Silicone augmentation rhinoplasty in an Oriental population.

Aesthetic augmentation rhinoplasty is gaining in popularity among Oriental populations. Despite being widely criticized in the literature, silicone implants remain the most commonly used as a result of their ease of application and lack of donor site morbidity. The authors present 355 consecutive Chinese patients who underwent silicone augmentation rhinoplasty from January 1999 to April 2003. During a mean follow-up period of 160 days, 28 patients (7.9%) developed major complications that required either removal or revision of the implant. The patients who had received the largest volume implants had the highest extrusion and infection rates, indicating that overaugmentation is the main cause. The authors hypothesize that the lower complication rates in Oriental compared with white populations is primarily the result of structural differences in the soft tissue envelope of the nose. In our series of patients, nasal augmentation with silicone implants proved to be effective and safe.

Penoscrotal extramammary Paget's disease: a review of 33 cases in a 20-year experience.

Extramammary Paget's disease in men most frequently involves the penoscrotal area. The uncertainty of the outcome and of the relationship to the underlying adnexal carcinoma and associated internal malignancy still exists. From 1982 to 2001, 33 patients with penoscrotal extramammary Paget's disease were treated and followed up. Therapeutic modalities included carbon dioxide laser ablation (two patients) and local wide excision (31 patients). Split-thickness skin graft (22 patients), local scrotal flap (six patients), and primary closure (three patients) were utilized to reconstruct the penoscrotal defects after local wide excision. An underlying adnexal carcinoma occurred in seven of 33 patients (21.2 percent). The incidence of associated internal malignancy was 9.1 percent (three of 33 patients), including one concurrently and two nonconcurrently associated malignancies. Eight of 33 patients had local recurrence, representing an incidence of 24.2 percent. Three patients (9.1 percent) had distant metastasis and ultimately died of metastatic carcinoma. Of these patients, 31 were grouped according to the degrees of involvement: limited to the epidermis (group 1, n = 14), involvement of the adnexal gland and/or hair follicle (group 2, n = 10), and the presence of an underlying adnexal carcinoma (group 3, n = 7). Local wide excision with subsequent reconstruction by split-thickness skin graft was favored in this series. Patients with an underlying adnexal carcinoma or pathological invasion of the dermis (group 2 or 3) had a worse prognosis than patients without. From this study, it is difficult to address the particular relationship between the outcome and the associated internal malignancy.

Breast augmentation with bilateral deepithelialized TRAM flaps: an alternative approach to breast augmentation with autologous tissue.

Since the 1980s, many patients have benefited from the use of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap for postmastectomy reconstruction. In addition to cancer reconstruction, this technique has recently been used to treat patients with breast implant intolerance and for reconstruction after siliconoma resection. However, physicians and patients alike believe that such an extensive procedure should not be used for aesthetic purposes, and to the authors' knowledge, no study has been reported on the use of pedicled TRAM flaps for aesthetic augmentation mammaplasty. In the past several years, a number of the authors' patients have requested simultaneous breast augmentation and abdominoplasty. These patients objected to the use of prosthetic implants because of potential complications such as implant failure, capsular contracture, wrinkling, and palpability. Therefore, from 1995 to 2000, the authors performed 14 cases of bilateral breast augmentation with deepithelialized, pedicled TRAM flaps. In this series, the donor-site complication rate was similar to that of the traditional TRAM flap. Surprisingly, no cases of complete or partial flap loss were clinically detected. The only complaints were pedicle bulges at the costal margins. These patients were all extremely satisfied with the results. It was concluded that the TRAM flap is safe for augmentation in a subset of carefully selected women with hypoplastic or atrophic breasts. The authors discuss patient selection, technique, and their experience with this method of breast augmentation.

Anterolateral thigh flap for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Most postmastectomy defects are reconstructed by use of lower abdominal-wall tissue either as a pedicled or free flap. However, there are some contraindications for using lower abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction, such as inadequate soft-tissue volume, previous abdominoplasty, lower paramedian or multiple abdominal scars, and plans for future pregnancy. In such situations, a gluteal flap has often been the second choice. However, the quality of the adipose tissue of gluteal flaps is inferior to that of lower abdominal flaps, the pedicle is short, and a two-team approach is not possible because creation of the gluteal flap requires that the patient's position be changed during the operation. In 2000, five cases of breast reconstructions were performed with anterolateral thigh flaps in the authors' institution. Two of them were secondary and three were immediate unilateral breast reconstructions. The mean weight of the specimen removed was 350 g in the three patients who underwent immediate reconstruction, and the mean weight of the entire anterolateral thigh flap was 410 g. Skin islands ranged in size from 4 x 8 cm to 7 x 22 cm, with the underlying fat pad ranging in size from 10 x 12 cm to 14 x 22 cm. The mean pedicle length was 11 cm (range, 7 to 15 cm). All flaps were completely successful, except for one that involved some fat necrosis. The quality of the skin and underlying fat and the pliability of the anterolateral thigh flap are much superior to those of gluteal flaps and are similar to those of lower abdominal flaps. In thin patients, more subcutaneous fat can be harvested by extending the flap under the skin. Use of a thigh flap allows a two-team approach with the patient in a supine position, and no change of patient position is required during the operation. However, the position of the scar may not be acceptable to some patients. Therefore, when an abdominal flap is unavailable or contraindicated, the creation of an anterolateral thigh flap for primary and secondary breast reconstruction is an alternative to the use of lower abdominal and gluteal tissues.