The development of study exit criteria for evaluating antimanic compounds.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest on the part of investigators and the public at large in finding ways to study and improve treatments for the seriously mentally ill without exposing such individuals to unnecessary risks. One group of particular interest in this regard are patients suffering from acute mania. We set out to define "exit" criteria or novel clinical endpoints that might help to assess the efficacy of antimanic compounds. We sought a method that would be safer, more economical, and less sensitive to nonspecific factors in the clinical environment while still allowing unambiguous assessment of efficacy. METHOD: From a pool of subjects being screened for or already participating in intervention studies, we retrospectively identified 76 admissions of patients with a manic or mixed episode according to DSM-IV. We fit a mixed-effects regression model to all available data obtained using the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale from admission to day 28 of treatment. Using the estimated model coefficients, we obtained empirical Bayes (EB) estimates of each subject's trend coefficients based on (1) all available data and (2) data through day 11 of treatment for mania. RESULTS: We found a high correlation (r = .67) between EB estimates of final response at day 28 and actual day 28 scores on the Bech-Rafaelsen scale based on scores through day 11. When subjects were categorized as full, partial, or nonresponders according to their final Bech-Rafaelsen score, we were able to show that only 2 of the 23 predicted nonresponders became full responders, 27 of the 31 predicted full responders became full responders, and 16 of the 22 predicted partial responders became partial or full responders. CONCLUSION: We conclude on the basis of this chart review study that it should be possible to define exit criteria for trials assessing the efficacy of antimanic compounds on the basis of relatively short duration exposure to experimental treatment.

Evaluation of platelet activation in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease after paroxetine or nortriptyline treatment.

This study investigated the effects of antidepressant treatment on platelet activation in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Plasma levels of platelet alpha-granule release products beta-thromboglobulin (BTG) and platelet factor 4 (PF4) were measured in 17 depressed patients with IHD who were treated in a 6-week, double-blind trial with either paroxetine (10 patients) or nortriptyline (7 patients). Baseline measurements of BTG and PF4 were significantly elevated in both drug treatment groups before the initiation of antidepressant therapy compared with those of healthy control subjects. In the paroxetine group, mean PF4 and BTG levels significantly decreased from these elevated baseline values within 1 week of treatment and remained low at 3- and 6-week measurements. In contrast, the nortriptyline group did not exhibit a significant decrease in PF4 or BTG plasma levels after 1, 3, or 6 weeks of treatment. Therefore, platelet activation in depressed patients with IHD seems to be inhibited by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. The effect of paroxetine on PF4 and BTG plasma levels suggests that it may reduce platelet aggregation in vivo and may positively impact IHD-related mortality in this population.

Treatment of major depression with nortriptyline and paroxetine in patients with ischemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. METHOD: After a 2-week, single-blind placebo lead-in phase, 81 outpatients with DSM-III-R-defined nonpsychotic unipolar major depression and ischemic heart disease were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with paroxetine or nortriptyline for 6 weeks. Paroxetine was administered at a fixed-flexible dose of 20-30 mg/day. Nortriptyline dose was adjusted with the use of blood-level monitoring to reach a plasma concentration of 50-150 ng/ml. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 41 patients who started treatment with paroxetine and 29 of the 40 patients who started treatment with nortriptyline had an improvement of at least 50% in their Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores. Significantly more patients taking nortriptyline discontinued treatment prematurely (35% versus 10%), and more patients taking nortriptyline had adverse events resulting in termination (25% versus 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were efficacious. Sixty-three percent of all patients improved at least 50%, and of these, 90% met the criteria for remission. Paroxetine was better tolerated than nortriptyline and less likely to produce cardiovascular side effects.

Comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.

CONTEXT: Depression and ischemic heart disease often are comorbid conditions and, in patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the presence of depression is associated with increased mortality. Patients with heart disease need a safe and effective treatment for depression. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, cardiovascular effects, and safety of a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, with a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline hydrochloride, in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. DESIGN: Two-week placebo lead-in followed by a double-blind randomized 6-week medication trial. SETTING: Research clinics in 4 university centers. PATIENTS: Eighty-one outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder and with documented ischemic heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with either paroxetine, 20 to 30 mg/d, or nortriptyline targeted to a therapeutic plasma level, 190 to 570 nmol/L (50-150 ng/mL), for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For effectiveness of treatment, a decline in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by 50% and final score of 8 or less; for cardiovascular safety, heart rate and rhythm, supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, electrocardiogram conduction intervals, indexes of heart rate variability, and rate of adverse events. RESULTS: By intent-to-treat analysis, 25 (61%) of 41 patients improved during treatment with paroxetine and 22 (55%) of 40 improved with nortriptyline. Neither drug significantly affected blood pressure or conduction intervals. Paroxetine had no sustained effects on heart rate or rhythm or indexes of heart rate variability, whereas patients treated with nortriptyline had a sustained 11% increase in heart rate from a mean of 75 to 83 beats per minute (P<.001) and a reduction in heart rate variability, as measured by the SD of all normal R-R intervals over a 24-hour period, from 112 to 96 (P<.01). Adverse cardiac events occurred in 1 (2%) of 41 patients treated with paroxetine and 7 (18%) of 40 patients treated with nortriptyline (P<.03). CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine and nortriptyline are effective treatments for depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of serious adverse cardiac events compared with paroxetine.

Elevated platelet factor 4 and beta-thromboglobulin plasma levels in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.

Clinical depression has recently been recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiac mortality in patients after myocardial infarction. The underlying mechanisms of this increased mortality remain unclear. This study investigated the hypothesis that patients suffering from ischemic heart disease (IHD) and depression concurrently may have abnormal platelet activation resulting in an increased risk of thrombosis. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) and beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG) were measured in young healthy control subjects, in nondepressed patients with IHD, and in depressed patients with IHD. Mean PF4 and beta-TG plasma levels in the IHD group with depression were found to be significantly higher than those of the control and IHD groups. This increase was not related to age, gender, racial difference, aspirin use, or severity of cardiac disease. This finding suggests that in depressed patients with IHD there is greater platelet activation, and may indicate an increased risk of thrombotic complications.

Paroxetine is a novel nitric oxide synthase inhibitor.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, has been reported to inhibit cytochrome P450 activity. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) is structurally homologous to cytochrome P450. Accordingly, in our study, we observed the effects of paroxetine on NOS activity. Seventeen ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients received paroxetine and fourteen received nortriptyline for treatment of clinical depression defined by a score of 17 or higher on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Serum nitrite and nitrate levels were significantly decreased following paroxetine treatment but not nortriptyline treatment. Paroxetine was also a more potent inhibitor of NOS enzyme activity than nortriptyline, as measured by the conversion of [14C] arginine to [14C] citrulline by hamster brain cytosols. In addition, paroxetine reversed the force-frequency relationship in isolated hamster papillary muscles in a manner analogous to that of known NOS inhibitors. Thus, paroxetine appears to be a novel NOS inhibitor in vitro and in vivo.

[Arguments for early treatment of refractory schizophrenia]. / Arguments pour traiter précocement les schizophrénies résistantes.

The authors, taking up their experience and the literature, attempt to view the precociousness of alternative, classical neuroleptic treatments in schizophrenia, from notion of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, precocious refractory and intolerance. Until now, clozapine was administrated to patients lasting resistant and in mainly cases hospitalized since many years. As such as quality of life and economy of health, it would be desirable to quickly think of alternatives neuroleptic's therapeutic protocols and clozapine in the treatment-resistant schizophrenias or those presenting an intolerance.

Double-blind comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline on the postural stability of late-life depressed patients.

This article describes a 6-week study evaluating body sway during double-blind therapy with nortriptyline versus paroxetine in geriatric patients. Body sway was measured with patients' eyes open, then closed, using a stable force platform at 4 timepoints: before starting antidepressant medication, and after 1, 2, and 6 weeks of treatment. Measures such as the length (L) of path of the center of pressure (COP) and the area included within the COP path were selected for quantitative assessment of stability. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with planned comparisons was used to examine the pair-wise difference at baseline and Weeks 1, 2, and 6 of treatment. No significant difference was found in body sway parameters over the 6 weeks of study for patients treated with either nortriptyline or paroxetine.