Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pharm Sci ; 21(2-3): 179-89, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14757489

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using oral modified-release formulations for the purposes of site-specific targeting and regional drug absorption assessment in man. An immediate release pellet formulation containing ranitidine as the model drug of choice for the study was fabricated by extrusion-spheronisation, and then film coated with either the enteric polymer polyvinyl acetate phthalate or the bacteria-degradable polymer amylose, in combination with ethylcellulose, to effect drug release within the small intestine and colon, respectively. Optimised formulations were evaluated in vivo in ten healthy volunteers, who each received, on four separate occasions, the immediate release, small intestinal release and colonic release formulations (each equivalent to 150mg ranitidine), and an intravenous injection of ranitidine (equivalent to 50mg ranitidine). Blood samples were collected and assessed for ranitidine concentration, and radiolabelled placebo pellets were co-administered with the coated ranitidine pellets to monitor their gastrointestinal transit using a gamma camera. Ranitidine was rapidly released and absorbed from the immediate release formulation, whereas the enteric formulation (10% coat weight gain) delayed drug release until some or all of the pellets had emptied into the small intestine. The amylose-ethylcellulose coated formulation (coat ratio 1:3, coat weight gain 25%) retarded ranitidine release until the pellets had reached the colon. The mean absolute bioavailability of ranitidine from the immediate release, small intestinal release and colonic release formulations were 50.6, 46.1 and 5.5%, respectively. These data are in general agreement to those obtained from a previous regional intubation study. The present study therefore demonstrates the practical potential of utilising a non-invasive, formulation-based approach to assess drug absorption from different regions of the human gastrointestinal tract.


Subject(s)
Cellulose/analogs & derivatives , Colon/metabolism , Histamine H2 Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Intestine, Small/metabolism , Ranitidine/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Amylose , Biological Availability , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Compounding , Excipients , Gastrointestinal Transit/drug effects , Histamine H2 Antagonists/blood , Histamine H2 Antagonists/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ranitidine/blood , Tablets, Enteric-Coated , Time Factors
2.
Pharm Res ; 19(9): 1368-74, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12403075

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of co-administered polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400), a pharmaceutical excipient previously shown to accelerate small intestinal transit, on the absorption characteristics of ranitidine from the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers each received, on two separate occasions, an immediate-release pellet formulation of ranitidine (150 mg) encapsulated within a hard gelatin capsule and a liquid preparation consisting of 150 ml orange juice (control) or 150 ml orange juice containing 10 g PEG 400 (test). The liquid preparations were also radiolabelled with indium-III to allow their transit through the gastrointestinal tract to be followed using a gamma camera. On a further occasion an intravenous injection of ranitidine (50 mg) was administered. Blood samples were taken over a 12 h period on each study day to allow a ranitidine plasma and subsequent absorption rate profile to be generated for each oral formulation. Urine was collected for 24 h and assessed for PEG 400 concentration. RESULTS: The absolute bioavailability of ranitidine from the pellet formulation was significantly reduced by 31% (from 51% to 35%) and small intestinal liquid transit time was significantly shortened by 37% (from 226 min to 143 min) as a consequence of PEG 400 in the test preparation. PEG 400 also affected the rate of ranitidine absorption, with major differences noted in the mean absorption time and Cmax parameters. The appearance of double peaks were less evident in the ranitidine pharmacokinetic profiles in the presence of PEG 400, and little or no correlation was observed between the absorption of ranitidine and PEG 400. CONCLUSIONS: These results clearly demonstrate that PEG 400 adversely influences the gastrointestinal absorption of ranitidine. This in turn has ramifications for the use of PEG 400 as a pharmaceutical excipient in oral formulations.


Subject(s)
Intestinal Absorption/physiology , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacokinetics , Ranitidine/pharmacokinetics , Biological Availability , Cross-Over Studies , Digestive System/drug effects , Digestive System/metabolism , Drug Interactions/physiology , Humans , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Male , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacology , Ranitidine/blood
3.
Int J Pharm ; 237(1-2): 23-33, 2002 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11955801

ABSTRACT

The H(2)-receptor antagonist ranitidine has previously been shown to be a substrate for colonic bacterial metabolism. The objective of the present study was to assess the in vitro stability of the other H(2)-receptor antagonists, cimetidine, famotidine and nizatidine, to colonic bacteria. One hundred milligrams of each drug were introduced into individual batch culture fermenters (100 ml) consisting of buffer medium inoculated with freshly voided human faeces (10% w/v). Control experiments, equivalent drug quantities in buffer medium without the presence of faeces, were also run in parallel. Samples were removed at set time intervals over a 24 h period and were subsequently analysed by HPLC. A selection of the samples removed from the fermenters was also subjected to analysis by UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Following an initial dissolution phase in the fermentation system, a marked decline in nizatidine concentration was noted over time with virtually no drug remaining after 12 h, thereby suggesting degradation and metabolism of the drug by colonic bacteria. No such decline in concentration was noted for cimetidine or famotidine or for any of the drugs in the control buffer systems. The metabolic reaction pathway for nizatidine was complex, although UV and mass spectrometry analysis indicated that metabolism was initiated via cleavage of an N-oxide bond within the molecule. These results in combination with those obtained from a previous study indicate that of the four commercially available H(2)-receptor antagonists, nizatidine and ranitidine are susceptible to metabolism by colonic bacteria, which in turn has ramifications for drug delivery and absorption.


Subject(s)
Bacteria, Anaerobic/metabolism , Cimetidine/metabolism , Digestive System/metabolism , Digestive System/microbiology , Famotidine/metabolism , Histamine H2 Antagonists/metabolism , Nizatidine/metabolism , Cimetidine/chemistry , Famotidine/chemistry , Female , Histamine H2 Antagonists/chemistry , Humans , Nizatidine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...