Qualitative versus quantitative assessment of electroencephalography in cognitive decline: Comparison in a clinical population.

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of visual assessment of electroencephalography (EEG) using the Grand Total EEG (GTE) score and quantitative EEG (QEEG) using spectral analysis in the context of cognitive impairment. This was a retrospective study of patients with mild cognitive impairment, with (MCI+V) or without (MCI) vascular dysfunction, and patients with dementia including Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body Dementia and vascular dementia. The results showed that the GTE is a simple scoring system with some potential applications, but limited ability to distinguish between dementia subtypes, while spectral analysis appeared to be a powerful tool, but its clinical development requires the use of artificial intelligence tools.

Multi-approach comparative study of EEG patterns associated with the most common forms of dementia.

Electroencephalography's (EEG) sensitivity in discriminating dementia syndromes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate EEG markers in patients with major cognitive disorders. The studied population included 4 groups of patients: Alzheimer's disease with associated vascular lesions, Alzheimer's disease without vascular lesions (AD-V), Lewy body disease and vascular dementia (VaD); and completed by a control group composed by cognitively unimpaired patients. EEGs were analysed quantitatively using spectral analysis, functional connectivity and micro-states. By comparison to the controls, expected slowing and alterations of functional connectivity were detected in patients with dementia. Among these patients, an overall increase in power in the alpha band was observed in the VaD group, mainly when compared to the 2 AD groups, while the Alzheimer's disease without vascular lesions group exhibited increased power in the beta-2 band and higher functional connectivity in the same frequency band. Micro-state analyses revealed differences in temporal dynamics for the VaD group. A number of EEG modifications reported as markers of some syndromes were found, but others were not reproduced.

Do kinematic gait parameters help to discriminate between fallers and non-fallers with Parkinson's disease?

OBJECTIVE: Although a number of clinical factors have been linked to falls in Parkinson's disease (PD), the diagnostic value of gait parameters remains subject to debate. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine to what extent the combination of gait parameters with clinical characteristics can distinguish between fallers and non-fallers. METHODS: Using a video motion system, we recorded gait in 174 patients with PD. The patients' clinical characteristics (including motor status, cognitive status, disease duration, dopaminergic treatment and any history of falls or freezing of gait) were noted. The considered kinematic gait parameters included indices of gait bradykinesia and hypokinesia, asymmetry, variability, and foot clearance. After a parameters selection using an ANCOVA analysis, support vector machine algorithm was used to build classification models for distinguishing between fallers and non-fallers. Two models were built, the first included clinical data only while the second incorporated the selected gait parameters. RESULTS: The "clinical-only" model had an accuracy of 94% for distinguishing between fallers and non-fallers. The model incorporating additional gait parameters including stride time and foot clearance performed even better, with an accuracy of up to 97%. CONCLUSION: Although fallers differed significantly from non-fallers with regard to disease duration, motor impairment or dopaminergic treatment, the addition of gait parameters such as foot clearance or stride time to clinical variables increased the model's discriminant power. SIGNIFICANCE: This predictive model now needs to be validated in prospective cohorts.