ABSTRACT
E-cigarette, or vaping, product use has been declared an epidemic, and a new disease has emerged from their use. We describe 4 patients with significant acute lung injury related to e-cigarette use who underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. All cases posed anesthetic challenges, including increased airway reactivity, hypoxia, increasing oxygen requirements, and, in 2 severe cases, the need for continued postprocedural mechanical ventilatory support. It is imperative that all members of the treating team are aware of the disproportionate risk of respiratory complications to anticipate the possible need for increased postprocedural respiratory support.
Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage/methods , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Lung Injury/etiology , Vaping/adverse effects , Adolescent , Awareness/ethics , Bronchoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Hypoxia/epidemiology , Lung Injury/diagnosis , Lung Injury/therapy , Male , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The North American Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group (PCCG) established the Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry to evaluate outcomes in infants and children undergoing craniosynostosis repair. The goal of this multicenter study was to utilize this registry to assess differences in blood utilization, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, duration of hospitalization, and perioperative complications between endoscopic-assisted (ESC) and open repair in infants with craniosynostosis. We hypothesized that advantages of ESC from single-center studies would be validated based on combined data from a large multicenter registry. METHODS: Thirty-one institutions contributed data from June 2012 to September 2015. We analyzed 1382 infants younger than 12 months undergoing open (anterior and/or posterior cranial vault reconstruction, modified-Pi procedure, or strip craniectomy) or endoscopic craniectomy. The primary outcomes included transfusion data, ICU utilization, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications; secondary outcomes included anesthesia and surgical duration. Comparison of unmatched groups (ESC: N = 311, open repair: N = 1071) and propensity score 2:1 matched groups (ESC: N = 311, open repair: N = 622) were performed by conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Imbalances in baseline age and weight are inherent due to surgical selection criteria for ESC. Quality of propensity score matching in balancing age and weight between ESC and open groups was assessed by quintiles of the propensity scores. Analysis of matched groups confirmed significantly reduced utilization of blood (26% vs 81%, P < .001) and coagulation (3% vs 16%, P < .001) products in the ESC group compared to the open group. Median blood donor exposure (0 vs 1), anesthesia (168 vs 248 minutes) and surgical duration (70 vs 130 minutes), days in ICU (0 vs 2), and hospital length of stay (2 vs 4) were all significantly lower in the ESC group (all P < .001). Median volume of red blood cell administered was significantly lower in ESC (19.6 vs 26.9 mL/kg, P = .035), with a difference of approximately 7 mL/kg less for the ESC (95% confidence interval for the difference, 3-12 mL/kg), whereas the median volume of coagulation products was not significantly different between the 2 groups (21.2 vs 24.6 mL/kg, P = .73). Incidence of complications including hypotension requiring treatment with vasoactive agents (3% vs 4%), venous air embolism (1%), and hypothermia, defined as <35°C (22% vs 26%), was similar between the 2 groups, whereas postoperative intubation was significantly higher in the open group (2% vs 10%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study of ESC versus open craniosynostosis repair represents the largest comparison to date. It demonstrates striking advantages of ESC for young infants that may result in improved clinical outcomes, as well as increased safety.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Propensity Score , Registries , Craniofacial Abnormalities/diagnosis , Craniofacial Abnormalities/epidemiology , Craniofacial Abnormalities/surgery , Craniosynostoses/diagnosis , Craniosynostoses/epidemiology , Endoscopy/trends , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Plastic Surgery Procedures/trends , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We describe the rare case of an infant with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, unilateral lung agenesis, and unpalliated single-ventricle physiology. Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and parallel circulation are at risk for maldistribution of systemic and pulmonary blood flow. Optimal perioperative management should include an assessment of the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow (Qp:Qs). Traditionally, arterial and systemic venous oxygen (SvO2) saturations are needed to calculate Qp:Qs. However, in this case, SvO2 measurement was not feasible. On the basis of a previously described relationship, we used 2-site near-infrared spectroscopy to calculate a near-infrared spectroscopy-derived SvO2, which was then used to estimate Qp:Qs and guide goal-directed interventions.
