Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Ethn Dis ; 32(4): 325-332, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36388863

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore factors associated with anticoagulation (AC) initiation after atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Urban medical center. Patients: Adults with emergency department (ED) diagnosis of new onset AF from 1/1/2017-1/1/2020 discharged home. Methods: We compared patients initiated on AC, our primary outcome, to those not initiated on AC. Stroke, major bleeding, and AC initiation within 1 year of visit were secondary outcomes. We hypothesized that minority race and non-English language preference are associated with failure to initiate AC. Results: Of 111 patients with AF, 88 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65 (SD 15); 47 (53%) were women. 49 (56%) patients were initiated on AC. Age (61 vs 68 years; P=.02), non-English language (28% vs 10%; P=.03), leaving ED against medical advice (AMA) (36% vs 14%; P=.04), and CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 (41% vs 6%; P<=.001) were associated with no AC initiation. There were no associations between patient-reported race/ethnicity and AC. Cardiology consultation (83.67% vs 30.78%; P<.0001) and higher median CHA2DS2-VASc score (3[2-4]) vs. 2[1-4]; P=.047) were associated with AC. Of 73 patients with follow-up data at 1 year, 2 (8%) not initiated on AC had strokes, 2 (4%) initiated on AC had major bleeds, and 15 (62.5%) not initiated on AC in the ED subsequently were initiated on AC. Conclusion: More than half of ED patients with new AF eligible for AC were initiated on it. Work to improve AC utilization among patients with new AF who left AMA from ED and those who prefer to communicate in a non-English language may be warranted.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Adult , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/complications , Emergency Service, Hospital , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
2.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(3): 437-443, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35755227

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose: A large proportion of ischemic stroke patients lack a definitive stroke etiology despite extensive diagnostic testing. Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) can directly invade blood vessels causing vasculitis and may be associated with cryptogenic stroke (CS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of CS patients tested for VZV. The following were considered evidence of VZV reactivation (VZV+): positive CSF VZV PCR, anti-VZV IgM in CSF, or anti-VZV IgG CSF/serum ratio of 1:10 or higher. We describe the cohort, report VZV+ proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CI) determined with the Wald method, and compare patient groups using standard statistical tests. Results: A total of 72 CS patients met full study inclusion criteria. Most of the patients were <65 years old, had few traditional vascular risk factors, and had multifocal infarcts. Mean age was 49 years (SD ±13) and 47% were women. A total of 14 patients (19.4%; CI: 11.4-30.8%) had evidence of CNS VZV reactivation. There was no difference in evaluated demographic or radiographic features between those with versus without evidence of VZV reactivation. History of ischemic stroke in the past year (11/14 vs 25/43, P<.05) and hypertension (13/14 vs 35/58 and P<.05) were associated with VZV+. Conclusion: We found a high proportion of CNS VZV reactivation in a cross-sectional cohort of CS patients selected for CSF testing. Testing for VZV might be reasonable in CS patients who are young, have multifocal infarcts, or had an ischemic stroke within the past year, but additional research is needed.

3.
Neurohospitalist ; 12(1): 13-18, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment with aspirin plus clopidogrel, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), within 24 hours of high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke symptoms to eligible patients is recommended by national guidelines. Whether or not this treatment has been adopted by emergency medicine (EM) physicians is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of EM physicians in the United States. The survey consisted of 13 multiple choice questions regarding physician characteristics, practice settings, and usual approach to TIA and minor stroke treatment. We report participant characteristics and use chi-squared tests to compare between groups. RESULTS: We included 162 participants in the final study analysis. 103 participants (64%) were in practice for >5 years and 96 (59%) were at nonacademic centers; all were EM board-certified or board-eligible. Only 9 (6%) participants reported that they would start DAPT for minor stroke and 8 (5%) reported that they would start DAPT after high-risk TIA. Aspirin alone was the selected treatment by 81 (50%) participants for minor stroke patients who presented within 24 hours of symptom onset and were not candidates for thrombolysis. For minor stroke, 69 (43%) participants indicated that they would defer medical management to consultants or another team. Similarly, 75 (46%) of participants chose aspirin alone to treat high-risk TIA; 74 (46%) reported they would defer medical management after TIA to consultants or another team. CONCLUSION: In a survey of EM physicians, we found that the reported rate of DAPT treatment for eligible patients with high-risk TIA and minor stroke was low.

4.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(2): 225-235, 2021 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855312

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of emergency medicine (EM) physicians towards non-specific neurological conditions and the use of clinical decision support (CDS) to improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of EM physicians at four emergency departments (EDs) affiliated with a single US healthcare system. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Conventional content analysis was used to identify themes related to EM physicians' perspectives on acute diagnostic neurology; directed content analysis was used to explore views regarding CDS. Each interview transcript was independently coded by two researchers using an iteratively refined codebook with consensus-based resolution of coding differences. RESULTS: We identified two domains regarding diagnostic safety: (1) challenges unique to neurological complaints and (2) challenges in EM more broadly. Themes relevant to neurology included: (1) knowledge gaps and uncertainty, (2) skepticism about neurology, (3) comfort with basic as opposed to detailed neurological examination, and (4) comfort with non-neurological diseases. Themes relevant to diagnostic decision making in the ED included: (1) cognitive biases, (2) ED system/environmental issues, (3) patient barriers, (4) comfort with diagnostic uncertainty, and (5) concerns regarding diagnostic error identification and measurement. Most participating EM physicians were enthusiastic about the potential for well-designed CDS to improve diagnostic accuracy for non-specific neurological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians identified diagnostic challenges unique to neurological diseases as well as issues related more generally to diagnostic accuracy in EM. These physician-reported issues should be accounted for when designing interventions to improve ED diagnostic accuracy.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Neurology , Physicians , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Physicians/psychology , Qualitative Research
5.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(12): 106145, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34649036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treating high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces subsequent ischemic stroke risk yet current rates of clopidogrel-aspirin treatment are uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TIA patients who presented to any of the four emergency departments (ED) of a single urban health system from 1/1/2018-3/1/2020. Medical record review was used to describe the cohort and assess clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. Patient eligibility for clopidogrel-aspirin was determined using relevant criteria from the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial. Comparisons among eligible patients who received versus did not receive clopidogrel-aspirin were conducted using t-test, chi-squared, and Mann-Whitney as indicated. RESULTS: We identified 248 TIA patients of whom 95 met eligibility criteria for clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. Among these 95 patients, mean age was 69.5 (SD: 12), 68.4% were women, and median ABCD2 score was 5 (IQR: 4-6). A total of 26/95 (27.4%) eligible patients received clopidogrel-aspirin within 24 hours of symptom onset. Appropriate clopidogrel-aspirin use was associated with having a stroke code called upon ED arrival (88.5% vs. 34.8%; P<0.001), being evaluated by a vascular neurologist (88.5% vs. 21.1%; P<0.001), and not presenting to the community ED site wherein only a single patient received clopidogrel-aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: In a multisite, single health system study, nearly three-fourths of high-risk TIA patients eligible for clopidogrel-aspirin treatment did not receive it. Appropriate clopidogrel-aspirin use was highest among patients seen by vascular neurologists and lowest at the community ED, though under treatment was evident at all sites.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Clopidogrel , Emergency Service, Hospital , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eligibility Determination , Female , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(12): e019001, 2021 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34056914

ABSTRACT

Background Accurate diagnosis of patients with transient or minor neurological events can be challenging. Recent studies suggest that advanced neuroimaging can improve diagnostic accuracy in low-risk patients with transient or minor neurological symptoms, but a cost-effective emergency department diagnostic evaluation strategy remains uncertain. Methods and Results We constructed a decision-analytic model to evaluate 2 diagnostic evaluation strategies for patients with low-risk transient or minor neurological symptoms: (1) obtain advanced neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging brain and magnetic resonance angiography head and neck) on every patient or (2) current emergency department standard-of-care clinical evaluation with basic neuroimaging. Main probability variables were: proportion of patients with true ischemic events, strategy specificity and sensitivity, and recurrent stroke rate. Direct healthcare costs were included. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, conducted sensitivity analyses, and evaluated various diagnostic test parameters primarily using a 1-year time horizon. Cost-effectiveness standards would be met if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was less than willingness to pay. We defined willingness to pay as $100 000 US dollars per quality-adjusted life year. Our primary and sensitivity analyses found that the advanced neuroimaging strategy was more cost-effective than emergency department standard of care. The incremental effectiveness of the advanced neuroimaging strategy was slightly less than the standard-of-care strategy, but the standard-of-care strategy was more costly. Potentially superior diagnostic approaches to the modeled advanced neuroimaging strategy would have to be >92% specific, >70% sensitive, and cost less than or equal to standard-of-care strategy's cost. Conclusions Obtaining advanced neuroimaging on emergency department patient with low-risk transient or minor neurological symptoms was the more cost-effective strategy in our model.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Hospital Costs , Ischemic Attack, Transient/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Attack, Transient/economics , Ischemic Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Neuroimaging/economics , Cerebral Angiography/economics , Clinical Decision-Making , Computed Tomography Angiography/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/therapy , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 275, 2021 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431950

ABSTRACT

Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) in the young is increasing in prevalence and the largest subtype within this cohort is cryptogenic. To curb this trend, new ways of defining cryptogenic stroke and associated risk factors are needed. We aimed to gain insights into the presence or absence of cardiovascular risk factors in cases of cryptogenic stroke. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-49 who presented to an urban tertiary care center with AIS. We manually collected predefined demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological variables. Clinical risk phenotypes were determined using these variables through multivariate analysis of patients with the small and large vessel disease subtypes (vascular phenotype) and cardioembolic subtype (cardiac phenotype). The resultant phenotype models were applied to cases deemed cryptogenic. Within the 449 patients who met criteria, patients with small and large vessel disease (vascular phenotype) had higher rates of hypertension, intracranial atherosclerosis, and diabetes mellitus, and higher admission glucose, HbA1c, admission blood pressure, and cholesterol compared to the patients with cardioembolic AIS. The cardioembolic subgroup (cardiac phenotype) had significantly higher rates of congestive heart failure (CHF), rheumatic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, clotting disorders, left ventricular hypertrophy, larger left atrial sizes, lower ejection fractions, and higher B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin levels. Adjusted multivariate analysis produced six variables independently associated with the vascular phenotype (age, male sex, hemoglobin A1c, ejection fraction (EF), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and family history of AIS) and five independently associated with the cardiac phenotype (age, female sex, decreased EF, CHF, and absence of intracranial atherosclerosis). Applying these models to cryptogenic stroke cases yielded that 51.5% fit the vascular phenotype and 3.1% fit the cardiac phenotype. In our cohort, half of young patients with cryptogenic stroke fit the risk factor phenotype of small and large vessel strokes.


Subject(s)
Heart Disease Risk Factors , Ischemic Stroke/epidemiology , Phenotype , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
8.
Thromb Res ; 199: 10-13, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33385794

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 associated coagulopathy and mortality related to thrombotic complications have been suggested as biological mediators in racial disparities related to COVID-19. We studied the adjusted prevalence of acute ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and deep venous thrombosis stratified by race in hospitalized patients in one New York City borough during the local COVID-19 surge. The multi-racial cohort included 4299 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 9% of whom were white, 40% black, 41% Hispanic and 10% Asian or other. We found a 6.1% prevalence of composite thrombotic events. There were no significant race-specific differences in thrombotic events when adjusting for basic demographics, socioeconomic factors, medical comorbidities or biomarkers using a stepwise regression model. We therefore found no evidence that the racial disparities related to COVID-19, and specifically thrombotic complications, are caused by biological differences in race.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Thrombosis/etiology , Aged , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , New York/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Racial Groups , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Socioeconomic Factors , Stroke/etiology
9.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 8(2): 199-208, 2021 05 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33006951

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of head computed tomography (HCT) at emergency department (ED) visit for non-specific neurological symptoms has been associated with increased subsequent stroke risk and may be a marker of diagnostic error. We evaluate whether HCT occurrence among ED headache patients is associated with increased subsequent cerebrovascular disease risk. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with headache who were discharged home from the ED (ED treat-and-release visit) at one multicenter institution. Patients with headache were defined as those with primary ICD-9/10-CM discharge diagnoses codes for benign headache from 9/1/2013-9/1/2018. The primary outcome of cerebrovascular disease hospitalization was identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes and confirmed via chart review. We matched headache patients who had a HCT (exposed) to those who did not have a HCT (unexposed) in the ED in a one-to-one fashion using propensity score methods. RESULTS: Among the 28,121 adult patients with ED treat-and-release headache visit, 45.6% (n=12,811) underwent HCT. A total of 0.4% (n=111) had a cerebrovascular hospitalization within 365 days of index visit. Using propensity score matching, 80.4% (n=10,296) of exposed patients were matched to unexposed. Exposed patients had increased risk of cerebrovascular hospitalization at 365 days (RR: 1.65: 95% CI: 1.18-2.31) and 180 days (RR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.06-2.49); risk of cerebrovascular hospitalization was not increased at 90 or 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Having a HCT performed at ED treat-and-release headache visit is associated with increased risk of subsequent cerebrovascular disease. Future work to improve cerebrovascular disease prevention strategies in this subset of headache patients is warranted.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Disorders , Emergency Service, Hospital , Adult , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Disorders/epidemiology , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/epidemiology , Headache/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
11.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(10): 105114, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32912527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on stroke care and the impact of the epidemic on acute stroke hospitalizations has not been described. METHODS: We analyze the stroke admission rate in three hospitals in New York City from January 1, 2020 through April 17, 2020, identifying all cases of acute ischemic stroke, intraparenchymal hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. RESULTS: We confirmed 518 cases of out-of-hospital stroke. During the baseline period up to February 25, 2020, the daily stroke admission rate was stable, with the slope of the regression describing the number of admissions over time equal to -0.33 (se = 1.21), not significantly different from 0 (p = 0.79), with daily admissions averaging 41. During the pandemic period, the slope was -4.4 (se = 1.00); i.e., the number of stroke admissions decreased an average of 4.4 per week, (p = 0.005), with weekly admissions averaging 23, a reduction of 44% versus baseline. This general result was not different by patient age, sex, or race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly stroke admission rate started declining two weeks prior to the local surge of coronavirus admissions. The consequences of lack of diagnosis and treatment of a large proportion of acute stroke patients are likely severe and lasting.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Intracranial Hemorrhages/therapy , Patient Admission/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Stroke/therapy , Aged , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Host Microbial Interactions , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages/diagnosis , Intracranial Hemorrhages/epidemiology , Intracranial Hemorrhages/virology , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/virology , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Time Factors
12.
Neurology ; 95(13): 583-592, 2020 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732292

ABSTRACT

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic epicenter in Bronx, NY, the Montefiore Neuroscience Center required rapid and drastic changes when considering the delivery of neurologic care, health and safety of staff, and continued education and safety for house staff. Health care leaders rely on principles that can be in conflict during a disaster response such as this pandemic, with equal commitments to ensure the best care for those stricken with COVID-19, provide high-quality care and advocacy for patients and families coping with neurologic disease, and advocate for the health and safety of health care teams, particularly house staff and colleagues who are most vulnerable. In our attempt to balance these principles, over 3 weeks, we reformatted our inpatient neuroscience services by reducing from 4 wards to just 1, in the following weeks delivering care to over 600 hospitalized patients with neuro-COVID and over 1,742 total neuroscience hospital bed days. This description from members of our leadership team provides an on-the-ground account of our effort to respond nimbly to a complex and evolving surge of patients with COVID in a large urban hospital network. Our efforts were based on (1) strategies to mitigate exposure and transmission, (2) protection of the health and safety of staff, (3) alleviation of logistical delays and strains in the system, and (4) facilitating coordinated communication. Each center's experience will add to knowledge of best practices, and emerging research will help us gain insights into an evidence-based approach to neurologic care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Medical Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Neurology/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Ambulatory Care , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Communication , Delivery of Health Care , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Hospitalization , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Neurology/education , Neuroscience Nursing , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Personal Protective Equipment , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine , Text Messaging
13.
Stroke ; 51(6): 1876-1878, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32295512

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose- Cervicocephalic artery dissection is an important cause of stroke. The clinical presentation of dissection can resemble that of benign neurological conditions leading to delayed or missed diagnosis. Methods- We performed a retrospective cohort study using statewide administrative claims data from all Emergency Department visits and admissions at nonfederal hospitals in Florida from 2005 to 2015 and New York from 2006 to 2015. Using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, CM codes, we identified adult patients hospitalized for cervicocephalic artery dissection. We defined probable misdiagnosis of dissection as having an Emergency Department treat-and-release visit for symptoms or signs of dissection, including headache, neck pain, and focal neurological deficits in the 14 days before dissection diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare adverse clinical outcomes in patients with and without probable misdiagnosis. Results- Among 7090 patients diagnosed with a dissection (mean age 52.7 years, 44.9% women), 218 (3.1% [95% CI, 2.7%-3.5%]) had a preceding probable Emergency Department misdiagnosis. After adjustment for demographics and vascular risk factors, there were no differences in rates of stroke (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.62-1.09]) or in-hospital death (odds ratio, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.07-1.08]) between dissection patients with and without a probable misdiagnosis at index hospitalization. Conclusions- We found that ≈1 in 30 dissection patients was probably misdiagnosed in the 2 weeks before their diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Arteries , Diagnostic Errors , Emergency Service, Hospital , Stroke/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Female , Florida , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York , Retrospective Studies , Rupture, Spontaneous/diagnosis
14.
Neurohospitalist ; 9(4): 203-208, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31534609

ABSTRACT

The role of Varicella zoster virus (VZV) in neurological illness, particularly cerebrovascular disease, has been increasingly recognized. Primary infection by VZV causes varicella (chickenpox), after which the virus remains latent in neuronal ganglia. Later, during aging or immunosuppression, the virus can reactivate causing zoster (shingles). Virus reactivation can also spread to cerebral arteries causing vasculitis and stroke. Zoster is a recognized risk factor for stroke, but stroke can occur without preceding zoster rash. The diagnosis of VZV cerebral vasculitis is established by abnormal brain imaging and confirmed by presence of viral DNA or anti-VZV antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid. Treatment with acyclovir with or without prednisone is usually recommended. VZV vasculitis is a unique and uncommon stroke mechanism that has been under recognized. Careful diagnostic investigation may be warranted in a subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke to detect VZV vasculitis and initiate appropriate therapy. In the following review, we detail the clinical presentation of VZV vasculitis, diagnostic challenges in VZV detection, and suggest the ways to enhance recognition and treatment of this uncommon disease.

15.
Neurohospitalist ; 9(1): 9-14, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30671158

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is practice variability in the treatment of patients with minor ischemic stroke with thrombolysis. We sought to determine which clinical factors physicians prioritize in thrombolysis decision-making for minor stroke using adaptive conjoint analysis. METHODS: We conducted our conjoint analysis using the Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives methodology via the 1000Minds platform to design an online preference survey and circulated it to US physicians involved in stroke care. We evaluated 6 clinical attributes: language/speech deficits, motor deficits, other neurological deficits, history suggestive of increased risk of complication from thrombolysis, age, and premorbid disability. Survey participants were asked to choose between pairs of treatment scenarios with various clinical attributes; scenarios automatically adapted based on participants' prior responses. Preference weights representing the relative importance of each attribute were compared using unadjusted paired t tests. Statistical significance was set at α = .05. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants completed the survey; 61% were vascular neurologists and 93% worked in academic centers. All neurological deficits were ranked higher than age, premorbid status, or potential contraindications to thrombolysis. Differences between each successive mean preference weight were significant: motor (31.7%, standard deviation [SD]: 9.5), language/speech (24.1%, SD: 9.6), other neurological deficits (16.6%, SD: 6.4), premorbid status (12.9%, SD: 6.6), age (10.1%, SD: 6.3), and potential thrombolysis contraindication (4.7%, SD: 4.4). CONCLUSION: In a conjoint analysis, surveyed US physicians in academic practice assigned greater weight to motor and speech/language deficits than other neurological deficits, patient age, relative contraindications to thrombolysis, and premorbid disability when deciding to thrombolyse patients with minor stroke.

17.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 27(5): 1363-1367, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies examining predictors of delay in hospital arrival after stroke symptom onset have not accounted for patients who are found with their symptoms and cannot seek help independently. Our objective is to show that inclusion of patients who are "found down" in studies of prehospital delay biases the estimated association of sociodemographic and clinical variables with time of hospital arrival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to a tertiary care hospital in the Bronx, New York. RESULTS: Compared with all other patients with acute ischemic stroke (N = 1784), patients who were found down (N = 120) were more likely to be older (75 ± 13 years versus 68 ± 14 years, P < .0001), female (68% versus 53%, P = .003), Caucasian race (P < .001), have higher socioeconomic status (P = .001), more severe stroke deficits (P < .0001), use emergency medical services (P < .001), and arrive to the hospital more than 3 hours after symptom onset (P < .001). Inclusion of patients who were found down in a model predicting delay in hospital arrival decreased the strength of the association between the predictors and the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Being found with stroke symptoms confounds the association of sociodemographic and clinical variables with time of hospital arrival. Studies of predictors of prehospital delay should therefore exclude patients who are found down.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/therapy , Emergency Medical Services , Stroke/therapy , Time-to-Treatment , Transportation of Patients , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
Ethn Dis ; 27(2): 125-132, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28439183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Conflicting reports exist about hospital arrival time after stroke onset in Hispanics compared with African Americans and Caucasians. Our current study investigates race-ethnic disparities in hospital arrival times after stroke onset. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of hospital arrival times in Hispanic, African American, and Caucasian acute ischemic stroke patients (N=1790) presenting to a tertiary-care hospital in the Bronx, New York. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the association between race-ethnicity and hospital arrival time adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status (SES), NIH stroke scale (NIHSS), history of stroke, preferred language and transportation mode to the hospital. RESULTS: There were 338 Caucasians, 662 Hispanics, and 790 African Americans in the cohort. Compared with Caucasians, African Americans and Hispanics were younger (P<.0001 respectively), had lower SES (P<.001 respectively) and were less likely to use EMS (P=.003 and P=.001, respectively). A greater proportion of Hispanic and African American women had delayed hospital arrival times (≥3 hours) after onset of stroke symptoms compared with Caucasian women (74% of Hispanic, 72% of African American, and 59% of Caucasian women), but this difference between race-ethnicities is no longer present after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Compared with Caucasian men, hospital arrival ≥3 hours after symptom onset was more likely for African American men (OR 1.72, 95% CI:1.05-2.79) but not Hispanic men (OR .80, 95% CI .49-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: African American men and socially disadvantaged women delay in presenting to the hospital after stroke onset. Future research should focus on identifying the factors contributing to pre-hospital delay among race-ethnic minorities.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Ethnicity , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Patient Admission , Quality of Health Care , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Brain Ischemia/ethnology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Minority Groups , Nutrition Surveys/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
19.
Stroke ; 48(5): 1416-1419, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28386037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study evaluated the use of an artificial intelligence platform on mobile devices in measuring and increasing medication adherence in stroke patients on anticoagulation therapy. The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants, while reducing the need for monitoring, have also placed pressure on patients to self-manage. Suboptimal adherence goes undetected as routine laboratory tests are not reliable indicators of adherence, placing patients at increased risk of stroke and bleeding. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, 12-week study was conducted in adults (n=28) with recently diagnosed ischemic stroke receiving any anticoagulation. Patients were randomized to daily monitoring by the artificial intelligence platform (intervention) or to no daily monitoring (control). The artificial intelligence application visually identified the patient, the medication, and the confirmed ingestion. Adherence was measured by pill counts and plasma sampling in both groups. RESULTS: For all patients (n=28), mean (SD) age was 57 years (13.2 years) and 53.6% were women. Mean (SD) cumulative adherence based on the artificial intelligence platform was 90.5% (7.5%). Plasma drug concentration levels indicated that adherence was 100% (15 of 15) and 50% (6 of 12) in the intervention and control groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, some with little experience using a smartphone, successfully used the technology and demonstrated a 50% improvement in adherence based on plasma drug concentration levels. For patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants, absolute improvement increased to 67%. Real-time monitoring has the potential to increase adherence and change behavior, particularly in patients on direct oral anticoagulant therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02599259.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/blood , Artificial Intelligence , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Medical Informatics Applications , Medication Adherence , Mobile Applications , Stroke/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Outcome Assessment
20.
Stroke ; 45(12): 3589-96, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25378430

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: NINDS (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke)-SiGN (Stroke Genetics Network) is an international consortium of ischemic stroke studies that aims to generate high-quality phenotype data to identify the genetic basis of pathogenic stroke subtypes. This analysis characterizes the etiopathogenetic basis of ischemic stroke and reliability of stroke classification in the consortium. METHODS: Fifty-two trained and certified adjudicators determined both phenotypic (abnormal test findings categorized in major pathogenic groups without weighting toward the most likely cause) and causative ischemic stroke subtypes in 16 954 subjects with imaging-confirmed ischemic stroke from 12 US studies and 11 studies from 8 European countries using the web-based Causative Classification of Stroke System. Classification reliability was assessed with blinded readjudication of 1509 randomly selected cases. RESULTS: The distribution of pathogenic categories varied by study, age, sex, and race (P<0.001 for each). Overall, only 40% to 54% of cases with a given major ischemic stroke pathogenesis (phenotypic subtype) were classified into the same final causative category with high confidence. There was good agreement for both causative (κ 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.75) and phenotypic classifications (κ 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pathogenic subtypes can be determined with good reliability in studies that include investigators with different expertise and background, institutions with different stroke evaluation protocols and geographic location, and patient populations with different epidemiological characteristics. The discordance between phenotypic and causative stroke subtypes highlights the fact that the presence of an abnormality in a patient with stroke does not necessarily mean that it is the cause of stroke.


Subject(s)
Stroke/classification , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.) , Phenotype , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...