Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate on heroin seeking behavior in the nucleus accumbens in rats.

Histone acetylation and other modifications of the chromatin are important regulators of gene expression and may contribute to drug-induced behaviors and neuroplasticity. Inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDAC) activity results in the change of some drug-induced behaviors，however, relatively little is known about the effects of HDAC inhibitors on heroin-seeking behavior. In the present study, male rats were trained to self-administer heroin under a FR1 schedule for consecutive 14 days, followed by 14 daily 2h extinction session in the operant chamber. After training, the heroin priming (250µg/kg) was introduced for the reinstatement of heroin-seeking behavior. Pretreatment with sodium butyrate (NaB) (200 or 400mg/kg, i.p.), an inhibitor of HDAC, failed to affect heroin self-administration. Additionally，systemic administration of NaB (400mg/kg, i.p.)increased significantly the reinstatement of heroin-seeking induced by heroin priming when NaB administered 12h, but not 6h before the reinstatement test. The same effect was observed after the intracerebroventricular injection of NaB (5µL, 100µg/µL). Moreover, the levels of histone H3 acetylation at lysine 18（H3K18）and H4 acetylation at lysine 5 or lysine 8（H4K5 or H4K8）in the accumbens nucleus core and shell were remarkably increased during the reinstatement and were further strengthened after intracerebroventricular injection of NaB. These results demonstrated that activation of histone acetylation may be involved in the heroin-seeking behavior, and identifying these epigenetic changes will be critical in proposing a novel pharmacological strategy for treating heroin addiction.

Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dosing of morphine: a comparison of analgesia, tolerance, and subsequent voluntary morphine intake.

Improved utilization of continuous or intermittent opioid administration in pain treatment necessitates a comparison of the antinociceptive effect and tolerance of these two treatment methods. More importantly, the effect of treatment method on subsequent opioid consumption has not been directly compared, although it is widely assumed that continuous opioid treatment may produce lower addictive liability relative to intermittent opioid treatment. In this study, we compared the antinociceptive effect and tolerance of morphine in rats that received repeated injection (10 mg/kg twice daily for 7 days) or continuous infusion (20 mg/kg daily for 7 days) subcutaneously and the self-administration of intravenous morphine in these rats after 7 days of withdrawal. Both intermittent and continuous morphine treatment produced antinociceptive tolerance, but the exhibition of tolerance differed. Moreover, intermittent morphine pretreatment facilitated subsequent morphine self-administration, whereas continuous morphine pretreatment produced minimal effects, as shown by comparable levels of active responses and morphine consumption between continuous morphine and saline-treated rats. These results suggest that the administration method of opioid should be selected according to the specific pain situation and that continuous opioid administration or long-acting therapy may be advantageous, producing less influence on drug-taking behavior than intermittent administration of short-acting drugs.

Differential involvement of GABAA and GABAB receptors in propofol self-administration in rats.

AIM: Propofol has shown abuse potential. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of GABA(A) antagonist and GABA(B) agonist on propofol reinforcement. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to self-administer propofol at a dose of 1.7 mg/kg per infusion under a fixed ratio (FR1) schedule of reinforcement for 14 d. In a separate set of experiments, food-maintained self-administration under a fixed ratio (FR5) schedule and locomotor activities of Sprague-Dawley rats were examined. RESULTS: GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline (0.25 mg/kg, ip) significantly increased the number of injections and active responses. Pretreatment with GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen (3 mg/kg, ip) significantly decreased the number of active responses and total infusions of propofol during the training session. Moreover, microinjection of baclofen (50 and 100 ng/side) into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) significantly decreased the number of active responses and total infusions of propofol. Neither baclofen (1-3 mg/kg, ip) nor bicuculline (0.25-1 mg/kg, ip) affected food-maintained responses or motor activities. CONCLUSION: Propofol maintains its reward properties partially through GABA(A) receptor activation. Stimulation of GABA(B) receptors in VTA may counteract the reinforcing properties of propofol.

Microinjection of M(5) muscarinic receptor antisense oligonucleotide into VTA inhibits FosB expression in the NAc and the hippocampus of heroin sensitized rats.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of M(5) muscarinic receptor subtype on the locomotor sensitization induced by heroin priming, and it's effect on the FosB expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the hippocampus in the heroin sensitized rats. METHODS: Locomotor activity was measured every 10 min for 1 h after subcutaneous injection of heroin. FosB expression was assayed by immunohistochemistry, and the antisense oligonucleotides (AS-ONs) targeting M(5) muscarinic receptor was transferred with the lipofectin. RESULTS: Microinjection of AS-ONs targeting M(5) muscarinic receptor in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) blocked the expression of behavioral sensitization induced by heroin priming in rats. Meanwhile, the expression of FosB-positive neurons in either the NAc or the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus increased in heroin-induced locomotor sensitized rats. The enhancement of FosB-positive neurons in the NAc or DG could be inhibited by microinjection of M(5) muscarinic receptor AS-ONs into the VTA before the heroin-induced locomotor sensitization was performed. In contrast, microinjection of M(5) muscarinic receptor sense oligonucleotide (S-ONs) into the VTA did not block the expression of behavioral sensitization or the expression of FosB in the NAc or DG in the heroin sensitized rats. CONCLUSION: Blocking M(5) muscarinic receptor in the VTA inhibits the expression of heroin-induced locomotor sensitization, which is associated with the regulation of FosB expression in the NAc and hippocampus neurons. M(5) muscarinic receptor may be a useful pharmacological target for the treatment of heroin addiction.

[Intrathecal injection of muscarinic receptors or GDNF antisense oligonucleotides inhibits the increase of c-Fos expression in locus coeruleus of morphine-withdrawal rats].

The antisense approach and immunohistochemistry were used to study the effects of different muscarinic receptor (M) subtypes and glial cell derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) on the scores of morphine-withdrawal syndrome and the expression of c-Fos in locus coeruleus (LC). Intrathecal injection of M2 receptor antisense oligonucleotides (M2AS-oligo) or GDNF antisense oligonucleotides (GDNFAS-oligo) decreased the scores of morphine withdrawal syndrome. The expression of c-Fos positive neurons in the LC increased in morphine-dependent rats and increased to a greater extent after the injection of naloxone (4mg/kg, ip) in morphine dependent rats. Intrathecal injection of M2AS-oligo or GDNFAS-oligo inhibited the increase of c-Fos expression in LC during morphine withdrawal, but there was no effect in case of M1AS-oligo. The results suggest that M2 receptor of spinal cord mediates the neural activation of LC during morphine withdrawal. And the interaction between neurons and glial cells may be involved in the ascending activation process.