Prospective multicenter registration study of colorectal cancer: significant variations in radicality and oncosurgical quality-Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Protocol SAKK 40/00.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate in a multicenter cohort study the radicality of colorectal cancer resections, to assess the oncosurgical quality of colorectal specimens, and to compare the performance between centers. METHODS: One German and nine Swiss hospitals agreed to prospectively register all patients with primary colorectal cancer resected between September 2001 and June 2005. The median number of eligible patients with one primary tumor included per center was 95 (range 12-204). RESULTS: The following variations of median values or percentages between centers were found: length of bowel specimen 20-39 cm (25.8 cm), maximum height of mesocolon 6.5-12.5 cm (9.0 cm), number of examined lymph nodes 9-24 (16), distance to nearer bowel resection margin in colon cancer 4.8-12 cm (7 cm), and in rectal cancer 2-3 cm (2.5 cm), central ligation of major artery 40-97 % (71 %), blood loss 200-500 ml (300 ml), need for perioperative blood transfusion 5-40 % (19 %), tumor opened during mobilization 0-11 % (5 %), T4-tumors not en-bloc resected 0-33 % (4 %), inadvertent perforation of mesocolon/mesorectum 0-8 % (4 %), no-touch isolation technique 36-86 % (67 %), abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer 0-30 % (17 %), rectal cancer specimen with circumferential margin ≤1 mm 0-19 % (10 %), in-hospital mortality 0-6 % (2 %), anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess 0-17 % (7 %), re-operation 0-17 % (8 %). CONCLUSION: In colorectal cancer, surgery considerable variations between different centers were found with regard to radicality and oncosurgical quality, suggesting a potential for targeted improvement of surgical technique.

Malignant solitary fibrous tumor involving the liver.

Solitary fibrous tumors are predominantly benign and are most commonly found in the thoracic cavity and pleura; while reports exist in the literature of malignant solitary fibrous tumors and those located in extrathoracic organs, these cases are considered extremely rare. Herein, a case is reported of a malignant solitary fibrous tumor involving the liver that was diagnosed and treated in a 62-year-old woman. The patient presented with complaints of upper abdominal pain and unintentional weight loss. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed a remarkably large mass, measuring 15 cm × 10 cm × 20 cm, which appeared to be unrelated to any particular organ. The intraoperative finding of a wide communication with the left liver suggested hepatic origin, and served as an indicator for tumor resection via left hemihepatectomy. The diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor and its malignant nature was confirmed by histological and immunohistochemical examination of the resected tissues. Hepatic solitary fibrous tumor is very rare, and surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. Due to limited reports of such tumors in the literature, little can be said about the benefit of adjuvant therapy and prognosis for the rare cases with malignant histological findings.

Factors influencing the success of in vivo sentinel lymph node procedure in colon cancer patients: Swiss prospective, multicenter study sentinel lymph node procedure in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure has the potential to provide relevant improvement in nodal staging in colon cancer patients. However, there remains room for improvement for SLN identification and sensitivity. Therefore, the objective of the present investigation was to analyze factors influencing the success of the SLN procedure in colon cancer patients. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four consecutive colon cancer patients were prospectively enrolled in this multicenter study and underwent in vivo SLN procedure with isosulfan blue 1 % followed by open standard oncologic colon resection. Several patient-, tumor-, and procedure-related factors possibly influencing the SLN identification and sensitivity were analyzed. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph node identification rate and accuracy were 89.1 and 83.9 %, respectively. Successful identification of SLN was significantly associated with the intraoperative visualization of blue lymphatic vessels (p < 0.001) and with female gender (p = 0.024). True positive SLN results were significantly associated with higher numbers of SLN (p = 0.026) and with pN2 stage (p = 0.004). There was a trend toward better sensitivity in patients with lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: The success of the SLN procedure in colon cancer patients depends on both procedure-related factors (intraoperative visualization of blue lymphatic vessels, high number of SLN identified) and patient factors (gender, BMI). While patient factors can not be influenced, intraoperative visualization of blue lymphatics and identification of high numbers of SLN are key for a successful SLN procedure.

Resident work hour restrictions do not improve patient safety in surgery: a critical appraisal based on 7 years of experience in Switzerland.

In 2005 the Swiss government implemented new work-hour limitations for all residency programs in Switzerland, including a 50-hour weekly limit. The reduction in the working hours of doctors in training implicate an increase in their rest time and suggest an amelioration of doctors' clinical performance and consequently in patients' outcomes and safety - which was not detectable in a preliminary study at a large referral center in Switzerland. It remains elusive why work-hour restrictions did not improve patient safety. We are well advised to thoroughly examine and eliminate the known adverse effects of reduced work-hours to improve our patients' safety.

Sentinel lymph node procedure leads to upstaging of patients with resectable colon cancer: results of the Swiss prospective, multicenter study sentinel lymph node procedure in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The value of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in colon cancer patients remains a matter of debate. The objective of this prospective, multicenter trial was 3-fold: to determine the identification rate and accuracy of the SLN procedure in patients with resectable colon cancer; to evaluate the learning curve of the SLN procedure; and to assess the extent of upstaging due to the SLN procedure. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four consecutive colon cancer patients were enrolled onto this prospective trial. They underwent an intraoperative SLN procedure with isosulfan blue 1% injected peritumorally followed by open standard colon resection with oncologic lymphadenectomy. Three levels of each SLN were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunostained with the pancytokeratin marker AE1/AE3 if H&E was negative. RESULTS: SLN identification rate and accuracy were 89.1% and 83.9%, respectively. SLN were significantly more likely to contain tumor infiltrates than non-SLN (P < 0.001). Both SLN identification rate (P = 0.021) and the sensitivity of the procedure (P = 0.043) significantly improved with experience. The use of immunohistochemistry in SLN resulted in an upstaging of 15.4% (16 of 104) stage I and II patients considered node-negative in initial H&E analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The SLN procedure for colon cancer has good identification and accuracy rates, which further improve with increasing experience. Most importantly, the SLN procedure results in upstaging of >15% of node-negative patients. The potential advantage of performing the SLN procedure appears to be particularly important in these patients because they may potentially benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Early closure of ileostomy is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Temporary loop ileostomy is increasingly used in colorectal surgery but necessitates secondary closure. We evaluated postoperative complications, particularly nausea and vomiting, in patients with early, intermediate, or late elective ileostomy closure. METHODS: We included all patients undergoing ileostomy closure from 2001 to 2008. Time from ileostomy construction to closure was classified as early (EC, <12 weeks), intermediate (IC, 12-18 weeks), and late (LC, >18 weeks). Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared the frequency of postoperative complications between the groups. RESULTS: We included 134 patients (87 males; median age 71 years, range 29-91). Carcinoma of the rectum (n = 67, 50%) was the main reason for ileostomy construction. The median time to ileostomy closure was 103 days (range 8-461). Among patients with EC, IC, and LC, postoperative nausea occurred in 50.0, 73.1, and 78.6%, respectively (p = 0.006), and postoperative vomiting in 22.5, 57.7, and 59.5%, respectively (p = 0.001). Adjusting for important covariates, the odds ratio for postoperative nausea was 2.0 (95% CI 0.76-5.1) for IC and 4.1 (95% CI 1.2-14.3) for LC compared to EC (p = 0.069). For postoperative vomiting, adjusted odds ratios were 3.8 (95% CI 1.4-10.4) for IC and 4.6 (95% CI 1.4-15.5) for LC (p = 0.012). Other complications did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that early ileostomy closure might reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Inadequate quality of surveillance after curative surgery for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer patients are at risk for recurrence. Recurrent disease might be curable if detected early by surveillance. However, data on the quality of surveillance are scarce. The objective of this study is to analyze the quality of surveillance after curative surgery for colon cancer among a cohort of Swiss patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative surgery, 129 stage I-III colon cancer patients were followed by chart review, questionnaires, and phone interviews. National surveillance guidelines mandate periodic measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography (US/CT), and colonoscopy. However, surveillance was left to the discretion of the treating physicians. Actual surveillance was compared with the recommendations in the guidelines. RESULTS: Datasets of all 129 patients were available. Median follow-up was 33.5 months (range 5.6-74.7 months). Eighteen patients (14.0%) recurred during follow-up. Three-year overall and disease-free survival were 94.7% and 83.5%, respectively. Periodic CEA measurements, US/CT, and colonoscopies as recommended by the guidelines were performed in 32.8%, 31.7%, and 23.8% of patients, respectively. Forty-four patients (34.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. For these patients there was a trend towards better compliance with national surveillance guidelines than for patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of surveillance after curative surgery for colon cancer among a cohort of Swiss patients is inadequate. Further education of health care professionals and patients regarding the potential life-saving benefits of surveillance is imperative. It is cardinal that quality of surveillance is critically analyzed in other countries with different health care systems as well.

The influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on survival and local recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Past studies have identified surgeon- and institution- related characteristics as prognostic factors in colorectal cancer surgery. The present work assesses the influence of the surgeon's and the hospital's caseload on long-term results of colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The data on 2706 patients from 2, randomized, colorectal cancer trials (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research [SAKK] 40/81, SAKK 40/87) investigating adjuvant intraportal and systemic chemotherapy and 1 concurrent registration study (SAKK 40/88) were reviewed. A first analysis included 1809 eligible, nonmetastatic patients from all 3 studies. A subsequent subgroup analysis included 915 eligible patients from both randomized trials. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR) were analyzed in multivariate models taking into account the possible effect of clustering. The main potential covariates were surgeon's annual caseload (>5 operations/year vs < or =5 operations/year), hospital's annual caseload (>26 operations/year vs < or =26 operations/year), tumor site, T stage, and nodal status. RESULTS: Primary analysis of all 3 studies combined found a high surgeon's caseload to be positively associated with OS (P = .025) and marginally with DFS (P = .058). Separate analysis for each trial, however, showed that a high surgeon's caseload was beneficial for outcome in both randomized trials but not in the registration study. A subgroup analysis of 915 patients with 376 rectal and 539 colonic primaries from both randomized trials, therefore, was performed. Neither age, gender, year of operation, adjuvant chemotherapy (intraportal vs systemic vs operation alone), hospital academic status (university vs non-university), training status of the surgeon (certified surgeon vs surgeon-in-training), nor inclusion in 1 of the 2 randomized trials (SAKK 40/81 vs SAKK 40/87) was a significant predictor of outcome. However, both high surgeon's and high hospital's annual caseloads were independent, beneficial prognostic factors for OS (P = .0003, P = .044) and DFS (P = .0008, P = .020), and marginally significant factors for LR (P = .057, P = .055). CONCLUSIONS: High surgeon's and hospital's annual caseloads are strong, independent prognostic factors for extending overall and disease-free survival and reducing the rate of local recurrence in 2 randomized colorectal cancer trials.

Prognostic and predictive relevance of DNAM-1, SOCS6 and CADH-7 genes on chromosome 18q in colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Chromosome 18q deletion has been described as a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). The relationship between its supposed negative prognostic influence and the inactivation of candidate tumor suppressors deleted in colorectal cancer, Smad2 and Smad4 has not been definitively established. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genetic status of three novel putative tumor suppressors, Cadh-7, DNAX accessory molecule-1 (Dnam-1) and suppressor of cytokine signaling (Socs6) on chromosome 18q and to correlate molecular results with patient survival and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred and ninety representative patient samples from a randomized multicenter study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- based adjuvant chemotherapy were screened for the gene copy status of Cadh-7, Socs6 and Dnam-1 using real-time quantitative PCR assay, and the molecular results were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Loss of gene copy number was found in 26.8, 37.9 and 54.2% for Cadh-7, Dnam-1 and Socs6, respectively. Only Dnam-1 deletion was an independent negative prognostic factor for the 5-year overall survival (OS) in the untreated group of patients (hazard ratio = 2.44; p = 0.01). On the contrary, loss of Cadh-7 gene copy number was a favourable prognostic factor for disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.43; p = 0.03) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.29; p = 0.01) in the untreated control population. Furthermore and most importantly, patients with Dnam-1 deletion who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower risk of death compared to untreated patients with Dnam-1 deletion (hazard ratio = 0.51; p = 0.05), whereas those with Dnam-1 retention did not derive any benefit from 5-FU-based treatment (hazard ratio = 1.68; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of Dnam-1 gene copy number and retention of Cadh-7 might be indicators of worse prognosis, and Dnam-1 deletion might predict for a beneficial response to adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in patients with CRC. The confirmation of our findings in large independent randomized studies is needed.

Prognostic and predictive relevance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the phenotypic hallmark of a deficient DNA mismatch-repair system, observed in 10-20% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC). Since the prognostic and predictive value of this genetic alteration has been assessed mainly in non-randomised, uncontrolled studies, we investigated the potential of MSI to predict patient survival and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in tumour specimens from a randomised trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) that tested the value of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin adjuvant chemotherapy. MSI status was determined in matched normal and tumour tissue samples from 160 patients using a panel of 9 microsatellite markers. There was no correlation between high frequency MSI (MSI-H) and overall (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) in the untreated control group of patients (HR=1.13, p=0.80; and HR=0.89, p=0.81, respectively). Furthermore, MSI-H phenotype did not predict for a larger benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS or DFS (HR=0.49, p=0.41; HR=0.49, p=0.41, respectively), making a potential value of this molecular marker as a predictive factor in CRC unlikely. Our data do not confirm the prognostic relevance of MSI-H status in colorectal cancer patients found in some other studies. In addition, microsatellite instability did not correlate with the extent of chemotherapy benefit, although we observed a statistically non-significant favourable impact of 5-FU-based treatment in the MSI-H group compared to MSI-L/MSS patients. Larger prospective randomised trials are required to conclusively establish a potential clinical significance of MSI in colorectal cancer.

Learning curve: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer surgery.

The individual surgeon is an independent prognostic factor for outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. The surgeon's learning curve is therefore directly related to the patient's outcome. The exact shape of the learning curve, however, is unknown. The present study reviewed supervision, training/teaching, specialization, surgeon's caseload, and hospital's caseload as the five main surgeon- and hospital-related confounding factors for outcome, and examined their influence on the learning curve as well as their interactions and prognostic significance. All five confounding factors were related to outcome. The highest degree of evidence, however, was found for training/teaching (introduction of total mesorectal excision), specialization in colorectal surgery (special interest, board-certification, specialized colorectal cancer units), and the surgeon's caseload. Five surgeon- and hospital-related factors directly influence the surgeon's learning curve and are therefore rightly considered predictors of outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Improvements in supervision, training/teaching, specialization, the surgeon's caseload, and the hospital's caseload will therefore translate into enhanced patient outcome.

Amplification of SKI is a prognostic marker in early colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Improved risk stratification of early colorectal cancer might help to better select patients for adjuvant treatment. Alterations in the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) pathway have frequently been found in colorectal cancer, but their impact on prognosis remains controversial. We therefore analyzed two transcriptional corepressors of the TGF-beta signaling pathway with respect to prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit in early colorectal cancer. METHODS: The gene copy status of SKI and SNON was analyzed by use of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in 179 colorectal tumor biopsies, which had been collected from a randomized multicenter trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). RESULTS: Partial or complete allelic loss was found in 41.5% and 55.2% for SKI and SNON, whereas amplification was found in 10.1% and 15.1%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that gene amplification of SKI independently predicted reduced relapse-free [hazard ratio (HR) for relapse 2.08, P =.049] and overall survival (HR for death 2.62, P =.012). In contrast, deletion of SKI and the gene copy status of SNON were not significantly correlated with prognosis. CONCLUSION: Amplification of SKI is a negative prognostic marker in early-stage colorectal cancer. This marker should help to improve risk stratification to better select patients for adjuvant therapy. Confirmatory investigations are warranted.

STRAP is a strong predictive marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Molecular predictors for the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer are of considerable clinical interest. To this aim, we analyzed the serine threonine receptor-associated protein (STRAP), an inhibitor of TGF-beta signaling, with regard to prognosis and prediction of adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy benefit. METHODS: The gene copy status of STRAP was determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in 166 colorectal tumor biopsies, which had been collected from a randomized multicenter trial of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/mitomycin C (MMC) adjuvant chemotherapy of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). RESULTS: Amplification of STRAP was found in 22.8% of the tumors. When left without adjuvant chemotherapy, patients bearing tumors with a STRAP amplification had a significantly better prognosis (hazard ratio for death: 0.26; P=.004). Interestingly, these patients, when receiving adjuvant treatment, had a worse survival (hazard ratio for death: 3.48; P=.019) than without chemotherapy, whereas patients carrying tumors with diploidy or deletion of STRAP benefited from the treatment (hazard ratio for death: 0.44; P=.052). This suggests the amplification of STRAP as a strong predictor of an unfavorable effect of 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: If confirmed, the STRAP gene copy status might provide a parameter to decide about the use of 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

SMAD7 is a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer.

Chromosomal region 18q21 is frequently deleted in colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Potential tumor suppressor mechanisms altered by 18q21 deletion include mediation of TGFbeta signaling by SMADs. Following the definition of SMAD4 deletion as a negative predictive marker for chemotherapy benefit in patients with CRC, we aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the deletion of other SMAD genes clustered in this region: SMAD2 and SMAD7 in 264 CRC biopsies from a previous clinical study. In contrast to SMAD2 deletion, for which no clinical relevance was observed, hazard ratios (HR) in a multivariate analysis associated with SMAD7 deletion [overall survival (OS): HR = 0.43, p = 0.0012; disease-free survival (DFS): HR = 0.50, p = 0.0033] indicated a favorable outcome for these patients. In addition, SMAD7 duplication had a hazardous effect on survival [OS: HR = 2.10, p = 0.020; DFS: HR = 2.06, p = 0.015]. Moreover, the HRs associated with one additional copy of SMAD7 were 1.76, p = 0.00024 [OS] and 1.64, p = 0.00048 [DFS] respectively, showing a graded effect of SMAD7 on patient outcome depending on gene copy number that suggests a dose-and-effect basis. Since SMAD7 blocks TGFbeta signaling, these data are consistent with the loss of SMAD7 rendering carcinoma cells more sensitive to cell growth arrest/apoptotic effect of TGFbeta, whereas gain of SMAD7 function might result in TGFbeta resistance, thereby emphasizing the role of TGFbeta in tumor suppression.

DCR3 locus is a predictive marker for 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the incidence of distant metastasis and increases survival of patients with colorectal cancer. However, predictive markers are needed to define subsets of patients with stage II and III disease that may benefit from adjuvant treatment. A secreted member of the TNF receptor superfamily, the decoy receptor 3 (DcR3), was reported to be amplified in colorectal cancer as a negative regulator of Fas-mediated apoptosis. We analyzed DcR3 gene copy number and protein expression in a large series of tumors from a randomized multicenter trial of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C (FU/MMC) adjuvant chemotherapy of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK 40/81), using real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry on tumor microarrays. Results of gene status and protein expression of DcR3 were correlated with disease-free and overall survival of patients. We observed amplification of the DcR3 gene in 185/294 (63%) and overexpression of the DcR3 protein in 163/223 (73%) of colorectal tumors. Multivariate analysis showed no prognostic effect of DcR3 gene amplification and protein overexpression. However, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more beneficial in patients with normal DcR3 gene copy number than in patients with amplification (DFS: HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.16-6.98, p = 0.02; OS: HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.19-8.32, p = 0.02), whereas DcR3 protein overexpression did not influence the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (DFS: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.65-1.60, p = 0.95; OS: HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.61-1.49, p = 0.83). We conclude that amplification of the 20q13 locus is a predictive marker for adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.