Nonsurgical Strategies to Reduce Mortality in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Consensus Process.

OBJECTIVE: A careful choice of perioperative care strategies is pivotal to improve survival in cardiac surgery. However, there is no general agreement or particular attention to which nonsurgical interventions can reduce mortality in this setting. The authors sought to address this issue with a consensus-based approach. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process. SETTING: A web-based international consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: More than 400 physicians from 52 countries participated in this web-based consensus conference. INTERVENTIONS: The authors identified all studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported on interventions with a statistically significant effect on mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery through a systematic Medline/PubMed search and contacts with experts. These studies were discussed during a consensus meeting and those considered eligible for inclusion in this study were voted on by clinicians worldwide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven interventions finally were selected: 10 were shown to reduce mortality (aspirin, glycemic control, high-volume surgeons, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, levosimendan, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, vacuum-assisted closure, and volatile agents), whereas 1 (aprotinin) increased mortality. A significant difference in the percentages of agreement among different countries and a variable gap between agreement and clinical practice were found for most of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This updated consensus process identified 11 nonsurgical interventions with possible survival implications for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This list of interventions may help cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists worldwide in their daily clinical practice and can contribute to direct future research in the field.

Nonsurgical Strategies to Reduce Mortality in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: An Updated Consensus Process

OBJECTIVE:A careful choice of perioperative care strategies is pivotal to improve survival in cardiac surgery. However, there is no general agreement or particular attention to which nonsurgical interventions can reduce mortality in this setting. The authors sought to address this issue with a consensus-based approach.DESIGN:A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process.SETTING:A web-based international consensus conference.PARTICIPANTS:More than 400 physicians from 52 countries participated in this web-based consensus conference.INTERVENTIONS:The authors identified all studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported on interventions with a statistically significant effect on mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery through a systematic Medline/PubMed search and contacts with experts. These studies were discussed during a consensus meeting and those considered eligible for inclusion in this study were voted on by clinicians worldwide.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Eleven interventions finally were selected: 10 were shown to reduce mortality (aspirin, glycemic control, high-volume surgeons, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, levosimendan, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, vacuum-assisted closure, and volatile agents), whereas 1 (aprotinin) increased mortality. A significant difference in the percentages of agreement among different countries and a variable gap between agreement and clinical practice were found for most of the interventions.CONCLUSIONS:This updated consensus process identified 11 nonsurgical interventions with possible survival implications for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This list of interventions may help cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists worldwide in their daily clinical practice and can contribute to direct future research in the field.

From varices to venous ulceration: the story of chronic venous disease described by metalloproteinases.

Chronic venous disease (CVD) and its most frightening complication, chronic venous ulceration (CVU), represent an important socioeconomic burden in the western world. Metalloproteinases have been identified in the pathogenesis of several vascular diseases such as venous problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate a broad range of metalloproteinases, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases) and ADAMTSs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases with thrombospondin motifs) and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) and a related protein, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), in patients with CVD in order to correlate their serum levels with each stage of the disease. We performed a multicenter open-label study that comprised the enrolment of 541 patients with CVD of clinical stages C1-C6, (178 males, 363 females; mean age 57·29, median age 53·72, age range 29-81); 29 subjects without CVD were included in this study (9 males and 20 females; mean age 54·44, median age 50, age range 28-84) as the control group. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed for measuring serum levels of proteases and related proteins. The study found that the serum elevation of MMP-2, ADAMTS-1 and ADAMTS-7 appeared to be correlated with the initial stages of CVD, whereas the serum elevation of MMP-1, MMP-8, MMP-9, NGAL, ADAM-10, ADAM-17 and ADAMTS-4 was particularly involved in skin change complications. This study showed that each stage of CVD may be described by particular patterns of metalloproteinases, and this may have therapeutic implications in discovering new targets and new drugs for the treatment of CVD.