Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin J Pain ; 38(9): 551-561, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35777964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been linked to the development and impact of chronic pain in adulthood. The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ACEs in a treatment-seeking sample of adults with chronic pain and the relationship between number and type(s) of ACEs and pain-related outcomes. METHODS: Adults (N=1794) presenting for treatment at a multidisciplinary pain management center completed self-report measures of childhood adversity, pain, functioning, emotional distress, and adjustment to pain. RESULTS: Participants endorsing ≥4 ACEs had significantly worse pain-related outcomes and lower quality of life compared with individuals reporting fewer ACEs. Having ≥3 ACEs was associated with higher anxiety and depression levels. Experiences of childhood neglect negatively affected mental health-related outcomes independent of the number of ACEs. Significant sex differences were found in the number and type of ACEs reported but not in the relationship between ACEs and outcome variables. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that the number and the type of self-reported ACE(s) are associated with pain-related variables and psychosocial functioning in adults with chronic pain. The results highlight the importance of assessment of ACEs and trauma-informed care with patients with chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Chronic Pain , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Quality of Life
2.
J Affect Disord ; 307: 286-293, 2022 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35351491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that depression and chronic pain commonly co-exist and impact each other. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) have been shown to lead to statistically and clinically significant improvements for patients who report both depressed mood and chronic pain, however there is a gap in the literature regarding the mechanisms by which these improvements occur. METHODS: This two-site, distinct sample study (Study 1: N = 303, 10-week, individual format, ACT-based program; Study 2: N = 406, 3-week, group format, CBT-based program) evaluated mediators of treatment improvement in depressive symptoms among adult IPRP participants who reported elevated depressive symptoms at program admission and examined treatment mechanisms for depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Self-reported pain self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing - particularly the helplessness domain - mediated the treatment-related change in depression among IPRP participants with elevated depressive symptoms across the two sites and samples. In one sample, full mediation was achieved while in the other sample, partial mediation was achieved. Participants in both samples showed improvement on all measures. LIMITATIONS: This study relied on self-report measures of depressive severity and not clinical diagnosis. Results may not generalize to other populations of patients with chronic pain. There was no control condition in either study. CONCLUSION: Increasing pain self-efficacy and decreasing a sense of helplessness are important treatment targets among IPRP participants who endorse symptoms of depression.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Adult , Catastrophization , Chronic Pain/complications , Depression , Humans , Pain Management/methods , Self Efficacy
3.
Pain Med ; 23(2): 362-374, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343314

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain and depression frequently co-occur and exacerbate one another; therefore, it is important to treat both conditions to improve patient outcomes. The current study evaluates an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) with respect to the following questions: 1) How do clinically elevated depressive symptoms impact pain-related treatment outcomes? and 2) To what extent does IPRP participation yield reliable and clinically significant change in depressed mood? METHODS: Participants in this study included 425 adults who engaged in a 10-week IPRP and completed self-report measures of pain, mood, and functioning at intake and discharge. Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on self-reported depressive symptoms (PROMIS Depression): within normal limits (WNL; n = 121), Mild (n = 115), Moderate (n = 153), and Severe (n = 36). RESULTS: Participants reported significant improvement in pain, pain-related life interference, health-related quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and depressed mood regardless of initial symptom level. In addition, 43.4% of patients with Mild, Moderate, or Severe depressed mood reported reliable and clinically significant improvement in depressive symptoms and 30.3% were in remission at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the assertion that IPRPs represent an effective treatment for patients with comorbid chronic pain and depression and that participation is associated with improvement in both conditions.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Depression , Adult , Catastrophization , Chronic Pain/rehabilitation , Humans , Pain Management/methods , Quality of Life
4.
Clin J Pain ; 37(5): 321-329, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830091

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are commonly reported by individuals with chronic pain. However, little is known about how ACE exposure influences treatment outcomes. The goal of the current study was to evaluate group and treatment-related differences among adults with varying levels of ACE exposure participating in a pain rehabilitation treatment program. METHODS: Adult participants (N=269) were categorized as 0 ACEs (n=65), 1 to 2 ACEs (n=87), or ≥3 ACEs (n=117). Participants completed self-report measures of pain, physical functioning, and psychosocial functioning at intake and discharge from a 10-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. RESULTS: ACE exposure was frequently endorsed in this sample, with the majority of participants (78.5%) reporting at least 1 form of childhood adversity. Adults in the ≥3 ACEs group reported a greater level of impairment in mental health symptoms and adjustment to chronic pain; however, all groups endorsed treatment improvements and there were no differences in response to treatment. There were also no differences between groups on measures of pain or physical functioning at intake or discharge. DISCUSSION: ACE exposure appears common among treatment-seeking adults with chronic pain and is associated with increased clinical complexity. However, adults with and without exposure to ACEs endorsed significant improvements in pain and functioning following participation in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. This model of treatment may be especially well situated to address the biopsychosocial contributions to pain among those with a history of adversity.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Chronic Pain , Mental Disorders , Adult , Humans , Mental Health , Treatment Outcome
5.
Pain Med ; 21(11): 2789-2798, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529199

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the prevalence of abusive partner relationships among individuals presenting for chronic pain treatment. In addition, this study examined the association between partner abuse histories and pain-relevant outcome variables. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: This study took place at a specialty pain rehabilitation treatment center in the Midwestern United States. SUBJECTS: Participants in this study (N = 108) included adults (Mage = 45.73 [15.95] years) presenting for chronic pain treatment who consented to participate in a research study on stress, relationships, and chronic pain. METHODS: Participants completed self-report measures about relationship and abuse histories, physical and mental health, and demographic information. Participants were categorized into the following groups: no intimate partner violence (IPV), past IPV (>12 months ago), or current/recent IPV (≤12 months ago). RESULTS: Results indicated that over half (56%) of the sample endorsed a history of partner abuse and around one-third (29%) of the sample had experienced abuse within the past year. Psychological/emotional abuse was the most common form of abuse reported. Those with current/recent abuse histories reported greater impairment in pain interference, post-traumatic stress symptoms, mental health functioning, and pain self-efficacy compared with those who had not experienced abuse in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: Partner abuse appears common among individuals with chronic pain and is associated with pain-relevant outcomes, warranting additional clinical attention and research in this area.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Intimate Partner Violence , Spouse Abuse , Adult , Child , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prevalence
6.
Pain Pract ; 20(1): 44-54, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs are an evidence-based biopsychosocial treatment approach for chronic pain. The purpose of the current study is to assess outcomes for a 10-week interdisciplinary, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based, outpatient treatment model and to evaluate the relationship between psychological process variables (ie, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain self-efficacy) and treatment outcomes. METHODS: 137 adults with chronic pain completed an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. Measures of pain, pain interference, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depressed mood, insomnia, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and pain self-efficacy were completed at admission and discharge. Data were also collected on demographic and clinical variables, including opioid use. RESULTS: Results indicated significant changes in all measures at program discharge compared to admission. Opioid doses were also reduced. Results of within-subjects meditational analyses indicated that pain catastrophizing accounted for a significant portion of the treatment effect for pain severity, pain interference, and depressed mood. Pain acceptance was a mediator for change in depressed mood, whereas pain self-efficacy was a mediator for pain interference outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a 10-week, ACT-based treatment model for interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. In addition, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and pain self-efficacy were each found to be mechanisms by which individuals achieve successful treatment outcomes. This research provides further support for interdisciplinary rehabilitation approaches for chronic pain.


Subject(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Management/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catastrophization/psychology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...