Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 204(3): 877-886, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37952982

ABSTRACT

In the phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 trial (NCT01757535) of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in remission following intensive chemotherapy (IC) and ineligible for haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) maintenance significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo. The impact of subsequent treatment following maintenance has not been evaluated. In this post hoc analysis, OS was estimated for patients who received subsequent AML therapy, and by regimen received (IC or lower-intensity therapy). First subsequent therapy (FST) was administered after treatment discontinuation in 134/238 Oral-AZA and 173/234 placebo patients. OS from randomization in patients who received FST after Oral-AZA versus placebo was 17.8 versus 12.9 months (HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.64-1.04], median follow-up: 56.7 months); OS from FST was similar between arms. Among patients who received injectable hypomethylating agents as FST, median OS was 8.2 versus 4.9 months in the Oral-AZA versus placebo groups (HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.41-1.06]). Forty-eight patients (16/238 Oral-AZA, 32/234 placebo) received HSCT following treatment discontinuation, including six Oral-AZA patients still in first remission; Oral-AZA OS benefit persisted when censoring these patients. Oral-AZA maintenance can prolong AML remission duration without negatively impacting survival outcomes after salvage therapies.


Subject(s)
Azacitidine , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Azacitidine/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Remission Induction , Chronic Disease , Antimetabolites/therapeutic use
4.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 145(5): 1243-1251, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30830294

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In a previous study of smoking cessation in veterans with lung cancer, we noted as an incidental finding that current smokers were much younger than former smokers at diagnosis. To confirm and extend this observation, we analyzed the association of smoking status with age at diagnosis and survival of lung cancer patients. METHODS: The Jefferson Cancer Registry collects information on all cancer patients registered at this hospital. Information on smoking status has been recorded since 1995. We determined age at diagnosis and survival of current and former smokers with lung cancer. RESULTS: 5111 lung cancer cases were identified in the registry from 1995 to 2011 inclusive. Smoking status was recorded in 4687 cases (91.7%). Of these, 1859 (39.7%) were current, 2423 (51.7%) were former, and 405 (8.6%) were never smokers. There was a 6-year difference in median age at lung cancer diagnosis between the current (63 years) and former smokers (69 years) (P < 0.0001). The median survival was 12.1 months for current versus 14.5 months for former smokers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm and extend our observation that among patients diagnosed with lung cancer, current smokers are younger than former smokers. The possible explanations include higher competing causes of death and increased risk of lung cancer among current smokers as well as increasing proportions of former smokers in older populations. Ongoing exposure to tobacco carcinogens may accelerate the development of lung cancer in continuing smokers. This provides more incentive for smokers to quit at the earliest age possible.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Smokers , Smoking , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Public Health Surveillance , Registries , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking Cessation , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
5.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(10): 1183-1192, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323088

ABSTRACT

Background: Use of chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial because it improves survival only in some patients. We aimed to develop a statistical model using routine and readily available blood tests to predict the prognosis of patients with stage II CRC and to identify which patients are likely to benefit from chemotherapy. Methods: We divided 422 patients with stage II CRC into a training and a testing set. The association of routine laboratory variables and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed. A prognostic model was developed incorporating clinically relevant laboratory variables with demographic and tumor characteristics. A prognostic score was derived by calculating the sum of each variable weighted by its regression coefficient in the model. Model performance was evaluated by constructing receiver operating characteristic curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Significant associations were seen between 5 laboratory variables and patient DFS in univariate analyses. After stepwise selection, 3 variables (carcinoembryonic antigen, hemoglobin, creatinine) were retained in the multivariate model with an AUC of 0.75. Compared with patients with a low prognostic score, those with a medium and high prognostic score had a 1.99- and 4.78-fold increased risk of recurrence, respectively. The results from the training set were validated in the testing set. Moreover, chemotherapy significantly improved DFS in high-risk patients, but not in low- and medium-risk patients. Conclusions: A routine laboratory variable-based model may help predict DFS of patients with stage II CRC and identify high-risk patients more likely to benefit from chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Models, Biological , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Age Factors , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods
6.
Carcinogenesis ; 38(4): 439-446, 2017 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28334112

ABSTRACT

Prospective and longitudinal epidemiological evidence is needed to assess the association between telomere length and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In 323 cancer-free Korean-American HBV patients with 1-year exclusion window (followed for >1 year and did not develop HCC within 1 year), we measured the relative telomere length (RTL) in baseline serum DNAs and conducted extensive prospective and longitudinal analyses to assess RTL-HCC relationship. We found that long baseline RTL conferred an increased HCC risk compared to short RTL [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.93, P = 0.0005). The association remained prominent when the analysis was restricted to patients with a more stringent 5-year exclusion window (HR = 7.51, P = 0.012), indicating that the association was unlikely due to including undetected HCC patients in the cohort, thus minimizing the reverse-causation limitation in most retrospective studies. Adding baseline RTL to demographic variables increased the discrimination accuracy of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis from 0.769 to 0.868 (P = 1.0 × 10-5). In a nested longitudinal subcohort of 16 matched cases-control pairs, using a mixed effects model, we observed a trend of increased RTL in cases and decreased RTL in controls along 5 years of follow-up, with a significant interaction of case/control status with time (P for interaction=0.002) and confirmed the association between long RTL and HCC risk [odds ratio [OR] = 3.63, P = 0.016]. In summary, serum DNA RTL may be a novel non-invasive prospective marker of HBV-related HCC. Independent studies are necessary to validate and generalize this finding in diverse populations and assess the clinical applicability of RTL in HCC prediction.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , DNA/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Telomere/genetics , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/virology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hepatitis B virus , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/virology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
7.
Stem Cells Transl Med ; 6(2): 527-538, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28191759

ABSTRACT

Cardiomyocytes can be differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in defined conditions, but efficient and consistent cardiomyocyte differentiation often requires expensive reagents such as B27 supplement or recombinant albumin. Using a chemically defined albumin-free (E8 basal) medium, we identified heparin as a novel factor that significantly promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation efficiency, and developed an efficient method to differentiate hPSCs into cardiomyocytes. The treatment with heparin helped cardiomyocyte differentiation consistently reach at least 80% purity (up to 95%) from more than 10 different hPSC lines in chemically defined Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12-based medium on either Matrigel or defined matrices like vitronectin and Synthemax. One of heparin's main functions was to act as a Wnt modulator that helped promote robust and consistent cardiomyocyte production. Our study provides an efficient, reliable, and cost-effective method for cardiomyocyte derivation from hPSCs that can be used for potential large-scale drug screening, disease modeling, and future cellular therapies. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:527-538.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Culture Media/chemistry , Heparin/pharmacology , Human Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/drug effects , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Line , Human Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Phenotype , Time Factors , Wnt Signaling Pathway/drug effects
8.
Sci Rep ; 6: 23992, 2016 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27063412

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have demonstrated a potential link between circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content and cancers. However, there is no study evaluating the association between circulating mtDNA as a non-invasive marker of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. We conducted a nested case-control study to determine circulating mtDNA content in serum samples from 116 HBV-related HCC cases and 232 frequency-matched cancer-free HBV controls, and evaluate the retrospective association between mtDNA content and HCC risk using logistic regression and their temporal relationship using a mixed effects model. HCC cases had significantly lower circulating mtDNA content than controls (1.06 versus 2.47, P = 1.7 × 10(-5)). Compared to HBV patients with higher mtDNA content, those with lower mtDNA content had a significantly increased risk of HCC with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-3.72, P = 0.004). Quartile analyses revealed a significant dose-dependent effect (Ptrend = 0.001) for this association. In a pilot longitudinal sub-cohort of 14 matched cases-control pairs, we observed a trend of dramatically decreased mtDNA content in cases and slightly decreased mtDNA content in controls, with a significant interaction of case-control status with time (Pinteraction = 0.049). Our findings suggest that circulating mtDNA is a potential novel non-invasive biomarker of HCC risk in HBV patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , DNA, Mitochondrial/blood , Hepatitis B, Chronic/genetics , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Drinking , Female , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis B, Chronic/pathology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking
9.
Gastroenterology ; 150(5): 1135-1146, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26836586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated differences in treatment of black vs white patients with colon cancer and assessed their effects on survival, based on cancer stage. METHODS: We collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and identified 6190 black and 61,951 white patients with colon cancer diagnosed from 1998 through 2009 and followed up through 2011. Three sets of 6190 white patients were matched sequentially, using a minimum distance strategy, to the same set of 6190 black patients based on demographic (age; sex; diagnosis year; and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry), tumor presentation (demographic plus comorbidities, tumor stage, grade, and size), and treatment (presentation plus therapies) variables. We conducted sensitivity analyses to explore the effects of socioeconomic status in a subcohort that included 2000 randomly selected black patients. Racial differences in treatment were assessed using a logistic regression model; their effects on racial survival disparity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: After patients were matched for demographic variables, the absolute 5-year difference in survival between black and white patients was 8.3% (white, 59.2% 5-y survival; blacks, 50.9% 5-y survival) (P < .0001); this value decreased significantly, to 5.0% (P < .0001), after patients were matched for tumor presentation, and decreased to 4.9% (P < .0001) when patients were matched for treatment. Differences in treatment therefore accounted for 0.1% of the 8.3% difference in survival between black and white patients. After patients were matched for tumor presentation, racial disparities were observed in almost all types of treatment; the disparities were most prominent for patients with advanced-stage cancer (stages III or IV, up to an 11.1% difference) vs early stage cancer (stages I or II, up to a 4.3% difference). After patients were matched for treatment, there was a greater reduction in disparity for black vs white patients with advanced-stage compared with early-stage cancer. In sensitivity analyses, the 5-year racial survival disparity was 7.7% after demographic match, which was less than the 8.3% observed in the complete cohort. This reduction likely was owing to the differences between the subcohort and the complete cohort in those variables that were not included in the demographic match. This value was reduced to 6.5% (P = .0001) after socioeconomic status was included in the demographic match. The difference decreased significantly to 2.8% (P = .090) after tumor presentation match, but was not reduced further after treatment match. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant disparities in treatment and survival of black vs white patients with colon cancer. The disparity in survival appears to have been affected more strongly by tumor presentation at diagnosis than treatment. The effects of treatment differences on disparities in survival were greater for patients with advanced-stage vs early-stage cancer.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Colonic Neoplasms/ethnology , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , White People , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , SEER Program , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , United States/epidemiology
10.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 9(2): 172-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26712941

ABSTRACT

Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are needed to decrease mortality from this cancer. However, as new biomarkers have been slow to be brought to clinical practice, we have developed a diagnostic algorithm that utilizes commonly used clinical measurements in those at risk of developing HCC. Briefly, as α-fetoprotein (AFP) is routinely used, an algorithm that incorporated AFP values along with four other clinical factors was developed. Discovery analysis was performed on electronic data from patients who had liver disease (cirrhosis) alone or HCC in the background of cirrhosis. The discovery set consisted of 360 patients from two independent locations. A logistic regression algorithm was developed that incorporated log-transformed AFP values with age, gender, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase levels. We define this as the Doylestown algorithm. In the discovery set, the Doylestown algorithm improved the overall performance of AFP by 10%. In subsequent external validation in over 2,700 patients from three independent sites, the Doylestown algorithm improved detection of HCC as compared with AFP alone by 4% to 20%. In addition, at a fixed specificity of 95%, the Doylestown algorithm improved the detection of HCC as compared with AFP alone by 2% to 20%. In conclusion, the Doylestown algorithm consolidates clinical laboratory values, with age and gender, which are each individually associated with HCC risk, into a single value that can be used for HCC risk assessment. As such, it should be applicable and useful to the medical community that manages those at risk for developing HCC.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/blood , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Liver Cirrhosis/blood , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Logistic Models , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , ROC Curve , alpha-Fetoproteins/analysis
11.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 153(2): 407-16, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264468

ABSTRACT

Current clinical guidelines state that the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may be considered to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia in the non-curative setting to alleviate anemia-related symptoms. However, no convincing survival benefit has been demonstrated to support the use of ESAs in these patients. Using the comprehensive data collected in the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) and Medicare-linked database, we analyzed the effect of ESA use on the short-term (18-month) and long-term (60-month) survival rates of chemotherapy-treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Confounding variables were adjusted using a propensity score approach. We also analyzed the effects of ESA on the survival of patients receiving trastuzumab, a commonly prescribed targeted therapy agent in treating HER2-positive tumors. Metastatic breast cancer patients who received ESA treatment exhibited similar 60-month survival rate to those without ESA treatment (22.8 vs. 24.9%, p = 0.8). ESA-treated patients had a trend toward better 18-month survival [crude hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.68-1.09, p = 0.21]. This protective effect during the first 18 months of chemotherapy became marginally significant after adjusting for the propensity of receiving ESAs (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.01, p = 0.070). An interaction effect between ESA and trastuzumab on patient survival was noticeable but not statistically significant. ESAs did not negatively affect the long-term survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. Moreover, ESAs improved patients' survival during the first 18 months of chemotherapy treatment. These findings endorse the current clinical guideline. Given the short survival of these patients, the potential short-term beneficial effects of ESAs are clinically meaningful.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/mortality , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Comorbidity , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Metastasis , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , SEER Program , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
12.
Hum Pathol ; 46(7): 1068-77, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26284269

ABSTRACT

ARID2 (ARID2), CTNNB1 (ß catenin), tumor protein 53 (p53), and PIK3CA (p110α) mutations are implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); and previous work has contributed to thorough molecular characterization of these events. However, studies that assess the impact of these mutations on downstream protein expression, especially those that evaluate all 4 cancer markers simultaneously, are relatively lacking. Hence, the present study uses immunohistochemistry to assess protein expression patterns of ARID2, ß-catenin, p53, and p110α in HCCs and adjacent nonneoplastic cirrhotic tissues from 58 explanted livers. Notably, this study is the first to our knowledge to investigate ARID2 protein expression in the liver. The frequency of ARID2 mutations detected using our immunohistochemistry method was similar to that reported in previous molecular studies. Furthermore, we found that loss of ARID2 protein expression may be associated with recurrence, although further studies must be done to validate these findings in a larger population. We found that expression patterns of the 4 cancer markers were independent of each other, suggesting separate pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. We also did not observe an association between viral etiology and protein expression. Consistent with previous studies, overexpression of p53 correlated with poor differentiation. Lastly, 17.5% of HCCs paradoxically had diffuse loss of the oncoprotein p110α compared with strong expression in background cirrhotic liver. The exact mechanism is unclear, but enigmatic loss of oncoprotein function has been described in other carcinomas and could potentially have significant implications for the use of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) drug therapies.

13.
Hum Pathol ; 46(4): 583-92, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701229

ABSTRACT

AT-rich interactive domain 2 (ARID2), catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88kDa (ß-catenin), tumor protein 53 (p53), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (p110α) mutations are implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); and previous work has contributed to thorough molecular characterization of these events. However, studies that assess the impact of these mutations on downstream protein expression, especially those that evaluate all 4 cancer markers simultaneously, are relatively lacking. Hence, the present study uses immunohistochemistry to assess protein expression patterns of ARID2, ß-catenin, p53, and p110α in HCCs and adjacent nonneoplastic cirrhotic tissues from 58 explanted livers. Notably, this study is the first to our knowledge to investigate ARID2 protein expression in the liver. The frequency of ARID2 mutations detected using our immunohistochemistry method was similar to that reported in previous molecular studies. Furthermore, we found that loss of ARID2 protein expression may be associated with recurrence, although further studies must be done to validate these findings in a larger population. We found that expression patterns of the 4 cancer markers were independent of each other, suggesting separate pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. We also did not observe an association between viral etiology and protein expression. Consistent with previous studies, overexpression of p53 correlated with poor differentiation. Lastly, 17.5% of HCCs paradoxically had diffuse loss of the oncoprotein p110α compared with strong expression in background cirrhotic liver. The exact mechanism is unclear, but enigmatic loss of oncoprotein function has been described in other carcinomas and could potentially have significant implications for the use of targeted mechanistic target of rapamycin (serine/threonine kinase) drug therapies.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Class Ia Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/metabolism , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , beta Catenin/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Liver/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 26(1): 45-56, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25359303

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A survival disparity of black versus white breast cancer patients has been extensively documented but not adequately explained. Blacks and whites also have significant differences in hematologic traits including hemoglobin (HGB). However, a link between survival disparity and hematologic differences has not been reported. We aimed to explore the effect of pre-treatment hematologic variables on this survival disparity. METHODS: We sequentially matched 443 black patients, using a minimum distance approach, to four different sets of 443 whites on demographics (age, year of diagnosis, smoking, and drinking status), tumor presentation (all demographic variables plus tumor stage, grade, and hormone receptor status), treatment (all presentation variables plus surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy), and presentation plus pre-treatment hematologic variables. Racial survival for each matched dataset was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We found that white patients matched on demographic characteristics had more favorable survival than blacks [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.77, p log-rank = 0.0002]. Presentation match diminished this disparity [HR 0.72 (0.54-0.95), p log-rank = 0.0199], which was not further reduced in treatment match [HR 0.73 (0.55-0.96), p log-rank = 0.0249]. However, the survival disparity was largely reduced when pre-treatment level of HGB or red blood cell distribution width was further matched in addition to presentation match [HR 0.83 (0.64-1.09), p log-rank = 0.1819 and HR 0.83 (0.64-1.09), p log-rank = 0.1760, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: We found that in our patient population, differences in tumor presentation and certain pre-treatment hematologic traits, but not treatment, were associated with the survival disparity between black and white breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Health Status Disparities , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
15.
Int J Cancer ; 136(2): 382-91, 2015 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24866905

ABSTRACT

Cancer patients undergo routine clinical monitoring with an array of blood tests that may carry long-term prognostic information. We aimed to develop a new prognostic model predicting survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on laboratory tests commonly performed in clinical practice. A cohort of 1,161 stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients was divided into training (n = 773) and testing (n = 388) cohorts. We analyzed the associations of 32 commonly tested laboratory variables with patient survival in the training cohort. We developed a model based on those significant laboratory variables, together with important clinical variables. The model was then evaluated in the testing cohort. Five variables, including albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen and international normalized ratio, were significantly associated with patient survival after stepwise selection. A model incorporating these variables classified patients into low-, medium- and high-risk groups with median survival of 16.9, 7.2 and 2.1 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Compared with low-risk group, patients in the medium- and high-risk groups had a significantly higher risk of death at 1 year, with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.95 (95% CI 1.62-2.36) and 5.22 (4.30-6.34), respectively. These results were validated in the testing cohort. Overall, we developed a prognostic model relying entirely on readily available variables, with similar predictive power to those which depend on more specialized and expensive molecular assays. Further study is necessary to validate and further refine this model, and compare its performance to models based on more specialized and expensive testing.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma, Large Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Models, Statistical , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Large Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Large Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Cohort Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival Rate
16.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 30(1): 131-138, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24995497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: APRI (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] to platelet ratio index) is widely used to assess fibrosis and cirrhosis risk, especially in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Few studies have evaluated APRI and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. Prospective evidence is needed to assess whether APRI predicts HCC risk in HBV patients. METHOD: In a prospectively enrolled clinical cohort of 855 HBV patients with a 1-year exclusion window (followed for > 1 year and did not develop HCC within 1 year), the predictive value of APRI in HCC risk was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model using univariate and multivariate analyses and longitudinal analysis. RESULTS: Higher APRI prospectively conferred a significantly increased risk of HCC in univariate analysis (quartile analysis, P trend = 2.9 × 10(-7) ). This effect remained highly significant after adjusting for common host characteristics but not cirrhosis (P trend = 7.1 × 10(-5) ), and attenuated when cirrhosis is adjusted (P trend = 0.021). The effect remained prominent when the analysis was restricted to patients with a more stringent 2-year exclusion window (P trend = 0.008 in quartile analysis adjusting all characteristics including cirrhosis), indicating that the association was unlikely due to including undetected HCC patients in the cohort, thus minimizing the reverse-causation limitation in most retrospective studies. Longitudinal comparison demonstrated a persistently higher APRI value in HBV patients who developed HCC during follow-up than those remaining cancer free. CONCLUSION: APRI might be a marker of HCC risk in HBV patients in cirrhosis-dependent and -independent manners. Further studies are warranted to validate this finding and test its clinical applicability in HCC prevention.


Subject(s)
Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/blood , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Platelet Count , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/prevention & control , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk , Young Adult
17.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 148(1): 175-85, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25261294

ABSTRACT

The use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to treat anemia in breast cancer patients who are treated with chemotherapy is a matter of ongoing debate. Several recent randomized trials challenged conventional wisdom, which holds that ESAs are contraindicated for breast cancer patients undergoing curative treatment. We aimed to perform the first large national population-based study to analyze the association between ESA use and breast cancer patient outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy-treated invasive breast cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Non-ESA users were sequentially 1:1 matched to 2,000 randomly sampled ESA users on demographics (age, diagnosis year, race, marital status, and socioeconomic status), tumor presentation (stage, grade, and status of hormone receptors), and treatments (surgery, radiation, and sub-types of chemotherapy) using a minimum distant strategy. Breast cancer-specific survival of ESA and matched non-ESA users was compared using Fine and Gray competing risk model. Compared to ESA users, non-ESA users exhibited dramatically different baseline characteristics such as less advanced tumor, and fewer co-morbidities. Non-ESA users had a significantly more favorable breast cancer-specific survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 0.75, p < 0.0001). This survival disparity was progressively diminished in the sequential matching of demographics (sHR = 0.74, p = 0.0004), presentation (sHR = 0.86, p = 0.06), and treatment (sHR = 0.89, p = 0.17) variables. Stratified analyses identified subgroups of patients whose breast cancer-specific survival were not different between ESA and non-ESA users. In the SEER-Medicare database, ESA usage does not seem to be associated with unfavorable breast cancer-specific survival in breast cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The ESA-breast cancer prognosis association is complex and requires more intensive investigations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Aged , Anemia/chemically induced , Anemia/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , SEER Program , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 340, 2013 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23841898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anemia refers to low hemoglobin (Hb) level and is a risk factor of cancer patient survival. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recently suggested that post-diagnosis Hb change, regardless of baseline Hb level, indicates the potential presence of anemia. However, there is no epidemiological study evaluating whether Hb change has direct prognostic values for cancer patients at the population level. METHODS: We identified 6675 patients with a diagnosis of primary lung, breast, colorectal, or liver cancer who visited the Kimmel Cancer Center at the Thomas Jefferson University from 1998 to 2011. All patients had at least two Hb measurements within the first six months after diagnosis. We analyzed the main, dose-dependent, and time-dependent effects of Hb changes on patient survival. RESULTS: Compared to patients with a low Hb change (|∆Hb|≤2.6), those having a |∆Hb|>2.6 exhibited a significantly shorter survival (hazard ratio=1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.50, P=4.5 × 10(-22), Plog rank=1.6 × 10(-39)). This association remained significant across the four cancer types. Bootstrap resampling validated these findings 100% of the time with P<0.01 in all patients and in patients of individual cancers. The association exhibited an apparent U-shape dose-dependent pattern. Time-dependent modeling demonstrated that the effect of Hb change on the survival of the overall patient population persisted for approximately 4.5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Post-diagnosis Hb change associates with the survival of multiple cancers and may have clinical values in tailoring anti-anemia treatments. Because Hb level is frequently measured during cancer treatment, Hb changes may be a potentially important variable in building cancer prognosis models.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Hemoglobins/analysis , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Anemia/complications , Anemia/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models
19.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 28(9): 1469-75, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23611210

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hyperphosphatemia has been implicated in the development and treatment of various cancers. However, whether it can be used as a direct prognostic marker of colorectal cancer (CRC) has remained unexplored. Given new insights into the importance of hyperphosphatemia in CRC, we sought to evaluate the association of hyperphosphatemia with the clinical outcomes of this disease. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a well-characterized clinic-based cohort with 1241 CRC patients, we assessed the association of postoperative hyperphosphatemia with patient overall survival. RESULTS: Postoperative hyperphosphatemia measured within the first month after surgery was significantly associated with CRC survival. Compared to patients with a normal phosphate level, those with hyperphosphatemia exhibited a significant unfavorable overall survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.29, P = 2.6 × 10(-8) (log-rank P = 1.2 × 10(-7) ). Stratified analyses indicated the association was more pronounced in patients with colon (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.57-2.56, P = 3.17 × 10(-8) ) but not rectal cancer (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.58-1.59, P = 0.889) (P interaction = 0.023), as well as in those not receiving chemotherapy (HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.59-2.90, P = 6.2 × 10(-7) ) but not in those receiving chemotherapy (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.92-1.82, P = 0.136) (P interaction = 0.012). Flexible parametric survival model demonstrated that the increased risk for death conferred by postoperative hyperphosphatemia persisted over 150 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data indicated that postoperative hyperphosphatemia might be used as a prognostic marker of CRC patients after surgery. Since phosphate level is routinely tested in clinics, it may be incorporated into clinical models to predict CRC survival.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Hyperphosphatemia/etiology , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/blood , Hyperphosphatemia/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Philadelphia/epidemiology , Phosphates/blood , Postoperative Period , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 44(3): 293-304, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23549858

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Platelets have been implicated in cancer metastasis and prognosis. No population-based study has been reported as to whether preoperative platelet count directly predicts metastatic recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. DESIGN: Using a well-characterized cohort of 1,513 surgically resected CRC patients, we assessed the predictive roles of preoperative platelet count in overall survival, overall recurrence, as well as locoregional and distant metastatic recurrences. RESULTS: Patients with clinically high platelet count (≥400 × 10(9)/L) measured within 1 month before surgery had a significantly unfavorable survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.05, P = 2.6 × 10(-6), P(log rank) = 1.1 × 10(-11)) and recurrence (HR = 1.90, 1.24-2.93, P = 0.003, P(log rank) = 0.003). The association of platelet count with recurrence was evident only in patients with metastatic (HR = 2.81, 1.67-4.74, P = 1.1 × 10(-4), P(log rank) = 2.6 × 10(-6)) but not locoregional recurrence (HR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.21-1.68, P = 0.325, P(log rank) = 0.152). The findings were internally validated through bootstrap resampling (P < 0.01 at 98.6 % of resampling). Consistently, platelet count was significantly higher in deceased than living patients (P < 0.0001) and in patients with metastatic recurrence than locoregional (P = 0.004) or nonrecurrent patients (P < 0.0001). Time-dependent modeling indicated that the increased risks for death and metastasis associated with elevated preoperative platelet counts persisted up to 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that clinically high level of preoperative platelets was an independent predictor of CRC survival and metastasis. As an important component of the routinely tested complete blood count panel, platelet count may be a cost-effective and noninvasive marker for CRC prognosis and a potential intervention target to prevent metastatic recurrence.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/blood , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Platelet Count , Preoperative Care , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...