Experience with intracavernous injection in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: dose considerations.

We sought to identify factors influencing dose maintenance of intracavernous (IC) injection among patients with ED following radical prostatectomy. A total of 93 patients underwent prostatectomy and received IC treatment for ED, including PGE1 single therapy (n=53) and triple therapy (n=40). In the PGE1-only group, the maintenance dosage was significantly correlated with preoperative sexual function and nerve sparing (NS) (P<0.05). For example, the maintenance dose among patients with no, unilateral and bilateral NS was 10.8 ± 6.6 µg (0.54 ± 0.33 ml), 10.8 ± 3.8 µg (0.54 ± 0.19 ml) and 6.4 ± 4.6 µg (0.32 ± 0.23 ml), respectively. In terms of preoperative sexual function, the maintenance dose among non-ED versus ED patients was 0.38 ± 0.25 ml (7.6 ± 5.0 µg) and 0.59 ± 0.31 ml (11.8 ± 6.2 µg), respectively. No significant correlation was observed between the maintenance dose and NS or preoperative sexual function among the triple-therapy patients or between the maintenance dose and age, body mass index, systemic diseases and initiation of ED treatment among all patients (P>0.05). Thus, maintenance dose of PGE1 therapy could be partly determined by NS status and prior ED of patients.

Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function.

To assess the efficacy of vacuum constriction devices (VCD) following radical prostatectomy (RP) and determine whether early use of VCD facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. This prospective study consisted of 109 patients who underwent nerve-sparing (NS) or non-nerve-sparing (NNS) RP between August 1999 and October 2001 and developed erectile dysfunction following surgery. The patients were randomized to VCD use daily for 9 months (Group 1, N=74) or observation without any erectogenic treatment (Group 2, N=35). Treatment efficacy was analyzed by responses to the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM) (abridged 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5)), which were stratified by the NS status. Patient outcome regarding compliance, change in penile length, return of natural erection, and ability for vaginal intercourse were also assessed. The mean patient age was 58.2 years, and the minimum follow-up was 9 months. Use of VCD began at an average of 3.9 weeks after RP. In Group 1, 80% (60/74) successfully used their VCD with a constriction ring for vaginal intercourse at a frequency of twice/week with an overall spousal satisfaction rate of 55% (33/60). In all, 19 of these 60 patients (32%) reported return of natural erections at 9 months, with 10/60 (17%) having erections sufficient for vaginal intercourse. The abridged IIEF-5 score significantly increased after VCD use in both the NS and NNS groups. After a mean use of 3 months, 14/74 (18%) discontinued treatment. In Group 2, 37% (13/35) of patients regained spontaneous erections at a minimum follow-up of 9 months after surgery. However, only four of these patients (29%) had erections sufficient for successful vaginal intercourse and rest of patients (71%) sought adjuvant treatment. Of the 60 successful users, 14 (23%) reported a decrease in penile length and circumference at 9 months (range, 4-8 months) compared to 12/14 (85%) among the nonresponders. However, in control group 22/35 reported decrease in penile length and circumference. Early use of VCD following RP facilitates early sexual intercourse, early patient/spousal sexual satisfaction, and potentially an earlier return of natural erections sufficient for vaginal penetration.

Long-term efficacy and compliance of intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis.

Baseline and follow-up data from 102 patients using intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction (ED) following RP were retrospectively collected. We compared baseline International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires with the abridged IIEF-5 questionnaires, referred to as the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM) to determine drug efficacy. The mean presurgery SHIM score was 21.75+/-5.23, which decreased to 4.23+/-3.48 after surgery and increased to 19.46+/-8.78 post-treatment. Overall, 68% (69/102) of patients achieved and maintained erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and 48% (49/102) of patients continued long-term therapy with a mean use of 3.7+/-1.9 y. In all, 52% (53/102) patients discontinued IC therapy. However when excluding patients who switched to oral therapy, had loss of partner or return of normal erections; the compliance to IC injections was 70.6% (71/102). There was no difference in the SHIM analysis between the nerve sparing (NS) and the non-NS or between the types of medications used. IC injections can provide excellent long-term efficacy and compliance in up to 70% of the patients. This study suggests that IC injections are an excellent salvage option in NS patients who fail oral therapy and a first option in patients with non-NS procedures.

Penile prosthesis infections.

In this retrospective review we looked at infection rates and risk factors in penile prosthesis recipients. Computer registry records of patients implanted with three-piece inflatable prostheses from April 1986 to March 1999 were reviewed. Bacteriological culture report data were obtained from the medical records. There were 491 three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis recipients with follow-up ranging from 1 to 168 months (mean 83). All patients were implanted more than 1 y ago. There were 10 infections in 491 recipients (2.0%). In 285 primary prosthesis recipients there were seven infections (2.5%). In 206 secondary prosthesis recipients there were three infections (1.5%). Seven infections occurred in 354 non-diabetics (2.0%) and three infections occurred in 137 diabetics (2.2%). None of these differences were statistically significant. Explants for infection were performed in 8 weeks or less following implantation in eight patients. In two patients explants occurred at 17 and 26 months following implantation. Cultures from the periprosthetic space grew E. coli (four), Proteus mirabilis (two), Staph. aureus (two), and bacteroides (two). Infections occurred in 2.0% of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in infection rates between first time and repeat prosthesis recipients and between diabetic and non-diabetic recipients. Eight of the 10 infections occurred 8 weeks or less following implantation.

Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

Radical prostatectomy is the standard treatment for organ/specimen-confined prostate cancer, yet erectile dysfunction in selected series is still reported as high as 90% after this procedure. Thus, most men need adjuvant treatments to be sexually active following radical prostatectomy. These include vacuum constriction devices, intracorporeal injections of vasoactive drugs, and transurethral dilators, all of which have reported response rates of 50% to 70%. Unfortunately, long-term compliance is suboptimal, with a discontinuation rate of nearly 50% at one year. These non-oral options should be offered on an individual basis to patients who have failed oral therapy since efficacy and compliance vary. Also, these options should be considered in the early postoperative period to enhance sexual activity and penile oxygenation, which may prevent corporeal fibrosis. Early penile rehabilitation with intracavernosal injections or vacuum constriction devices should be encouraged to increase chances for recovery of rigid erections. In patients with some preservation of nerve tissue, oral sildenafil may be effective in promoting an earlier return of erectile function. The potential impact of sildenafil and other new oral therapies should encourage urologists to continue to perform and perfect the nerve-sparing approach.

A priori crystal structure prediction of native celluloses.

The packing of beta-1,4-glucopyranose chains has been modeled to further elaborate the molecular structures of native cellulose microfibrils. A chain pairing procedure was implemented that evaluates the optimal interchain distance and energy for all possible settings of the two chains. Starting with a rigid model of an isolated chain, its interaction with a second chain was studied at various helix-axis translations and mutual rotational orientations while keeping the chains at van der Waals separation. For each setting, the sum of the van der Waals and hydrogen-bonding energy was calculated. No energy minimization was performed during the initial screening, but the energy and interchain distances were mapped to a three-dimensional grid, with evaluation of parallel settings of the cellulose chains. The emergence of several energy minima suggests that parallel chains of cellulose can be paired in a variety of stable orientations. A further analysis considered all possible parallel arrangements occurring between a cellulose chain pair and a further cellulose chain. Among all the low-energy three-chain models, only a few of them yield closely packed three-dimensional arrangements. From these, unit-cell dimensions as well as lattice symmetry were derived; interestingly two of them correspond closely to the observed allomorphs of crystalline native cellulose. The most favorable structural models were then optimized using a minicrystal procedure in conjunction with the MM3 force field. The two best crystal lattice predictions were for a triclinic (P(1)) and a monoclinic (P2(1)) arrangement with unit cell dimensions a = 0.63, b = 0.69, c = 1.036 nm, alpha = 113.0, beta = 121.1, gamma = 76.0 degrees, and a = 0.87, b = 0.75, c = 1.036 nm, gamma = 94.1 degrees, respectively. They correspond closely to the respective lattice symmetry and unit-cell dimensions that have been reported for cellulose Ialpha and cellulose Ibeta allomorphs. The suitability of the modeling protocol is endorsed by the agreement between the predicted and experimental unit-cell dimensions. The results provide pertinent information toward the construction of macromolecular models of microfibrils.

Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of the Princeton Consensus Panel.

Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in both sexes and adversely affects patients' quality of life and well being. Given the frequent association between sexual dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, in addition to the potential cardiac risk of sexual activity itself, a consensus panel was convened to develop recommendations for clinical management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Based upon a review of the research and presentations by invited experts, a classification system was developed for stratification of patients into high, low, and intermediate categories of cardiac risk. The large majority of patients are in the low-risk category, which includes patients with (1) controlled hypertension; (2) mild, stable angina; (3) successful coronary revascularization; (4) a history of uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI); (5) mild valvular disease; and (6) no symptoms and <3 cardiovascular risk factors. These patients can be safely encouraged to initiate or resume sexual activity or to receive treatment for sexual dysfunction. An important exception is the use of sildenafil in patients taking nitrates in any form. Patients in the intermediate-risk category include those with (1) moderate angina; (2) a recent MI (<6 weeks); (3) left ventricular dysfunction and/or class II congestive heart failure; (4) nonsustained low-risk arrhythmias; and (5) >/=3 risk factors for coronary artery disease. These patients should receive further cardiologic evaluation before restratification into the low- or high-risk category. Finally, patients in the high-risk category include those with (1) unstable or refractory angina; (2) uncontrolled hypertension; (3) congestive heart failure (class III or IV); (4) very recent MI (<2 weeks); (5) high-risk arrhythmias; (6) obstructive cardiomyopathies; and (7) moderate-to-severe valvular disease. These patients should be stabilized by specific treatment for their cardiac condition before resuming sexual activity or being treated for sexual dysfunction. A simple algorithm is provided for guiding physicians in the management of sexual dysfunction in patients with varying degrees of cardiac risk.

Management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease: recommendations of The Princeton Consensus Panel.

Sexual dysfunction is highly prevalent in both sexes and adversely affects patients' quality of life and well being. Given the frequent association between sexual dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, in addition to the potential cardiac risk of sexual activity itself, a consensus panel was convened to develop recommendations for clinical management of sexual dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Based upon a review of the research and presentations by invited experts, a classification system was developed for stratification of patients into high, low, and intermediate categories of cardiac risk. The large majority of patients are in the low-risk category, which includes patients with (1) controlled hypertension; (2) mild, stable angina; (3) successful coronary revascularization; (4) a history of uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI); (5) mild valvular disease; and (6) no symptoms and <3 cardiovascular risk factors. These patients can be safely encouraged to initiate or resume sexual activity or to receive treatment for sexual dysfunction. An important exception is the use of sildenafil in patients taking nitrates in any form. Patients in the intermediate-risk category include those with (1) moderate angina; (2) a recent MI (<6 weeks); (3) left ventricular dysfunction and/or class II congestive heart failure; (4) nonsustained low-risk arrhythmias; and (5) >/=3 risk factors for coronary artery disease. These patients should receive further cardiologic evaluation before restratification into the low- or high-risk category. Finally, patients in the high-risk category include those with (1) unstable or refractory angina; (2) uncontrolled hypertension; (3) congestive heart failure (class III or IV); (4) very recent MI (<2 weeks); (5) high-risk arrhythmias; (6) obstructive cardiomyopathies; and (7) moderate-to-severe valvular disease. These patients should be stabilized by specific treatment for their cardiac condition before resuming sexual activity or being treated for sexual dysfunction. A simple algorithm is provided for guiding physicians in the management of sexual dysfunction in patients with varying degrees of cardiac risk.

Role of Viagra after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the response to sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy was influenced by the presence or absence of neurovascular bundles, the interval from surgery to the initiation of drug therapy, and the dose of the drug. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up data from 91 patients presenting with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy were obtained. The patients were stratified according to the type of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure: bilateral NS, unilateral NS, and non-NS. They were interviewed using the Cleveland Clinic Post Prostatectomy (CCPP) questionnaire and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. RESULTS: The presence or absence of the neurovascular bundles influenced the ability to achieve vaginal intercourse. In the patients who had undergone bilateral NS, 71.7% (38 of 53) responded; in those with unilateral NS, 50% (6 of 12) responded; and in those with non-NS, 15.4% (4 of 26) responded. The IIEF questionnaire confirmed the quality of the positive responses, with significant improvements in response to question 3 (frequency of penetration), question 4 (frequency of maintenance of erection), and question 7 (satisfaction with intercourse). The magnitude of improvement in responses was higher in the bilateral NS group than in the unilateral NS and non-NS groups (P <0.05). When the data of the 48 positive responders were analyzed, no difference in the response rate was found when the interval from surgery to drug therapy was stratified by the following three intervals: 0 to 6 months (44%), 6 to 12 months (55%), and greater than 12 months (53%). Of the positive responders, 14 (29.1%) required the 50-mg dose, and 34 (70.9%) required the 100-mg dose. The most common side effects were transient headaches (28.6%), flushing (21.9%), dizziness (8.8%), dyspepsia (6.5%), and nasal congestion (5.4%), with an increase in the incidence of headaches seen at the higher dose (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate after radical prostatectomy depends on the presence of the neurovascular bundles. Our data suggest that the response to sildenafil is not related to the interval between the surgery and initiation of drug therapy but is related to the dose.

Treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the response to sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in patients with erectile dysfunction after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up data from 21 patients presenting with erectile dysfunction after radiation treatment for clinical T1-2 prostate cancer were obtained. Two patients had undergone iodine-125 seed implantation and the remaining 19 conformal external beam irradiation. All 21 patients were considered to have erectile dysfunction as assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and were prescribed sildenafil at a dosage of 50 mg, with a titration to 100 mg if needed. The mean time between the completion of radiation therapy and initiation of sildenafil was 24.6 +/- 5.8 months. The quality of the erectile function was assessed after a minimum of four doses by using the Cleveland Clinic Erectile Function (CCEF) questionnaire and the IIEF questionnaire. A positive response to sildenafil on the CCEF questionnaire was defined as an erection sufficient for vaginal penetration. The responses on the IIEF questionnaire were rated on a scale of 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), with 0 being no sexual activity. RESULTS: On the CCEF questionnaire, 71% (15 of 21) of patients had a positive response, with a mean duration of 12.7 +/- 2.5 minutes of intercourse, and a corresponding spousal satisfaction rate of 71%. Twelve (80%) of the 15 responders required titration to the 100-mg dosage for maximal effect. The most common side effects seen were transient flushing (19%), abnormal color vision (14%), and headaches (10%). No patient discontinued the drug because of side effects. On the IIEF questionnaire, the responses to questions 3 (frequency of penetration), 4 (maintenance of erection), 7 (satisfactory intercourse), and 15 (erection confidence) increased from mean baseline scores of 1.3, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.8 to final mean scores of 4.0, 3.9, 3.2, and 3.4, respectively (P <0.001). On the global efficacy question (ability to achieve firm erections), 71% of the patients responded positively. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil citrate can improve the ability to achieve and maintain an erection in most patients with erectile dysfunction after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Management of severe corporeal fibrosis with implantation of prosthesis via a transverse scrotal approach.

PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience in the management of severe corporeal fibrosis with placement of the AMS 700 CXM* prosthesis to determine the efficacy of this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 26 men with severe corporeal fibrosis who underwent placement of the AMS 700 CXM prosthesis via a transverse scrotal approach between August 1991 and July 1996 were reviewed. RESULTS: In all cases the AMS 700 CXM prosthesis was successfully implanted with primary closure of the tunica albuginea, although 2 patients required extended corporotomies. Followup data were available on all 26 men. At a mean followup of 22.5 months (range 3 to 63) 24 of the 26 men had a functional device (92%). One patient required explantation for infection and 1 underwent explantation for cylinder cross-over. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the AMS 700 CXM prosthesis in patients with severe corporeal fibrosis produced good results at approximately 2 years of followup.

Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.

PURPOSE: Recently, we have noted an increasing incidence of revisions being performed in patients implanted with the length and girth expanding AMS 700 Ultrex* inflatable penile prosthesis. This observation prompted us to compare the long-term mechanical reliability of the AMS Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis versus the girth-expanding AMS 700 CX* or CXM* inflatable penile prosthesis in men with organic erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using chart review, mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews, we obtained accurate followup on 111 of 142 (78.2%) patients with CX/CXM implanted between June 1986 and September 1995, and on 152 of 179 (84.9%) patients implanted with Ultrex between October 1989 and September 1995. The CX/CXM and Ultrex groups were compared with regard to 3 end points: 1) mechanical failure caused by any malfunctioning component, 2) device failure caused by any cylinder complication and 3) cylinder aneurysms/leaks. RESULTS: Followup ranged from 1.0 to 112.0 months for the CX/CXM group (mean 47.2 months), and 0.7 to 71.5 months for the Ultrex group (mean 34.4 months). CX/CXM versus Ultrex group comparison demonstrated 10 CX/CXM mechanical failures (9.0%) versus 26 Ultrex failures (17.1%), p = 0.001; 5 CX/CXM cylinder complications (4.5%) versus 13 Ultrex cylinder complications (8.6%), p = 0.0292; and 3 CX/CXM cylinder aneurysms/leaks (2.7%) versus 9 in the Ultrex group (5.9%), p = 0.0162. Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated significantly decreased mechanical survival in all 3 categories for Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis versus CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Although Ultrex cylinders provide length and girth expansion, Ultrex cylinders exhibit an increased mechanical failure rate at shorter followup compared with CX/CXM cylinders. This increased propensity for Ultrex cylinder problems should be closely monitored.

AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders.

PURPOSE: We compared the ability of the CX and Ultrex cylinders to straighten the penis in men who received a 3-piece AMS 700 series inflatable penile prosthesis for erectile dysfunction and erectile deformity due to Peyronie's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 34 and 38 patients receiving devices CX and Ultrex cylinders, respectively, were reviewed. RESULTS: All 34 patients receiving the CX cylinders achieved complete penile straightening with cylinder inflation and bending alone. In 10 of 38 patients receiving the Ultrex cylinders complete straightening with cylinder inflation and bending could not be achieved, and simultaneous corporoplasty was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Girth expanding CX cylinders have better penile straightening properties than girth and length expanding Ultrex cylinders. We recommend use of CX cylinders for 3-piece AMS 700 series inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease.

Coping strategies and continued drug use among methadone maintenance patients.

Drug addiction has been conceived as a maladaptive means of coping utilized by individuals unable or unwilling to deal with stresses in more adaptive ways. Although a growing body of evidence supports the link between alcohol abuse and maladaptive coping styles, there is relatively little empirical support for the connection between maladaptive coping and other kinds of drug use. The present study employed a cross-sectional design to assess coping and drug use in a sample of 276 methadone maintenance patients. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the factor structure of the coping measure and the relationship between coping and unauthorized drug use. The results suggest that coping and drug use are related in this population and that this relationship is different for Black patients than for White patients.

Penile scarring with intracavernous injection therapy using prostaglandin E1: a risk factor analysis.

PURPOSE: We attempted to identify risk factors for penile scarring in patients using prostaglandin E1 injection therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 92 patients using prostaglandin E1 therapeutically were reviewed. With statistical methods, patients with (15) and without (77) scarring were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences between the 2 groups were found regarding duration of followup, injection frequency, prostaglandin E1 dose per injection, total number of injections or total prostaglandin E1 dose. Patients with initial penile scarring did not have a significantly higher incidence of further scarring with prostaglandin E1. CONCLUSIONS: Penile scarring with prostaglandin E1 injection therapy is sporadic and unpredictable. Patients with initial penile scarring do not have a higher incidence of further scarring.

Efficacy of the vacuum constriction device in patients with corporeal venous occlusive dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The vacuum constriction device (VED) is an effective nonsurgical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Its efficacy in specific patient groups, however, has not been extensively studied. Only one study to date has examined the use of the VED in patients with corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction (CVOD). This study used a mailed questionnaire and no statistical analysis of the data. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the VED in patients with documented CVOD. METHODS: From 1989 to 1992, 294 patients chose to use a VED as treatment for erectile dysfunction. All patients were evaluated with a thorough history and physical examination, hormonal testing, glucose tolerance testing, and nocturnal penile tumescence studies. Ninety-eight patients underwent additional vascular testing. When seen in follow-up, patients were asked to assess erection quality and overall satisfaction with the device. RESULTS: Fifty patients had documented CVOD (33 by cavernosometry, 16 by ultrasound, and 1 by cavernosography). Twenty-eight patients (56%) were satisfied, 13 patients (26%) were unsatisfied, and in 9 patients (18%) satisfaction could not be determined. Thirty-eight patients (76%) achieved an erection of at least 7 on a scale of 1 to 10. There was no relationship between the severity of disease (as measured by cavernosometry) and the rating of erection (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.77) or satisfaction with the device (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The VED is an acceptable nonsurgical treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to CVOD regardless of severity. Its success rate is comparable to other therapeutic modalities such as injection therapy.

Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection.

PURPOSE: We determine the colony counts of organisms present on culture of clinically uninfected genitourinary prostheses at reoperation for reasons other than infection. These results served as control data for comparison with cultures from infected devices to determine the relative incidence of organisms involved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cultures were prospectively obtained from 65 penile prostheses and 22 artificial urinary sphincters. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months after reoperation or until development of infection (mean 27 months) at which time cultures were again obtained. RESULTS: Low colony counts of Staphylococcus epidermidis were isolated from 40% of uninfected penile prostheses and 36% of artificial urinary sphincters. Only 3 of these devices later became infected (9%) and in all cases a higher colony count of another organism was found at explanation. CONCLUSIONS: While Staph. epidermidis can cause prosthesis infection, low colony counts of the organism may not be associated with clinical infection. Therefore, the high incidence of infection attributed to this organism may be overestimated.

Primary erectile dysfunction in a man with congenital isolation of the corpora cavernosa.

We report on a 33-year-old man with primary erectile dysfunction, isolated cavernous bodies, corporeal veno-occlusive dysfunction, and hypoplastic cavernous arteries. To our knowledge, this is only the second reported case of absence of communication between the corpora cavernosa.