Defining enhanced recovery after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) has not been described in the literature. This study examined patients undergoing pCCA resection within a standard post hepatectomy ERAS pathway to define achievable targets suitable for these patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing pCCA resection at University Hospital Aintree (January 2009-October 2017) were identified. Achievement of key ERAS outcomes was assessed. Patients were stratified on incidence of major complications and pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chi Square and Mann Whitney analyses were undertaken as appropriate. Achievable ERAS targets were derived from patients who did not develop a major complication. RESULTS: 46 patients underwent resection with enhanced recovery. Median age 65 (24 male: 22 female). Key ERAS outcomes in patients who did not experience major complications are described as medians (interquartile range): length of stay 8 days (6-13), duration critical care 2 days (2-4), inotropes 6 h (0-24), epidural 3 days (3-4), early mobilization day 1 (1-2), full mobilization day 3 (3-4), urinary catheter removal day 4 (3-5), NGT removal day 1 (1-2) and restoration oral nutrition day 2 (2-4). Patients deemed high risk pre-operatively or those who developed major complications post-operatively required significantly longer critical care (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002 respectively). Other ERAS targets remained achievable in similar timeframes. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS for pCCA is achievable. Applicable ERAS standards are defined which take into account minor complications. High risk patients and those with major complications can be appropriately managed in an ERAS pathway, though there is increased need for critical care support.

Adherence to early mobilisation: Key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been proven effective in liver surgery. Adherence to the ERAS pathway is variable. This study seeks to evaluate adherence to key components of an ERAS protocol in liver resection, and identify the components associated with successful clinical outcomes. METHOD: All patients undergoing liver resections for two consecutive years were included in our ERAS pathway. Six key components of ERAS included preoperative assessment, nutrition and gastrointestinal function, postoperative analgesia, mobilisation and discharges. Successful accomplishment of ERAS was defined as hospital discharge by postop day (POD) 6. Adherences of these elements were compared between the successful and un-successful groups. RESULTS: During the studied period, 223 patients underwent liver resections, among which 103 had major hepatectomies. N = 147 patients (66%) were discharged within our ERAS protocol target (6 days). On multivariable analysis, sitting out of bed by POD 1 (p < 0.03), walking by POD 3 (p = 0.03), removal of urinary catheter by POD 3 (p < 0.01), and avoiding major complications (p < 0.01) were factors associated with successful completion to our ERAS protocol; whereas advanced age (p = 0.34) and discontinuation of PCA/epidural by POD 3 (p = 0.50) were not significant parameters. There was a significant difference in the length of stay (p < 0.01) following major and minor liver resection, of which the indications for surgery also varied significantly. There was no difference in hospital re-admission rate, and morbidity and mortality between major and minor liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitating early mobilisation and reducing postoperative complications are keys to successful outcomes of ERAS in liver resection.