbor viral quasispecies with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). The reference method for HIV genotypic resistance testing (GRT) has long been Sanger sequencing (SS), but next-generation sequencing (NGS), following recent progress in workflow and cost-effectiveness, is replacing SS because of higher sensitivity. From the PRESTIGIO Registry, we present a case of a 59-year-old HTE woman who failed darunavir/ritonavir plus raltegravir at low-viremia levels due mainly to high pill burden and poor adherence. NGS-GRT was performed on HIV-RNA at failure and the results were compared to all past SS-GRT data available (historical genotype). In this case, NGS-GRT did not detect any minority drug-resistant variants. After discussing several therapeutic options, the treatment was changed to dolutegravir 50 mg twice daily plus doravirine 100 mg once a day, based on clinical history, adherence issues, and pill burden, as well as the historical SS-GRT and the latest NGS-GRT results. At six months follow-up visit, the patient had HIV-RNA below 30 copies/ml and CD4+ T cell count increased from 673 cells/ mm3 to 688 cells/ mm3. Close follow-up of this patient is ongoing.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Humans , Raltegravir Potassium/therapeutic use , Darunavir/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , HIV-1/genetics , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy , RNA , Viral Load , Drug Resistance, Viral , Treatment Outcome
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(2): 280-286, 2023 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36976301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severely immunocompromised patients are at risk for prolonged or relapsed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination treatment in immunocompromised COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We included all immunocompromised patients with prolonged/relapsed COVID-19 treated with combination therapy with 2 antivirals (remdesivir plus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, or molnupiravir in case of renal failure) plus, if available, anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), between February and October 2022. The main outcomes were virological response at day 14 (negative Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2] swab) and virological and clinical response (alive, asymptomatic, with negative SARS-CoV-2 swab) at day 30 and the last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (Omicron variant in 17/18) were included: 18 received full combination of 2 antivirals and mAbs and 4 received 2 antivirals only; in 20 of 22 (91%) patients, 2 antivirals were nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus remdesivir. Nineteen (86%) patients had hematological malignancy, and 15 (68%) had received anti-CD20 therapy. All were symptomatic; 8 (36%) required oxygen. Four patients received a second course of combination treatment. The response rate at day 14, day 30, and last follow-up was 75% (15/20 evaluable), 73% (16/22), and 82% (18/22), respectively. Day 14 and 30 response rates were significantly higher when combination therapy included mAbs. Higher number of vaccine doses was associated with better final outcome. Two patients (9%) developed severe side effects (bradycardia leading to remdesivir discontinuation and myocardial infarction). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy including 2 antivirals (mainly remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and mAbs was associated with high rate of virological and clinical response in immunocompromised patients with prolonged/relapsed COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Immunocompromised Host , Drug Therapy, Combination , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment/adverse effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment/methods , Recurrence , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Drug Combinations , Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Med Virol ; 95(2): e28560, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757085

ABSTRACT

Since May 2022, multiple human Monkeypox cases were identified in nonendemic countries, mainly among men who have sex with men. We aimed to report the features, clinical course, management, and outcome of the Monkeypox cases diagnosed in the Dermatology and Infectious Disease Units of the San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy. We performed an observational study of the Monkeypox cases diagnosed from July 1 until August 31, 2022, collecting clinical, laboratory, and histological data. We studied 16 Monkeypox-infected men (14 homosexual, 2 bisexual) with a median age of 37 years. Three were HIV-infected. All patients reported multiple sexual partners and/or unprotected sex in the 2 weeks before the diagnosis. Most patients had prodromal signs/symptoms before the appearance of the skin/mucosal eruption, consisting of erythematous papules/vesicles/pustules in the anogenital area, which tended to erode evolving into crusts and ulcers. Lesions were often associated with local and/or systemic symptoms. Histopathology showed overlapping features in all cases: epidermal ulceration and dermal inflammatory infiltrate consisting of lymphocytes and neutrophils with an interstitial and perivascular/peri-adnexal pattern and endothelial swelling. Concomitant sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (gonococcal/nongonococcal proctitis and anal high-risk human papillomavirus [HR-HPV] infection) were frequent. Four patients were hospitalized, and one received specific treatment. The overall outcome was good. At the follow-up visit, three patients presented skin scars. Our series confirms the features of the current Monkeypox outbreak; however, different from other studies, we found a considerable rate of concomitant STIs, such as anal HR-HPV infection, that should be kept in mind because this persistent infection is the main cause of anal cancers.


Subject(s)
Anus Diseases , Mpox (monkeypox) , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Male , Humans , Adult , Homosexuality, Male , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks
8.
Pulmonology ; 29(6): 457-468, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of barotrauma associated with different types of ventilatory support is unclear in COVID-19 patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the different respiratory support strategies on barotrauma occurrence; we also sought to determine the frequency of barotrauma and the clinical characteristics of the patients who experienced this complication. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective case-control study from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 included COVID-19 patients who experienced barotrauma during hospital stay. They were matched with controls in a 1:1 ratio for the same admission period in the same ward of treatment. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression (OR) were performed to explore which factors were associated with barotrauma and in-hospital death. RESULTS: We included 200 cases and 200 controls. Invasive mechanical ventilation was used in 39.3% of patients in the barotrauma group, and in 20.1% of controls (p<0.001). Receiving non-invasive ventilation (C-PAP/PSV) instead of conventional oxygen therapy (COT) increased the risk of barotrauma (OR 5.04, 95% CI 2.30 - 11.08, p<0.001), similarly for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 6.24, 95% CI 2.86-13.60, p<0.001). High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), compared with COT, did not significantly increase the risk of barotrauma. Barotrauma frequency occurred in 1.00% [95% CI 0.88-1.16] of patients; these were older (p=0.022) and more frequently immunosuppressed (p=0.013). Barotrauma was shown to be an independent risk for death (OR 5.32, 95% CI 2.82-10.03, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: C-PAP/PSV compared with COT or HFNO increased the risk of barotrauma; otherwise HFNO did not. Barotrauma was recorded in 1.00% of patients, affecting mainly patients with more severe COVID-19 disease. Barotrauma was independently associated with mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: this case-control study was prospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov as NCT04897152 (on 21 May 2021).


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Barotrauma/epidemiology , Barotrauma/etiology
9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(1): ofac656, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655192

ABSTRACT

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients receiving a short course (SC) vs a prolonged course (PC) of antifungal therapy for uncomplicated Candida bloodstream infections (BSIs). Methods: All episodes of uncomplicated Candida BSI from September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2020, were reviewed. We compared the primary (all-cause 90-day mortality) and secondary study end points (1-year recurrent Candida BSI and all-cause 1-year mortality) among patients who underwent SC (5-11 days) or PC (12-24 days) therapy using propensity score analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Results: A total of 114 patients with uncomplicated Candida BSI were included: 35 (30.7%) were classified into the SC group (median [interquartile range {IQR}], 9 [7-11] days) and 79 (69.3%) into the PC group (median [IQR], 14 [14-16] days). Patients in the SC group compared with the PC group had a higher rate of hospitalization in the surgical ward (40.0% vs 19.0%; P = .02) or septic shock at the time of Candida BSI onset (11.4% vs 1.3%; P = .03). The risk of 90-day mortality was not different between the SC and PC groups (n = 8 [22.9%] vs 17 [21.5%], respectively; IPTW-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.31-1.47; P = .20). The risk for recurrent Candida BSI within 1 year of completing therapy (IPTW-adjusted sHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.20-5.80; P = .94) or for all-cause 1-year mortality (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.35-1.50; P = .38) did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Receiving a short vs prolonged course of antifungal therapy did not affect mortality or BSI recurrence in patients with uncomplicated candidemia.

10.
Int J STD AIDS ; 34(3): 208-210, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520997

ABSTRACT

Monkeypox (MPXV) usually causes a mild and self-limited infection. To date there are no data about cidofovir for the treatment for MPXV in humans. We report a case of a 25 years-old Brazilian man with a concurrent diagnosis of acute HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection, primary syphilis and MPXV infection with a nasal lesion successfully treated with intravenous cidofovir.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Male , Humans , Adult , Mpox (monkeypox)/diagnosis , Mpox (monkeypox)/pathology , Cidofovir/therapeutic use , Brazil
11.
J Clin Med ; 13(1)2023 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38202159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious disease, and in many cases, surgery is necessary. Whether the type of prosthesis implanted for aortic valve replacement (AVR) for IE impacts patient survival is a matter of debate. The aim of the present study is to quantify differences in long-term survival and recurrence of endocarditis AVR for IE according to prosthesis type among patients aged 40 to 65 years. METHODS: This was an analysis of the INFECT-REGISTRY. Trends in proportion to the use of mechanical prostheses versus biological ones over time were tested by applying the sieve bootstrapped t-test. Confounders were adjusted using the optimal full-matching propensity score. The difference in overall survival was compared using the Cox model, whereas the differences in recurrence of endocarditis were evaluated using the Gray test. RESULTS: Overall, 4365 patients were diagnosed and operated on for IE from 2000 to 2021. Of these, 549, aged between 40 and 65 years, underwent AVR. A total of 268 (48.8%) received mechanical prostheses, and 281 (51.2%) received biological ones. A significant trend in the reduction of implantation of mechanical vs. biological prostheses was observed during the study period (p < 0.0001). Long-term survival was significantly higher among patients receiving a mechanical prosthesis than those receiving a biological prosthesis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.546, 95% CI: 0.322-0.926, p = 0.025). Mechanical prostheses were associated with significantly less recurrent endocarditis after AVR than biological prostheses (HR 0.268, 95%CI: 0.077-0.933, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis of the INFECT-REGISTRY shows increased survival and reduced recurrence of endocarditis after a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis implant for IE in middle-aged patients.

12.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(6): 568-574, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206149

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss empirical therapy for severe infections due to Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance (GNB-DTR) in current clinical practice, focusing in particular on the positioning of novel therapeutic agents and rapid diagnostic tests. RECENT FINDINGS: The current era of novel agents active against GNB-DTR and showing differential activity against specific determinants of resistance is an unprecedented scenario, in which the clinical reasoning leading to the choice of the empirical therapy for treating severe GNB-DTR infections is becoming more complex, but it also allows for enhanced treatment precision. SUMMARY: Novel agents should be used in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles, aimed at reducing selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance. However, this does not mean that they should not be used. Indeed, excesses in restrictive uses may be unethical by precluding access to the most effective and less toxic treatments for patients with severe GNB-DTR infections. Given these premises (the 'how'), empirical treatment with novel agents should be considered in all patients with risk factors for GNB-DTR and severe clinical presentation of acute infection (the 'when'). Furthermore, empirical novel agents should preferably be continued only for a few hours, until de-escalation, modification, or confirmation (as targeted therapy) is made possible by the results of rapid diagnostic tests (the 'how long').


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
13.
Curr Med Chem ; 29(6): 1000-1015, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, many aspects of the physiological role of PCSK9 have been elucidated, in particular regarding its role in lipid metabolism, cardiovascular risk but also its role in innate immunity. Increasing evidence is available on the involvement of PCSK9 in the pathogenesis of viral infections, mainly HCV, as well as in the regulation of host response to bacterial infections, mainly sepsis and septic shock. Moreover, the action of PCSK9 has been investigated as a crucial step in the pathogenesis of malaria infection and disease severity. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this paper is to review available published literature on the role of PCSK9 in a wide array of infectious diseases. CONCLUSION: Besides the ongoing investigation on PCSK9 inhibition among HIV-infected patients for the treatment of HIV- and ART-related hyperlipidemia, preclinical studies indicate how PCSK9 is involved in reducing the replication of HCV. Moreover, a protective role of PCSK9 inhibition has also been proposed against dengue and SARS-CoV-2 viral infections. Interestingly, high plasmatic PCSK9 levels have been described in patients with sepsis. Finally, a loss of function in the PCSK9-encoding gene has been reported to possibly reduce mortality in malaria infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Animals , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Proprotein Convertase 9/genetics , Proprotein Convertase 9/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 23(3): 361-375, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882041

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Pneumonia, Staphylococcal/drug therapy
15.
Ann Med ; 53(1): 1779-1786, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An unexpected high prevalence of enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) has been observed in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary objective was to describe the characteristics of ICU-acquired enterococcal BSI in critically ill patients with COVID-19. A secondary objective was to exploratorily assess the predictors of 30-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICU-acquired enterococcal BSI. RESULTS: During the study period, 223 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to COVID-19-dedicated ICUs in our centre. Overall, 51 episodes of enterococcal BSI, occurring in 43 patients, were registered. 29 (56.9%) and 22 (43.1%) BSI were caused by Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, respectively. The cumulative incidence of ICU-acquired enterococcal BSI was of 229 episodes per 1000 ICU admissions (95% mid-p confidence interval [CI] 172-298). Most patients received an empirical therapy with at least one agent showing in vitro activity against the blood isolate (38/43, 88%). The crude 30-day mortality was 42% (18/43) and 57% (4/7) in the entire series and in patients with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium BSI, respectively. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score showed an independent association with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.32 per one-point increase, with 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.66, p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative incidence of enterococcal BSI is high in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Our results suggest a crucial role of the severity of the acute clinical conditions, to which both the underlying viral pneumonia and the enterococcal BSI may contribute, in majorly influencing the outcome.KEY MESSAGESThe cumulative incidence of enterococcal BSI is high in critically ill patients with COVID-19.The crude 30-day mortality of enterococcal BSI in critically ill patients with COVID-19 may be higher than 40%.There could be a crucial role of the severity of the acute clinical conditions, to which both the underlying viral pneumonia and the enterococcal BSI may contribute, in majorly influencing the outcome.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterococcus faecalis , Enterococcus faecium , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Mortality , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Aged , Bacteremia/microbiology , Critical Illness , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Clin Case Rep ; 9(8): e04589, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34429989

ABSTRACT

Cannabinoid abuse may facilitate disseminated skin infection by herpes viruses in predisposed patients. These patients should be counselled about that.

17.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(2): 96-108, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405480

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the currently available evidence about the use oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and for other potential indications. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies) pertaining to the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin either for ABSSSI or for other indications. SUMMARY: Oritavancin and dalbavancin are valid options for outpatient therapy and early discharge in patients with ABSSSI, especially when adherence to oral therapy cannot be guaranteed or no oral choices are available. Furthermore, it is worth noting that a non-negligible portion (sometimes the majority) of oritavancin and dalbavancin use in available real-life experiences is for indications other than ABSSSI, especially for Gram-positive osteomyelitis and endocarditis. The number of studies on the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides for these currently off-label indications is rapidly increasing and will help to further optimize the use of these peculiar antibiotics in the forthcoming future.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Lipoglycopeptides/administration & dosage , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/microbiology , Teicoplanin/administration & dosage
18.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(2): 109-117, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the available results of primary analyses from high-quality randomized studies of either recently approved or possible future agents for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). RECENT FINDINGS: In the last 2 decades, several novel agents have been approved for the treatment of ABSSSI, that are also active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition to already available agents, further molecules are in clinical development that could become available for treating ABSSSI in the forthcoming future. SUMMARY: The current and future availability of several new-generation antibiotics will allow to modulate therapeutic choices not only on efficacy but also on other relevant factors such as the combination of the drug safety profile and the comorbidities of any given patient, the expected adherence to outpatient therapy, and the possibilities of early discharge or avoiding hospitalization by means of oral formulations, early switch from intravenous to oral therapy, or single-dose administration of long-acting intravenous agents. With the advent of new-generation antibiotics, all these factors are becoming increasingly essential for tailoring treatment to individual patients in line with the principles of personalized medicine, and for optimizing the use of healthcare resources.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Acute Disease/therapy , Animals , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacterial Physiological Phenomena/drug effects , Humans , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/microbiology
19.
Microorganisms ; 9(1)2021 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33401591

ABSTRACT

The possible negative impact of severe adult respiratory distress caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19) on antimicrobial stewardship and infection control has been postulated, but few real-life data are available. The aim of this study was to report our experience with colonization/infection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp) and Candida auris among critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). All COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICUs at San Martino Policlinico Hospital-IRCCS in Genoa, Italy, were screened from 28 February to 31 May 2020. One-hundred and eighteen patients admitted to COVID-19 ICUs were included in the study. Among them, 12 (10.2%) became colonized/infected with CRPA, 6 (5.1%) with C. auris and 2 (1.6%) with CR-Kp. All patients with CRPA received prior treatment with meropenem, and in 11 (91.7%) infection was not preceded by colonization. Four patients (66.7%) developed C. auris candidemia. A significant spread of resistant pathogens was observed among critically ill COVID-19 patients. Dedicated strategies are warranted to prevent horizontal spread and maintain effective antimicrobial stewardship programs in the setting of COVID-19 care.

20.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(2): 167-177, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915685

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of severe infections due to Acinetobacter baumannii with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-AB), which exhibits resistance to all ß-lactams, ß-lactam/ß-lactamases inhibitor combinations, and fluoroquinolones, remains a challenge for clinicians. AREAS COVERED: The present perspective provides a personal view on both current and future agents for the treatment of severe DTR-AB infections. EXPERT OPINION: We currently are in a transition era for the treatment of DTR-AB infections, where in the past 20 years, polymyxin-based regimens have become the most used approach (although possibly suboptimal, there were few or no alternatives) and where in the next 20 years, polymyxins will likely be replaced by less toxic novel agents as first-line choices. Two novel antimicrobial agents have been recently approved that show activity against DTR-AB, cefiderocol and eravacycline, while durlobactam/sulbactam is in phase-3 of clinical development. In the near future, these agents could become important first-line choices for the treatment of DTR-AB within approved indications, or for off-label indications in the absence of dependable alternatives. Good-quality post-marketing experiences remain necessary for arising clinically relevant questions and guiding the design of further dedicated randomized controlled trials to stably optimize the use of novel agents for DTR-AB infections in the next decades.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...