ABSTRACT
Bone and joint infections represent a potentially devastating complication of prosthetic orthopedic joint replacement, thus requiring both rapid and appropriate antibiotic treatment. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogens involved in this pathology. Being able to assert its presence is the first step of efficient patient management. This monocenter study evaluated the MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assay for the molecular detection of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in bone and joint biopsy specimens and synovial fluids. This test, together with conventional techniques, including standard cultures and the 16S rRNA amplification assay, was performed on 208 successive perioperative samples collected prospectively for 1 year obtained from 129 patients. Using conventional techniques, we detected a microbial pathogen in 76 samples from 58 patients, 40 of which were identified as S. aureus. The limit of detection (LOD) of the MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assay was experimentally determined for bone and joint biopsy specimens and synovial fluids using negative samples spiked with S. aureus ATCC 43300. The sensitivities of S. aureus detection with the MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assay were 82.5% (33/40 samples) and 97.5% (39/40 samples) using the manufacturer's LOD and an experimentally determined LOD, respectively. Interestingly, using the osteoarticular specific LOD, 15 additional samples were determined to be positive for S. aureus DNA with the MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assay; in all cases, these samples were obtained from patients considered to be infected with S. aureus according to their clinical and microbiological records. The results were available within 24 h, which could help to expedite therapeutic decisions.
Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to compare the course of the disease between healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-HCWs suffering from covid-19 and eligible for outpatient management. METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort of outpatients with covid-19, diagnosed between the 10th March and the 2nd April, 2020 with a daily collection of symptoms by an on-line auto-questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were included (median age, 41 years [interquartile range, 19-78 years]; 74.2% female), of whom 132 (71%) were HCWs. The median follow-up after symptom onset was 14 (min 4-max 24) days. HCWs were significantly younger than non-HCWs (median age 40.3 years vs. 47.2 years [P<0.005]), and 81.8% were women. Four patients (2.2%) were hospitalized including one HCW. The median time to recovery was 9 days after symptom onset (95% CI 8-11) in the global population and respectively 8 (95% CI 8-9) and 13 (95% CI 11-15) days in HCWs and in non-HCWs (P<0.005). After adjusting for age, co-morbidities, and gender, the instantaneous risk ratio for symptom absence in HCWs was 1.76 compared with non-HCWs (95% CI [1.16-2.67], P=0.037). CONCLUSION: HCWs suffering from covid-19 had favorable outcomes and had a shorter time to recovery than non HCWs.
