A Head-to-head Comparison of Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Strategies Using the Stockholm3 Test, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Swedish National Guidelines: Results from a Prospective Population-based Screening Study.

Background: Strategies for early detection of prostate cancer aim to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and avoid detection of insignificant cancers and unnecessary biopsies. Swedish national guidelines (SNGs), years 2019 and 2020, involve prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, clinical variables, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The Stockholm3 test and MRI have been suggested to improve selection of men for prostate biopsy. Performance of SNGs compared with the Stockholm3 test or MRI in a screening setting is unclear. Objective: To compare strategies based on previous and current national guidelines, Stockholm3, and MRI to select patients for biopsy in a screening-by-invitation setting. Design setting and participants: All participants underwent PSA test, and men with PSA ≥3 ng/ml underwent Stockholm3 testing and MRI. Men with Stockholm3 ≥11%, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 on MRI, or indication according to SNG-2019 or SNG-2020 were referred to biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa at prostate biopsy, defined as an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade of ≥2. Results and limitations: We invited 8764 men from the general population, 272 of whom had PSA ≥3 ng/ml. The median PSA was 4.1 (interquartile range: 3.4-5.8), and 136 of 270 (50%) who underwent MRI lacked any pathological lesions. In total, 37 csPCa cases were diagnosed. Using SNG-2019, 36 csPCa cases with a high biopsy rate (179 of 272) were detected and 49 were diagnosed with ISUP 1 cancers. The Stockholm3 strategy diagnosed 32 csPCa cases, with 89 biopsied and 27 ISUP 1 cancers. SNG-2020 detected 32 csPCa and 33 ISUP 1 cancer patients, with 99 men biopsied, and the MRI strategy detected 30 csPCa and 35 ISUP 1 cancer cases by biopsying 123 men. The latter two strategies generated more MRI scans than the Stockholm3 strategy (n = 270 vs 33). Conclusions: Previous guidelines provide high detection of significant cancer but at high biopsy rates and detection of insignificant cancer. The Stockholm3 test may improve diagnostic precision compared with the current guidelines or using only MRI. Patient summary: The Stockholm3 test facilitates detection of significant cancer, and reduces the number of biopsies and detection of insignificant cancer.

Intracranial volume before and after surgical treatment for isolated metopic synostosis.

Metopic synostosis results in a keel-shaped forehead, hypotelorism, and an increased interparietal width. This study aimed to measure the frontal and total intracranial volume in patients with metopic synostosis before and after surgery and to compare the effect of 2 different operation methods. All patients operated for isolated metopic synostosis between 2002 and 2008 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital who had undergone preoperative and/or postoperative computed tomographic examination (at 3 y of age) were included. The patients were grouped according to operation method: (1) forehead remodeling in combination with a bone graft or (2) forehead remodeling in combination with a spring. Sex- and age-matched controls were identified. A previously developed MATLAB computer program was used to measure the frontal and total intracranial volumes. Sixty patients and 198 controls were included. Preoperatively, the patients with metopic synostosis had significantly lower frontal volumes than those of the controls (P < 0.001) but equal total intracranial volumes. The operations redistributed the intracranial volume and resulted in an improved, frontal-total intracranial volume ratio. However, at 3 years of age, the frontal volume (P < 0.001), total intracranial volume (P ≤ 0.002), and ratio between the 2 (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the patients than in the controls. The 2 operation methods were equally efficient in creating an improved frontal-total ratio. Surgery for metopic synostosis improves the distribution of the intracranial volume but does not result in normal total intracranial volume or frontal volume at 3 years of age.

New objective measurement of forehead symmetry in unicoronal craniosynostosis - comparison between fronto-orbital advancement and forehead remodelling with a bone graft.

Patients with unicoronal synostosis (UCS) present with ipsilateral forehead flattening, contralateral frontal bossing, and rotation of the facial midline. Uni- or bilateral fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) techniques are the most common surgical approaches for correction of UCS. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the surgical outcome in patients for UCS, using a new MATLAB computer tool programmed to measure the symmetry of the two halves of the forehead.Files were reviewed from a consecutive series of patients treated for UCS at the unit, from 1979-2008. The patients were grouped according to the method of operation used. The computer tool evaluated preoperative and postoperative cephalograms and CT scans. Eighty-eight patients were included. The male-to-female ratio was 1:2.4. Forty-six patients had been operated on with FOA and 42 with forehead remodelling using a calvarial bone graft. Forehead symmetry was significantly improved by both techniques (p < 0.001 for both), but the postoperative forehead symmetry was significantly better after forehead remodelling (p = 0.025). The reoperation rate was much lower for the second group (6.5 vs 37.2%, p < 0.001). It is concluded that forehead remodelling with a calvarial bone graft creates a more symmetrical forehead than FOA and may, therefore, be a better alternative for treatment of unicoronal synostosis.

A novel quantitative image-based method for evaluating cranial symmetry and its usefulness in patients undergoing surgery for unicoronal synostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unicoronal synostosis presents with cranial asymmetry. Fixed points are difficult to identify; surgical results are therefore difficult to evaluate. The aim of this study was to develop a computer-based method for evaluation of forehead symmetry to enable evaluation of surgical results in unicoronal synostosis. METHODS: The MATLAB tool was programmed to segment computed tomographic images, leaving the outermost contour. Cephalometric images were segmented manually due to lower contrast. A center-point (O) and an end-point were manually defined in the midline of the forehead and at the nonfused coronal suture, respectively. The program then found a point (p) on the fused side, at the same distance from the O as the end-point. The contours of the left and right side of the forehead were thereafter superimposed, and the position of minimal area mismatch of the sides was identified. To correct for growth between preoperative images and follow-up, the number of mismatching pixels was related to the area outlined by the contour of the forehead, the end-point and p. Two quantities, the relative symmetry change and the absolute symmetry change, were defined and evaluated by repeated measurements on spherical and elliptical phantoms and 15 patients. RESULTS: Measurements with the MATLAB program were reliable with an SD of 0.26% to 5.39% for the expected range of differences. The SD was lower for measurements on computed tomographic images than for measurements on cephalometric images. The SD was also lower in patients with large surgical improvement than in patients with little improvement. The results support the use of relative symmetry change to evaluate surgical results. CONCLUSIONS: Our new computer-based method is capable of measuring forehead symmetry with good precision. This method can be used for systematic evaluation of surgical outcome for unicoronal synostosis and other asymmetric skull deformities.

A new computer tool for systematic evaluation of intracranial volume and its capacity to evaluate the result of the operation for metopic synostosis.

The aim of this project was to develop a tool for systematic evaluation of volumetric changes after surgery for craniosynostosis. A computer program using MATLAB was developed to measure total intracranial volume and frontal volume, anterior to the coronary sutures, by multiplying the area with slice thickness of each slice from just above foramen magnum to just beneath the vertex in CT examinations. The ratio between frontal volume and total volume was used for evaluation of the clinical result in 12 patients operated on for metopic synostosis. In 0.625 and 5 millimetre slices the coefficients of variation were 0.00049 and 0.00058, respectively, for measurements of total volume. The highest coefficient of variation was found in postoperative measurements of the frontal volume and was 0.014 in 0.625 millimetre slices. Measurements in 5 millimetre slices resulted in 3.8% ± 1.5% (mean ± SD) lower total volumes and 5.8% ± 5.3% lower frontal volumes than measurements in 0.625 millimetre slices. In patients operated on for metopic synostosis the ratio between frontal volume and total volume increased 25% ± 16% for patients operated on with cranioplasty in combination with a spring (n = 6) and 20% ± 13% for patients operated on with cranioplasty in combination with a bone transplant (n = 6). In summary, this study has developed a tool that can determine frontal and total intracranial volume with little variation. This tool can be used for systematic evaluation of the result of the operation for metopic synostosis.