Towards optimal use of antithrombotic therapy of people with cancer at the end of life: A research protocol for the development and implementation of the SERENITY shared decision support tool.

BACKGROUND: Even though antithrombotic therapy has probably little or even negative effects on the well-being of people with cancer during their last year of life, deprescribing antithrombotic therapy at the end of life is rare in practice. It is often continued until death, possibly resulting in excess bleeding, an increased disease burden and higher healthcare costs. METHODS: The SERENITY consortium comprises researchers and clinicians from eight European countries with specialties in different clinical fields, epidemiology and psychology. SERENITY will use a comprehensive approach combining a realist review, flash mob research, epidemiological studies, and qualitative interviews. The results of these studies will be used in a Delphi process to reach a consensus on the optimal design of the shared decision support tool. Next, the shared decision support tool will be tested in a randomised controlled trial. A targeted implementation and dissemination plan will be developed to enable the use of the SERENITY tool across Europe, as well as its incorporation in clinical guidelines and policies. The entire project is funded by Horizon Europe. RESULTS: SERENITY will develop an information-driven shared decision support tool that will facilitate treatment decisions regarding the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy in people with cancer at the end of life. CONCLUSIONS: We aim to develop an intervention that guides the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy, prevents bleeding complications, and saves healthcare costs. Hopefully, usage of the tool leads to enhanced empowerment and improved quality of life and treatment satisfaction of people with advanced cancer and their care givers.

Implementation of a systematic comprehensive geriatric assessment for elderly patients suspected of pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The phenotype of patients seen for a suspicion of pulmonary hypertension has changed, with an increasing age and frequency of comorbidities. Selection of elderly patients, in whom a classical work-up is mandatory, is challenging. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has modified the management of elderly patients with cancer. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) shares with cancer a functional impact and may evolve rapidly, depending on the group of PH. We assessed the impact of a systematic CGA in patients over 70 years old referred for a suspicion of PH. METHODS: A standardised CGA was performed on every patient older than 70 years old, referred for a PH suspicion, before considering invasive tests for diagnosis and treatment, between July 2014 and May 2019. Our primary aim was to describe the impact of CGA on the decision to stop or pursue the recommended diagnostic work-up for PH. RESULTS: Among the thirty-one patients evaluated [mean age 81,5 (72-91) years], a negative CGA leads to stop the diagnostic work-up in eleven patients. Among the nineteen remaining patients, sixteen had confirmed PH, with half being chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that comprehensive geriatric assessment could be an excellent first screen for elderly patients referred for a PH suspicion. Involving a geriatric physician stopped the investigations in one third of patients. In patients with a favourable CGA, PH was confirmed in most of the cases, with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension being the first cause of PH.