ABSTRACT
Background: Superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears are a common finding in overhead athletes. The original classification system produced by Snyder in 1990 contained 4 types of SLAP tears and was later expanded to 10 types. The classification has been challenging because of inconsistencies between surgeons making diagnoses and treatments based on the diagnosis. Furthermore, patient factors-such as age and sports played-affect the treatment algorithms, even across similarly classified SLAP tears. Purpose: To (1) assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Snyder and expanded SLAP (ESLAP) classification systems and (2) determine the consistency of treatment for a given SLAP tear depending on different clinical scenarios. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 20 arthroscopic surgical videos and magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients with SLAP tears were sent to 20 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons at various stages of training. Surgeons were asked to identify the type of SLAP tear using the Snyder and ESLAP classifications. Surgeons were then asked to determine the treatment for a SLAP tear using 4 clinical scenarios: (1) in the throwing arm of an 18-year-old pitcher; (2) in the dominant arm of an 18-year-old overhead athlete; (3) a 35-year-old overhead athlete; (4) or a 50-year-old overhead athlete. Responses were recorded, and the cases were shuffled and sent back 6 weeks after the initial responses. Results were then analyzed using the Fleiss kappa coefficient (κ) to determine interobserver and intraobserver degrees of agreement. Results: There was moderate intraobserver reliability in both the Snyder and ESLAP classifications (κ = 0.52) and fair interobserver reliability for both classification systems (Snyder, κ = 0.31; ESLAP, κ = 0.30; P < .0001) among all surgeons. Additionally, there was only fair agreement (κ = 0.30; P < .0001) for the treatment modalities chosen by the reviewers for each case. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SLAP tears remain a challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons in diagnostics and treatment plans. Therefore, care should be taken in the preoperative discussion with the patient to consider all the possible treatment options because this may affect the postoperative recovery period and patient expectations.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To biomechanically evaluate the use of the suture augmentation construct at time 0 of ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Eighty porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction using 2 techniques for graft fixation: a single suspensory construct (SSC), performed with a femoral button and tibial interference screw; and a double suspensory construct (DSC), with a femoral and tibial button. Each fixation technique was performed on 40 porcine knees divided into 4 subgroups. The first group had a nonaugmented ACL reconstruction, the second group had an ACL reconstruction with suture augmentation, and the third and fourth groups were the same as the first and second groups, with the graft resected 80% to simulate graft weakening. Ultimate load, yield load, stiffness, cyclic displacement values, and mode of failure were recorded for each graft. RESULTS: In a weakened graft model with 80% graft resection, there was a significant increase in ultimate strength (P < .001), yield strength (P < .001), and cyclic displacement (P < .001) with suture augmentation. There was no significant increase in stiffness with suture augmentation with either construct (P = .278). In the setting of an intact graft, there were no differences in either SSC or DCS groups with or without suture augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a suture to ACL reconstruction techniques resulted in minimal changes in baseline biomechanical characteristics while improving ultimate load, yield load, and cyclic displacement in a weakened graft model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture augmentation of ACL reconstruction may confer improved integrity of the graft and is worth consideration and future clinical study.
