The symptom experience of early and late treatment seekers before an atrial fibrillation diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a complex condition associated with a broad spectrum of symptoms, coupled with variability in the frequency, duration and severity of symptoms. Early treatment seeking is important to reduce the risk of stroke, heart failure and dementia. Despite the increasing prevalence, there remains a limited understanding of the symptom experience prior to an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, and how these experiences influence treatment-related decisions and time frames. AIMS: This qualitative study aimed to explore the symptom experiences of patients receiving an early diagnosis of less than 48 hours and a late diagnosis of 48 hours or more after symptom awareness. METHODS: Twenty-six adults were interviewed guided by the symptom experience model. The symptom checklist was used to probe patient's symptoms further. Data were analysed using a two-step approach to thematic analysis utilising concepts from the symptom experience model. RESULTS: The two groups differed in their perception, evaluation and response to symptoms. The early diagnosis group (n = 6) experienced traumatic, severe and persistent symptoms, evoking concern and urgent treatment seeking. Conversely, the late diagnosis group (n = 20) reported more vague, paroxysmal symptoms that were readily ignored, self-theorised as non-illness related, and engaged in non-treatment strategies. Healthy self-perceptions, past experiences, atrial fibrillation knowledge and healthcare provider interactions influenced early or late treatment seeking. CONCLUSION: For many, the atrial fibrillation pre-diagnosis was a tumultuous period, requiring prolonged periods to recognise symptoms and formulate treatment-seeking responses. This study may promote future research and strategies aimed at facilitating the early identification and response to symptoms among atrial fibrillation patients.

Gender and the Symptom Experience before an Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world. Despite the increasing prevalence, there remains a limited understanding of how the pre-diagnosis symptom experience varies by gender. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively explore gender differences/similarities in the pre-diagnosis period of AF. Twenty-six adults (13 men and 13 women) were interviewed guided by the Symptom Experience in AF (SEAF). Data were analyzed using a two-step approach to thematic analysis. Women had greater challenges receiving a timely diagnosis, with 10 women (77%) experiencing symptoms ≥1 year prior to their diagnosis, in comparison to only three (23%) of the men. Women also reported more severe symptoms, less AF-related knowledge, viewed themselves as low risk for cardiovascular disease, and described how their comorbid conditions confused AF symptom evaluation. This study provides a foundational understanding of differences/similarities in the AF symptom experience by gender.

The Symptom Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Before Their Initial Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common form of dysrhythmia, steadily increases in prevalence with age. If left untreated, AF significantly increases the risk of stroke, heart failure, and death. Despite the increasing prevalence, there are significant research gaps in the prediagnosis symptom experiences of patients with AF. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the prediagnosis symptom experience of patients with AF. METHODS: Participants 19 years or older with AF diagnosed in the previous year were recruited (n = 26) from outpatient cardiac rehabilitation and AF clinics. Semistructured interviews, broadly guided by the Symptom Experience Model, explored perceptions, evaluations, and responses to AF symptoms. Thematic analysis used a 2-step approach, deductively coding for participants' symptom perceptions, evaluations, and responses and inductively coding within these broader Symptom Experience Model concepts. RESULTS: Perception involved awareness of bodily sensations, ranging from imperceptible noticing to commanding attention, heightened by rest and activity. In evaluation, participants used self-derived theories to explain their symptoms, gathered evidence to support/refute their theories, and formulated alternative theories as symptoms changed over time. Responses consisted of nontreatment, self-treatment, and health seeking; most participants needed repeated healthcare visits before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified challenges participants experienced in developing awareness of their AF symptoms, the complex cognitive processes associated with evaluation, and barriers that made it difficult to respond to AF symptoms in a timely manner. Understanding the prediagnosis symptom experience from the patient's perspective is essential for the enhancement of current AF screening practices.

The Stressors and Coping Strategies of Older Adults With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Prior to and Following Direct Current Cardioversion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the stressors and coping strategies of older adults with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) before and after direct current cardioversion. METHOD: The study used a qualitative descriptive design. Sixteen patients were recruited through an AF clinic to participate in individual interviews prior to the cardioversion and at 6 and 12 weeks post procedure. RESULTS: Pre-cardioversion, older adults experienced symptom and health care-related stressors superimposed on existing non-AF stressors. They used a range of emotion and problem-focused coping. Non-AF stressors increased post procedure at the same time that participants perceived less need for coping strategies with a return to regular rhythm. DISCUSSION: There was a shift from AF to non-AF related stressors following the cardioversion but a decrease in coping strategies. Older adults with AF should be encouraged to maintain use of coping strategies to manage ongoing stress and reduce the risk of AF recurrence.

In-hospital outcomes of a regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction acute transfer and repatriation program.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presents challenges in a large geographic area for achieving treatment time targets and creates demands on the PCI centre resources. OBJECTIVE: We compare the in-hospital mortality rate of patients presenting with STEMI and referred for PCI from 11 transfer hospitals with those presenting to the cardiac centre in a regional STEMI program with a selective repatriation strategy. METHODS: Between June 1, 2003, and June 30, 2007, clinical and procedural data of all STEMI patients who were referred to the catheterization laboratory were prospectively collected. Patients who sustained prolonged cardiac arrest were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1154 patients from regional hospitals and 325 patients initially presenting to the PCI centre were referred for acute intervention. There was no significant in-hospital mortality difference between the 2 groups (3.7% vs 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.87). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age, female gender, multivessel coronary disease, history of hypertension, low ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and thrombolytic pretreatment, but not transfer status, were independent predictors for mortality. Among the 1154 transfer patients, 937 patients (81.2%) returned immediately post procedure and had a lower mortality rate than the remaining 217 patients (18.2%) who required admission to the PCI centre following cardiac catheterization (1.9% vs 11.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A regional system of STEMI care based on rapid patient transfer to a PCI centre and repatriation was feasible and safe.