Long-term biomonitoring of breast cancer patients under adjuvant chemotherapy: the comet assay as a possible predictive factor.

Most chemotherapy treatments induce DNA damage in the exposed patients. Using the comet assay and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), we have quantified this induced DNA damage and studied its relationship with GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, and clinical parameters. For this purpose, 29 Caucasian women, breast cancer patients under CMF or CEF adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the study. The clinical parameters considered were (i) therapies side effects, like haematological and biochemical toxicities, (ii) prognostic and predictive factors, like hormonal receptor expression, tumour differentiation degree, sickness stage, and nodal status, and (iii) the effectiveness of the chemotherapy measured as five years relapse probability. The results were also related to the confounding factor age. Comet assay results indicate that 13 patients were characterised by absence of induced DNA strand breaks, and 16 patients presented induced DNA strand breaks along the treatment. Relationships between comet variables and clinical parameters, found with principal component analysis, correlations, one-way ANOVA and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that: (1) baseline levels of DNA damage are related to GSTM1 genotype and to hormonal receptor expression; (2) GSTM1 genotype also influences comet results after chemotherapy, as it does the AST level; (3) the tail moment values of the cycle 6.1 and the sickness stage might predict cancer relapse at five years: for the Stage, OR = 13.8 (IIB versus I+IIA), 95% CI 0.80-238.97, and for 6.1 cycle TM, OR = 1.3, 95%, CI 0.97-1.79, with a potential model (10* Stage (I-IIA = 0, IIB = 1) + 6.1 cycle), that has a good predictive capacity, with an area under ROC curve of 0.872 (CI 0.62-1.00). To our knowledge, this is the first time such a predictive value is found for the comet assay. Nevertheless, before the comet assay could be used as a tool for oncologists, this relationship should be confirmed in more patients, and problems of standardisation and data interpretation should be solved.

Impact of erythropoietin on the reduction of blood transfusions and on survival of lung cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Anaemia is a common problem in patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy and is normally associated with a negative impact on patients' quality of life (QOL), poor cancer control and diminished survival. In clinical trials, recombinant human erythropoietin has been shown to correct and prevent anaemia, decrease the need for blood transfusions and improve cancer patients' QOL. METHODS: A retrospective study followed lung cancer patients who received first-line chemotherapy in our hospital in 1998 and in 2005. The incidence of anaemia was analysed, as was the impact of incorporating erythropoietin into the treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of anaemia was 68% (69% of which reported asthenia) in 1998 vs. 54% (60% with asthenia) in 2005. The comparison of anaemia rates (1998 vs. 2005) were grade 1 (16% vs. 32%), grade 2 (36% vs. 16%), grade 3 (16% vs. 5%) and grade 4 (none). Treatment for anaemia included transfusion 52%, intravenous iron 5% and epoetin 4% in 1998. In 2005 anaemia was treated with transfusion 9%, intravenous iron 41%, and epoetin 49%. Median survival (1998 vs. 2005) was 242 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 217-329) vs. 356 days (95% CI 322-382). CONCLUSIONS: Erythropoietin is a valid alternative for cancer patients with anaemia undergoing chemotherapy. It can possibly avoid the need for transfusions without negatively impacting survival.

Prospective randomised phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel administered weekly in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and paclitaxel have activity in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and can be administered as weekly schedules. This phase II randomised study was designed to test the efficacy and toxicity of both taxanes in patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 71) with documented NSCLC were randomised to receive docetaxel (n = 35 patients; 36 mg/m(2)) or paclitaxel (n = 36 patients; 80 mg/m(2)) as a 1 h weekly infusion for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. The cycles were repeated until disease progression or non-acceptable toxicities occurred. RESULTS: Treatment achieved partial response of one versus five patients, median time-to-progression of 74 versus 68 days, and overall survival of 184 versus 105 days, with docetaxel and paclitaxel, respectively. The most common non-haematological toxicities were (docetaxel versus paclitaxel): grade 3/4 pulmonary toxicity in seven versus one patient; grade 2/3 diarrhoea in nine versus five; and grade 3/4 haematological toxicities occurred in two versus four patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel and paclitaxel administered weekly have discrete efficacy in patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The higher non-haematological toxicity of docetaxel, particularly pulmonary toxicity and diarrhoea, is of concern and warrants further investigation.

Combination of docetaxel, epirubicin and vinorelbine administered every 2 weeks as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a dose-finding study.

AIMS: To assess efficacy and optimum combination dosage of intravenous docetaxel (T), epirubicin (E) and vinorelbine (N) administered every 2 weeks and without colony stimulating factor (CSF) support in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients (n = 5 1) with MBC were consecutively assigned to four different dose levels (DL) to receive (in mg/m2): Level I = T35 + E30 + N25; Level II = T30 + E30 + N25; Level III = T30 + E25 + N25; and Level IV = T25 + E25 + N25. Consecutive cycles were delayed if absolute neutrophil and/or platelet counts fell below 1.5 x 10(9) and 100 x 10(9) l(-1), respectively. Treatment at a given dose level was suspended if 33% or more of patients included in a given cohort had unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The patients evaluable for toxicity (n = 48) received 448 cycles (median 9; range 1-23). There was neutropenia G 3-4 in 30 patients (63%) with fever in 3 (6%). The G 2-3 non-hematological toxicities were alopecia in 39 patients (81%), mucositis in 11 (23%), and nausea/vomiting in 8 (17%). There were no toxic deaths. Treatment delay or dose reduction after first cycle occurred in > or = 30% of patients treated in all DLs, except the fourth. Objective response was achieved in 29 of the 47 evaluable patients (58%; 95% CI: 50-66). The median duration of response, time-to-progression and overall survival were 13, 11 (range 8-14) and 20 (range 16-24) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel, epirubicin and vinorelbine without CSF support ought not to exceed 25 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. The efficacy is no greater than other existing regimens for first-line treatment of MBC.

Cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide in carcinosarcoma of the female genital tract. A phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC 55923).

Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract are highly malignant tumours composed of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. In the past, these tumours were frequently treated as sarcomas. However, a number of arguments, including the sensitivity of these tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, suggest that these tumours behave more like poorly differentiated carcinomas. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynaecological Cancer Group therefore decided to perform a prospective phase II study in patients with advanced or metastatic carcinosarcoma with an approach such as that used in gynaecological carcinomas. Eligible patients could have primary or recurrent disease, but prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not allowed. The treatment plan recommended upfront debulking, followed by chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and doxorubicin. Patients who could be debulked to non-measurable disease remained eligible for the study, but the response assessment was restricted to patients who had measurable disease before the start of chemotherapy. A total of 48 patients (39 primary disease, 9 recurrent disease) were registered, 41 of them being eligible. In 9 patients, all macroscopic lesions could be removed, 32 patients were left with residual disease and were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 56%: a complete response (CR) was observed in 11 (34%) patients and partial response (PR) in 7 (22%) patients. No change occurred in 5 patients and progression in 2 patients. In 7 patients, response could not be assessed. Median survival for all of the 41 eligible patients was 26 months. Severe leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were common and necessitated dose reductions or delays in 60% of patients. From a clinical point of view, the most severe non-haematological toxicity was renal dysfunction, and one patient died of this complication in the absence of disease progression. The results of this study are in-line with the hypothesis that carcinosarcomas are chemosensitive, in particular for the currently investigated regimen. The treatment also included upfront cytoreduction when feasible. Considering the observed toxicities, alternative platinum-based regimens with more favourable toxicity profiles should be explored.

Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in endometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy yields better response rates which do not always lead to a survival advantage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reported differences in the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX) versus combination therapy with cisplatin (CDDP) in endometrial adenocarcinoma lead to significant advantage in favour of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically-proven advanced and/or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and were chemo-naïve. Treatment consisted of either DOX 60 mg/m(2) alone or CDDP 50 mg/m2 added to DOX 60 mg/m2, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were entered and median follow-up is 7.1 years. The combination DOX-CDDP was more toxic than DOX alone. Haematological toxicity consisted mainly of white blood cell toxicity grade 3 and 4 (55% versus 30%). Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 3 and 4 alopecia (72% versus 65%) and nausea/vomiting (36 % versus 12%). The combination DOX-CDDP provided a significantly higher response rate than single agent DOX (P <0.001). Thirty-nine patients (43%) responded on DOX-CDDP [13 complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs)], versus 15 patients (17%) on DOX alone (8 CR and 7 PR). The median overall survival (OS) was 9 months in the DOX-CDDP arm versus 7 months in the DOX alone arm (Wilcoxon P = 0.0654). Regression analysis showed that WHO performance status was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for survival, and stratifying for this factor, treatment effect reaches significance (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.03, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to single agent DOX, the combination of DOX-CDDP results in higher but acceptable toxicity. The response rate produced is significantly higher, and a modest survival benefit is achieved with this combination regimen, especially in patients with a good performance status.

Phase II study of carboplatin and 1-h intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel in a novel sequence as first-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide when administered in combination to previously-untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=95) with limited-stage disease (LSD; n=45) or extensive-stage disease (ESD; n=50) from 14 Spanish hospitals were entered into the study. Etoposide was administered 80 mg/m(2)/day intravenous (i.v.) on days 1, 2 and 3, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 3 and carboplatin area-under-the-concentration-time-curve=6; i.v. on day 3, of a 3-week cycle, and repeated for up to 6 cycles. RESULTS: The overall response (OR) rate was 74% (n=70; 32 complete, 38 partial). Although the OR in LSD and ESD patients was similar (73 vs 74%, respectively), the percentage complete response was significantly higher among the former (49 vs 20%). The main toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (62 and 18%, respectively) and there were 3 toxic deaths. Other toxicities were rare or easily manageable. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 1 year were 53 and 70% in LSD and 18 and 39% in ESD patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin has an anti-tumour activity in SCLC that is comparable to other combination regimens, and is well tolerated.

Phase II study of a combination of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin in advanced fallopian tube carcinoma. An EORTC gynecological cancer group study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical activity and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (C), adriamycin (A) and cisplatin (P) for patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the Fallopian tube having FIGO stage III-IV disease. METHODS: The CAP-regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, adriamycin 45 mg/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day one every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible patients with histologically-confirmed Fallopian tube adenocarcinoma were entered in the trial. Fourteen patients had FIGO stage III, and ten had stage IV disease. The median number of CAP cycles was six. Ten patients had a complete and six had a partial response (response rate: 67%, 95% confidence limits: 45-84%). WHO grade III-IV side-effects included haematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting and alopecia. Furthermore, mild signs of cisplatin-related peripheral neurotoxicity were observed. At a median follow-up of 40 months, nine patients were alive and 15 had died due to malignant disease. The median time to progression was 13 months for all patients. The median overall survival was 24 months and the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival and their 95% confidence limits were 73% (54-92%), 25% (4-46%) and 19% (0-38%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The present data confirm the therapeutic activity of the CAP-regimen in primary Fallopian tube adenocarcinoma. The response rate is moderate and the toxicity profile is acceptable.

Phase II study of mitomycin-C and cisplatin in disseminated, squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynecological Cancer Group study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the tumour response rate and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy consisting of mitomycin-C and cisplatin in patients with disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin, 6 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), and cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2) given i.v., both administered on day 1 of each cycle. The regimen was repeated at 4-weekly intervals. Mitomycin-C/cisplatin were used to treat 33 evaluable patients aged 29-67 years (median: 50 years). All patients except 1 had previously been treated with either surgery, radiation or both. At the initiation of chemotherapy, 8 patients had loco-regional and disseminated disease and 25 women had only distant metastases. The overall response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26-61%). Five complete and nine partial responses were observed with a median duration of response of 7.9 months (95% CI: 3.7-23.5 months). 9 patients had stable disease and 10 developed progressive disease during mitomycin-C/cisplatin-treatment. World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV side-effects were documented in 15 women, of whom 10 had gastro-intestinal toxicity, 3 had haematological toxicity, 1 had alopecia and 1 developed an allergic reaction to cisplatin. There were neither drug-related deaths nor severe or irreversible renal or hepatic dysfunction or peripheral neuropathy. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.2 months) for all patients and 10.5 months (95% CI: 6.2-15.2 months) for the responders. The median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-18.4 months).The mitomycin-C/cisplatin combination showed antitumour activity in the treatment of advanced or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The regimen was well tolerated and could be administered on an outpatient basis.

Randomized phase III trial of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin-C, and cisplatin (BEMP) versus cisplatin (P) in disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group study.

PURPOSE: Three previous mitomycin-cisplatin-based chemotherapy trials conducted within the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group (GCCG) in patients with disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCCUC) suggested that with such regimens a higher overall response rate and a higher complete response rate could be obtained compared to what might have been expected from cisplatin alone. In that respect the combination of bleomycin, vindesine (Eldesine), mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) was the most promising. In the present study BEMP has been compared with the best single agent, cisplatin (P) in the expectation that improved response rates might translate into a better survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were those with SCCUC and disseminated measurable disease outside previously irradiated areas, aged < or = 75 years, with a WHO performance status < or = 2 and adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic and pulmonary function, who gave consent according to regulations followed in individual institutions. Patients were randomized to BEMP: E 3 mg/m2 day 1, P 50 mg/m2 day 1, B 15 mg (24-hour infusion) day 2-4 and M 8 mg/m2 (at alternate cycles), or P 50 mg/m2. The first four cycles were given every 3 weeks (induction phase). Subsequent cycles were given every four weeks (maintenance phase), during which B was deleted from BEMP (MEP). Patients failing on P could be treated with BEM. Of the 287 patients entered, 235 were eligible and 201 evaluable for response. RESULTS: BEMP induced a significantly higher response rate than P (42% vs. 25%, P = 0.006). There was no difference in complete response rate (11% vs. 7%). BEMP was significantly more toxic than P (+/- BEM), both with respect to hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities. After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, survival curves were not significantly different. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3 and 10.1 months with BEMP and 4.5 and 9.3 months with P (+/- BEM), respectively. In a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for survival, a lower age (P = 0.003), a lower performance status (P = 0.0001) and a short (<1 year) interval since diagnosis (P = 0.0152) were all associated with an increased risk of dying. For progression-free survival, lower age, prior radiotherapy, locoregional involvement and no prior surgery were associated with a high risk. Treatment with BEMP or P had no significant impact on survival, but for progression-free survival there was a trend in favor of BEMP (P = 0.0893). Adjusting for prognostic factors did not change the effect of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with BEMP produces more toxicity and more responses compared with cisplatin alone in patients with disseminated SCCUC, but this does not translate into a better survival. Therefore, in the palliative setting single-agent cisplatin should remain the standard therapy for these patients.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and topotecan in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma that recurred after or didn't respond to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable and assessable disease were randomized to receive either PLD 50 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour infusion every 4 weeks or topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified prospectively for platinum sensitivity and for the presence or absence of bulky disease. RESULTS: A total of 474 patients were treated (239 PLD and 235 topotecan). They comprised the intent-to-treat population. The overall progression-free survival rates were similar between the two arms (P =.095). The overall response rates for PLD and topotecan were 19.7% and 17.0%, respectively (P =.390). Median overall survival times were 60 weeks for PLD and 56.7 weeks for topotecan. Data analyzed in platinum-sensitive patients demonstrated a statistically significant benefit from PLD for progression-free survival (P =.037), with medians of 28.9 for PLD versus 23.3 weeks for topotecan. For overall survival, PLD was significantly superior to topotecan (P =.008), with a median of 108 weeks versus 71.1 weeks. The platinum-refractory subgroup demonstrated a nonstatistically significant survival trend in favor of topotecan (P =.455). Severe hematologic toxicity was more common with topotecan and was more likely to be associated with dosage modification, or growth factor or blood product utilization. CONCLUSION: The comparable efficacy, favorable safety profile, and convenient dosing support the role of PLD as a valuable treatment option in this patient population.

Bleomycin, methotrexate, and CCNU in locally advanced or recurrent, inoperable, squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group Study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate tumor response rate and treatment toxicity of a modified combination chemotherapy consisting of bleomycin (B), methotrexate (M), and CCNU (C) for patients with locally advanced, squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva (not amenable to resection by standard radical vulvectomy) or recurrent disease (after incomplete resection). Tumor resectability was reassessed in patients who had responded to chemotherapy. METHODS: The regimen consisted of bleomycin 5 mg intramuscular (im) days 1-5, CCNU 40 mg per os (po) days 5-7, and methotrexate 15 mg po days 1 and 4 during the first week. During weeks 2-6 the patient was administered bleomycin 5 mg im days 1 and 4, and methotrexate 15 mg po on day 1 of the week. This 6-week cycle was repeated at 49-day intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-five eligible patients with a median age of 66 years (range, 39-82 years) were entered in this phase II trial. Twelve patients had primary locally advanced disease, 13 patients had a locoregional recurrence, and all received up to three BMC cycles. Two complete and twelve partial responses were observed (response rate, 56%; 95% confidence limits, 35-76%). The BMC regimen was associated with major hematological side effects and mild signs of bleomycin-related pulmonary toxicity. At a median follow-up of 8 months, 3 patients were alive, 18 had died due to malignant disease, 2 had died due to toxicity, and 2 had died due to intercurrent disease and unknown cause. The median progression-free survival was 4.8 months and the median survival was 7.8 months. The 1-year survival was 32% (95% confidence limits, 13-51%). CONCLUSION: The present data confirm the therapeutic activity of the BMC regimen in locoregionally advanced or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall response rate was 56%. BMC is an outpatient treatment that may play a role in the palliative therapy of advanced or recurrent vulva cancer.

D-TRP-6-LHRH (Triptorelin) is not effective in ovarian carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Co-operative Group Study.

Between March and September 1988, 74 patients with progressive ovarian cancer after prior platinum-based therapy were treated with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist Triptorelin (Decapeptyl degrees). Treatment consisted of i.m. injection of 3.75 mg of microencapsulated Triptorelin on days 1, 8 and 28 followed by 4-weekly injections until tumor progression. No objective responses were observed. Eleven out of 68 evaluable patients (16%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5 months in patients with disease stabilization and 2 months for all evaluable patients. The median survival for patients with disease stabilization was 17 months, whereas for all patients it was 4 months. The treatment was well tolerated; the only reported adverse events were incidental hot flushes. This study showed that the LHRH agonist Triptorelin has only modest efficacy in patients pretreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

A phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine (Navelbin; N) has proven to be active in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) and cyclophosphamide (C) and epirubicin (Epiadriamycin: E) are still among the main cytostatic agents against this tumor. On this basis was carried out a study to determine the activity and toxicity of the combination of these three agents (CEN). PATIENTS AND METHOD: From April 1996 to March 1998, 59 patients with ABC were recruited of whom 56 were found eligible and evaluable for toxicity and 55 for activity. The treatment regimen was C: 400 mg/m2, E: 30 mg/m2 and N: 25 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: The median number of cycles administered was 6 (range: 1-16). The most common hematological toxicity was grade (G) 3 and 4 neutropenia occurring in 36% of patients, associated with fever in 7% of them. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 5% and 7%, respectively. Other G2-G3 non hematologic toxicities were: N/vomiting in 34%, alopecia in 73% and mucositis in 11% of patients. An objective response was achieved in 28 of 56 patients (50%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 37-63%): complete response (CR) in 9%, partial response (PR) in 41%. The median duration of response, time to progression and overall survival time was 54, 47 and 90 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CEN combination at these doses and treatment schedule appears to have acceptable tolerability but there is no apparent improvement in therapeutic efficacy when compared to other regimens used as first line treatment in ABC.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of etoposide, leucovorin, and bolus fluorouracil (ELF) or infusional fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FUP) with that of the reference protocol of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 399 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized and analyzed for toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free and overall survival. Only reviewed and confirmed responses were considered. The analysis of remission was based on assessable patients with documented measurable lesions. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used for the statistical analysis of time-to-event end points. RESULTS: The overall response rate for 245 eligible patients with measurable disease was 9% with ELF, 20% with FUP, and 12% with FAMTX, with no significant differences. One hundred twelve patients were eligible for efficacy in assessable, nonmeasurable disease. No change was observed in 66% of patients treated with ELF, 56% with FUP, and 55% with FAMTX. Two patients achieved a complete tumor regression (one each for ELF and FAMTX). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the median survival times were 7.2 months with ELF, 7.2 months with FUP, and 6.7 months with FAMTX, respectively, with no significant differences. Nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities of ELF, FUP, and FAMTX were acceptable, with neutropenia being the major toxicity for all three regimens. Seven treatment-related deaths occurred (two with FUP and five with FAMTX). CONCLUSION: All three investigated regimens demonstrate modest clinical efficacy and should not be regarded as standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered to achieve a better clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Oxaliplatin or paclitaxel in patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynecology Group.

PURPOSE: This was a multicentric, open, randomized, phase II study of single-agent paclitaxel and oxaliplatin to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin in a relapsing progressive ovarian cancer patient population and to analyze the safety profile and impact of both agents on quality of life, time to progression, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with platinum-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to two arms: 41 received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours every 3 weeks, and 45 received oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) over 2 hours every 3 weeks. For inclusion, patients had to have a performance status of 0 to 2 and to have received at least one and no more than two prior cisplatin- and/or carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens within the last 12 months. RESULTS: Seven confirmed responses were observed in each arm, for an overall response rate in the total treated population of 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 32%) in the paclitaxel arm and 16% (95% CI, 7% to 29%) in the oxaliplatin arm. Median time to progression was 14 weeks and 12 weeks, and overall survival was 37 weeks and 42 weeks in the paclitaxel and oxaliplatin arms, respectively. Among 63 patients with a 0- to 6-month progression-free, platinum-free interval, there were five objective responses with paclitaxel in 31 patients and two objective responses with oxaliplatin in 32 patients. Nine patients (22%) in the paclitaxel arm had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (National Cancer Institute of Canada [NCIC] Common Toxicity Criteria). Two patients (4%) experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia in the oxaliplatin arm. Maximum grade (grade 3) NCIC neurosensory toxicity was experienced by three patients (7%) in the paclitaxel arm and by four patients (9%) in the oxaliplatin arm. CONCLUSION: Single-agent oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is active with moderate toxicity in patients with cisplatin-/carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer.

Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, fluorouracil (CEF) versus cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (CNF) in women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The mitoxantrone combination CNF and the epirubicin combination CEF have shown similar activity and less toxicity than the standard CAF combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A prospective randomised study was started to compare safety and activity between CEF and CNF administered using a classical chemotherapeutic schedule in MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1987 to June 1993, 151 patients were randomised to receive cyclophosphamide (C) 100 mg m(-2) p.o. days 1-14, fluorouracil (F) 500 mg m(-2) i.v. days 1 and 8, and epirubicin (E) 30 mg m(-2) i.v. days 1 and 8, or mitoxantrone (N) 6 mg m(-2) i.v. days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks. Seventy-three patients were eligible for CEF and 72 for CNF. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 61.6% of the CEF group and 44.4% in CNF group (p = 0.004). The median duration of response was 64 weeks in CEF and 50 weeks in CNF group (p = 0.02) and median time to progression was 51 and 33 weeks, respectively (p = 0.0004). At the time of analysis, all except six patients (one in CNF and five in CEF) had died and the median survival time in the CEF group was longer than in CNF (74.4 weeks vs 51.4 weeks; log-rank chi2 test p = 0.015). CNF produced more hematologic toxicity than CEF (WHO scale; grades 2-4); leucopenia 84% vs 68% (p = 0.03) and thrombocytopenia 17% vs 4.5% (p = 0.01); CEF caused more grade 2 and 3 alopecia: 93% vs 70% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination CEF using this schedule and dosage in metastatic breast cancer is more effective with less toxicity than CNF, except for alopecia, and was associated with longer survival.

Randomised phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer.

Patients with measurable or evaluable locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus were treated with cisplatin (CDDP), 100 mg/m2, combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 as a continuous infusion from days 1-5 (Arm A) or with CDDP alone (Arm B). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. 92 patients were randomised centrally, 88 were eligible. The response rate was 35% (95% CI (confidence interval), 20-54%) in Arm A and 19% (95% CI, 8-35%) in Arm B. One complete response was observed in each arm. The median duration of survival was 33 weeks and 28 weeks for Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Haematological and non-haematological toxicities were more frequent and more severe in Arm A. The most prominent toxicities were grade 4 aplasia and septicaemia (2), meningeal haemorrhage (1), cerebrovascular accident (3) and ischaemia of the lower limbs (1) all occurring in Arm A. Overall, seven treatment-related deaths (16%) were observed in Arm A, none in Arm B. The severe side-effects induced by the combination suggest that, currently, no standard chemotherapy can be recommended for patients with advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer.

Topotecan, an active drug in the second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a large European phase II study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with preclinical activity against various tumor types. We conducted a large multicenter phase II study with topotecan in ovarian cancer in patients who had failed to respond to one prior cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d was administered intravenously by 30-minute infusion for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. As the cisplatin-free interval relates to response in subsequent treatment, patients were stratified in subgroups, ie, cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive. RESULTS: One-hundred eleven patients entered the study. Nineteen patients were considered to be ineligible; 92 patients were assessable for response. A total of 552 courses were given (median, four per patient; range, one to 17). The major toxicities were leukocytopenia and neutropenia, which were grade 3 to 4 in 54.2% and 69.1% of courses, respectively, but with only 4.3% of these being grade 4 neutropenia plus fever or infectious complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given in 20.5% of courses to maintain dose-intensity. Other relatively frequent side effects were alopecia (82%), nausea (36.4%), and vomiting (17.5%). The overall response rate was 16.3%, with one complete response (CR) and 14 partial responses (PRs). In the cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive strata, the response rates were 5.9%, 17.8%, and 26.7%, respectively. The median duration of time of documented response was 21.7 weeks (range, 4.6 to 41.9). CONCLUSION: Topotecan in a daily-times-five schedule is an effective regimen as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Further investigations of topotecan in ovarian cancer, including first-line use and combination with other active agents, are indicated.