Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Transfer to the Emergency Department among Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with the potentially inappropriate transfer of nursing home (NH) residents to emergency departments (EDs) and to compare hospitalization costs before and after transfer of individuals addressed inappropriately vs those addressed appropriately. DESIGN: Multicenter, observational, case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 17 hospitals in France, 1037 NH residents. MEASURES: All NH residents transferred to the 17 public hospitals' EDs in southern France were systematically included for 1 week per season. An expert panel composed of family physicians, emergency physicians, geriatricians, and pharmacists defined whether the transfer was potentially inappropriate or appropriate. Residents' and NHs' characteristics and contextual factors were entered into a mixed logistic regression to determine factors associated independently with potentially inappropriate transfers. Hospital costs were collected in the national health insurance claims database for the 6 months before and after the transfer. RESULTS: A total of 1037 NH residents (mean age 87.2 ± 7.1, 68% female) were transferred to the ED; 220 (21%) transfers were considered potentially inappropriate. After adjustment, anorexia [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-3.71], high level of disability (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), and inability to receive prompt medical advice (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20-2.32) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of potentially inappropriate transfers. The existence of an Alzheimer's disease special care unit in the NH (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.92), NH staff trained on advance directives (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.89), and calling the SAMU (mobile emergency medical unit) (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.66) were significantly associated with a lower probability of potentially inappropriate transfer. Although the 6-month hospitalization costs prior to transfer were higher among potentially inappropriate transfers compared with appropriate transfers (€6694 and €4894, respectively), transfer appropriateness was not significantly associated with hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Transfers from NHs to hospital EDs were frequently appropriate. Transfer appropriateness was conditioned by NH staff training, access to specialists' medical advice, and calling the SAMU before making transfer decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02677272.

Systematic Dementia Screening by Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Nursing Homes for Reducing Emergency Department Transfers: The IDEM Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Dementia is often underdiagnosed in nursing homes (NHs). This potentially results in inappropriate care, and high rates of emergency department (ED) transfers in particular. Objective: To assess whether systematic dementia screening of NH residents combined with multidisciplinary team meetings resulted in a lower rate of ED transfer at 12 months compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with NHs as the unit of randomization. The IDEM (Impact of Systematic Tracking of Dementia Cases on the Rate of Hospitalization in Emergency Care Units) trial took place at 64 public and private NHs in France. Recruitment started on May 1, 2010, and was completed on March 31, 2012. Residents who were aged 60 years or older, had no diagnosed or documented dementia, were not bedridden, had lived in the NH for at least 1 month at inclusion, and had a life expectancy greater than 12 months were included. The residents were followed up for 18 months. The main study analyses were completed on October 14, 2016. Intervention: Two parallel groups were compared: an intervention group consisting of NHs that set up 2 multidisciplinary team meetings to identify residents with dementia and to discuss an appropriate care plan, and a control group consisting of NHs that continued their usual practice. During the inclusion period of 23 months, all residents of participating NHs who met eligibility criteria were included in the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point (ED transfer) was analyzed at 12 months, but the residents included were followed up for 18 months. Results: A total of 64 NHs participated in the study and enrolled 1428 residents (mean [SD] age, 84.7 [8.1] years; 1019 [71.3%] female): 599 in the intervention group (32 NHs) and 829 in the control group (32 NHs). The final study visit was completed by 1042 residents (73.0%). The main reason for early discontinuation was death (318 residents [22.7%]). The intervention did not reduce the risk of ED transfers during the 12-month follow-up: the proportion of residents transferred at least once to an ED during the 12-month follow-up was 16.2% in the intervention group vs 12.8% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.83-2.09; P = .24). Conclusions and Relevance: This study failed to demonstrate that systematic screening for dementia in NHs resulted in fewer ED transfers. The findings do not support implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings for systematic dementia screening of all NH residents, beyond the national recommendations for dementia diagnosis, to reduce ED transfers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01569997.

The Temporal Trend in the Transfer of Older Adults to the Emergency Department for Traumatic Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis According to Their Place of Residence.

OBJECTIVES: There has been an increase in the number of visits by older individuals to emergency departments (EDs). The primary cause of this is trauma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal changes in the use of EDs by older individuals for traumatic injuries, characterize their trauma, and specify the mode of transport to the ED according to their place of residence (community-dwelling or nursing home resident). DESIGN: A monocentric, retrospective study of patients over 65 years of age, admitted to University Center Hospital ED for trauma between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 20,741 patients were included. RESULTS: The mean age was 81.8 years (standard deviation 9.1 years); 11,879 (57.3%) patients were community-living with family, 5077 (24.5%) were nursing home (NH) residents, and 3785 (18.22%) patients were community-dwelling living alone. Overall, 33.3% of the NH residents were transferred during the weekend compared with 28.04% of the community-dwelling individuals (P < .001). Ten percent (1577 patients) of the community-dwelling individuals compared with 21.8% (1109 patients) of the transfers of NH residents to ED occurred late at night (P < .001). The primary reason for use of the ED was head trauma (32.0%), followed by cutaneo-mucous wounds (28.7 %) and limb fractures (25.9%). In most cases, NH residents were transferred by ambulance (5000 residents; 98.4%), compared with community-dwelling individuals (11,118; 70.1%; P < .001). Overall, 7459 (36.0 %) patients were hospitalized. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: In comparison with community-dwelling individuals, ED transfers of NH residents in the context of trauma-related emergency were higher during after-hour periods, lengthes of stay at the ED were longer, and residents were admitted less to the in hospital.

Impact of a geriatric intervention conducted in nursing homes on inappropriate prescriptions of antipsychotics.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of a quality assurance approach in a nursing home, with or without the intervention of a geriatrician, on the potentially inappropriate prescription of antipsychotics (PIPA) at 18 months; and to identify the factors associated with PIPA after 18 months of intervention (T18). METHODS: We used data from a multicentre individually tailored controlled trial (IQUARE study). The study population comprised residents included in the IQUARE study with at least one potentially inappropriate prescription of antipsychotics at baseline (T0) who were still in nursing home at T18 (n = 636; nursing homes = 175). The control group received individual feedback from the quality assurance audit performed at baseline. The intervention group also had at least 5 collaborative work meetings with a geriatrician over an 18-month period. We used a multilevel logistic regression model. RESULTS: The rates of inappropriate antipsychotic drug prescribing were 66.5% and 45.2% at T0 and T18, respectively. This decrease in the rate of PIPA is significant (p < 0.001). A significant decrease was found within each group: in the intervention arm (68.1% at T0 vs. 44.6% at T18; p < 0.001) and in the control arm (65.2% at T0 vs. 45.6% at T18; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not highlight any statistically significant association between living in a nursing home having received an intervention and PIPA at T18. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative work meetings with a geriatrician does not provide significant added value to a global quality assurance approach towards PIPA. Individual feedback to each nursing home appears to have a substantial impact on decreasing PIPA.

Mortality and Antipsychotic Drug Use in Elderly Patients With Parkinson Disease in Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate mortality rate in elderly and very elderly (≥85 years) residents with Parkinson disease (PD) in nursing homes (NHs) with and without antipsychotic drugs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: All residents with PD from the 6275 NH residents participating in the Impact d'une démarche QUAlité sur l'évolution des pratiques et le déclin fonctionnel des Résidents en Etablissement d'hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes (IQUARE) study. SETTING: A total of 175 NHs in Midi-Pyrénées region, South-Western France. EXPOSURE: Patients with PD taking antipsychotic drugs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: All-cause mortality between baseline and 18 months. STATISTICAL METHODS: Logistic regression was used to explore baseline characteristics associated with mortality rate and with antipsychotic use at 18 months. RESULTS: At baseline, among 452 residents with PD, 72 (15.9%) received at least 1 antipsychotic drug. Mortality rates at 18 months in residents with PD with and without antipsychotic use were similar (34.3% and 38.2%, respectively, P = .58). Among factors associated with mortality, a statistically significant increase in mortality rate was found in very old residents (≥85 years of age) [odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.1] or in those with chronic pulmonary disease (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.5-8.5). Among residents ≥85 years of age, we also found a statistically significant increase in mortality rate in individuals with arterial hypertension (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-5.8). Moreover, a statistically significant increase in prescription of antipsychotic drugs was found in residents who tried to elope (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.4-10.7) and in those with severe psychiatric diseases (excluding depression) (OR 7.5; 95% CI 4.1-13.6). CONCLUSIONS: In this study investigating factors associated with mortality in old and very old residents with PD in NHs, no significant association was observed with the use of antipsychotics. However, our study suggests that age (≥85 years) or chronic pulmonary disease could be associated with mortality among patients with PD, as well as arterial hypertension in very old patients (≥85 years of age).

Prevention of Functional Decline by Reframing the Role of Nursing Homes?

Institutionalization is generally a consequence of functional decline driven by physical limitations, cognitive impairments, and/or loss of social supports. At this stage, intervention to reverse functional losses is often too late. To be more effective, geriatric medicine must evolve to intervene at an earlier stage of the disability process. Could nursing homes (NHs) transform from settings in which many residents dwell to settings in which the NH residents and those living in neighboring communities benefit from staff expertise to enhance quality of life and maintain or slow functional decline? A task force of clinical researchers met in Toulouse on December 2, 2015, to address some of these challenges: how to prevent or slow functional decline and disabilities for NH residents and how NHs may promote the prevention of functional decline in community-dwelling frail elderly. The present article reports the main results of the Task Force discussions to generate a new paradigm.

[Reinforced accommodation units and the management of patients with dementia]. / Prise en charge des patients déments en unités d'hébergement renforcées.

Dementia is frequently associated with behavioural disorders that can be difficult to manage. In regards to these symptoms, psychoactive drugs are not very effective and have many potential side effects. In order to take care of patients with such severe disorders, specific units called "reinforced hosting units" ("UHR; Unités d'Hébergement Renforcées" in French) have been developed within long term care units. Specifically trained teams take care of these patients in specially designed settings. A French national inquiry has studied the development, the characteristics and the activity of these units in 2013 and 2012.

Organizational Factors Associated With Inappropriate Neuroleptic Drug Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Multilevel Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the number of attending general practitioners (GPs) in nursing homes and other facility characteristics are associated with inappropriate neuroleptic prescribing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: One hundred seventy-five nursing homes in France participating in the IQUARE (Impact d'une démarche QUAlité sur l'évolution des pratiques et le déclin fonctionnel des Résidents en EHPAD) study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6275 residents included between May and July 2011. MEASUREMENTS: The outcome measure was potentially inappropriate prescribing of neuroleptic drugs according to the approved indications and French guidelines. Resident characteristics and nursing home characteristics were electronically recorded by the nursing home's coordinating physician. Because of the hierarchical structure of data (resident level and nursing home level), multivariate analysis using a multilevel binary logistic model was carried out to investigate factors associated with inappropriate neuroleptic prescribing. RESULTS: Of 6275 residents enrolled, 1532 (24.4%) had at least 1 prescription for a neuroleptic drug. This corresponded to 513 residents (33.5%) with appropriate prescribing (with regard to indication, substance and dose) and 1019 (66.5%) with potentially inappropriate prescribing. The multilevel binary logistic model showed that residents who lived in a nursing home with 30 GPs or more/100 beds had a higher likelihood of potentially inappropriate prescription than those who lived in nursing homes with fewer than 10 GPs/100 beds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-3.12]. Residents who were ≥ 85 years old and those with dementia were more likely to have inappropriate prescription (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.32-2.32 and aOR, 2.06; 95% CI 1.56-2.74, respectively) such as the statement "no psychotropic drug prescription," whereas the resident did in fact have a prescription (aOR 1.96; 95% CI 1.03-3.74). CONCLUSIONS: Organizational difficulties because of a large number of physicians probably explain the association with inappropriate prescribing of neuroleptics.