A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of ultrasound to diagnose borderline ovarian tumours.

Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The ability to distinguish between BOTs and other ovarian cancer types prior to surgery could have a profound impact on patient childbearing counselling and surgical planning. Ultrasound (US) pattern recognition by an expert examiner can be an excellent tool for the discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian masses. With respect to US features, most studies were based on well-known risk models. Nevertheless, very few studies have solely evaluated the utility of ultrasound in diagnosing BOTs. We aimed to evaluate the use of US in identifying BOTs solely from benign and malignant ovarian tumours in isolation from risk models. We performed a systematic literature review to identify publications that evaluated the use of US to differentiate between BOTs and malignant and/or benign ovarian tumours using Pubmed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. We performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity studies. We computed the summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of US in diagnosing BOTs using the bivariate approach of Reitsma in the mada package in R. The initial search resulted in 24,737 publications. Hundred and seven publications were screened, and five studies contained diagnostic data. Different US criteria applied to identify BOTs. Four out of five studies including 244 women with BOTs and 965 women with benign or malignant tumours were suitable for the meta-analysis. Pooling of the results from four studies showed an overall sensitivity of 0.660 (95 % CI: 0.597 - 0.718) and specificity of 0.854 (95 % CI: 0.728 - 0.927). The overall US accuracy was uniform in sensitivity and variable in specificity. A low false positive rate, 0.146 (95 % CI: 0.073 - 0.272) was observed. US correctly identified BOTs in more than six out of 10 women for potential ovarian sparing surgery, whereas it correctly identified the absence of BOTs in more than eight out of 10 symptomatic women. More carefully designed studies are needed to evaluate the use of pre-operative US for the diagnosis of BOTs.

Efficacy of 5% imiquimod for the treatment of Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia-A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis.

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) is an uncommon disease associated with HPV and is considered to be a precursor of vaginal carcinoma. To date, treatment recommendations vary with no universally accepted standard of care as best treatment modality. Nevertheless, 5% imiquimod appears to be a promising, alternative, non-invasive treatment option. To ascertain the efficacy of 5% imiquimod for the treatment of this rare condition, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of women who received 5% imiquimod with their complete response, HPV clearance and recurrence rates. A literature search was carried out throughout the PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Databases for relevant studies. We computed the summary proportions for complete response, HPV clearance and non-recurrence following administration of 5% imiquimod by random effects meta-analysis. Six articles reporting on 94 patients were included. The summary proportions of women with complete response and HPV clearance were 76.5% (95% CI 59.4-98.5) and 52.5% (95% CI 29.5-93.6) respectively. The summary proportion of women with non-recurrence appeared high (94.3% (95% CI 67.1-132)), yet not significant. Use of 5% imiquimod for the treatment of VaIN is associated with relatively high response rate, satisfactory HPV clearance, whilst the risk for VaIN recurrence appears low.

Optimal MRI interval for detection of asymptomatic recurrence in surgically treated early cervical cancer by use of a mathematical model.

INTRODUCTION: Applications of mathematical modeling may provide an insight into the timing of surveillance modalities. We aimed to determine the optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interval for the detection of surgically treated early cervical cancer asymptomatic recurrence by using a mathematical model for volumetric tumor growth time. METHODS: We assumed that tumor volume increases by a factor equal to the basis of natural logarithms (e~2.718) at constant time intervals. Using a mathematical formula, the tumor volume (V) was converted to diameter (D), which could be expressed as a function of time (t), given an initial diameter Di (corresponding to initial volume Vi) and a constant DT, where DT is the time required for volumetric tumor growth by a factor (e). Three different DTs were used for demonstration of the model, i.e. 20, 100 and 400 days. RESULTS: Assuming complete surgical clearance, a worst-case scenario for a 20-day DT indicated that a 20 µm cervical tumor would need at least 12 months to reach 10 mm in diameter, which would be detected with an annual surveillance interval MRI. Over a 5-year (60 months) follow-up, nearly five surveillance MRIs would be required if the threshold of 10 mm was desired. For a 100-day DT over a 5-year (60 months) follow-up, a single only MRI would be required, if the threshold of 10 mm was desired. In the case of an indolent tumor (DT is 400 days), the model would not recommend a surveillance MRI to detect asymptomatic recurrence. A positive linear association between optimal MRI intervals and volumetric tumor DTs was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: In the absence of evidence, we postulate annual MRI scanning is probably the shortest interval, which can be clinically useful for optimization of routine surveillance follow-up protocols in surgically treated early cervical cancer. This mathematical model requires proper verification in prospective clinical studies. Hippokratia 2016, 20(1): 4-8.

Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic fibroids; a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are the most common reproductive tract tumours in females. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a fertility-sparing procedure for treatment of symptomatic fibroids. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of UAE in the treatment of 118 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids in a single Academic Centre in the West of Ireland to determine whether fibroid and uterine size affect clinical outcomes and complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 118 patients who underwent UAE for treatment of symptomatic fibroids between November 2006 and August 2011. Diagnosis of fibroids in symptomatic patients was established by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or transabdominal ultrasonography (US). Three different embolic agents were used. All patients had at least one follow-up using MRI, at three and/or 12 months. A non-validated questionnaire was used to report patient satisfaction with regards to symptoms improvement on a yes-or-no basis. RESULTS: Mean fibroid volume, uterine size and dominant fibroid size were significantly reduced at three months and one year follow-up (p = 0.00) and that was tallied with symptoms improvement (p < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction at three months was 84% falling to 75.9% by 12 months (all p < 0.05). Few complications were reported (2.5%). No significant difference was observed in safety or efficacy for different embolic agents. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the safety and efficacy of UAE in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids. Hippokratia 2014; 18 (3): 258-261.

Potential predictors of chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer--how do we define chemosensitivity?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether microvessel density (measured by CD31), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or multidrug resistance (MDR1) could determine the response to chemotherapy or act as prognostic factors in ovarian cancer. METHODS: Seventy-nine ovarian specimens were immunostained. Pearson correlation, 1-way ANOVA and chi-square were used for univariate analysis. Kaplan Meier survival curves were used, log-rank was used for univariate analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate evaluation. Response to chemotherapy was assessed after 6 months and again after 1 year. RESULT: Quantifying VEGF proved to be a valuable independent prognostic indicator in progression-free survival (PFS) (p<0.05) and overall survival (OS) (p<0.0001). VEGF correlated with response to chemotherapy at the 6-month interval (r=0.446, p<0.001) but failed to correlate at the 1-year interval. Increased staining with CD31 was associated with decreased PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p<0.01) in univariate but not multivariate analysis. MDR1 failed to act as a prognostic marker or as a predictor of response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: VEGF correlates with response to chemotherapy at the 6-month but not the 12-month interval. What should our criteria be for determining sensitivity to chemotherapy? CD31, VEGF and MDR1 do play a role in some ovarian malignancies but other factors are likely to be involved and perhaps molecular profiling will determine which factors will be important for determining the response to chemotherapy.