Structured Callouts, the Shared Mental Model, and Teamwork: A Video-Based Study in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The shared mental model is essential to high-quality resuscitations. A structured callout (SCO) is often performed to establish the shared mental model, but the literature on SCOs is limited. The objectives of this study are to describe performance of SCOs during pediatric medical emergencies and to determine whether a SCO is associated with better teamwork. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in the resuscitation area of an academic pediatric emergency department, where performance of a SCO is a standard expectation. Only medical or nontrauma patients were eligible for inclusion. Data collection was performed by structured video review by 2 observers and verified by a third blinded observer. A SCO was defined as team leader (Pediatric Emergency Medicine fellow or faculty physician) verbalization of at least 1 element of the patient history/examination or an assessment of patient physiology and 1 element of the diagnostic or therapeutic plan. We independently measured teamwork using the Teamwork Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) tool. RESULTS: We reviewed 60 patient encounters from the pediatric emergency department resuscitation area between April 2018 and June 2020. Median patient age was 6 years; the team leader was a Pediatric Emergency Medicine fellow in 55% of encounters. The physician team leader performed a SCO in 38 (63%) of patient encounters. The TEAM scores were collected for 46 encounters. Mean TEAM score (SD) was 42.3 (1.7) in patients with a SCO compared with 40.0 (3.0) in those without a SCO ( P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of a SCO was associated with better teamwork, but the difference was of unclear clinical significance.

HIV in youth prevention in the emergency department initiative: A survey of pediatric emergency medicine providers.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of HIV among adolescents remains high, and adolescents are known to participate in sexual behaviors that increase their risk for HIV, such as unprotected sex and sex with multiple partners. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to be effective at preventing HIV when taken daily and is approved by the FDA for use in adolescents. Efforts to screen patients in adult emergency departments and connect them with PrEP services have been validated. We surveyed pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers to determine their knowledge of PrEP, prescribing practices, willingness to prescribe, and barriers to a screening protocol in the pediatric emergency department (PED). METHODS: We administered a survey to a multidisciplinary group of PEM providers to measure knowledge, use, willingness, and implementation barriers to PrEP as well as elements needed for a successful referral system. RESULTS: A total of 87 responses were included for analysis. While 79.1% of all providers had heard of PrEP, only 14.8% of prescribing providers had ever discussed PrEP with a patient, and none had ever prescribed PrEP. Overall, 76.3% of all providers were knowledgeable about PrEP based on answers to true/false questions, with prescribing providers significantly more likely to be knowledgeable compared to nurses (p = 0.005). Knowledgeable providers had higher willingness scores to refer for PrEP compared to providers who were not knowledgeable. Ninety-two percent of providers felt a PrEP referral process from the PED would be feasible. Creation of an eligibility algorithm and educational materials were the most common efforts providers preferred to make them more likely to refer for PrEP. The most notable barriers perceived by providers included patient noncompliance with therapy (20.9%), acceptance of PrEP discussion among patients and parents (19.8%), and cost of therapy (15.1%). CONCLUSION: PEM providers are knowledgeable about PrEP but have little experience with discussing or prescribing PrEP. Their willingness to refer for PrEP and anticipated feasibility of a PrEP referral system is encouraging. These results support the need for future educational efforts among PEM providers and creation of referral systems for PrEP services from the PED.

Evaluating Palliative Opportunities Across the Age Spectrum in Children and Adolescent Patients with Cancer.

Purpose: Adolescent patients with cancer experience unique stressors due to their developmental stage, with increased physical, emotional, and social distress. Palliative care (PC) serves an important role in pediatric cancer care. We examined "palliative opportunities," or events during a patient's cancer course where subspecialty PC would be warranted and compared opportunities between adolescents and younger patients. Methods: Patients from a single center, 0-18 years of age at cancer diagnosis, who died from January 1, 2012, to November 30, 2017, were included. In this secondary analysis, patients were divided into cohorts based on age at diagnosis: 0-12 and 13-18 years. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Descriptive statistics and modeling were performed. Number, type, and timing of palliative opportunities and PC consultation timing and reason were evaluated across cohorts. Results: Of the 296 patients included for analysis, 27.7% were 13-18 years (82/296) at diagnosis. Frequency of palliative opportunities did not differ by age (median 7.0 [interquartile range 4.0 and 10.0] in both cohorts). PC consultation occurred in 36.5% (108/296), with neither rate nor timing differing by age group. PC consultations in adolescents were more often for symptom management (p = 0.0001). Adolescent patients were less likely to have a do-not-resuscitate order placed before death (61.0%, 50/82) compared to younger patients (73.8%, 158/214, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Adolescent patients with cancer did not experience more palliative opportunities than younger patients in this cohort, although they often have challenging psychological, family, and social stressors that were not identified. Incorporating additional palliative opportunities could enhance identification of stress and symptoms in adolescents with cancer such that PC could be timed to meet their needs.

Evaluating palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite favorable prognoses, pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies experience significant challenges that may lead to diminished quality of life or family stress. They are less likely to receive subspecialty palliative care (PC) consultation and often undergo intensive end-of-life (EOL) care. We examined "palliative opportunities," or events when the integration of PC would have the greatest impact, present during a patient's hematologic malignancy course and relevant associations. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted on patients aged 0-18 years with a hematologic malignancy who died between 1/1/12 and 11/30/17. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. A priori, nine palliative opportunity categories were defined. Descriptive statistics were performed. Palliative opportunities were evaluated over temporal quartiles from diagnosis to death. Timing and rationale of pediatric PC consultation were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients (n = 92) had a median of 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0) palliative opportunities, incurring 522 total opportunities, increasing toward the EOL. Number and type of opportunities did not differ by demographics. PC consultation was most common in patients with lymphoid leukemia (50.9%, 28/55) and myeloid leukemia (48.5%, 16/33) versus lymphoma (0%, 0/4, p = 0.14). Forty-four of ninety-two patients (47.8%) received PC consultation a median of 1.8 months (IQR 4.1) prior to death. Receipt of PC was associated with transplant status (p = 0.0018) and a higher number of prior palliative opportunities (p = 0.0005); 70.3% (367/522) of palliative opportunities occurred without PC. CONCLUSION: Patients with hematologic malignancies experience many opportunities warranting PC support. Identifying opportunities for ideal timing of PC involvement may benefit patients with hematologic cancers and their caregivers.

Characterization of a hyperphosphorylated variant of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 expressed in E. coli.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell-surface receptors in humans and regulate numerous physiological processes through the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. GPCR kinases (GRKs) selectively phosphorylate active GPCRs, which promotes arrestin binding, receptor internalization, and initiation of alternative signaling pathways. GRK5 is a representative member of one of three GRK subfamilies that does not need post-translational lipidation or other binding partners to exhibit full activity against GPCRs, rendering it a useful tool for biophysical studies directed at characterizing GRK function. However, recombinant expression of GRK5 has thus far been limited to insect and mammalian systems. Here, we describe the expression of functional GRK5 in E. coli and its purification and biochemical characterization. Bacterially expressed GRK5 is hyperphosphorylated, primarily in regions known to be flexible from prior crystal structures, which slightly decreases its catalytic activity toward receptor substrates. Mutation of a single phosphorylation site, Thr10, restores kinetic parameters to those of GRK5 purified from insect cells. Consequently, bacterial expression will allow for production of GRK5 at a reduced cost and faster pace and would facilitate production of isotopically labeled kinase for NMR studies or for the incorporation of unnatural amino acids.