ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This prospective study compares the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) based on the elastogram to B-mode (E/B) size ratio to shear-wave elastography (SWE) incorporating assessment of boundary tissue stiffness. METHODS: In this prospective study, 81 women consented to undergo ultrasound (US) elastographic assessment prior to biopsy of their mass(es). A total of 101 masses were evaluated with SE and SWE using a single machine (Siemens Acuson S2000). The histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) were obtained for SE and SWE. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of SE using the E/B ratio was 94.7% (95% CI: 87.6 100) and 81.0% (95% CI: 71.3 90.1) respectively. For SWE the sensitivity and specificity was 73.7% (95% CI: 59.7 87.7) and 82.5% (95% CI: 73.2 91.9) respectively. The AUC for SE was higher (0.878) compared to SWE (0.697). CONCLUSION: SE elastography using the E/B ratio yields diagnostic performance which is superior to SWE incorporating assessment of peripheral stiffness.
