Effect of vitamin D in addition to letrozole on the ovulation rate of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: protocol of a multicentre randomised double-blind controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Low vitamin D status is prevalent among women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of the study is to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on (1) the ovulation rate to letrozole and (2) other reproductive, endocrine and metabolic outcomes after 1 year of supplementation in women with PCOS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. A total of 220 anovulatory women with PCOS diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria will be recruited. They will be randomly assigned to either the (1) vitamin D supplementation group or (2) placebo group. Those in the vitamin D group will take oral Vitamin D3 50 000 IU/week for 4 weeks, followed by 50 000 IU once every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. Those who remain anovulatory after 6 months will be treated with a 6-month course of letrozole (2.5 mg to 7.5 mg for 5 days per cycle titrated according to response) for ovulation induction. The primary outcome is the ovulation rate. All statistical analyses will be performed using intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was sought from the Institutional Review Board of the participating units. All participants will provide written informed consent before joining the study. The results of the study will be submitted to scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04650880.

Optimizing non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing: investigating culture conditions, sample collection, and IVF treatment for improved non-invasive PGT-A results.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to optimize the non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in the laboratory by comparing two collection timing of the spent culture medium (SCM), two embryo rinsing protocols, and the use of conventional insemination instead of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). METHODS: Results of two embryo rinsing methods (one-step vs sequential) and SCM collected on day 5 vs day 6 after retrieval were compared against trophectoderm (TE) biopsies as reference. Results from day 6 SCM in cycles fertilized by conventional insemination were compared with PGT-A using ICSI. RESULTS: The rate of concordance was higher in day 6 samples than in day 5 samples when the sequential method was used, in terms of total concordance (TC; day 6 vs day 5: 85.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.0228), total concordance with same sex (TCS, 82.5% vs 28,0%, p < 0.0001), and full concordance with same sex (FCS, 62.5% vs 24.0%, p = 0.0025). The sequential method significantly out-performed the one-step method when SCM were collected on day 6 (sequential vs one-step, TC: 85.0% vs 64.5%, p = 0.0449; TCS: 82.5% vs 54.8%, p = 0.0113; FCS: 62.5% vs 25.8%, p = 0.0021). There was no significant difference in niPGT-A results between cycles fertilized by the conventional insemination and ICSI. CONCLUSION: We have shown a higher concordance rate when SCM was collected on day 6 and the embryos were rinsed in a sequential manner. Comparable results of niPGT-A when oocytes were fertilized by conventional insemination or ICSI. These optimization steps are important prior to commencement of a randomized trial in niPGT-A.

Randomised double-blind controlled trial of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in in vitro fertilisation: a protocol paper.

INTRODUCTION: The success rate of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment for couples with infertility remains low due to lack of a reliable tool in selecting euploid embryos for transfer. This study aims to compare the efficacy in embryo selection based on morphology alone compared with non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) and morphology in infertile women undergoing IVF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised double-blind controlled trial conducted in two tertiary assisted reproduction centres. A total of 500 infertile women will be recruited and undergo IVF as indicated. They will be randomly assigned on day 6 after oocyte retrieval into two groups: the intervention group using morphology and niPGT-A and the control group based on morphology alone. In the control group, blastocysts with the best quality morphology will be replaced first. In the intervention group, blastocysts with the best morphology and euploid result of spent culture medium will be replaced first. The primary outcome is a live birth per the first embryo transfer. The statistical analysis will be performed with the intention to treat and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was sought from the institutional review board of the two participating units. All participants will provide written informed consent before joining the study. The results of the study will be submitted to scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04474522.

Hyaluronic acid-enriched transfer medium for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of hyaluronic acid (HA)-enriched transfer medium versus standard medium on live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer (FET). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Two tertiary fertility centers. PATIENT(S): Infertile women aged <43 years at the time of in vitro fertilization undergoing FET. INTERVENTION(S): The women were randomly assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The HA group used EmbryoGlue (Vitrolife, Gothenburg, Sweden) with an HA concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, while the control group used supplemented G-2 (Vitrolife) medium with an HA concentration of 0.125 mg/mL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate. RESULT(S): Five hundred fifty women were recruited from April 2016 to April 2018 and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Eight women in the HA group and 5 women in the control group did not undergo FET because the embryos did not survive on thawing. One woman in the HA group cancelled FET because of fever. One woman in the HA group withdrew and received conventional medium. The 2 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. The live birth rates in the HA group and the control group were comparable (25.5% vs. 25.8%; relative risk 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.31). The other clinical outcomes were also similar between the 2 groups. Logistic regression showed that the type of transfer medium was not associated with live birth. CONCLUSION(S): The use of HA-enriched transfer medium does not improve the live birth rate of FET compared with standard medium. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02725827 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Will use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester reduce the miscarriage rate when compared with placebo? SUMMARY ANSWER: Use of oral progestogen in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester did not reduce miscarriage before 20 weeks when compared with placebo. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy and occurs in 15-20% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Use of vaginal progestogens is not effective in reducing miscarriage but there is still no good evidence to support use of oral progestogen for the treatment of threatened miscarriage. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a randomized double-blind controlled trial. A total of 406 women presenting with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester were recruited from 30 March 2016 to May 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women attending Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinics because of vaginal bleeding during the first trimester were recruited and randomly assigned to use dydrogesterone 40 mg orally, followed by 10 mg orally three times a day or placebo until 12 completed weeks of gestation or 1 week after the bleeding stopped, whichever was later. The primary outcome was the miscarriage rate before 20 weeks of gestation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The two groups of women had comparable age, BMI, number of previous miscarriages, gestation and ultrasound findings at presentation. The miscarriage rate before 20 weeks of gestation was similar in both groups, being 12.8% (26/203) in the progestogen group and 14.3% (29/203) in the placebo group (relative risk 0.897, 95% CI 0.548-1.467; P = 0.772). The live birth rate was 81.3% in the progestogen group versus 83.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.697). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of obstetric outcomes and side effects. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The primary outcome was the miscarriage rate, rather than the live birth rate. Women were recruited from Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinics and those with heavy vaginal bleeding might be admitted into wards directly instead of attending Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic. The severity of vaginal bleeding was subjectively graded by women themselves. The sample size was not adequate to demonstrate a smaller difference in the miscarriage rate between the progestogen and placebo groups. We did not exclude women with multiple pregnancy, which increased the risk of miscarriage although there was only one set of twin pregnancy in the placebo group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Use of oral progestogen is not recommended in women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the Health and Medical Research Fund, HKSAR (reference number 12132341). All authors declared no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov with an identifier NCT02128685. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 1 May 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 30 March 2016.

A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation? DESIGN: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The women were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.1 mg fentanyl and 5 mg midazolam or 25 mg pethidine and 5 mg diazepam, plus paracervical block with 10 ml 1% lignocaine. The primary outcome was abdominal pain level during retrieval assessed by linear visual analogue scale from 0-10. Secondary outcomes included vaginal pain levels during and after retrieval and postoperative abdominal pain levels and side-effects, satisfaction level, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. A pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 1 for the difference in pain levels between two groups was set. RESULTS: Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during retrieval were significantly lower in the fentanyl and midazolam group compared with the pethidine and diazepam group (per-protocol analysis, vaginal pain: 1.6 versus 4.3; mean difference: -2.7, 95% CI -3.7, -1.8; P < 0.001; abdominal pain: 2.9 versus 5.2; mean difference: -2.3, 95% CI -3.3 to -1.3; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). No differences were observed in these pain levels after retrieval. Most women experienced no postoperative side-effects. The fentanyl and midazolam group had better sedation level, satisfaction level on pain relief and satisfaction on the overall retrieval procedure than the pethidine and diazepam group. No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The fentanyl and midazolam group had significantly lower vaginal and abdominal pain levels during oocyte retrieval than the pethidine and diazepam group.