Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 71(3): 904-915, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implant signal processing strategies define the rules of how acoustic signals are converted into electrical stimulation patterns. Technological and anatomical limitations, however, impose constraints on the signal transmission and the accurate excitation of the auditory nerve. Acoustic signals are degraded throughout cochlear implant processing, and electrical signal interactions at the electrode-neuron interface constrain spectral and temporal precision. In this work, we propose a novel InterlACE signal processing strategy to counteract the occurring limitations. METHODS: By replacing the maxima selection of the Advanced Combination Encoder strategy with a method that defines spatially and temporally alternating channels, InterlACE can compensate for discarded signal content of the conventional processing. The strategy can be extended bilaterally by introducing synchronized timing and channel selection. InterlACE was explored unilaterally and bilaterally by assessing speech intelligibility and spectral resolution. Five experienced bilaterally implanted cochlear implant recipients participated in the Oldenburg Sentence Recognition Test in background noise and the spectral ripple discrimination task. RESULTS: The introduced alternating channel selection methodology shows promising outcomes for speech intelligibility but could not indicate better spectral ripple discrimination. CONCLUSION: InterlACE processing positively affects speech intelligibility, increases available unilateral and bilateral signal content, and may potentially counteract signal interactions at the electrode-neuron interface. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows how cochlear implant channel selection can be modified and extended bilaterally. The clinical impact of the modifications needs to be explored with a larger sample size.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Speech Perception/physiology , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Acoustic Stimulation
2.
Ear Hear ; 41(6): 1752-1763, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the factors influencing the uptake of cochlear implants in adults, determine the impact of each factor, and to conceptualize the journey to implantation from a multistakeholder perspective. DESIGN: Concept mapping was used to integrate input from multiple stakeholders, each with their own experience and expertise. This mixed participatory method collects qualitative and quantitative data collection and enables further quantitative analysis. There were two participant cohorts: clients (cochlear implant recipients, candidates, and family members) and professionals (cochlear implant audiologists, ear, nose, and throat surgeons, administration staff, managers. and manufacturer representatives). A total of 93 people participated in the study: client cohort (n = 60, M age = 66.60 years) and professional cohort (n = 33, M age = 45.24 years). Participants brainstormed statements in response to the question "What influences people's decision to get/not get a cochlear implant?" They subsequently grouped the statements and named each group. They rated each statement as to its impact on the decision and prioritized the need for each to be changed/improved using a five-point Likert scale. Multidimensional scaling was used to produce a visual representation of the ideas and their relationship in the form of concepts. Further analysis was conducted to determine the differences between the cohorts, subcohorts, and concepts. RESULTS: One hundred ten unique statements were generated and grouped into six concepts which either directly affected the client or their environment. These concepts were: external influences (awareness and attitude of non-implant professionals about uptake, cost, logistics, the referral pathway, public awareness); uncertainties, beliefs, and fears (fears, negative effect of word of mouth, unsuccessful previous ear surgery, cosmetics of the device, misunderstanding of how a cochlear implant functions, eligibility for an implant and outcomes after implantation); health problems (mental and physical health); hearing difficulties (social, emotional, and communication impacts of hearing loss, severity of hearing loss, benefit from and experience with hearing aids); implant professionals (implant team's attitude, knowledge and relationship with clients, quality of overall service); and goals and support (clients 'hearing desires and goals, motivation, positive impact of word of mouth, family support, having a cochlear implant mentor. The six concepts fell into two overarching domains: the client-driven domain with four concepts and the external domain with two concepts. The mean rating of concepts in terms of impact on a client's decision to get an implant ranged from 2.24 (external influences, the main barrier) to 4.45 (goals and support, the main driver). Ratings significantly differed between the client and professional cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This study increases our understanding of the factors, which influence a client's decision choose a cochlear implant as a hearing treatment. It also provides new information on the influence of the other stakeholders on the client journey. The magnitude of the generated statements in the client-driven domain highlights the pivotal role of individualized care in clinical settings in influencing a client's decision and the need for the professionals to understand a client's needs and expectations. A client's persistent hearing difficulties, goals, and support network were identified as drivers to the uptake of cochlear implants. However, the barriers identified highlight the need for a collaborative multi- and interdisciplinary approach to raise awareness in and educate non-implant hearing professionals about the cochlear implant process, as well as providing information to empower clients to make educated decisions and consider a cochlear implant as a hearing management option.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Adult , Aged , Deafness/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged
3.
Hear Res ; 388: 107885, 2020 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035288

ABSTRACT

A bio-inspired coding (BIC) strategy was implemented in this study with the goal of better representation of spectral and temporal information. The auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) characteristics such as refractory recovery, facilitation and spatial spread were obtained from ECAP data recorded in 11 CI recipients. These characteristics, together with a non-individualized model-derived adaptation effect, were integrated into the BIC strategy for a better selection of channels. Two variations of the BIC strategy were compared to the conventional advanced combination encoder (ACE) coding strategy: the BIC-I strategy based on the individual CI recipients' ECAP parameters, and the BIC-G strategy based on the median values of ECAP parameters from all CI recipients who participated in the study. The melodic contour identification (MCI) and Oldenburg sentence recognition in noise (OLSA) tests were used to assess and compare the three coding strategies. A significantly better performance in the transformed MCI test results with the rationalized arcsine transformation, was observed for both BIC strategy variations compared to the ACE strategy. There was no significant difference between the two variations of the BIC strategy and the ACE strategy in the OLSA test. No correlation was found between recovery time constants, absolute refractory periods, left and right width of SOE functions from three test electrodes and CI recipients' performances in the two experiments. However, significant correlations were found between facilitation time constant and amplitude and the results of the MCI and OLSA tests for the two variations of the BIC strategy.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Pitch Perception , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Recognition, Psychology , Speech Intelligibility , Young Adult
4.
Hear Res ; 380: 187-196, 2019 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31325737

ABSTRACT

Auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) refractoriness and facilitation can be quantified in electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded via neural response telemetry (NRT). Although facilitation has been observed in animals and human cochlear implant (CI) recipients, no study has modeled this in human CI users until now. In this study, recovery and facilitation effects at different masker and probe levels for three test electrodes (E6, E12 and E18) in 11 CI subjects were recorded. The ECAP recovery and facilitation were modeled by exponential functions and the same function used for +10 CL masker offset condition can be applied to all other masker offsets measurements. Goodness of fit was evaluated for the exponential functions. A significant effect of probe level was observed on a recovery time constant which highlights the importance of recording the recovery function at the maximum acceptable stimulus level. Facilitation time constant and amplitude showed no dependency on the probe level. However, facilitation was stronger for masker level at or around the threshold of the ECAP (T-ECAP). There was a positive correlation between facilitation magnitude and amplitude growth function (AGF) slope, which indicates that CI subjects with better peripheral neural survival have stronger facilitation.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Hearing Disorders/therapy , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Telemetry , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
J Neurosci Methods ; 277: 63-74, 2017 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27939961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contemporary speech processing strategies in cochlear implants (CIs) such as the Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) use a standard Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) filterbank to extract envelopes. The assignment of the FFT bins to approximate the frequency resolution of the basilar membrane is only partly based on physiology, especially since the bins are distributed linearly below 1000Hz and logarithmically above 1000Hz. NEW METHOD: A Gammatone filterbank which provides a closer approximation to the bandwidths of filters in the human auditory system could replace the standard FFT filterbank in the ACE strategy. An infinite impulse response (IIR) all-pole design of the Gammatone filterbank was compared to the FFT filterbank with 128, 256 and 512 points resolutions and the effect of the frequency boundaries of the filters was also investigated. RESULTS: Melodic contour identification (MCI) and just noticeable difference (JND) experiments, both involving synthetic clarinet notes in octaves 3 and 4, were conducted with 6 normal hearing (NH) participants using noise vocoded stimuli; and 10 CI recipients just performed the MCI experiment. The MCI results for both NH and CI subjects, showed a significant effect of the filterbank on the percentage correct responses of the participants. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The Gammatone filterbank can better resolve the harmonics of tested synthetic clarinet notes which led to better performances in the MCI experiment. CONCLUSIONS: The total delay of the Gammatone filterbank can be made smaller than the delay of the FFT filterbank with the same frequency resolution at low frequencies.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Mapping , Cochlear Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Electric Stimulation , Female , Fourier Analysis , Hearing Disorders/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Music , Pitch Perception
6.
Hear Res ; 333: 136-149, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26775182

ABSTRACT

Most simulations of cochlear implant (CI) coding strategies rely on standard vocoders that are based on purely signal processing techniques. However, these models neither account for various biophysical phenomena, such as neural stochasticity and refractoriness, nor for effects of electrical stimulation, such as spectral smearing as a function of stimulus intensity. In this paper, a neural model that accounts for stochastic firing, parasitic spread of excitation across neuron populations, and neuronal refractoriness, was developed and augmented as a preprocessing stage for a standard 22-channel noise-band vocoder. This model was used to subjectively and objectively assess consonant discrimination in commercial and experimental coding strategies. Stimuli consisting of consonant-vowel (CV) and vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) tokens were processed by either the Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) or the Excitability Controlled Coding (ECC) strategies, and later resynthesized to audio using the aforementioned vocoder model. Baseline performance was measured using unprocessed versions of the speech tokens. Behavioural responses were collected from seven normal hearing (NH) volunteers, while EEG data were recorded from five NH participants. Psychophysical results indicate that while there may be a difference in consonant perception between the two tested coding strategies, mismatch negativity (MMN) waveforms do not show any marked trends in CV or VCV contrast discrimination.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Computer Simulation , Neural Networks, Computer , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Loudness Perception , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Prosthesis Design , Psychoacoustics , Speech Acoustics , Stochastic Processes , Time Factors , Voice Quality
7.
Am J Audiol ; 24(3): 398-410, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001407

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Background sounds provided by a wearable sound playback device were mixed with the acoustical input picked up by a cochlear implant speech processor in an attempt to suppress tinnitus. METHOD: First, patients were allowed to listen to several sounds and to select up to 4 sounds that they thought might be effective. These stimuli were programmed to loop continuously in the wearable playback device. Second, subjects were instructed to use 1 background sound each day on the wearable device, and they sequenced the selected background sounds during a 28-day trial. Patients were instructed to go to a website at the end of each day and rate the loudness and annoyance of the tinnitus as well as the acceptability of the background sound. Patients completed the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire (Tyler, Stocking, Secor, & Slattery, 2014) at the beginning of the trial. RESULTS: Results indicated that background sounds were very effective at suppressing tinnitus. There was considerable variability in sounds preferred by the subjects. CONCLUSION: The study shows that a background sound mixed with the microphone input can be effective for suppressing tinnitus during daily use of the sound processor in selected cochlear implant users.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Sound , Tinnitus/rehabilitation , Deafness/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Music , Tinnitus/complications
8.
Audiol Res ; 5(2): 132, 2015 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26779327

ABSTRACT

The Nucleus(®) 5 System Sound Processor (CP810, Cochlear™, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia) contains two omnidirectional microphones. They can be configured as a fixed directional microphone combination (called Zoom) or as an adaptive beamformer (called Beam), which adjusts the directivity continuously to maximally reduce the interfering noise. Initial evaluation studies with the CP810 had compared performance and usability of the new processor in comparison with the Freedom™ Sound Processor (Cochlear™) for speech in quiet and noise for a subset of the processing options. This study compares the two processing options suggested to be used in noisy environments, Zoom and Beam, for various sound field conditions using a standardized speech in noise matrix test (Oldenburg sentences test). Nine German-speaking subjects who previously had been using the Freedom speech processor and subsequently were upgraded to the CP810 device participated in this series of additional evaluation tests. The speech reception threshold (SRT for 50% speech intelligibility in noise) was determined using sentences presented via loudspeaker at 65 dB SPL in front of the listener and noise presented either via the same loudspeaker (S0N0) or at 90 degrees at either the ear with the sound processor (S0NCI+) or the opposite unaided ear (S0NCI-). The fourth noise condition consisted of three uncorrelated noise sources placed at 90, 180 and 270 degrees. The noise level was adjusted through an adaptive procedure to yield a signal to noise ratio where 50% of the words in the sentences were correctly understood. In spatially separated speech and noise conditions both Zoom and Beam could improve the SRT significantly. For single noise sources, either ipsilateral or contralateral to the cochlear implant sound processor, average improvements with Beam of 12.9 and 7.9 dB in SRT were found. The average SRT of -8 dB for Beam in the diffuse noise condition (uncorrelated noise from both sides and back) is truly remarkable and comparable to the performance of normal hearing listeners in the same test environment. The static directivity (Zoom) option in the diffuse noise condition still provides a significant benefit of 5.9 dB in comparison with the standard omnidirectional microphone setting. These results indicate that CI recipients may improve their speech recognition in noisy environments significantly using these directional microphone-processing options.

9.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 15(1): 36-42, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23684420

ABSTRACT

Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users encounter difficulties in localizing sound sources in everyday environments, especially in the presence of background noise and reverberation. They tend to show large directional errors and front-back confusions compared to normal hearing (NH) subjects in the same conditions. In this study, the ability of bilateral CI users to use head movements to improve sound source localization was evaluated. Speech sentences of 0.5, 2, and 4.5 seconds were presented in noise to the listeners in conditions with and without head movements. The results show that for middle and long signal durations, the CI users could significantly reduce the number of front-back confusions. The angular accuracy, however, did not improve. Analysis of head trajectories showed that the CI users had great difficulties in moving their head towards the position of the source, whereas the NH listeners targeted the source loudspeaker correctly.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/therapy , Head Movements/physiology , Noise , Sound Localization/physiology , Adult , Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Differential Threshold/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
10.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 14(2): 107-16, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21762546

ABSTRACT

Being able to display and analyse the output of a speech processor that encodes the parameters of complex stimuli to be presented by a cochlear implant (CI) is useful for software and hardware development as well as for diagnostic purposes. This firstly requires appropriate hardware that is able to receive and decode the radio frequency (RF)-coded signals, and then processing the decoded data using suitable software. The PCI-IF6 clinical hardware for the Nucleus CI system, together with the Nucleus Implant Communicator and Nucleus Matlab Toolbox research software libraries, provide the necessary functionality. RFcap is a standalone Matlab application that encapsulates the relevant functions to capture, display, and analyse the RF-coded signals intended for the Nucleus CI24M/R, CI24RE, and CI500 multichannel CIs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Software , Algorithms , Electrodes , Equipment Design , Humans
11.
Int J Audiol ; 49(9): 657-66, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20583945

ABSTRACT

Current cochlear implants can operate at high pulse rates. The effect of increasing pulse rate on speech performance is not yet clear. Habituation to low rates may affect the outcome. This paper presents the results of three subsequent studies using different experimental paradigms, applying the Nucleus CI24RE device, and conducted by ten European implant teams. Pulse rate per channel varied from 500 to 3500 pulses per second with ACE and from 1200 to 3500 pps with CIS strategy. The results showed that the first rate presented had little effect on the finally preferred rate. Lower rates were preferred. The effect of pulse rate on word scores of post-linguistic implantees was small; high rates tended to give lower scores. However, there were no significant differences between the word scores across subjects if collected at the individually preferred pulse rate. High pulse rates were preferred when the post-implantation threshold was low.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech , Auditory Threshold , Electric Stimulation , Europe , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/psychology , Humans , Loudness Perception , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Fitting , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
12.
Ear Hear ; 28(4): 558-70, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17609616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: AutoNRT is the completely automatic electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measuring algorithm in the recently released Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. AutoNRT allows clinicians to automatically record T-NRT profiles that in turn can be used as a guide for initial fitting. The algorithm consists of a pattern recognition part that judges if the traces contain an ECAP and an intelligent flow that optimizes the measurement parameters and finds the ECAP threshold (T-NRT). The objective of this study was to determine how accurate, reliable, and fast the automatic measurements are. DESIGN: Data on more than 400 electrodes were collected as part of the multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. T-NRT values determined by the algorithm were compared with T-NRT determinations on the same data by different human observers. Also, the time the measurements took was analyzed. RESULTS: In 90% of the cases, the absolute difference between the AutoNRT and the human observer determined T-NRT was less than 9 CL; the median absolute difference was 3 CL. A second experiment, in which a group of human observers were asked to analyze NRT data, showed high variability in T-NRT; in some cases, two experienced clinicians disagreed by more than 30 current levels. Compared with the group, AutoNRT performed as well as the "average" clinician, with the advantage that the AutoNRT threshold determinations are objective. Analysis of the timing data showed an average intraoperative measurement time of less than 20 sec per electrode with a standard deviation of 5 sec, suggesting that the total array of 22 electrodes can be measured intraoperatively in about 7 minutes on average. CONCLUSIONS: AutoNRT provides comparable accuracy to an average clinician but with the added benefit of significant time savings over manual recordings. This makes it a valuable tool for clinical measurement of ECAP threshold in cochlear implant recipients.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Automation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Algorithms , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Severity of Illness Index
13.
Ear Hear ; 28(2 Suppl): 42S-45S, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17496644

ABSTRACT

Comparisons of the subjective loudness growth function and the objective evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth function indicate that both functions are exponential in nature. This implies that a more accurate estimate of the ECAP threshold would be obtained using exponential regression of the amplitude growth function instead of the currently used linear regression. The perceptual threshold and the ECAP threshold seem to approach each other when the stimulation rate is lowered to reduce temporal summation effects. The effect of the stimulation rate on the perceptual threshold will have to be taken into account when trying to use the ECAP threshold for predicting the perceptual threshold.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Loudness Perception , Telemetry/methods , Auditory Perception , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Humans , Psychophysics , Time Factors
14.
Int J Audiol ; 43(5): 252-63, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15357408

ABSTRACT

Neural response telemetry (NRT) data from 63 subjects equipped with the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant System generally exhibited little change over up to 4 years. Larger changes, when they occurred, were seen only within the first 15 months postoperatively, and these changes diminished over time. Intraoperative NRT data were generally stable enough to be used for assisting in the initial speech processor fitting sessions. It was not possible to predict changes in the subjective map threshold and comfortable loudness levels (T and C levels, respectively) based on observed changes in the NRT data. The long-term stability of the neural response amplitude and the neural response threshold, however, implies that NRT may be useful as a routine diagnostic tool to detect changes to the neural periphery over time.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Postoperative Care , Telemetry , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Deafness/therapy , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
15.
Ear Hear ; 24(5): 380-91, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14534409

ABSTRACT

A useful and convenient means to analyze the radio frequency (RF) signals being sent by a speech processor to a cochlear implant would be to actually capture and display them with appropriate software. This is particularly useful for development or diagnostic purposes. sCILab (Swiss Cochlear Implant Laboratory) is such a PC-based software tool intended for the Nucleus family of Multichannel Cochlear Implants. Its graphical user interface provides a convenient and intuitive means for visualizing and analyzing the signals encoding speech information. Both numerical and graphic displays are available for detailed examination of the captured CI signals, as well as an acoustic simulation of these CI signals. sCILab has been used in the design and verification of new speech coding strategies, and has also been applied as an analytical tool in studies of how different parameter settings of existing speech coding strategies affect speech perception. As a diagnostic tool, it is also useful for troubleshooting problems with the external equipment of the cochlear implant systems.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Software , Speech Perception , Equipment Design , Humans
16.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 111(5 Pt 1): 407-14, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12018325

ABSTRACT

The main aim of this study was to validate a new technique, neural response telemetry (NRT), for measuring the electrically evoked compound action potential in adult cochlear implant users via their Nucleus C124M implant. Thirty-eight adults were evaluated with a variety of measurement procedures with the NRT software. Electrically evoked compound action potentials were obtained in 31 of the 38 adults (81.6%) and in 132 of the 160 electrodes (82.5%) tested. In addition to validating this technique, we also established a set of default clinical test parameters.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Cochlear Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Telemetry , Adult , Aged , Amplifiers, Electronic , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Deafness/etiology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Electric Stimulation , Electrodes , Female , Hearing Loss, Sudden/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Software
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...