Missed anti-D immune globulin administration to postpartum patients in 2 health systems: an unrecognized patient safety risk.

BACKGROUND: Maternal-fetal Rh-alloimmunization is a rare but potentially fatal event, most often caused by maternal exposure to D-antigen-presenting Rh-positive erythrocytes at the time of delivery. Prophylaxis with anti-D immune globulin is highly effective with a low side-effect profile and results in a dramatically decreased risk of alloimmunization. Postpartum anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis is recommended by national societies to reduce Rh-alloimmunization. We hypothesized that a small number of postpartum patients do not receive prophylaxis as indicated.  . OBJECTIVE: We investigated patients in 2 separate health systems that did not receive indicated prophylaxis and devised a suite of Electronic Health Record interventions to prevent future errors. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed charts retrospectively from Electronic Health Record data of 2 urban academic health systems, the MetroHealth System and Oregon Health & Science University. We identified all Rh-negative postpartum patients and their infants delivering from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of postpartum patients not receiving indicated anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis. Once cases of missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis were identified, we reviewed individual charts to determine the relevant clinical circumstances and potential causes for error. RESULTS: Of 29,801 deliveries over 5 years (15,444 at MetroHealth System and 14,357 at Oregon Health & Science University), there were 3087 Rh-negative postpartum patients, of whom 7 were alloimmunized and ineligible for prophylaxis. Anti-D immune globulin was indicated for 2162 (70.0%) women as they delivered an Rh-positive infant. A total of 37 indicated patients did not receive postpartum anti-D immune globulin. Twenty patients were offered prophylaxis and declined. We missed a total of 17 opportunities, thus our institutions appropriately offered indicated anti-D prophylaxis to 99.2% of patients over a period of 5 years. Of the 17 true misses, anti-D immune globulin was ordered for some patients, whereas others did not have an anti-D immune globulin order placed. A toolkit in the Electronic Health Record consisting of decision-support hard stops, automated documentation, and longitudinal reporting was implemented at the MetroHealth System in the year after its inception. The Toolkit identified and helped prevent 4 potential misses, resulting in a 100% anti-D prophylaxis rate at the MetroHealth System. CONCLUSION: Given the serious nature of Rh-alloimmunization, we believe missed prophylaxis should be a never event. Through examination of our current processes, we identified areas of improvement and developed a Postpartum Anti-D Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Electronic Health Record Toolkit, which showed improvement in administration rates. Such a toolkit has the potential to identify patients appropriately and avoid missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis events.

Leveraging American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Guidelines for Point-of-Care Decision Support in Obstetrics.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) provides numerous narrative documents containing formal recommendations and additional narrative guidance within the text. These guidelines are not intended to provide a complete "care pathway" for patient management, but these elements of guidance can be useful for clinical decision support (CDS) in obstetrical and gynecologic care and could be exposed within electronic health records (EHRs). Unfortunately, narrative guidelines do not easily translate into computable CDS guidance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a method of translating ACOG clinical guidance into clear, implementable items associated with specific obstetrical problems for integration into the EHR. METHODS: To translate ACOG clinical guidance in Obstetrics into implementable CDS, we followed a set of steps including selection of documents, establishing a problem list, extraction and classification of recommendations, and assigning tasks to those recommendations. RESULTS: Our search through ACOG clinical guidelines produced over 500 unique documents. After exclusions, and counting only sources relevant to obstetrics, we used 245 documents: 38 practice bulletins, 113 committee opinions, 16 endorsed publications, 1 practice advisory, 2 task force and work group reports, 2 patient education, 2 obstetric care consensus, 60 frequently asked questions (FAQ), 1 women's health care guidelines, 1 Prolog series, and 9 others (non-ACOG). Recommendations were classified as actionable (n = 576), informational (n = 493), for in-house summary (n = 124), education/counseling (n = 170), policy/advocacy (n = 33), perioperative care (n = 4), delivery recommendations (n = 50), peripartum care (n = 13), and non-ACOG (n = 25). CONCLUSION: We described a methodology of translating ACOG narrative into a semi-structured format that can be more easily applied as CDS in the EHR. We believe this work can contribute to developing a library of information within ACOG that can be continually updated and disseminated to EHR systems for the most optimal decision support. We will continue documenting our process in developing executable code for decision support.