Distinguishing grounds between gene editing and neoeugenic conduct: bioethical and legalconsiderations / Fundamentos de distinción entre edición genética y conducta neoeugenica: consideraciones bioéticas y legales

The present work has the objective of analyzing whether the practice of gene editing, from the teleological foundation, can generate a scenario of neoeugenic choices. This study analyzes the current stage of gene editing, together with the panorama of neoeugenic practices, to delimit the distinctive aspects between these concepts, based on the desired purpose in the practice of gene editing. For that, the analytical-discursive method was used, identifying fundamental connections related to the problem and interpreting the concepts presented in search of an adequate response to the objectives raised. The research was based on scientific articles published in specialized journals, as well as books and chapters in collective works. (AU)

El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar si la práctica de la edición genética, desde el fundamento teleológico, puede generar un escenario de elecciones neoeugenésicas. Este estudio analiza la etapa actual de la edición de genes, junto con el panorama de las prácticas neoeugenésicas, con el fin de delimitar los aspectos distintivos entre estos conceptos, en función de la finalidad deseada en la práctica de la edición de genes. Para ello se utilizó el método analítico-discursivo, identificando conexiones fundamentales relacionadas con el problema e interpretando los conceptos presentados en busca de una respuesta adecuada a los objetivos planteados. La investigación se basó en artículos científicos publicados en revistasespecializadas, así como en libros y capítulos de obras colectivas. (AU)

An evolutionary view of self-awareness.

The capacity to be self-aware is regarded as a fundamental difference between humans and other species. However, growing evidence challenges this notion, indicating that many animals show complex signs and behaviors that are consonant with self-awareness. In this review, we suggest that many animals are indeed self-aware, but that the complexity of this process differs among species. We discuss this topic by addressing several different questions regarding self-awareness: what is self-awareness, how has self-awareness been studied experimentally, which species may be self-aware, what are its potential adaptive advantages. We conclude by proposing alternative models for the emergence of self-awareness in relation to species evolutionary paths, indicating future research questions to advance this field further.

Cross-cultural consistency and relativity in the enjoyment of thinking versus doing.

Which is more enjoyable: trying to think enjoyable thoughts or doing everyday solitary activities? Wilson et al. (2014) found that American participants much preferred solitary everyday activities, such as reading or watching TV, to thinking for pleasure. To see whether this preference generalized outside of the United States, we replicated the study with 2,557 participants from 12 sites in 11 countries. The results were consistent in every country: Participants randomly assigned to do something reported significantly greater enjoyment than did participants randomly assigned to think for pleasure. Although we found systematic differences by country in how much participants enjoyed thinking for pleasure, we used a series of nested structural equation models to show that these differences were fully accounted for by country-level variation in 5 individual differences, 4 of which were positively correlated with thinking for pleasure (need for cognition, openness to experience, meditation experience, and initial positive affect) and 1 of which was negatively correlated (reported phone usage). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Beliefs about Emotions Scale.

Introduction Beliefs about the unacceptability of expression and experience of emotion are present in the general population but seem to be more prevalent in patients with a number of health conditions. Such beliefs, which may be viewed as a form of perfectionism about emotions, may have a deleterious effect on symptomatology as well as on treatment adherence and outcome. Nevertheless, few questionnaires have been developed to measure such beliefs about emotions, and no instrument has been validated in a developing country. The current study adapted and validated the Beliefs about Emotions Scale in a Brazilian sample. Methods The adaptation procedure included translation, back-translation and analysis of the content, with the final Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale being tested online in a sample of 645 participants. Internal consistency of the scale was very high and results of a principal axis factoring analysis indicated a two-factor solution. Results Respondents with high fatigue levels showed more perfectionist beliefs, and the scale correlated positively with questionnaires measuring anxiety, depression and fear of negative evaluation, confirming cross-cultural associations reported before. Finally, men, non-Caucasians and participants with lower educational achievement gave greater endorsement to such beliefs than women, Caucasian individuals and participants with higher educational level. Conclusions The study confirms previous clinical findings reported in the literature, but indicates novel associations with demographic variables. The latter may reflect cultural differences related to beliefs about emotions in Brazil.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Beliefs about Emotions Scale / Adaptação transcultural e validação da versão brasileira da Escala de Crenças sobre Emoções

Abstract Introduction Beliefs about the unacceptability of expression and experience of emotion are present in the general population but seem to be more prevalent in patients with a number of health conditions. Such beliefs, which may be viewed as a form of perfectionism about emotions, may have a deleterious effect on symptomatology as well as on treatment adherence and outcome. Nevertheless, few questionnaires have been developed to measure such beliefs about emotions, and no instrument has been validated in a developing country. The current study adapted and validated the Beliefs about Emotions Scale in a Brazilian sample. Methods The adaptation procedure included translation, back-translation and analysis of the content, with the final Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale being tested online in a sample of 645 participants. Internal consistency of the scale was very high and results of a principal axis factoring analysis indicated a two-factor solution. Results Respondents with high fatigue levels showed more perfectionist beliefs, and the scale correlated positively with questionnaires measuring anxiety, depression and fear of negative evaluation, confirming cross-cultural associations reported before. Finally, men, non-Caucasians and participants with lower educational achievement gave greater endorsement to such beliefs than women, Caucasian individuals and participants with higher educational level. Conclusions The study confirms previous clinical findings reported in the literature, but indicates novel associations with demographic variables. The latter may reflect cultural differences related to beliefs about emotions in Brazil.

Resumo Introdução Crenças sobre a inaceitabilidade da expressão e experiência de emoção estão presentes na população em geral, mas parecem ser mais prevalentes em pacientes com uma série de problemas de saúde. Tais crenças, que podem ser vistas como uma forma de perfeccionismo sobre as emoções, podem ter um efeito deletério na sintomatologia, bem como na adesão ao tratamento e nos seus resultados. No entanto, poucos questionários foram desenvolvidos para medir tais crenças sobre emoções, e nenhum instrumento foi validado em um país em desenvolvimento. O presente estudo adaptou e validou a Escala de Crenças sobre Emoções (Beliefs about Emotions Scale) em uma amostra brasileira. Métodos O procedimento de adaptação incluiu tradução, retrotradução e análise do conteúdo, com a versão final brasileira da escala sendo testada online em uma amostra de 645 participantes. A consistência interna da escala foi muito alta e os resultados da análise fatorial de eixo principal indicaram uma solução de dois fatores. Resultados Os respondentes com altos níveis de fadiga mostraram crenças mais perfeccionistas, e a escala se correlacionou positivamente com questionários medindo ansiedade, depressão e medo de avaliação negativa, confirmando associações transculturais relatadas anteriormente. Finalmente, homens, não caucasianos e participantes com baixo nível de escolaridade endossaram mais tais crenças do que mulheres, indivíduos caucasianos e participantes com maior nível de escolaridade. Conclusões O estudo confirma achados clínicos anteriores relatados na literatura, mas indica novas associações com variáveis demográficas. O último pode refletir diferenças culturais relacionadas às crenças sobre emoções no Brasil.