Women with breast cancer: histologic findings in the contralateral breast.

PURPOSE: To investigate contralateral breast biopsy histologic findings in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histologic findings in 237 patients with breast cancer who underwent contralateral breast biopsy for clinically or mammographically detected abnormalities were retrospectively reviewed. Malignant findings were categorized by histologic type. Benign findings were categorized by risk of breast cancer. Comparison was made with mammographically guided breast biopsy results in 1,294 patients without breast cancer. RESULTS: Of the 237 patients, 168 (70.9%) had either malignancy or high-risk histologic findings. One hundred thirty-nine patients (58.6%) had malignant findings; 98 (41.4%) had benign findings. Of the 98 with benign findings, 29 (30%) had high-risk histologic findings. Thirty (33%) of the 91 patients with invasive cancer had invasive lobular carcinoma. Forty-seven (45.6%) of the 103 patients with malignant lesions at mammographically guided biopsies had ductal carcinoma in situ alone. CONCLUSION: Compared with biopsy in women without breast cancer, contralateral biopsy in women with breast cancer was more likely to show malignancy, invasive lobular carcinoma, or ductal carcinoma in situ alone (P < .001) or to show high-risk histologic benign findings (P < .001). Mammographic and clinical findings in the contralateral breast should be regarded as more suspicious than those in patients without known breast cancer.

Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Patients who have had cancer in one breast are at high risk for cancer in the contralateral breast. These bilateral cancers may be synchronous or metachronous. If the manifestations on mammography were similar in both breasts, an aggressive search for the mammographic findings of the first breast cancer might lead to early detection of the contralateral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammograms for patients with bilateral cancers to determine whether the mammographic appearance of the contralateral cancer is likely to be the same as that of the first cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the pathologic and mammographic records of 69 patients with surgically proven bilateral primary breast cancer. Thirty four of 69 (49%) had synchronous cancer, and 35 (51%) had metachronous cancer. Mammographic appearances were classified as microcalcifications, spiculated mass, nonspiculated mass (whether circumscribed or poorly defined), asymmetric or developing density, architectural distortion, and normal. Multiple findings were subclassified as major and minor findings. All findings were compared between both breast cancers, and statistical significance was determined by the two-sample Z test. RESULTS: Forty six (67%) of 69 patients had different major mammographic findings in the contralateral cancer. Of 30 patients whose first cancers had microcalcifications, 20 (67%) had microcalcifications in the contralateral cancer. Of 39 patients whose first cancers lacked microcalcifications, 17 (44%) had microcalcifications in the contralateral cancer. This difference was statistically significant (p = .02). Of 26 patients whose first cancers had spiculated masses, 9 (35%) had a contralateral spiculated mass. Of 43 patients whose first cancers lacked spiculated masses, 12 (28%) had a contralateral spiculated mass. This difference was not statistically significant (p = .22). CONCLUSION: Our results show that contralateral tumors usually have major mammographic findings different from those of the first cancer, and the mammographic signs of the first cancer do not indicate the most likely appearance of cancer in the contralateral breast. Evaluation of a contralateral mammogram should be performed without regard for the mammographic findings for the first cancer.

Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.

PURPOSE: To assess the contribution of mammography in the detection of cancer in the contralateral breast in women with bilateral breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms and clinical records of 77 patients with bilateral breast cancer were reviewed in a retrospective study. RESULTS: The contralateral cancer was detected at mammography in 68 of 77 patients (88%) and identified at mammography alone in 50 patients (65%). No statistically significant differences in either mammographic detection rates or stage of the contralateral cancer were noted in patients younger than 50 years (n = 25) compared with those 50 years of age or older (n = 52). Cancers detected at annual screening mammography were of lower stage than cancers in unscreened patients. In the screened group, 41% of tumors were ductal carcinoma in situ alone and 23% were stage II or III, compared with 22% and 50%, respectively, in the unscreened group. CONCLUSION: Mammographic examination and follow-up in patients with unilateral breast cancer allow detection of the majority of contralateral breast cancers and earlier stage cancers.