ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of swab cultures of cryopreserved skull flaps during cranioplasties for surgical site infections (SSIs). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent delayed cranioplasties with cryopreserved autografts between 2009 and 2017. The results of cultures obtained from swabs and infected surgical sites were assessed. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of swab cultures for SSIs were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 422 patients categorized into two groups, swab and nonswab, depending on whether swab cultures were implemented during cranioplasties. The overall infection rate was 7.58%. No difference was seen in infection rates between groups. There were 18 false-positive and no true-positive swab culture results. All bacteria between swab cultures and SSI cultures were discordant. Meanwhile, there were 19 false-negative swab cultures. The results showed high specificity but low sensitivity for swab cultures to predict SSI occurrence and the pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to low accuracy and sensitivity, swab cultures of cryopreserved autografts should not be routinely performed during delayed cranioplasties.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Load/methods , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Cryopreservation/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Surgical Flaps/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Load/trends , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniotomy/trends , Cryopreservation/trends , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Specimen Handling/trends , Surgical Flaps/transplantation , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Tissue Culture Techniques/methods , Tissue Culture Techniques/trends , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is a relatively simple and straightforward intervention; however, it is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. Postcranioplasty seizures, especially early seizures, are common and associated with poor outcomes and longer hospital stays. Protocols for preventing and managing early seizures have not been well established. METHODS: The medical records of 595 patients who underwent cranioplasty were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 259 had preexisting seizures and 336 had no seizures before cranioplasty. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were administered to patients who had no seizures before cranioplasty for 1 week, whereas an advanced AED regimen was administered to patients with preexisting seizures. Subsequently, clinical characteristics, occurrence of recurrent seizures, early seizures, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Our previous study showed positive results for prophylaxis in new-onset early seizures. In the patients with preexisting seizures, 46.7% of the patients (121/259) experienced recurrent seizures after cranioplasty and 17.4% of the patients (45/259) experienced early recurrent seizures within 1 week of their operation. In the group who received the advanced AEDs, early recurrent seizures were significantly reduced to 8.7% compared with the regular group (20.5%; P = 0.027). Younger age and preoperative hydrocephalus engendered a higher risk of recurrent seizures. The number of previous craniotomies was observed to have a trend of increasing early recurrent seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Cranioplasty is associated with a high incidence of postoperative seizures. Our management protocol for postcranioplasty seizures includes seizure prophylaxis and advanced use of AEDs, which can reduce the occurrence of early seizures.
