Postoperative limb alignment in total knee replacement. Conventional versus navigated versus robotic techniques.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to compare the coronal mechanical axis after total knee replacement (TKR) obtained in three groups of patients subjected to conventional, navigated, and robotic surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis. RESULTS: 124 knees were included (36 conventional, 41 navigated, 47 robotic). No statistically significant differences were found between the postOp tibiofemoral angle of the conventional, navigated and robotic groups (p = 0.396). A repeated-measure analysis of preOp-to-postOp also found no significant differences (p = 0.387). There were no differences in the proportion of outliers (3-degree) found (p = 0.211). Nevertheless, a higher proportion of patients in the robotic group improved their mechanical alignment, as compared with conventional surgery (p = 0.023), although no differences were found when comparing with navigation (p = 0.121). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the postOp alignment achieved. However, statistically significant differences were detected between robotic and conventional surgery when considering the percentage of patients with improved limb alignment.

Locally linear embedding and plantar pressure-time graph selection in heel pain classification: An observational, case-control study.

Plantar heel pain mainly manifests during the gait cycle when the whole foot is in contact with the floor, which corresponds to the second rocker of the gait. This moment can be studied through the analysis of pressure-time graphs obtained using plantar pressure plate systems. However, these graphs are complex, and a dimensionality reduction method, such as locally linear embedding (LLE), greatly assists in their comprehension. This observational, case-control pilot study included 45 subjects divided into case (n = 21) and control (n = 24) groups, depending on the presence/absence of plantar heel pain. The second rocker pressure-time graphs of the 45 subjects were obtained using the Footwork Pro® plantar pressure plate system. These graphs were analyzed and defined as the dynamic simultaneity surfaces (DSSs). This complex structure was composed of four dimensions: the dynamic simultaneity time (DST), slope upward grade (α), slope downward grade (ß), and height (h), and were reduced into one dimension and classified into pathological and non-pathological subjects using the LLE method. All 45 DSSs were successfully reduced and classified to distinguish between the case (plantar heel pain) and control (non-plantar heel pain) subjects. This study is the first to use the LLE method for gait analysis. This method serves as a novel and promising tool for the study and classification of pathological and non-pathological gait cycles. This method opens the door for future research and analysis, with significant potential to assess diagnosis, treatment follow-up, and injury prevention in physical medicine consultations.