Analgesic switching in chronic users of dextropropoxyphene in France.

BACKGROUND: The combination dextropropoxyphene/paracetamol (DXP/P) was the most prescribed opioid analgesic until its withdrawal in 2011. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated dispensations of analgesics in chronic users of DXP/P during the 18 months following its withdrawal. METHODS: A cross-sectional study repeated yearly was conducted by using the French reimbursement database from 2006 to 2015. Chronic DXP/P users were defined as patients who received at least 40 boxes of DXP/P in the year prior to withdrawal. Data on analgesic dispensing were analyzed at DXP/P withdrawal (T0) and then every 6 months for 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 63 671 subjects had a DXP/P reimbursement in the year prior to its discontinuation, of whom 7.1% were identified as chronic users (mean age: 71.5 years, women: 68.7%). Among the patients taking DXP/P alone at T0 (74.6%), one fourth switched to a peripheral analgesic, one fourth to a combination of peripheral analgesic/opioid, one fourth to another opioid, and the others mainly discontinued their treatment (14.1%) or died. During the following 12 months, most of the subjects taking only peripheral analgesics continued this treatment, while half of the subjects with a combination of opioid/peripheral analgesic or taking only an analgesic remained on this type of treatment. CONCLUSION: Eighteen months after DXP/P withdrawal, more than 10% of patients stopped taking an analgesic. Vigilance is required regarding any change in analgesics by regularly reassessing patients' pain and, in the case of opioid treatments, by monitoring the risk of use disorders.

Incidence and risk of cancer among multiple sclerosis patients: A matched population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have not yet found conclusive results on the risk of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to compare the incidence of all cancers and of specific types of cancer between MS patients and the general population by age and by sex. METHODS: All prevalent MS patients identified between 2008 and 2014 in the nationwide French health care database (Système National des Données de Santé) and without history of malignancy were included in a cohort study and followed up until cancer occurrence, date of death, or 31 December 2015, whichever came first. MS patients were matched based on sex and year of birth to non-MS controls from the general population without cancer before index date. Incidence rate was reported per 100,000 person-years (PY), and risk of cancer was estimated by type of cancer, age, and sex using a Cox model (hazard ratio [HR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Overall, 576 cancers per 100,000 PY were observed in MS patients versus 424 per 100,000 PY in the control population. The risk of cancer was higher among MS patients than among population controls whether considered overall (HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.29-1.43) or for prostate (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.68-2.58), colorectal and anal (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16-1.58), trachea, bronchus, and lung (HR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.96-2.84), and to a lesser extent, breast cancer (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: MS patients were associated with increased risk of cancer compared to population controls.

Ten-year trend of opioid and nonopioid analgesic use in the French adult population.

AIMS: Analgesics are the most widely used medicines worldwide. In parallel, opioid abuse has increased and is of major concern. The accessibility of pharmacologically powerful medicines and the addictovigilance signals in France about the risk of opiates addiction call for an overview of analgesic use. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of analgesics reimbursed in France over a 10-year period through its prevalence. METHODS: A cross-sectional study repeated yearly was conducted by using data from the French reimbursement database from 2006 to 2015. Analgesics were classified according to their pharmacological potency: prevalence of use for each category and sociodemographic characteristics of patients treated were analysed. RESULTS: The annual prevalence of analgesic use was high and increased during the study period (59.8%, 253 976 users in 2015). In 2015, prevalence was always higher in women and increased with age, except for those older than 84 years. Peripheral analgesics were the most used (55.3%, 234 739 users). The prevalence of weak analgesic use decreased (21.3%, 90 257 users), mainly due to the definitive withdrawal of dextropropoxyphene in France in 2011, which was not offset by an increase in the consumption of other weak analgesics. For strong analgesics (1.2%, 5129 users), morphine was the most widely used, with a dramatic increase in oxycodone use, especially in the elderly. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of analgesic use is high: approximately 31 million adults had at least 1 analgesic reimbursed in 2015. The most widely used analgesics were peripheral analgesics, far ahead of opioid analgesics.

Quality of Life and Pain During Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer With Cabazitaxel In Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study collected quality of life (QoL) and pain data during cabazitaxel treatment in patients with advanced metastatic or castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (QoL) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (pain) questionnaires were collected over 6 months. RESULTS: In 61 patients with mCRPC (median age, 72 years) from 22 centers, metastatic sites were bones (97%), lymph nodes (36%), and visceral (20%); 25% received cabazitaxel in the second line, 29% in the third line, and 46% in the fourth line or beyond. All had been previously treated with docetaxel, except one with paclitaxel, and 75% also with abiraterone, enzalutamide, or both. The median cabazitaxel duration was 3.4 months. Forty-nine patients were evaluable for QoL and 44 for pain. QoL was improved in 37%, maintained in 35%, and deteriorated in 37%. In 27%, pain decreased ≥ 1 level and remained stable in 52%. A total of 34% lowered analgesic drug level. Prostate-specific antigen response ≥ 50% was observed in 11 (32.6%) patients, of whom 7 improved QoL and 1 was stable. At 6 months, 83.6% survived (95% confidence interval, 71.7%-90.8%). A total of 46% had ≥ 1 grade ≥ 3 adverse events, mainly anemia and neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Although cabazitaxel was given as the third line and beyond for three-quarters of patients, over one-third had improved QoL and/or decreased pain during treatment.

Overall and progression-free survival with cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in routine clinical practice: the FUJI cohort.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure. The FUJI cohort aimed to confirm the real-life overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) and safety of cabazitaxel. METHODS: Multicentre, non-interventional cohort of French mCRPC patients initiating cabazitaxel between 2013 and 2015, followed 18 months. RESULTS: Four hundred one patients were recruited in 42 centres. At inclusion, median age was 70, main metastatic sites were bones (87%), lymph nodes (42%) and visceral (20%). 18% had cabazitaxel in 2nd-line treatment, 39% in 3rd-line and 43% in 4th-line or beyond. All had prior docetaxel, and 82% prior abiraterone, enzalutamide or both. Median duration of cabazitaxel treatment was 3.4 months. Median OS from cabazitaxel initiation was 11.9 months [95% CI: 10.1-12.9]. In multivariate analyses, grade ≥ 3 adverse events, visceral metastases, polymedication, and >5 bone metastases were associated with a shorter OS. Main grade ≥ 3 adverse events were haematological with 8% febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Real-life survival with cabazitaxel in FUJI was shorter than in TROPIC (pivotal trial, median OS 15.1 months) or PROSELICA (clinical trial 20 vs 25 mg/m2, median OS, respectively, 13.4 and 14.5 months). There was no effect of treatment-line on survival. No unexpected adverse concerns were identified. STUDY REGISTRATION: It was registered with the European Medicines Agency EUPASS registry, available at www.encepp.eu, as EUPAS10391. It has been approved as an ENCEPP SEAL study.