Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Med Educ Online ; 28(1): 2152162, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36443907

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Performance on the certifying examinations such as the American Board of Internal Medicine Certification Exam (ABIM-CE) is of great interest to residents and their residency programs. Identification of factors associated with certification exam result may allow residency programs to recognize and intervene for residents at risk of failing. Despite this, residency programs have few evidence-based predictors of certification exam outcome. The change to pass-or-fail score reporting of the USA Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 removes one such predictor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of residents from a medium-sized internal medicine residency program who graduated from 1998 through 2017. We used univariate tests of associations between ABIM-CE result and various demographic and scholastic factors. RESULTS: Of 166 graduates, 14 (8.4%) failed the ABIM-CE on the first attempt. Failing the first attempt of the ABIM-CE was associated with older median age on entering residency (29 vs 27 years; P = 0.01); lower percentile rank on the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) in each of the first, second, and third years of training (P < 0.001 for all); and lower scores on the USMLE Steps 1, 2 Clinical Knowledge, and 3 (P < 0.05 for all). No association was seen between a variety of other scholastic or demographic factors and first-attempt ABIM-CE result. DISCUSSION: Although USMLE step 1 has changed to a pass-or-fail reporting structure, there are still other characteristics that allow residency programs to identify residents at risk of ABIM-CE first time failure and who may benefit from intervention.


Subject(s)
Internal Medicine , Internship and Residency , Humans , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Certification , Inservice Training
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(6): 1394-1399, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34131878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient portal messages have been used in a variety of ways to facilitate improved communication between provider and patient. These platforms have shown promise in many ways for improving various health outcomes and overall communication between patient and provider. OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of automated portal reminder messages and self-scheduling options on increasing rates of annual influenza vaccination. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who receive their primary care through an ambulatory primary care clinic at a large, multidisciplinary, academic health center. INTERVENTIONS: One group of patients received a portal message reminder to undergo influenza vaccination. A second group received the same message with instructions to self-schedule the vaccination appointment. A third group received no portal message (control). MAIN MEASURES: Rates of influenza vaccination in each group for previously unvaccinated patients in the 2019-2020 influenza season. KEY RESULTS: For the group receiving the message with self-scheduling option (n=5408), the in-study vaccination rate was significantly greater than the group receiving no message (n=5621) (15.7% vs. 13.5%; p=0.002). For the group receiving a message alone (without self-scheduling) (n=5699), the in-study vaccination rate was significantly greater than the group receiving no message (15.1% vs. 13.5%; p=0.01). There was no significant difference in vaccination rate between the two intervention groups receiving messages (15.7% vs. 15.1%; p=0.549). CONCLUSIONS: Portal messaging reminders increase annual influenza vaccination rates, but the addition of a self-scheduling option did not further increase rates. KEY WORDS: vaccination patient portal messaging influenza.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Patient Portals , Text Messaging , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Reminder Systems , Vaccination
4.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 20(1): 193-203, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24916955

ABSTRACT

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented work hour restrictions for physicians in training in 2003 that were revised July 1, 2011. Current published data are insufficient to assess whether such work hour restrictions will have long-term impact on residents' education. We searched computer-generated reports of hospital in-patient census, continuity clinic census, in-training exam scores and first-year resident attendance at educational conferences for the academic years 2010-2011 (August 1, 2010-May 31, 2011) and 2011-2013 (August 1, 2011-May 31, 2013). During the first year of the study period, the residents' inpatient internal medicine services admitted 1,754 patients; during this same period for academic years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, the teaching services admitted 1,539 and 1,428 patients respectively, yielding a decrease of 16.4%. Monthly, these services cared for a mean of 27.1 (27.1/175.4 [15.4%]) fewer patients and 9.7 (9.7/34.4 [28.2%]) fewer patients per intern than in the previous year. No statistical difference was observed regarding continuity clinic attendance and in-training exam scores. Residents in the years following work hours restrictions attended more educational conferences. Implementation of 2011 ACGME work hour regulations resulted in fewer patients seen by first-year residents in hospital, but did not affect in-training exam scores. Whether these findings will translate into differences in patient outcomes, and quality of care remains to be seen.


Subject(s)
Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Work Schedule Tolerance , Workload/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Congresses as Topic , Education, Medical, Graduate , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , United States
5.
J Hosp Med ; 9(8): 508-14, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24801638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the advent of limits to resident duty hours and the size of teaching services, many academic institutions have introduced nonteaching services, often triaging perceived better teaching cases to the resident services. OBJECTIVE: To compare resident versus faculty perceptions of ideal cases for teaching services and compare these perceptions with actual triage decisions made by faculty who assigned patients to either teaching or nonteaching services. DESIGN: Residents and hospitalist faculty were surveyed about their perceptions of ideal and actual teaching admissions, first with qualitative, open-ended questions and then with quantitative, specific questions generated from responses to the first survey. Characteristics of patients admitted to teaching and nonteaching services were analyzed retrospectively and compared with resident and faculty perceptions. RESULTS: Residents and faculty agreed that rare cases, patients with unique physical findings, and a variety of pathology were ideal for teaching services and that social admissions, benefactors, and patients with chronic or functional pain were not. Residents believed that traditional ("bread and butter") medicine cases were under-represented on the teaching services. Although residents perceived that they received a disproportionate number of older patients, outside transfers, patients with chronic pain, and patients with cancer, the only statistically significant difference was in patient age, with the teaching service actually receiving younger patients (66.7 vs 69.3 years; P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Residents and faculty have similar views about ideal teaching cases, but a triage system based on perceived educational merit creates the possibility of resident misperceptions about their case mix, even if patients are distributed relatively equitably.


Subject(s)
Decision Making, Organizational , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Hospitalists/education , Hospitals, Teaching , Internship and Residency/methods , Patient Admission/standards , Physicians/standards , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 86(1): 63-9, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21193657

ABSTRACT

Coccidioidomycosis is caused by Coccidioides species, a fungus endemic to the desert regions of the southwestern United States, and is of particular concern for African Americans. We performed a PubMed search of the English-language medical literature on coccidioidomycosis in African Americans and summarized the pertinent literature. Search terms were coccidioidomycosis, Coccidioides, race, ethnicity, African, black, and Negro. The proceedings of the national and international coccidioidomycosis symposia were searched. All relevant articles and their cited references were reviewed; those with epidemiological, immunologic, clinical, and therapeutic data pertaining to coccidioidomycosis in African Americans were included in the review. Numerous studies documented an increased predilection for severe coccidioidal infections, coccidioidomycosis-related hospitalizations, and extrapulmonary dissemination in persons of African descent; however, most of the published studies are variably problematic. The immunologic mechanism for this predilection is unclear. The clinical features and treatment recommendations are summarized. Medical practitioners need to be alert to the possibility of coccidioidomycosis in persons with recent travel to or residence in an area where the disease is endemic.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Coccidioidomycosis/ethnology , Coccidioidomycosis/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Travel , United States/epidemiology
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 18(4): 535-8, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19361321

ABSTRACT

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare disease of unknown cause that traditionally affects young women of reproductive age. It is characterized by a proliferation of atypical smooth muscle cells, preferentially along the bronchovascular structures, that causes progressive respiratory failure. LAM is almost universally fatal without a lung transplant, although new clinical trials are ongoing. Because of its rareness and nonspecific presenting symptoms, patients often receive a missed or delayed diagnosis. We present the case of a 51-year-old postmenopausal woman who had hemoptysis ultimately determined to be due to LAM. As is common for patients with LAM, the initial chest radiograph was unremarkable, whereas subsequent computed tomography (CT) demonstrated the distinctive pulmonary parenchymal cysts. Biopsy of an HMB-45-positive, para-aortic lymphangiomyoma provided further confirmation of the diagnosis. LAM may be more common than previously recognized, and it is imperative for primary care providers to be able to recognize this disease so they can make prompt referrals to appropriate specialty centers.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lymphangioleiomyomatosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Hemoptysis/etiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lymphangioleiomyomatosis/complications , Middle Aged , Postmenopause , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...